[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills

Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole

Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands

Why CNN & Fareed Zakaria are Wrong About Iran and Trump

Something Is Going Deeply WRONG In Russia

329 Rivers in China Exceed Flood Warnings, With 75,000 Dams in Critical Condition

Command Of Russian Army 'Undermined' After 16 Of Putin's Generals Killed At War, UK Says

Rickards: Superintelligence Will Never Arrive

Which Countries Invest In The US The Most?

The History of Barbecue

‘Pathetic’: Joe Biden tells another ‘tall tale’ during rare public appearance

Lawsuit Reveals CDC Has ZERO Evidence Proving Vaccines Don't Cause Autism

Trumps DOJ Reportedly Quietly Looking Into Criminal Charges Against Election Officials

Volcanic Risk and Phreatic (Groundwater) eruptions at Campi Flegrei in Italy

Russia Upgrades AGS-17 Automatic Grenade Launcher!

They told us the chickenpox vaccine was no big deal—just a routine jab to “protect” kids from a mild childhood illness

Pentagon creates new military border zone in Arizona

For over 200 years neurological damage from vaccines has been noted and documented

The killing of cardiologist in Gaza must be Indonesia's wake-up call

Marandi: Israel Prepares Proxies for Next War with Iran?

"Hitler Survived WW2 And I Brought Proof" Norman Ohler STUNS Joe Rogan

CIA Finally Admits a Pyschological Warfare Agent from the Agency “Came into Contact” with Lee Harvey Oswald before JFK’s Assassination

CNN Stunned As Majority Of Americans Back Trump's Mass Deportation Plan

Israeli VS Palestinian Connections to the Land of Israel-Palestine

Israel Just Lost Billions - Haifa and IMEC

This Is The Income A Family Needs To Be Middle Class, By State

One Big Beautiful Bubble": Hartnett Warns US Debt Will Exceed $50 Trillion By 2032

These Are The Most Stolen Cars In Every US State

Earth Changes Summary - June 2025: Extreme Weather, Planetary Upheaval,

China’s Tofu-Dreg High-Speed Rail Station Ceiling Suddenly Floods, Steel Bars Snap


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Big night for tea party: O'Donnell wins Delaware
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/09/ ... -party-odonnell-wins-delaware/
Published: Sep 15, 2010
Author: DAVID ESPO
Post Date: 2010-09-15 06:39:42 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 648
Comments: 49

Tea party favorite O'Donnell wins GOP Senate primary in Delaware over longtime congressman

Virtually unknown a month ago, Christine O'Donnell rode a surge of support from tea party activists to victory in Delaware's Republican Senate primary Tuesday night, dealing yet another setback to the GOP establishment in a campaign season full of them. A second insurgent led narrowly for the GOP nomination in New Hampshire.

O'Donnell defeated nine-term Rep. Mike Castle, a fixture in Delaware politics for a generation and a political moderate. Republican Party officials, who had touted him as their only hope for winning the seat in the fall, made clear as the votes were being counted they would not provide O'Donnell funding in the general election campaign.

She enters the fall campaign as an underdog to Chris Coons, a county executive who was unopposed for the Democratic nomination. The Republican state chairman, Tom Ross, said recently she "could not be elected dogcatcher," and records surfaced during the campaign showing that the IRS had once slapped a lien against her and that her house had been headed for foreclosure. She also claimed falsely to have carried two of the state's counties in a race against Vice President Joe Biden six years ago.

With unemployment high and President Barack Obama's popularity below 50 percent, Republicans said a run of hotly contested primaries this spring and summer reflected voter enthusiasm that will serve the party well in the fall. The GOP needs to win 40 seats to take the House and 10 for control of the Senate.

Democrats countered that the presence of tea party-supported Republicans on the ballot on Nov. 2 would prove costly to the GOP. That proposition will be tested in seven weeks' time in Senate races in Nevada, Colorado, Florida, Kentucky — all states where establishment Republican candidates fell in earlier primaries — and now Delaware.

In the other marquee race of the night, for New Hampshire's Republican Senate nomination, lawyer Ovide Lamontagne led former Attorney General Kelly Ayotte, 40 percent to 38 percent, with votes counted from more than a third of the precincts.

Lamontagne, a former chairman of the state Board of Education, campaigned with the support of tea party activists, while Ayotte had a coalition of establishment Republicans, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and other conservatives.

The winner will face Democratic Rep. Paul Hodes, who is giving up his seat in the House to run for the Senate.

Nearly complete returns from Delaware showed O'Donnell with 53 percent of the vote. "Don't ever underestimate the power of 'we the people,'" she told supporters who cheered her triumph.

But Coons issued a statement moments after Castle's defeat. "We cannot let Joe Biden's seat fall into ultraconservative hands," he said.

Democratic New Hampshire Gov. John Lynch rolled to renomination for a fourth term, and he will face John Stephen, a former state health commissioner who won the GOP line on the ballot easily.

In New York, 40-year veteran Democratic Rep. Charles Rangel easily won renomination in his first time on the ballot since the House ethics committee accused him of 13 violations, most of them relating to his personal finances.

