See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Get Your No Planes Here
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 15, 2010
Author: various
Post Date: 2010-09-15 01:30:08 by wudidiz
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 1355
Comments: 34
Okay. You jokers are gonna have to get on board with the no planes. It's just that simple. There's no turning your head away and pretending it's not so. The truth will haunt you. Like a skeleton in your closet.... ....okay, I won't get poetic. You can run but you can't hide. No planes. On September 11th, 2001, not one airplane hit a building. None. Talk about a Psyop. I thought the Santa Claus story was bad. Think about it. Consider the implications. Before you do that, read this:
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
.
Ever wonder why the Pentagon didn't just video edit a plane hitting it and show it for all to see? Believe me, if they could do it without any signs they edited it they would, they obviously can't. So what makes you believe ALL videos of the towers being hit were fake wudidiz? Have you had each examined by a professional to see if it was video edited or not? If not, then how do you know they were all fake? You obviously don't know, you just believe it despite thousands of eyewitnesses to the planes hitting the towers. Sure some on TV were edited, but not because there were no planes that hit the towers, but rather because the planes that hit the towers were military planes.
God is always good!
I believe no airplane hit the wtc (for a few different reasons), therefore, any video of one hitting it is fake.
Why They Didn't Use Planes To Hit The WTC
.
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
I think I see what you mean, my eyes are tired though. I like this one.... you should get to know NLP to see how the propaganda is used to help feed those in denial and how it was used to sell the 911 lie in general as well as many of the after effects from it.
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
Add this to the list of astounding anomalies recorded that day. If anyone can explain how the nose of that aircraft slithered in through those columns visible on the north side of WTC2, I'll buy them the finest steak dinner available in the city of Houston. The nose of an airliner is the tip of the aluminum cigar tube that is the fuselage. It would not make it through steel and concrete intact as shown above. AFAIKS, that is impossible. The engines might do, at least as far as the turbine/compressor shaft go.
I would like to direct this to the distinguished members of the panel: You lousy cork-soakers. You have violated my farging rights. Dis somanumbatching country was founded so that the liberties of common patriotic citizens like me could not be taken away by a bunch of fargin iceholes... like yourselves. - Roman Moroni
You show an edited video for TV and you think that means no planes hit the towers despite not proving they were ALL edited. They would all have to be edited to show a plane that isn't there if no plane hit the tower. How the HECK do you think they could possibly accomplish that feat when they didn't control all of the videos being made that day? You have only demonstrated some TV videos were edited, but you in NO way have shown they ALL have been edited. Why is that so hard for you to understand? Military planes were first reported before anyone said they were commercial planes. First reports in situations like this are usually more accurate because the official spin wasn't out yet. The ones shown on TV had to be edited or everyone in America would know it was military planes that hit the towers. You can't discount thousands of eye-witnesses that saw the planes hit the towers that day just because they edited videos of the planes hitting the towers to cover up that it was military planes.
God is always good!
ping to above post
God is always good!
I can totally understand where you're coming from. However, I believe a plane could not enter a building as the video(s) show it does. Therefore, all the videos showing it entering the building like that are fake. Furthermore, anyone saying they saw it must be lying as well. The tail would have broken off or the wings or the fuselage would have crumpled or something instead of it just slicing into it like a hot knife through warm butter or a ghostplane and little dusty puffs of smoke exiting the building after impact. You say there are thousands of witnesses. Who are these people? What are their names? Addresses? Phone numbers? Is there a list of all of them? If so, then who compiled the list? Now, here's a fact. YOU don't know that any airplane hit a building that day. You have hearsay evidence at best. That's the most you have. You have faked videos of them hitting a building. You have a very corrupt and dishonest govt, media, education system, justice system all saying that airplanes hit those buildings and that's it. Period. As if that isn't enough, there is no record of either flight 11 or 77 that day.
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
I get two script errors on that page, which are easy enough to cancel, but there are also two videos that start running with audio automatically when the page opens and sounds jumbled. One is an interesting debate with Dylan Avery and the other is a computerized demonstration further down the page. To turn those videos off, scroll approximately 1/5 of the way down the page to June 03, 2007 -- Loose Change Frontman Dylan Avery Attacks Killtown, then about 3/4 of the way down to the 2nd video under the heading for May 24, 2007 -- Purdue engineers think wings & tail sections are stronger than steel. The video of the Killtown and Avery debate has an interesting section debunking an alleged eyewitness that day at the 4 min. remaining mark of the livevideo.com countdown timer.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
I prefer the investigational efforts of Ghangis. He is a cool Aussie bloke that doesn't loss site of the bigger picture and doesn't defend a position that is proven wrong
I've tried to stay focused on evidence rather than the wranglings of researchers but it does seem to me that Genghis lost site of the bigger picture when he teamed up with Col. Jenny Sparks. Do you think Killtown has defended a position that is proven wrong? I don't know of any such example.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Yes I do but I think you have a very worthy point of remaining focused on the evidence we can verify and avoid the back and forth squabbles of the various researchers. A bunch of "new" video has been released this year. Lots of stuff to pour over and examine.
You: Yes I do On what evidence do you base that opinion, if I may ask?
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
I don't entirely remember so I sent you some mail over it.
I get two script errors on that page, which are easy enough to cancel, but there are also two videos that start running with audio automatically when the page opens and sounds jumbled. One is an interesting debate with Dylan Avery and the other is a computerized demonstration further down the page. To turn those videos off, scroll approximately 1/5 of the way down the page to June 03, 2007 -- Loose Change Frontman Dylan Avery Attacks Killtown, then about 3/4 of the way down to the 2nd video under the heading for May 24, 2007 -- Purdue engineers think wings & tail sections are stronger than steel. The video of the Killtown and Avery debate has an interesting section debunking an alleged eyewitness that day at the 4 min. remaining mark of the livevideo.com countdown timer. I imagine if the owner of the site was told about the annoying videos and automatic audio he could and maybe would change it. It's such a very good page and that only takes away from it. Not sure what you mean by the script errors. I should definitely get around to watching all the videos and reading everything at that site soon enough, but haven't yet.
Thanks. You've got mail too.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
The error messages seem to be for the two movies that run automatically and say: A script in this movie is causing [flash player] to run slowly. If it continues to run, your computer may become unresponsive. Do you want to abort the script? Yes. No. Could be I need to upgrade that to correct the script errors and also the buffering trouble I get from livevideo.com. I dunno. I should write and mention the video problems, I suppose. I just figured there wasn't anything he could do about it in order to embed those films or he would have stopped the auto runs by now. I haven't gotten around to checking everything there yet either but still consider it an excellent resource from what I have studied of it.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
I did a bit of research on NLP (Neuro-linguistic programming - Wikipedia) and it is apparently traceable to Noam Chomsky's Transformational Grammar and Minimalist program. That led into "The elimination of the notion of government" -- linguistic government. Orwellian-speak is the word that I associate with all that Chomskyian mumbo-jumbo terminology. I already distrusted him as a forked-tongue speaker. What's your impression of him? Can you tell us more about NLP?
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Well I would not preface a topic of transformational psychology with words like mumbo jumbo. Nor should anyone think that Chomsky pioneered NLP. Bandler and Grinder fleshed this out and Grinder only based some of the linguistics in part from one of Chomskys works. My impression of Chomsky? meh... I used to think highly of him. I now wonder about his convictions. More about NLP. NLP is sorda like hypnotism...It is mental programing but not specifically trance induction although it is often used to help facilitate trance induction. Shrinks use it to observe and suggest. Business men use it to get ahead in work. And on the broadest scale TV people use it to control nations. Ultimate propaganda to drool over. Subtle word cues and body gestures that direct the mind to come to desired conclusions and exclusions. TV also utilizes other imagery. Take for example the fire fighters raising the flag at ground zero not unlike the soldiers raising the flag at Iwo Jima. The image meant to stir feelings of patriotism. The Congress singing God Bless America at the end of the day kinda like the indomitable spirit of the Who's whom we all watch every Christmas. Inspiring the spirit of unity in times of woe. The heavy pushing of Osama as a suspect with in seconds of second impact , a face to which we could assign blame. The Catch phrase of flight 93, "lets roll" to motivate us into action. Pre planed images , words, and gestures, meant to manipulate or elicit a specific thoughts and or conclusions. For 911 the conclusions should be obvious.
