Title: Part 1 Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth DC 2010 Source:
[None] URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWZuwgSg198 Published:Sep 10, 2010 Author:Richard Gage Post Date:2010-09-10 22:37:23 by Horse Keywords:None Views:354 Comments:3
Poster Comment:
This is the video of Richard Gage's 911 anniversary press conference.
In part 9 Gage compares the evidence for 911 to the photos of JFK's assassination. We need to believe the evidence of our eyes rather than the government lies.
Excerpts from: "The World Trade Center Building Designers: Pre-9/11 claims strongly implicate Towers should have remained standing on 9/11"
Like many modern structures and buildings, the WTC Towers were over-designed to withstand weight distribution in the event of structural damage. According to calculations made by the engineers who helped with the design of the Twin Towers, “all the columns on one side of a Tower could be cut, as well as the two corners and some of the columns on each adjacent side, and the building would still be strong enough to withstand a 100-mile-per-hour wind.”[5] As well, “Live loads on these columns can be increased more than 2,000% before failure occurs.”[6] . . Not only were the towers designed to survive plane crashes, they were designed to potentially survive multiple plane crashes. This fact is supported by Frank A. Demartini, the on-site construction manager for the World Trade Center, who said on January 25, 2001:
“The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. That was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door—this intense grid—and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting.”[25]