the notable journalist named Chris Bollyn wrote a story about the molten steel pools. I think he said that according to the 2 owners of the 2 firms hired to take away the wreckage there were 65 pools of liquid steel. and these were still liquid 5-6 weeks after the event. We've seen many photos and even videos of the red-hot or molten steel. Steel cannot get to a molten or liquid state with a fire from either ordinary materials such as wood, paper or cloth you'd find in an office. and it cannot get that hot either from the jet fuel. Jet fuel can get steel to the verge of where it will begin to get red-hot, but not actually melt the steel. the presence of the molten steel shows that there was something special, a chemical, used in destroying that building. there is no question in this matter.
The workers at the job-site saw the molten steel. they have talked to many people about it. this is a dead give-away. we know the building was sabotaged with something other than the airplanes because of this. For it to still be so hot after weeks indicates something very unusual happened. and nobody can deny it was there not just because of the eye-witnesses, but because of the NASA information. NASA flew a plane overhead with special equipment. They measured very high temperaturs that could not possibly have come from jet fuel. and besides the jet fuel would burn off so quickly. It takes real heat to melt steel.
People that know materials understand this to be a dead give-away. But look at our nation!!!!! experts are not on tv telling us this.
We've all been told of the tremendous heat required to liquify steel. It is simply impossible for that any appreciable amount of steel was kept that hot for "5 to 6 weeks". Not even a direct nuclear blast would have that effect.
We have departed from the realm of science into science fiction.
We have departed from the realm of science into science fiction.
you're an idiot shoonra. the federal government released a video of molten steel dripping from a steel bucket they used to remove it. red-hot liquid steel 5 weeks later, this is what the witnesses saw, this is what the video shows.
conventional wisdom is that this can't happen. but if a chemical like thermite continually interacts with the steel, then it can happen. obviously it did happen. The BYU professor Jones even tested the materials and found evidence of thermite.
yet morons deny simple reality in front of their faces. You conclude that the witnesses, the photographic evidence are false.
Perhaps someone will be good enough to post the link to the videos that show molten steel still liquified weeks after the attack.
People who responded to me seem to think that I don't know that steel can melt. Of course I do. But what would keep it liquid for weeks on end?? Is it possible that it was not liquified until the welders' torches were removing the wreckage long after the attack?