In all, five states chose nominees for the Senate, and six more had gubernatorial hopefuls on the ballot in the final big night of a primary season marked by recession and political upheaval. The winners had scant time to refocus their energies for midterm elections on Nov. 2.

Castle's defeat boosted the number of members of Congress who have lost primaries to eight, five Republicans and three Democrats. But that list does not include a lengthy list of GOP contenders who fell to tea party-supported challengers despite having the backing of party officials eager to maximize their gains in November.

The Republican primary in Delaware took a sharp turn for the negative three weeks ago after the Tea Party Express, Palin and Sen. Jim DeMint of South Carolina announced they would come to O'Donnell's aid.

Castle, a former two-term governor and a veteran of nearly two decades in the House, was repeatedly assailed as a liberal, a Republican in name only. He and the party responded by challenging O'Donnell's fitness for public office.

In an extraordinary move, the state Republican Party launched automated phone calls attacking O'Donnell in the campaign's final hours. The calls feature the voice of a woman who identifies herself as Kristin Murray, O'Donnell's campaign manager in her 2008 unsuccessful Senate campaign, accusing the candidate of "living on campaign donations — using them for rent and personal expenses, while leaving her workers unpaid and piling up thousands in debt."

Biden resigned the seat in early 2009, shortly after being sworn in as vice president, and his successor, Democratic Sen. Ted Kaufman, pledged not to run for a full term.

In Wisconsin, businessman Ron Johnson defeated two minor opponents for the Republican nomination to oppose three-term Democratic Sen. Russ Feingold in November in what polls show is a tight race. Johnson has said he will spend millions of his own money to finance his campaign through Election Day.

In New York, Democratic Attorney General Andrew Cuomo faced no opposition for the party's nomination for governor, and he will be the prohibitive favorite in the fall for an office his father held for three terms.

Political novice Carl Paladino, a wealthy developer who enjoyed tea party support, defeated Rep. Rick Lazio for the Republican nomination. Lazio angled for the conservative nomination and a spot on the November ballot anyway.

In Maryland, former Republican Gov. Bob Ehrlich won the nomination for a rematch against the man who ousted him from office in 2006, Democratic Gov. Martin O'Malley.

In Wisconsin, Milwaukee County Executive Scott Walker defeated former Rep. Mark Neumann for the Republican nomination for governor. Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett won the Democratic nomination.

Rangel's principal challenger for the nomination in his Harlem-based district was Adam Clayton Powell IV, a state assemblyman whose father Rangel defeated 40 years ago. In the decades since, Rangel rose to become chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, with enormous power over taxes, trade, Medicare and more, but Democrats forced him to step aside from that panel while he battles ethics charges.

He is accused of accepting several New York City rent-stabilized apartments, and omitting information on his financial disclosure forms. He's also accused of failing to pay taxes from a rental property in the Dominican Republic, and improperly soliciting money for a college center to be named after him. He has vowed to fight the charges, and faces an ethics committee trial, possibly after the elections.

A second New York Democratic incumbent, Rep. Carolyn Maloney, won easily despite a spirited challenge.

Rhode Island had a rare open seat in its two-member House delegation, following the decision of Democratic Rep. Patrick Kennedy to retire. Providence Mayor David Cicilline, who is openly gay, defeated three rivals for the Democratic nomination.

Source: AP News

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 39.

#2. To: Ada (#0)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-09-15   8:47:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Eric Stratton (#2)

Sounds like "Tea Party" has carefully been substituted for "Republican Party" in the media.

Because Tea Party backed Republican candidates won and Republican Party backed candidates didn't.

Ada  posted on  2010-09-15   9:01:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Ada (#3)

deleted

Eric Stratton  posted on  2010-09-15   9:54:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Eric Stratton (#4)

I looked at O'Donnel's web site and concluded that she is a typical republican on the issues. She agrees with barack Obama on all the big issues - war, heavy taxation she favors, torture she will not oppose so she supports it, same with police state issues, she loves war. she says she's going to balance the budget with budget cuts, meaning services to the domestic population who pays the taxes are going to be cut to protect the war spending and the debt spending. Her differences with Obama are very small and marginal. She is a very typical republican.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-09-15   10:58:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Red Jones (#5)

Did she come out against the UN Moon Treaty? If not, that means that she supports it. Did she come out explicitly against midget porn? If not, that means she supports that too.

Heck bro, did she come out, specifically, against poisoning and cooking babies? If not, that means she supports that...TOO!

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2010-09-15   14:52:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: SonOfLiberty (#18)

I think that politicians have a responsibility to communicate to the voters how they stand on the big important issues. can't get much bigger of an issue than derivatives trade. Should we allow businesspeople to engage in transactions that result in massive quantities of money ($1.4 quadrillion we're told) to be just made up out of thin air and distributed among the participants? They're making money out of thin air. and you think this isn't something for a politician to be expected to comment on.

I just expect them to have brains in their heads and to pay attention and to be responsible. This lady doesn't qualify.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-09-15   15:19:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Red Jones (#22) (Edited)

can't get much bigger of an issue than derivatives trade. S

To YOU. To YOU. To the majority of people, if you start saying the words "derivative trading" you're going to get either a glazed over expression or a "wait..dairy trading?".

If you want the popular vote, you have to hammer on simple themes with emotional appeal. Derivative trading is the exact opposite of that, and I wouldn't blame any political candidate for not talking about it during a run in the primaries. You might as well talk to votes about Oracle Database Administration if you're going to go down that path. Get it?

I would love to see the day arrive when the common majority of people could obtain this level of discourse. And it can happen. But it can't happen today, right now, they have to be allowed to think again (first, destroy the public schools, heh). A candidate can tell the truth, be honest and do what he/she can, but committing political suicide seems kind of futile.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2010-09-15   15:32:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: SonOfLiberty (#25)

if she ridiculed president Obama for legalizing derivatives trade to 2022 and spoke some of the things I spoke about it, then she'd gain votes. but lose with the establishment of course. I smell a puppet.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-09-15   15:35:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Red Jones (#26)

if she ridiculed president Obama for legalizing derivatives trade to 2022 and spoke some of the things I spoke about it, then she'd gain votes

Of ten people...while losing the interest (and votes) of a thousand. Don't you see what I'm telling you, sir?

I smell a puppet.

That's because you're bearing false witness. You're attributing things to people that they have not said and then calling them a rat. Using your technique, which you've done against other politicians as well in the past, one can construct any kind of homunculus that one wishes and then declare that monstrosity "a puppet".

Write her campaign, find out the truth, then spread the word. Telling me "what she didn't address ergo she supports it" is sophistry, and bad sophistry at that.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2010-09-15   15:44:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: SonOfLiberty (#27)

she had an opportunity to take a stand on some important issues I mentioned. She has her web site. I don't have to write them. it should be on her web- site.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-09-15   23:16:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Red Jones (#31)

she had an opportunity to take a stand on some important issues I mentioned. She has her web site. I don't have to write them. it should be on her web- site.

That's a lot of hubris on your part guy. "She had a chance to express things I think are important, but didn't! My issues should be on her website!"

C'mon. I mean really, c'mon.

Have you contacted her campaign yet and asked what her positions are on the issues you feel are important? And if not, there's no reason to take your "j'accuse!" statements, fabricated out of whole cloth, seriously.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2010-09-16   8:57:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: SonOfLiberty (#33)

I'm sorry, but the two biggest issues by far are the extreme pro-war stance of our government and the financial looting that our government facilitates. If she can't speak against those things, then she's a very poor leader. You prefer that we be ruled over people who are ruining our nation? you have strange values.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-09-16   9:13:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Red Jones (#35)

I'm sorry, but the two biggest issues by far are the extreme pro-war stance of our government and the financial looting that our government facilitates. If she can't speak against those things, then she's a very poor leader.

The two biggest issues that you feel are the two biggest issues.

You clearly do not understand how campaigns need to be constructed to work. I've tried to explain it to you, but you persist in your view without event he slightest sign that you've read what I've tried to present. Whatever.

You prefer that we be ruled over people who are ruining our nation? you have strange values.

And there you go now, directed towards me. I do not hold that position, nor have I indicated as such, but, you've made your own deductions based on nothing but conjecture, without asking, then made a judgment of affirmation as if your opinion were fact ("you have strange values.").

That is wholly dishonest. For a religious guy (so you claim) you seem to have no problem with deceit, lying or bearing false witness if it suits your purposes or agenda. Maybe you should reconsider the religion you've chosen to follow, sir, or better, come to understand your own error and not compound it through defensiveness.

I suspect we've not a lot more to say on this thread.

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2010-09-16   9:22:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: SonOfLiberty (#37)

You clearly do not understand how campaigns need to be constructed to work

I appreciate your responses. you're right that we're just going to disagree on these things.

I do understand what you say that conventional wisdom is that in your campaigns you must speak to the issues the voters are familiar with. the mass media determines these things. the mass media works for the oligarchs who rule. I'd get out of that pattern if I wanted to be a real leader.

If Christine O'Donnell said what I'd prefer her to say, then she'd be destroyed by onemeans or another. we've passed the point of no return. Our democracy is broken and I have no hope that it will work.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-09-16   10:59:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 39.

#40. To: Red Jones (#39)

I do understand what you say that conventional wisdom is that in your campaigns you must speak to the issues the voters are familiar with. the mass media determines these things. the mass media works for the oligarchs who rule. I'd get out of that pattern if I wanted to be a real leader.

I don't disagree. The problem is that to get out of it, candidates have to be elected who run the mindless campaigns, and then they go balls to the wall and eliminate these kinds of lunacies.

If Christine O'Donnell said what I'd prefer her to say, then she'd be destroyed by onemeans or another. we've passed the point of no return.

Quite so.

Our democracy is broken and I have no hope that it will work.

I'm always hoping democracy fails. I prefer a constitutional republic, as America was established to be. :)

SonOfLiberty  posted on  2010-09-16 11:09:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 39.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]