See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Get your planes here
Source:
me
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 15, 2010
Author: me
Post Date: 2010-09-15 01:48:24 by RickyJ
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 1376
Comments: 20
See the plane hit the big tall building. See it go boom! Too bad no planers can't see it. They are blind to planes and think video editing doesn't leave signs behind that any expert can easily see.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: RickyJ (#0)
You can run, but you can't hide, Ricky. Ever wonder why the Pentagon didn't just video edit a plane hitting it and show it for all to see? Believe me, if they could do it without any signs they did it they would, they can't.
God is always good!
The truth is too fantastic so people make up shit to explain away the obvious. Occam's Razor is cast aside for a crack pipe loaded with a Star-of-David rock.
__________________________________________________________ There's no getting around it. Laws of physics would not allow an airplane to do this to a concrete and steel building. No Planes/Video Fakery is the Occam's Razor being cast aside by the "Fantastic Four Planes" groupies of the dopey Official Conspiracy Theory.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
You should wonder if maybe some of them hoped people like you would wake up quicker to the illusionist perps if they didn't do that.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
One doesn't have to be an expert, Ricky, to see that no plane is shown in that video hitting WTC 2. I've already explained to you that it is only shown vanishing from view behind the shorter buildings and then an explosion is seen which is only assumed to be from a real plane impact. It's a "power of suggestion" trick to get you to fill-in-the-blank as you have by reading more into the scene than is really there.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Message from CB_Brooklyn's "Debunking the 9/11 *Anti-No- Plane-Theory* Myths": Let us review… The media (i.e. MSNBC): Plants in the ”truth movement” (i.e. Steven Jones): We can now understand why many “truthers” shy away from no-planes/TV-Fakery. Seems the 9/11 coverup perps tricked the “truth movement” with a well orchestrated plan of deception! Will these theories really “damage” the “truth movement”, or has the movement merely been tricked into thinking so? Many “truthers” often wonder why the mainstream media hasn’t broken the “inside job” story yet. The reason is simple: The 9/11 perps have not been exposed. (Check the “Suppression Timeline” linked above.) Only after the real 9/11 perpetrators are widely exposed [will] the media break! Will “truthers” finally start promoting no-planes/TV-Fakery? If the “truth movement” can’t admit their mistakes, why should the average person? People will simply continue believing what they feel most comfortable with: the “boxcutter” story. They don’t care about the evidence. Why should they? After all, the “truth movement” doesn’t. Or do they??? How many “truthers” have looked at the no-planes/TV-Fakery evidence lately… evidence that anyone can understand? Below you will find a ton of evidence. Look it through… you maybe surprised! [cont.]
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
If the planes didn't hit the buildings, then where are the hijacked planes and their more than 100 passengers and crew?? Some of those passengers were well- known, some were heads of businesses, and many had families. Not a single one has been seen again.
Whether or not planes hit the buildings, there's a VERY good chance that the aircraft which left their respective airports and were REPORTED to have hit the towers and the Pentagon were NOT the planes which hit the towers or the Pentagon. Flight 77 is the easiest to prove, since a 757 could not have descended while picking up airspeed, reaching 500+ mph at treetop level, then descending as in a normal landing with the nose level, which it would HAVE to have done in order for the observed damage to have been caused by an aircraft. Whatever hit the Pentagon did so flying level at 500+ mph at an altitude of inches off the ground in order to penetrate the ground floor level as it did. That is impossible for a multi-engine jumbo jet, as ground effect would force the aircraft to CLIMB, not descend. Even WITHOUT ground effect, the only way an aircraft can go down is to point the nose down AND/OR decrease airspeed sufficiently. If the nose had been down, the aircraft would have left a crater outside the Pentagon wall, flipped over and broken up outside of it. The wings in either case should have disintegrated upon impact and splattered thousands of gallons of burning jet fuel all over the outside of the Pentagon, yet that didn't happen. In fact, windows were still intact where the wings should have struck at 500 mph. That being said, as far as what happened to the passengers and the crew, they are more than likely dead. Nerve gas pumped into the ventilation system would easily have done that.
If you could only wiki a few things about physics RickyJ then you would be able to prove yourself and us. Where was the wake vortex? how can plane safeties in the programming be over come with boxcutters? where are the rest of those planes? has any other plane in the history of jets have ever melted into a building? why is it their is no action reaction from the moment of impact(t-0 impact)? just a few physics and one computer and forensic question. answers?
Theological arguments are so delightfully vicious. Now I need a bag of popcorn. LOL.
Ricky? got any mathmatical explinations about wake vortex yet?
Thousands of people said they saw planes hit the buildings, 100s of videos recorded planes hitting the buildings, yet you think there was no planes. Most people would call that insane, I call it being a damn government stooge out to discredit the 9/11 truth movement.
God is always good!
No no no, I am not asking for answers about the thousands of witnesses. And some of the things my questions were about can only be seen on those videos if they are there. I am not a stooge. Of course for all I know ...let me just say that I do not think you are a stooge myself nor a shill, nor anything else like that. All planes create wake vortex and when they crash it is really identifiable through the resulting explosion.. Could you point it out to anyone with some video? And what of the backround and forground issues in all the different tapes? Why are their backround and forground issues? If a video as such an issue shouldn't it be dismissed as conclusive video evidence? Other questions had to do with computer programming , basically how did the turn off the hard ware and soft ware safeties of the plane?
You need to start documenting your claims of thousands of witnesses and hundreds of videos. Repeating baseless claims over and over doesn't make them true and compromises your own credibility. Numerous sources have been provided here debunking many witnesses, all of which you seem to ignore. Which reported witnesses in this source -- posted by wudidiz, showing that a large majority of them neither saw or heard a plane -- do you want to list among your alleged thousands for debates and which do you want to deduct from a listing? There were very few "live" network videos and less than 50 amateur videos. That does not even amount to 100, let alone 100s plural. I doubt you can find an amateur video that hasn't been debunked or stands as unquestionable, or think you should have to do more than claim 100s as if that's so and none have been disproven. Of the news clips running live at the 9:02 WTC 2 "impact" time, CBS showed no plane, just an explosion. Repeat: CBS showed no plane, just an explosion. FOX and CNN don't even seem to have their own video. For some odd reason, those major networks were evidently importing footage from their competitor, ABC, and FOX announced the 2nd plane impact when the footage showed no plane or an explosion. MSNBC showed only an orb approaching and twice no plane impact before airing footage that did, likely also imported from their competitor ABC. So, the only original network footage showing a plane image live at 9:02 is apparently from ABC, which hides WTC 2 from view behind WTC 1 before the alleged impact and explosion at WTC 2. Here are the sources for that analysis: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peogJxIjVik http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhqLh_c0NL4 FOX @ 8:10 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OI8uUJNc1F8 CNN @ 3:31 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Tl__04Xoi0 MSNBC @ 3:01 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPtn-glZfc4 ABC @ 0:57
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
RickyJ? YOu still with us? YOu ever feel inclined to look up that stuff on wake vortex and overriding hardware and soft ware safeties?
And who owns ABC since 1996? Disney: 1996–2003: Disney purchase and network decline ------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
#2. To: All (#0)
#3. To: RickyJ (#0)
"This man is Jesus,” shouted one man, spilling his Guinness as Barack Obama began his inaugural address. “When will he come to Kenya to save us?"
-Schweizerische Schuetzenzeitung (Swiss Shooting Federation) April, 1941
#4. To: X-15 (#3)
No matter how you arrange your words.
#5. To: RickyJ (#2)
#6. To: X-15 (#3)
The truth is too fantastic so people make up shit to explain away the obvious. Occam's Razor is cast aside for a crack pipe loaded with a Star-of-David rock.
#7. To: RickyJ (#2)
Ever wonder why the Pentagon didn't just video edit a plane hitting it and show it for all to see?
#8. To: RickyJ (#0)
See the plane hit the big tall building. See it go boom! Too bad no planers can't see it. They are blind to planes and think video editing doesn't leave signs behind that any expert can easily see.
#9. To: wudidiz (#1)
promote the “official” version as “the truth”
ridicule the “alternate” version as the “offensive wacky conspiracy theory”
shun the “REAL” version and court cases
promote the “alternate” version as “the truth”
ridicule the “REAL” version as “offensive wacky conspiracy theory”
#10. To: RickyJ (#0)
#11. To: Shoonra (#10)
If the planes didn't hit the buildings, then where are the hijacked planes and their more than 100 passengers and crew?? Some of those passengers were well- known, some were heads of businesses, and many had families. Not a single one has been seen again.
"The real deal is this: the ‘royalty’ controlling the court, the ones with the power, the ones with the ability to make a difference, with the ability to change our course, the ones who will live in infamy if we pass the tipping points, are the captains of industry, CEOs in fossil fuel companies such as EXXON/Mobil, automobile manufacturers, utilities, all of the leaders who have placed short-term profit above the fate of the planet and the well-being of our children." - James Hansen
#12. To: RickyJ (#0)
#13. To: RickyJ (#0)
#14. To: RickyJ (#2)
#15. To: titorite (#12)
answers?
#16. To: RickyJ (#15)
(Edited)
Thousands of people said they saw planes hit the buildings, 100s of videos recorded planes hitting the buildings, yet you think there was no planes. Most people would call that insane, I call it being a damn government stooge out to discredit the 9/11 truth movement.
#17. To: RickyJ, wudidiz (#15)
(Edited)
Thousands of people said they saw planes hit the buildings, 100s of videos recorded planes hitting the buildings, yet you think there was no planes. Most people would call that insane, I call it being a damn government stooge out to discredit the 9/11 truth movement.
#18. To: GreyLmist, RickyJ (#17)
No Planes. Think about it. ................. Guaranteed Penetration (no it's not porn)
#19. To: RickyJ (#15)
#20. To: All (#17)
So, the only original network footage showing a plane image live at 9:02 is apparently from ABC, which hides WTC 2 from view behind WTC 1 before the alleged impact and explosion at WTC 2.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest