See other Editorial Articles
Title: Daddy, Why Do You Hate Muslims?
Source:
theuglytruth.wordpress.com
URL Source: http://www.jews-for-allah.org/phpbb/viewtopic.php?p=7341#7341
Published: Sep 11, 2010
Author: Mahmoud El-Yousseph
Post Date: 2010-09-11 23:25:35 by Max
Keywords: Daddy, Why Do You Hate Muslims, Islam, 9/11
Views: 353
Comments: 7
Daddy, Why Do You Hate Muslims? By Mahmoud El-Yousseph September 9, 2010 Son: Daddy, why do you hate Muslims? Father: First of all, they want to impose Shariah law on America and change our Constitution. Son: I thought that will take an act of Congress! Like 2/3 of both House and Senate, plus 3/4 of all states have to ratify it. Since there are only 2 Muslim Congressmen in the House, that would be virtually impossible. Father: Since when you are that smart son? Son: Well, I learned this at school last week. Father: I also do not like Moozlims because they can’t be patriotic Americans. Son: That is odd! My Muslim classmate, Chafique, told the class that his oldest brother had served in the US army and that his father is a retired US veteran. Father: Well son, these people are slick. They only do it to get the green card, citizenship and free education. Son: Not so daddy, I know from my friend that he and all of his siblings were born in America like me and my sister. And I remember him telling me the first time we met that after his father graduated from college and became a citizen, he choose to enlist in our military. Father: Which side are you on sweetheart? You seem to be spending a lot of time hanging out with your Moozlim buddy. Son: Dad, do you mean Muslim? Father: Listen son: I never told you that. The reason your father did not serve in the military is because I was the only son in my family. If something would have happened to me, you would not have been born and our family would be extinct over time. That is why your mom always called me lucky. Son: That is not what I heard! Mom told me that you were lucky because her best friend Jeffery died in a car accident. Father: Don’t be a smarty pants son! Besides your mom always likes to brag. Son: OK daddy. Anything you say. Father: Another thing I don’t like about them Moozlims is: they are not like us. They talk, eat and dress differently. They also eat Taliban food. Son: What is Taliban food dad? How do they get? Does it get shipped to them on an airplane? Dad: Not sure son. Son: That is funny, last weekend when I went shopping with mom, I ran into my Muslim friend I told you about. He was with his mom shopping. I noticed their grocerycart had stuff not different from what we bought. Father: Hey, you keep it up like that cookie, and you will not be visiting your Moozlim buddy anymore. Son: Daddy, have you heard about the drunken Connecticut man who stormed into a hookah bar and got his butt kicked? Father: Yes son, that was a mistake after all. He thought the hookah bar was a mosque. He got himself arrested and charged with disturbing the peace. It could have been worse. Like having his bones broken! Son: Like you always told me dad, violence is not the answer. There is always a better way. Son: What else don’t you like about Muslims, Dad? Father: They have a different God than us and they also worship a rock. Son: Daddy, I think you got it mixed up. When Muslims worship they do face toward the Kabah [what you call a rock] in Mecca and they worship only God that they refer to in Arabic as Allah. The Germans call him Got, and Jews refer to him as Yahweh. Besides, don’t Jews worship at the Wailing Wall? You never told me that they worship rocks or bricks. Did you know that Jews and Christians living in Arabia use the Arabic phrase “Allah” when referring to God. Are they wrong too? Father: I don’t like Arabic either. Son: Do you mean Arabs? Father: Whatever! After all, those Moozlims are terrorists who like to kill Americans and Jews. That is what they are son! Son: So what happens when we or the Jews kill Muslims? Are we or the Jews are referred as “terrorists” also? Father: No son! We kill them first before they come over here to kill us. That is called acting smart. Take them by surprise. I think we should do this to any country that doesn’t like or disagrees with us. Son: Just like the 19 hijackers did to us on 9/11? Father: Now you get the picture. Son: Would you have married mom if she was a Muslim? Father: As a man I would have to be a Muslim or convert to Islam first. I don’t think that would set well with your grandparents. Son: Daddy, have you ever met a Muslim before? Father: No son! They are strange. They never to go to our local bar for a beer. Son: Me and Chafique are good friends. Neither one of us goes to the bar or drink beer. Father: I think it is your bed time. Good night son! Son: Good night, daddy. I am happy we got to talk! Mahmoud El-Yousseph Retired USAF Veteran Feedback — elyoussseph6@yahoo.com SOURCE
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
Additional & related item; Is the influence of Talmudic law on US courts a cause for concern? Most readers of this blog and our website are not interested in purchasing a copy of the latest issue of this writer's Revisionist History newsletter no. 53, "Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan's Talmudic Imperative." This issue of Revisionist History concerns an analysis of what will be the Talmudic legal method of the new Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan. In light of the enormous national concern on the part of the Republican Right wing regarding the alleged threat of the imposition of Islamic Sharia Law on America, why is there such apathy about the ongoing imposition of Talmudic law on American jurisprudence? Kagan, for reasons documented in Revisionist History newsletter no. 53, will step up the intensity of Talmudic influence on the nation's highest court in terms of judicial activism and deference to recent precedent, rather than fixed principles as reflected in conservative jurisprudence, i.e. strict constructionism of the Constitution. Intrinsic to the Talmudic law is a situation ethics inimical to any return to the original intent of Constitutional law. Is your lack of interest in studying the imposition of Talmudic law on the Federal courts due to the fact that you already know all about the existence of Talmudic situation ethics and you can intelligently document it in order to alert others as to how it is shaping and manipulating Federal law? Or, unlike the energized American Right wing which is marching against Islam’s Sharia law, have you simply given up when it comes to Judaism’s Talmudic law and feel that the issue itself is not important, or the details of how it comes about are not of interest? In that case, how do you propose that we curb it? Or do you imagine that sooner or later I will reveal the Talmudic legal philosophy Kagan will use, here in this blog, free of charge? Out of respect for the paying subscribers of my hard copy newsletter who make my writing possible, and without whom both Revisionist History newsletter and this blog would be defunct, I can assure you that the latter assumption is groundless. I am always interested in determining why it is that the enemies of Truth, such as the Zionist Republicans who aid and abet the growth of Talmudic power over our court system -- prevail -- in this case, with their policy of misdirecting American vigilance over unconstitutional and alien influence on the judiciary toward Islamic law and away from rabbinic law. It seems that, if the apathy toward studying Revisionist History newsletter no. 53 is any accurate indicator, then it would perhaps be our own fault that kosher conservatives are controlling the populist grassroots revolt, since they energetically engage against what they claim is the imminent threat from Sharia Law, while on our side we are too dull or exhausted to thoroughly understand and then engage against the implementation of Talmudic law now underway. www.jews- for-allah.org/phpbb/viewtopic.php? http://t=4102&start=75">www.jews-for-allah.org/ph...topic.php? t=4102&start=75
One should be done with a Jewish kid asking his dad why he hates Christians.
God is always good!
Jesus was a Jew. He doesn't support nuking the Jews. Satan does though. So do you.
This is a prank call, but the message is clear for all to see. He, the prankee, is mad enough to murder.
Click for Privacy and Preparedness files The second dumbest creature on the face of the earth is the one who cannot recognize its enemies. The most stupid of all is the one who will defend and collaborate with the very enemies that are destroying it and its own kind. -Ben Klassen
Most readers of this blog and our website are not interested in purchasing a copy of the latest issue of this writer's Revisionist History newsletter no. 53, "Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan's Talmudic Imperative." This issue of Revisionist History concerns an analysis of what will be the Talmudic legal method of the new Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan. In light of the enormous national concern on the part of the Republican Right wing regarding the alleged threat of the imposition of Islamic Sharia Law on America, why is there such apathy about the ongoing imposition of Talmudic law on American jurisprudence? I've been wondering that myself. Yesterday, while watching one of the networks re-playing 911, stoking the fire of hate against Muslims, and watching the controversy of the mosque at ground zero, and the outrage over that pastor's proposed Koran burning, I wondered if I was witnessing the old Khazar trick of problem-reaction-solution. The Khazars went eeny-meen-miny-mo between the "evil" Muslim religion and "evil" Christianity, and chose Judaism, the supposed common denominator. Remember the [Albert Pike] goal is to pit the Moslem religion and "political Zionism" [Christian Zionism?] against each other, and get the world to worship Lucifer, the god of Judaism [and the Noahide Law]. I don't see how it will work this time though, unless they kill us dissenters who see through their crap. I've been thinking for awhile now, that what we need to do is distribute this: http://www.noahide.com/infiltration/xmas.htm and a reference to this : Merry Christmas, and OFF WITH YOUR HEAD! ... http://www.public-action.com/christmas.html to the Zionist churches. ============= edit. ....make that ALL the churches!
"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm
That was hilarious. I hate to say it, but lately I can identify with that on several levels. Wouldn't it be great if we could get an on-air discussion of this going between Christians and Jews? It could be so enlightening and might help to resolve this ancient problem. It would be a whole lot better than killing everything in our respective paths that disagrees with us.
"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm
Sink the boats. Mine the border.
“Ask any Indian nation how it preserves itself. It isn’t by letting anyone and everyone claim to be Indian. There are exceptions, but they are not the rule.” -- Eric Holder
#2. To: Max (#0)
(Edited)
#3. To: RickyJ (#2)
#4. To: RickyJ (#2)
#5. To: Max (#1)
(Edited)
Is the influence of Talmudic law on US courts a cause for concern?
#6. To: PSUSA (#4)
#7. To: Max (#0)
No son! We kill them first before they come over here to kill us. That is called acting smart.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest