[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The INCREDIBLE Impacts of Methylene Blue

The LARGEST Eruptions since the Merapi Disaster in 2010 at Lewotobi Laki Laki in Indonesia

Feds ARREST 11 Leftists For AMBUSH On ICE, 2 Cops Shot, Organized Terror Cell Targeted ICE In Texas

What is quantum computing?

12 Important Questions We Should Be Asking About The Cover Up The Truth About Jeffrey Epstein

TSA quietly scraps security check that every passenger dreads

Iran Receives Emergency Airlift of Chinese Air Defence Systems as Israel Considers New Attacks

Russia reportedly used its new, inexpensive Chernika kamikaze drone in the Ukraine

Iran's President Says the US Pledged Israel Wouldn't Attack During Previous Nuclear Negotiations

Will Japan's Rice Price Shock Lead To Government Collapse And Spark A Global Bond Crisis

Beware The 'Omniwar': Catherine Austin Fitts Fears 'Weaponization Of Everything'

Roger Stone: AG Pam Bondi Must Answer For 14 Terabytes Claim Of Child Torture Videos!

'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe

Cash Jordan Trump Deports ‘Thousands of Migrants’ to Africa… on Purpose

Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats

Texas Flood

Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas

Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Mosoud Pezeshkian

PROOF Netanyahu Wants US To Fight His Wars

RAPID CRUSTAL MOVEMENT DETECTED- Are the Unusual Earthquakes TRIGGER for MORE (in Japan and Italy) ?

Google Bets Big On Nuclear Fusion

Iran sets a world record by deporting 300,000 illegal refugees in 14 days

Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills

Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole

Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands

Why CNN & Fareed Zakaria are Wrong About Iran and Trump

Something Is Going Deeply WRONG In Russia

329 Rivers in China Exceed Flood Warnings, With 75,000 Dams in Critical Condition

Command Of Russian Army 'Undermined' After 16 Of Putin's Generals Killed At War, UK Says

Rickards: Superintelligence Will Never Arrive


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Come to no-planer heaven with me....
Source: wah.... the Internet of course ;-)
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 3, 2010
Author: moi
Post Date: 2010-09-03 20:59:35 by wudidiz
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: Look at, the facts, chicken, shit
Views: 3628
Comments: 87

I'm a no-planer now. It's easy and it's simple. You can do it too. Just look at the evidence.

Do you have any idea what this does to an ego like mine?

It's scary.

Think about it....

No planes hit any of the WTC. Either the videos were faked or (shudder) they're holograms.

WTF does that mean then?

What did hit them then? If anything?

So I have once again successfully distanced myself from some of my associates and society as a whole.

Great. Just what I needed. /s

It's lonely here. People look at you like, "Okey-dokey, dude"

Trust me, don't just lay that on someone without warming them up somehow first.

Introduce yourself or something.

On the upside, it's like graduating to the next level. Like being promoted.

To master kook.

lol

No, but seriously it's where the great minds must go. Lest they dwindle and stagnate and spin their tires in the lower plane realm.

The glorious truth beckons ye. It calls your name like a maid in the mist.

Like an angel when your sleeping it summons your higher self to transcend the 3d world and join us, the intellectual elite...

So anyway, yeah..... no planes. It's a fact.

Put that in your pipe and smoke it.


Poster Comment:

OMG, my first editorial! First one I remember anyway... lol Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 74.

#15. To: wudidiz (#0)

And a mighty fine editorial it was, too! :)

Kinda reminds me of that old Talking Heads song, "Once in a Lifetime" that goes, "How did I get here?" lol

On a high-hote, I saw that a No Planes poster won Best Answer recently at Yahoo! Answers, with close to 50% of the votes.

I don't know why there is hostility and division among some 9/11 TV Fakery and No Planes researchers. Am trying to go by the merits of the work rather than the politics of the contributers. Other than a couple of abrasive words, I think the video below is a helpful intro to the No Planes perspective. This is part of the description about it at LiveVideo.com, which has some buffering problems on my computer and can't be posted here without running automatically so will post the YouTube version for it instead:

the rabbit hole: an explanation of the basics of no plane theory, this is a bare bones examination, for people who have no idea how people could get to this theory.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkvC1SCsIcY

GreyLmist  posted on  2010-09-03   23:16:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: GreyLmist, wudidiz, PSUSA (#15)

this video is compelling. it's hard to believe that a plane, upon impact, would sail smoothly straight through the building like that. it does seem to defy the laws of physics. for sure, i don't believe it was a 757 (where's da plane, where's da plane) that crashed into the pentagon, so who knows what really happened with the towers. just sayin'.

christine  posted on  2010-09-04   11:31:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: christine (#21) (Edited)

this video is compelling. it's hard to believe that a plane, upon impact, would sail smoothly straight through the building like that. it does seem to defy the laws of physics. for sure, i don't believe it was a 757 (where's da plane, where's da plane) that crashed into the pentagon, so who knows what really happened with the towers. just sayin'.

Thanks for sayin' and also for the apfn info. Here's a link to a radio interview of Killtown on the 'Final Round' show - Discussing No-Planes @ WTC theory
48:56 - 1 year ago
Aired: January 16, 2009 Host: 'SoulReal' (This is an edited version. The original show was 2+ hours.)

GreyLmist  posted on  2010-09-07   18:00:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: Rickyj (#38)

Ricky, listen to Killtown on the Final Round show, linked in Grey's post and let me know what you think.

christine  posted on  2010-09-08   1:19:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: christine (#41)

OK, I found some time, listened to the whole show. :)

Killtown's argument is good, but there are two very big problems with his argument of no planes hitting the towers and all the videos of the planes hitting the towers being faked.

1st big problem:
After the first plane hit WTC 1 there were thousands of NYC residents, workers, and tourists, who always have cameras with them, taking photographs and recording videos of WTC 1 burning from all directions surrounding the towers. Surely someone somewhere would have a shot of the side of WTC 2 exploding with nothing hitting it if no plane hit it. But no one has ever posted such a video on the Internet. It would be virtually impossible for the perpetrators of 9/11 to control ALL the videos that would be taken that day. Some would have made their way into the public domain and then there would be proof that they faked the planes hitting the buildings. They obviously couldn't take that kind of risk so why not just use a real military plane remote controlled with laser guided missile technology to do the job? Why try to make something harder than it needs to be? No reason for it. They had to use real planes or they risked the very real threat of being found out to be liars even before the first Tower collapsed.

2nd big problem:
If they were going to fake the videos of planes hitting the towers to make sure there were no mistakes, then why did they not also fake the videos of the collapses of both the towers and WTC 7 to make it appear they were not controlled demolitions? Most see the video of the collapse of WTC 7 as the smoking gun of 9/11, myself included, so why did they not fake that video too if they wanted to get away with 9/11? It makes no sense that they would risk faking some of the videos which could show them all to be liars and not fake the videos which also show them to be responsible for 9/11 through basic physics, which unfortunately most Americans lack knowledge of.

RickyJ  posted on  2010-09-08   2:57:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#68. To: RickyJ (#56)

They obviously couldn't take that kind of risk so why not just use a real military plane remote controlled with laser guided missile technology to do the job? Why try to make something harder than it needs to be? No reason for it. They had to use real planes or they risked the very real threat of being found out to be liars even before the first Tower collapsed.

that's plausible to me. i do remember many NYers who claim to have seen the planes say that they were windowless and didn't appear to look like a commerical jet.

christine  posted on  2010-09-09   1:09:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#74. To: christine, RickyJ (#68)

RickyJ: They obviously couldn't take that kind of risk so why not just use a real military plane remote controlled with laser guided missile technology to do the job? Why try to make something harder than it needs to be? No reason for it. They had to use real planes or they risked the very real threat of being found out to be liars even before the first Tower collapsed.

christine: that's plausible to me. i do remember many NYers who claim to have seen the planes say that they were windowless and didn't appear to look like a commerical jet.

I think AWACS (Airborne Warning and Control System - emphasis on Control) could have shut down remote control planes. They were in the D.C. area and along the east coast that day. Not only would the perps have run the risk of being found out to be liars if that happened before impact but they wouldn't have had any "damage from planes and fires" excuse then for their objective of demolished buildings.

THE ENEMY IS INSIDE THE GATES by Donn de Grand Pré

airborne warning and control system (AWACS). They have the electronic capability to engage several aircraft simultaneously, knock out their on-board flight controls by EMP (electro-magnetic pulsing) and assume command and remote control of these targeted aircraft.

http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a955awacs

An Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) plane on a training mission in the Washington, DC, area is instructed to return to its base in Oklahoma, even though its advanced communications and surveillance capabilities would significantly benefit the military’s air defense efforts in response to the terrorist attacks. The AWACS belongs to the 552nd Air Control Wing, located at Tinker Air Force Base in Oklahoma. [US Air Force, 4/1/2000; GlobalSecurity (.org), 4/16/2006; Spencer, 2008, pp. 265] It has been flying a training mission somewhere near Washington (see Before 9:55 a.m. September 11, 2001). [Code One Magazine, 1/2002]

AWACS Sent Back to Oklahoma - According to author Lynn Spencer, the AWACS is directed to return to Tinker Air Force Base “in the immediate confusion after the attacks.” The exact time the plane’s crew receives this order, and the identity of the person or organization that gives the order, are unstated. NORAD’s Northeast Air Defense Sector (NEADS) will contact the AWACS later on, and instruct it to turn around and head to Washington, to provide radio and radar coverage over the capital (see (11:25 a.m.) September 11, 2001). [Spencer, 2008, pp. 265-266]

AWACS Has Advanced Surveillance and Communication Capabilities - The AWACS, also called the E-3 Sentry, is a modified Boeing 707 that provides surveillance, command, control, and communications to military commanders. [New York Times, 9/23/1995; GlobalSecurity (.org), 4/16/2006; US Air Force, 11/20/2009] According to a US Air Force manual, the plane’s “advanced surveillance radar provides long-range, low-level detection of aircraft targets over all types of terrain.” [US Air Force, 4/1/2000] It can track friendly and enemy aircraft over a 300-mile radius. [New York Times, 9/23/1995] Mark Rosenker, the director of the White House Military Office, will say that AWACS planes “give you the big picture in the sky. They’re able to identify what’s a friend, what’s a foe.” [White House, 8/29/2002] AWACS Would Help NEADS Contact Fighters - These planes are particularly important to NEADS. [9/11 Commission, 10/30/2003 ]
.
.
Before 9:55 a.m. September 11, 2001: AWACS Planes on Training Missions in Florida and Near Washington, DC

While President Bush is still in Sarasota, an AWACS (Airborne Warning and Control System plane) is flying a training mission off the coast of Florida. [cont.]

GreyLmist  posted on  2010-09-09   20:33:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 74.

        There are no replies to Comment # 74.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 74.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]