See other Editorial Articles
Title: INTERNATIONAL BANKERS VS NATION-STATES
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.realzionistnews.com/?p=550
Published: Sep 13, 2010
Author: Brother Nathanael Kapner
Post Date: 2010-09-13 06:55:25 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 89
Comments: 7
THE STRUGGLE BETWEEN NATION-STATES and internationalism is best understood in the conflict waged by Adolph Hitler prior to WW II against finance capital. When the National Socialists came to power in 1933, the German economy was in total collapse. Through an independent monetary policy of sovereign credit, not beholden to international Jewish financiers, Hitler was able to turn a bankrupt Germany into the strongest economy in Europe. By issuing interest-free money, the German government, under Hitler and Economics Minister, Hjalmar Schacht, financed its entire operations from 1935 to 1945 without gold and without debt. With full sovereignty intact, policies of economic nationalism and full employment thrived, thanks to the German industrialists, (not given to an internationalist spirit), who supported Hitler’s “Germany First” agenda.
VS NATION-STATES
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 4.
#3. To: Itistoolate (#0)
By issuing interest-free money, the German government, under Hitler and Economics Minister, Hjalmar Schacht, financed its entire operations from 1935 to 1945 without gold and without debt. With full sovereignty intact, policies of economic nationalism and full employment thrived, State Owned Banks: Fixing the Economy by Ellen Hodgson Brown "July 30, 2010 Ellen Hodgson Brown explains the rationale behind state owned banks. Due to the collapsing credit bubble which in turned popped the housing bubble, leading to recession, and perhaps, economic depression, there is not enough money and credit to keep the economy running. Three possible solutions are that the federal government issue debt-free money directly, that communities create alternate or community complementary currencies, or that a state create its own state owned bank, similar to the Bank of North Dakota. For example, a state owned bank in Michigan could provide credit to the state itself for infrastructure projects, help provide the capital for local banks, so they could in turn provide low interest loans to home owners, small and medium sized businesses, and students. In addition, a state owned bank could be used to help fund state expenses during tough times by providing loans. A major advantage of a state owned bank is that the state could borrow money from the bank at zero interest, for projects, saving between 50% and 100% of the cost of the project, since there would be no interest burden when repaying the loan. For Michigan, California, Florida, and other states looking to solve their economic problems, the state owned bank model, and the Bank of North Dakota in particular, should be studied in depth, as such a bank could provide the credit needed within that state economy during depressions and other tough economic times. Thanks to Local Future for producing this video."
http://www.usconstitutio n. net/const.html#A1Sec10 Section 10 - Powers prohibited of States No State shall... coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts... _______________ There is no real shortage of money or work except in the financial and valuation systems that are unfit to serve us and expect us to be enslaved on their plantations. Cities, communities, credit unions, individuals could all form their own banks. People could all be self-employed, earning their own currency as they work and produce, not dependent on the crumbs and whims of businesses. Theoretically, painters would never be out of work. If they ever got done painting everything around them that needs painted, it would be about time for them to start back at the point where they started. Big projects could be constructed as easily as small projects if the workers and material contributors earned their own monetary rewards from the time and stocks they provided to get it done. Children, the elderly, the handicapped - they all create more jobs in this world than the largest corporations just by their participation in the dinosaur education system, medical programs, and the making of all the tools of those trades that are needed to serve them. If all someone can manage to do is churn butter or sew, knit, crochet while rocking in a chair, they've done something constructive and their time should be considered valuable too. We don't need the gluttonously insatiable profiteers as middlemen. They need us to keep their scam systems going for them on the cheap. So don't. Be a freelancer instead.
#5. To: GreyLmist (#4)
Section 10 - Powers prohibited of States No State shall... coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts... I know they are not supposed to, but they accept Federal Reserve Notes as "payment" of debts, which is not payment at all, but merely passing the debt on to someone else...Federal Reserve Notes aren't money, either; they may have declared them by fiat "legal tender", but they're debt instruments. The District of Columbia Act of 1871 and the 14th Amendment and the Erie Railroad case, etc. etc. made the rest of the organic Constitution null and void for all practical purposes: The Two United States and the Law "....The present commercial system of "law" has replaced the old and familiar Common Law upon which our nation was founded. The following is the legal thread which brought us from sovereigns over government to subjects under government, through the use of negotiable instruments (Federal Reserve Notes) to discharge our debts with limited liability instead of paying our debts at common law with gold or silver coin. The change in our system of law from public law to private commercial law was recognized by the Supreme Court of the United States in the Erie Railroad vs. Thompkins case of 1938, after which case, in the same year, the procedures of Law were officially blended with the procedures of Equity. Prior to 1938, all U.S. Supreme Court decisions were based upon public law -- or that system of law that was controlled by Constitutional limitation. Since 1938, all U.S. Supreme Court decisions are based upon what is termed public policy. Public policy concerns commercial transactions made under the Negotiable Instrument's Law, which is a branch of the international Law Merchant. This has been codified into what is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code, which system of law was made uniform throughout the fifty States through the cunning of the Congress of the United States (which "United States" has its origin in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution, as distinguished from the "United States," which is the Union of the fifty States). In offering grants of negotiable paper (Federal Reserve Notes) which the Congress gave to the fifty States of the Union for education, highways, health, and other purposes, Congress bound all the States of the Union into a commercial agreement with the Federal United States (as distinguished from the Continental United States). The fifty States accepted the "benefits" offered by the Federal United States as the consideration of a commercial agreement between the Federal United States and each of the corporate States. The corporate States were then obligated to obey the Congress of the Federal United States and also to assume their portion of the equitable debts of the Federal United States to the international banking houses, for the credit loaned. The credit which each State received, in the form of federal grants, was predicated upon equitable paper. This system of negotiable paper binds all corporate entities of government together in a vast system of commercial agreements and is what has altered our court system from one under the Common Law to a Legislative Article I Court, or Tribunal, system of commercial law. Those persons brought before this court are held to the letter of every statute of government on the federal, state, county, or municipal levels unless they have exercised the REMEDY provided for them within that system of Commercial Law whereby, when forced to use a so-called "benefit" offered, or available, to them, from government, they may reserve their former right, under the Common Law guarantee of same, not to be bound by any contract, or commercial agreement, that they did not enter knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. This is exactly how the corporate entities of state, county, and municipal governments got entangled with the Legislative Democracy, created by Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution, and called here The Federal United States, to distinguish it from the Continental United States, whose origin was in the Union of the Sovereign States. The same national Congress rules the Continental United States pursuant to Constitutional limits upon its authority, while it enjoys exclusive rule, with no Constitutional limitations, as it legislates for the Federal United States. With the above information, we may ask: "How did we, the free Preamble citizenry of the Sovereign States, lose our guaranteed unalienable rights and be forced into acceptance of the equitable debt obligations of the Federal United States, and also become subject to that entity of government, and divorced from our Sovereign States in the Republic, which we call here the Continental United States?" We do not reside, work, or have income from any territory subject to the direct jurisdiction of the Federal United States. These are questions that have troubled sincere, patriotic Americans for many years. Our lack of knowledge concerning the cunning of the legal profession is the cause of that divorce, but a knowledge of the truth concerning the legal thread, which caught us in its net, will restore our former status as a free Preamble citizen of the Republic. The answer follows: Our national Congress works for two nations foreign to each other, and by legal cunning both are called The United States. One is the Union of Sovereign States, under the Constitution, termed in this article the Continental United States. The other is a Legislative Democracy which has its origin in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the Constitution, here termed the Federal United States. Very few people, when they see some "law" passed by Congress, ask themselves, "Which nation was Congress working for when it passed this or that so-called law?" Or, few ask, "Does this particular law apply to the Continental citizenry of the Republic, or does this particular law apply only to residents of the District of Columbia and other named enclaves, or territories, of the Democracy called the Federal United States?" Since these questions are seldom asked by the uninformed citizenry of the Republic, it was an open invitation for "cunning" political leadership to seek more power and authority over the entire citizenry of the Republic through the medium of "legalese." Congress deliberately failed in its duty to provide a medium of exchange for the citizenry of the Republic, in harmony with its Constitutional mandate. Instead, it created an abundance of commercial credit money for the Legislative Democracy, where it was not bound by Constitutional limitations. Then, after having created an emergency situation, and a tremendous depression in the Republic, Congress used its emergency authority to remove the remaining substance (gold and silver) from the medium of exchange belonging to the Republic, and made the negotiable instrument paper of the Legislative Democracy (Federal United States) a legal tender for Continental United States citizenry to use in the discharge of debts. At the same time, Congress granted the entire citizenry of the two nations the "benefit" of limited liability in the discharge of all debts by telling the citizenry that the gold and silver coins of the Republic were out of date and cumbersome. The citizens were told that gold and silver (substance) was no longer needed to pay their debts, that they were now "privileged" to discharge debt with this more "convenient" currency, issued by the Federal United States. Consequently, everyone was forced to "go modern," and to turn in their gold as a patriotic gesture. The entire news media complex went along with the scam and declared it to be a forward step for our democracy, no longer referring to America as a Republic. From that time on, it was a falling light for the Republic of 1776, and a rising light for Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal Democracy, which overcame the depression, which was caused by a created shortage of real money. There was created an abundance of debt paper money, so-called, in the form of interest-bearing negotiable instrument paper called Federal Reserve Notes, and other forms of paperwork credit instruments. Since all contracts since Roosevelt's time have the colorable consideration of Federal Reserve Notes, instead of a genuine consideration of silver and gold coin, all contracts are colorable contracts, and not genuine contracts. [According to Black's Law Dictionary (1990), colorable means "That which is in appearance only, and not in reality, what it purports to be, hence counterfeit, feigned, having the appearance of truth."] Consequently, a new colorable jurisdiction, called a statutory jurisdiction, had to be created to enforce the contracts. Soon the term colorable contract was changed to the term commercial agreement to fit circumstances of the new statutory jurisdiction, which is legislative, rather than judicial, in nature. This jurisdiction enforces commercial agreements upon implied consent, rather than full knowledge, as it is with the enforcement of contracts under the Common Law. All of our courts today sit as legislative Tribunals, and the so-called "statutes" of legislative bodies being enforced in these Legislative Tribunals are not "statutes" passed by the legislative branch of our three-branch Republic, but as "commercial obligations" to the Federal United States for anyone in the Federal United States or in the Continental United States who has used the equitable currency of the Federal United States and who has accepted the "benefit," or "privilege," of discharging his debts with the limited liability "benefit" offered to him by the Federal United States ... EXCEPT those who availed themselves of the remedy within this commercial system of law, which remedy is today found in Book 1 of the Uniform Commercial Code at Section 207. ...." I told you there is a battle being waged behind the scenes for people to reclaim their sovereignty as kings on the land, and discharging their debts as the Banksters' UCC Code provided for them [but someone "forgot" to tell them: www.docstoc.com/docs/9990644/WHY-THE-UCC-FILING ] CorpUSA is "raising up the staff" at every turn to avoid letting the people go. I was reading some of the actions in the courts of the land pirates the other night [ http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1029116/pg966 ; I read backwards to page 961]. They really don't want the people to know we are not the "land of the free" under the Constitution that the people idolize [Ezekiel 17:7-10], but a private, for-profit corporation under Admiralty Law/Public Policy [whatever]. What if people started demanding their states set up no-interest banks, and the courts said they couldn't because of what you just quoted. Wouldn't it put them on the spot? Wouldn't they then have to explain that the International Banksters bankrupted this country, and they now own this country lock, stock, and barrel, including us and our children, who are nothing but SLAVES, and that the CONSTITUTION IS DEAD? How will that set with the people, I wonder? How many will jump on the bandwagon to fight wars for them then, I wonder? I mean, something has to wake them up. The Tea Parties might want to think about organizing to march on their state capitals, and DEMAND this. I wonder how Nevada got around it?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestWhen the National Socialists came to power in 1933, the German economy was in total collapse. Through an independent monetary policy of sovereign credit, not beholden to international Jewish financiers, Hitler was able to turn a bankrupt Germany into the strongest economy in Europe.
#4. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#3)
(Edited)
Replies to Comment # 4.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 4.