Sounds very much like The Delphi Technique: More and more, we are seeing citizens being invited to “participate” in various forms of meetings, councils, or boards to “help determine” public policy in one field or another. They are supposedly being included to get ”input” from the public to help officials make final decisions on taxes, education, community growth or whatever the particular subject matter might be. Sounds great, doesn’t it? Unfortunately, surface appearances are often deceiving. You, Mr. or Mrs. Citizen, decide to take part in one of these meetings. Generally, you will find that there is already someone designated to lead or “facilitate” the meeting. Supposedly, the job of the facilitator is to be a neutral, non-directing helper to see that the meeting flows smoothly. Actually, he or she is there for exactly the opposite reason: to see that the conclusions reached during the meeting are in accord with a plan already decided upon by those who called the meeting. The process used to “facilitate” the meeting is called the Delphi Technique. This Delphi Technique was developed by the RAND Corporation for the U.S. Department of Defense back in the 1950s. It was originally intended for use as a psychological weapon during the cold war. However, it was soon recognized that the steps of Delphi could be very valuable in manipulating ANY meeting toward a predetermined end. How does the process take place? The techniques are well developed and well defined. First, the person who will be leading the meeting, the facilitator or Change Agent must be a likable person with whom those participating in the meeting can agree or sympathize. It is, therefore, the job of the facilitator to find a way to cause a split in the audience, to establish one or a few of the people as “bad guys” while the facilitator is perceived as the “good guy.” [end excerpt] You: The Catch phrase of flight 93, "lets roll" to motivate us into action. Pre planed images , words, and gestures, meant to manipulate or elicit a specific thoughts and or conclusions. For 911 the conclusions should be obvious. Many are obvious but some are not so much. For example, at WTC 2 "impact" time, a news clock rolled over from 9:02 to 9:03. That equates to the number 93 in occult calculations and, in occult terms, that number means "The Law". In the next phase that unfolded post-9/11, our Constitution was attacked and has been frenetically so ever since. The alleged Beamer phrase "Let's Roll" on alleged Flt. 93 reminds me of Kroll associations, linked here [my notes in brackets]: Short comment at 9-11 Whistleblower Andrew Grove comes forward. - Democratic Underground: "So Todd Beamer's father is a ceo for the [Legato] company bought by EMC involved in bank fraud relating to paying the terrorists? and they signed their checks 'let's roll'. it sounds like a bunch of the guys who [allegedly] died 911 also knew about this fraud M McL [Marsh & McLennan, purchaser of Kroll Associates] was in on ..." Long article but much more intriguing corporate info, etc., at the site.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
MIND CONTROL IN THE 21st CENTURY
Looks like quite a 4um gem you found there. :) Thanks for posting it for us. Copied the link to this topic for comment and consideration: 4um Post #57 at "Inside The LC The Strange but Mostly True Story of Laurel Canyon and the Birth of the Hippie Generation"
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Yeah, it's really good.
#2. To: All (#0)
#3. To: wudidiz (#0)
(Edited)
#4. To: RickyJ (#3)
So what makes you believe ALL videos of the towers being hit were fake wudidiz?
#5. To: All (#0)
#6. To: All, *9-11* (#0)
#7. To: All (#6)
#8. To: GreyLmist, All (#7)
No Planes. Think about it. ................. Guaranteed Penetration (no it's not porn)
#9. To: wudidiz (#1)
#10. To: wudidiz (#7)
#11. To: Eric Stratton (#10)
No Planes. Think about it. ................. Guaranteed Penetration (no it's not porn)
#12. To: wudidiz (#0)
#13. To: wudidiz (#11)
#14. To: wudidiz (#5)
#15. To: wudidiz (#11)
(Edited)
#16. To: Eric Stratton, randge, titorite, *9-11* (#13)
#17. To: RickyJ, Eric Stratton, GreyLmist, randge, titorite, all, *9-11* (#15)
Why is that so hard for you to understand?
No Planes. Think about it. ................. Guaranteed Penetration (no it's not porn)
#18. To: RickyJ, All (#15)
#19. To: wudidiz (#17)
#20. To: wudidiz (#0)
Killtown - No Planes
#21. To: GreyLmist (#20)
#22. To: titorite (#21)
I prefer the investigational efforts of Ghangis. He is a cool Aussie bloke that doesn't loss site of the bigger picture and doesn't defend a position that is proven wrong
#23. To: GreyLmist (#22)
Do you think Killtown has defended a position that is proven wrong?
#24. To: titorite (#23)
Me: Do you think Killtown has defended a position that is proven wrong?
#25. To: GreyLmist (#24)
#26. To: GreyLmist (#20)
Killtown - No Planes
No Planes. Think about it. ................. Guaranteed Penetration (no it's not porn)
#27. To: titorite (#25)
I don't entirely remember so I sent you some mail over it.
#28. To: wudidiz (#26)
I imagine if the owner of the site was told about the annoying videos and automatic audio he could and maybe would change it. It's such a very good page and that only takes away from it. Not sure what you mean by the script errors. I should definitely get around to watching all the videos and reading everything at that site soon enough, but haven't yet.
#29. To: titorite (#12)
you should get to know NLP to see how the propaganda is used to help feed those in denial and how it was used to sell the 911 lie in general as well as many of the after effects from it.
#30. To: GreyLmist (#29)
Orwellian-speak is the word that I associate with all that Chomskyian mumbo-jumbo terminology. I already distrusted him as a forked-tongue speaker. What's your impression of him? Can you tell us more about NLP?
#31. To: titorite (#30)
The Delphi Technique: Let’s Stop Being Manipulated!, by Albert V. Burns
#32. To: GreyLmist, titorite (#31)
No Planes. Think about it. ................. Guaranteed Penetration (no it's not porn)
#33. To: wudidiz (#32)
MIND CONTROL IN THE 21st CENTURY
#34. To: GreyLmist, SKYDRIFTER (#33)
No Planes. Think about it. ................. Guaranteed Penetration (no it's not porn)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest