Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Neocon Nuttery
See other Neocon Nuttery Articles

Title: Tom Tancredo & Sheriff Joe Arpaio endorse a 9/11 truther for governor of California
Source: .
URL Source: http://www.examiner.com/la-county-l ... her-for-governor-of-california
Published: Sep 13, 2010
Author: .
Post Date: 2010-09-13 08:39:46 by Artisan
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 481
Comments: 10

In an ironic twist, 'war on terra' shill Tom Tancredo and Sheriff Joe Arpaio, two loyal establishment statists, have endorsed a woman for governor of California who can aptly be described as a 9/11 truther, meaning she questions the official government report regarding 9/11/01.

I don't know Chelene Nightingale, but I like a lot of the things she says, such as ending the federal reserve, resisting government tyranny, securing our borders, and questioning the events of 9/11/01. You can read Nightingale's comments regarding 9/11 below, and watch a video interview with her regarding this topic. I am not mocking her for these remarks; far from it. I am a '9/11 truther' myself, and contend that 9/11 was absolutely a false flag operation orchestrated by criminal occultic elements within our own government. I even believe we have an absolute moral obligation to expose this truth and hold the true culprits responsible.

Chelene Nightingale is running for governor of California against Jerry Brown and Meg Whitman. Earlier I wrote an article outlining some of the notable political figures who have endorsed Nightingale for governor of California. (Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Richard Mack, Chuck Baldwin, Tom Tancredo, & G. Edward Griffin endorse female CA governor candidate)

Some of those people I like, and consider true patriots, such G. Edward Griffin, Sheriff Richard Mack, and Chuck Baldwin (who I voted for back in 2004 when he ran as VP candidate with Michael Peroutka of the Constitution Party).

A few of the others though, are questionable to say the least. Former Congressman Tom Tancredo, is known worldwide for being probably the biggest advocate of a secure border and the sovereignty of the United States. Tancredo served in Congress from January 3, 1999 to January 3, 2009. I supported the Colorado Congressman and even contributed to a fundraiser he held in La Canada California in 2003. (The event is described this excerpt from Daniel Sheehy's book Fighting Immigration Anarchy).

On other issues though, Tancredo was not so great. His ideals, or lack of them, were not in line with a no-compromise Constitutionalist or libertarian. Tancredo voted for the Real ID Act, the Patriot Act and it's numerous renewals, the Military Commissions Act, and voted continuously to fund and support the unconstituional wars launched by the Bush cabal. He even spoke of 'bombing Mecca', constantly harping back to the phony U.S. created 'war on terrorism' and thus supporting the extremely destructive warmongering Zionist agenda. Mark Dankof recently wrote an excellent article on Tancredo, titled 'Tom Tancredo’s Marriage to the MEK: Posterboy for Israel’s Infiltration of the American Right'.

Joe Arpaio, recently sued by the Justice Department for not cooperating in a civil rights probe, has a long history of civil rights abuse allegations and lawsuits. I studied his record years ago and it's crystal clear that he is an authoritarian jackboot. You can look all this up for yourself.

Virgil Goode, a former Congressman, also endorsed Nightingale. I don't know much about Goode, but since he voted 'YES on declaring Iraq part of War on Terror with no exit date (Jun 2006), Voted YES on making the PATRIOT Act permanent. (Dec 2005), and Voted YES on retroactive immunity for telecoms' warrantless surveillance (Jun 2008), [credit ontheissues.org] it's clear he is nothing more than a despicable GOP hack tyrant. He can take a hike along with Tancredo and Arpaio.

Arpaio and Tancredo are good on one issue- the border. On others though, they wholeheartedly embrace the abject tyranny of the state and the feds. So I find it funny that they support a candidate with the views expressed below. I also noticed that on Nightingale's website, she makes no mention of 9/11, chemtrails, or the 'new world order' whatsoever. Not that I could find at least. That's certainly her perogative, but since we only live once, why not get it out on the table into the public sphere.

Because let's be honest. Nightingale is not going to be our governor. Not enough Californians believe in limited Constitutional government to vote for her; That's if they counted votes anyway, which is doubtful. Elections are for the most part a dog and pony show sham. So, if you're gonna run for office, why not give it your all? C'mon, Chelene, post your 9/11 remarks predominantly on your website.

Senator Karen Johnson of Arizona recently ran for governor against socialist Jan Brewer. Johnson went on the statehouse floor last year and gave a courageous plea demanding that the public find out the truth about 9/11; Johnson talked about the controlled demolition of the buildings and all the questions that were never answered. Now that is a woman with guts. Debra Medina, an alleged Constitutionalist who ran for governor of Texas last year, accepted a lot of donations from 9/11 truthers only to later betray them and call them despicable. After I broke that story, the alternative media ran with it and Medina lost much of her support. It will be interesting to see if Tancredo, Arpaio, and Goode repudiate Nightingale's valid concerns about the official story of September 11, 2001. It's time to pick sides, be bold, and stand up for the truth.

Below is a partial transcipt of the Chelene Nightingale interview. The two part video interview, which lasts a little over 20 minutes, was produced by Paul Wittenberger and conducted by Mike Murphy. [Watch part 1 and part 2].

Q. "...you've also spoken about being mocked about the events of 9/11 and questioning the official report. Why do you think people are doing that ..

Nightingale: "Why cant we question what happened with 9/11? (article continues here Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Artisan (#0)

deleted

The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-09-13   8:41:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Artisan (#0)

Maybe the Truthers need to start their own political party.

"The Party Of Truth".

Sounds very catchy.

TooConservative  posted on  2010-09-13   10:05:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: TooConservative (#2)

The initials would be "TPOT", as "in tempest in a".

echo5sierra  posted on  2010-09-13   10:19:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Artisan (#0)

Arpaio and Tancredo are good on one issue- the border

If that alone separates them from the other bags of crap, I'll take it.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2010-09-13   10:20:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: TooConservative (#2)

Maybe the Truthers need to start their own political party.

"The Party Of Truth".

Sounds very catchy.

It would go exactly nowhere.

Might as well start a "The Kennedys are Patriots" party.

"Society is, always has been and always will be a structure for the exploitation and oppression of the majority through systems of political force dictated by an élite, enforced by thugs, uniformed or not, and upheld by a willful ignorance and stupidity on the part of the very majority whom the system oppresses." -- Richard K. Morgan

Turtle  posted on  2010-09-13   11:13:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Turtle, echo5sierra (#5)

It would go exactly nowhere.

Here I come up with this great idea, offer it to y'all for free and no one appreciates it.

Ingrates. LOL.

TooConservative  posted on  2010-09-13   11:32:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: TooConservative (#2)

Maybe the Truthers need to start their own political party.

Is this an admission on your part that Republicans and 'truth' simply don't mix? It seems that way.

all political parties but the big 2 are in fact marginalized in the American system. I think in 2008 not one 3'rd party candidate could get on the ballot in over 40 states. There are states that simply persecute them and keep them from prospering. regardless of public sentiment.

The Republican party reached its peaks in popularity in 1984 and in 1924. Loyalty to the Republicans today is very low compared to those peaks. The Democrat Party reached its peak popularity in 1964 when over 60% of voters would vote across the board democrat without thinking. Today the Democrats are a shell of what they were in terms of popularity. At least half our people either won't vote or strongly dislike both parties. both parties command a loyalty of only a small minority in fact.

but in this environment 3'rd parties can still not prosper. In my state a Republican operative got 4 amateurs on the ballot for the green party simply to disrupt the democrats' ability to get votes. 3'rd parties are finding roadblocks that should not be. and we can't trust the vote system.

so when you say this that they should form their own party you are saying that they should be made irrelevant. They are advocating 'truth' concerning the september 11'th events. All loyal Americans SHOULD BE interested in that.

you are one of those psychotic individuals who says that a jet airplane travelling at over 300 MPH went through a hole in a building that was 20 feet by 20 feet. We've had 100 threads here and elsewhere documenting that the initial hole was how I described it. newspapers all over the world showed the photo of the narrow hole at the pentagon. CNN itself said a Boeing 727 couldn't possibly have done this. and you dismiss all this evidence and ridicule those seeking truth.

Psalms 137:1 By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down, yea, we wept, when we remembered Zion.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-09-13   11:53:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Red Jones (#7)

one of those psychotic individuals

I would add sociopath to his list of diagnoses.

Lysander_Spooner  posted on  2010-09-13   12:11:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Red Jones (#7)

Is this an admission on your part that Republicans and 'truth' simply don't mix? It seems that way.

It was just an opening for my "Party Of Truth" line. Didn't you ever read anything by Orwell? You came from a school so dead-ass they didn't even show you the cheesy film version?

TooConservative  posted on  2010-09-13   15:26:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Artisan (#0)

let's be honest. Nightingale is not going to be our governor. Not enough Californians believe in limited Constitutional government to vote for her; That's if they counted votes anyway, which is doubtful. Elections are for the most part a dog and pony show sham.

Anyone who doesn't believe in limited Constitutional government shouldn't be allowed to vote in the elections for American government. I'm certain we can exclude them simply by proportionately reducing the representation numbers accordingly in Congress to reflect Constitutionalists only rather than "Progressive" Commies, et al. Ref: Amendment 14, .2 They could maybe vote on how much they'd like to tax each other but that wouldn't have any bearing on We the People of the Constitution.

-------

"They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC

GreyLmist  posted on  2010-09-14   5:54:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest