See other 4play Articles
Title: A Hatemail Turtle Got
Source:
Email
URL Source: [None]
Published: Sep 15, 2010
Author: Somebody
Post Date: 2010-09-15 11:14:55 by Turtle
Keywords: None
Views: 5280
Comments: 134
Dear Bob Wallace, Just so you know, many of us supposedly "lesser-intelligent" Blacks (or Afro-Americans, or whatever) actually are demonstrably intelligent despite your desperate attempts to portray and/or describe us to the contrary. I myself currently hold TWO Master's degrees (one of which is an MA in "Communications in Contemporary Society" from the Johns Hopkins University). Obviously, your overly simplistic, preconceived, and ridiculous notions of Black people must reflect an extremely limited exposure (or lack thereof); so I'll cut you some slack. However, in the future, while deeply engrossed in composing the next installment of your baseless, racist diatribes, do try to "wrap" your superior European brain around the very real fact that not all Blacks are stupid, mentally challenged and/or incapable of serious intellectual debate. After all, I frequently read White Nationalist/Supremacist websites for unorthodox (and in your case, preposterous) viewpoints. In short: GROW THE F%*K UP!! Sincerely, "Blaqbuck" M.S.L.S./M.A. P.S. Yeah, you guessed it genius, the above name's a pseudonym (just like yours Bob "yeah, right" Wallace)... See, us Blacks can use smart words, too. Idiot!
Poster Comment: I received this from an article I had at the Occidental Observer.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 67.
#42. To: Turtle (#0)
There is nothing inferior about the intelligence of blacks. When you judge people by race, you are always wrong.
William Shockley and Charles Murray have proven otherwise. There is simply no scientific method that has ever validated your assertions, which seem to be the obvious fawning affection of a negrophile. Also, most American blacks (and many in Africa) have European Caucasian blood, the result of which is greater intelligence. Pure black Africans had never built a shelter that would last past the first rainstorm and in a land swarming with docile beasts they had never dreamed of a plow. (forget about medical/scientific breakthroughs for the betterment of mankind. Their greatest contribution seems to be the machete and AK47 raids against those they perceive as weaker if not completely defenseless. And what about the documented cannibalism in the Congo by govt militia preying on Mbuti pygmies or the uniquely African belief that the rape of infant virgins will cure AIDS?) No, like it or not culture is a measure of intelligence. And, I think it's more likely that you measure intelligence by how much you quiver in the presence of a race that you've fetishized for reasons I dare not speculate about and you dare not reveal. If Africa was white the Sahara Desert would be the home of The Sahara Gardens Agricultural University, amusement/water parks, health retreats and retirement and condominium communities, airports and flying clubs. And instead of starving between aid shipments whites would be feeding the world just as they do now. (How silly of me to use the perpetual need for food and ways to meet the demand as a measure of intelligence. I must be thinking white, huh?) Since 1900 and the introduction of western medicine and agriculture Africans have proven that "dey sho can makes dem babies" even if they can't feed them. The population of Africa has increased by a ten factor and still they starve even as the eat termites....and ironically, thanks to whites Africa's greatly decreased infant mortality rate may ultimately relieve their perpetual war on hunger.... But, their space program? How about advances in fish farming? How about mosquito control? "Hey white man, you measure intelligence your way and I'll measure it mine!"__Armadillo
Not sure I agree with that. Pinging OI since his knowledge of archeology is greater than mine. How would you explain the Great Zimbabwe and the pyramids of Ethiopia? As far as I know they were all built by true blacks.
Not sure I agree with that. Pinging OI since his knowledge of archeology is greater than mine. How would you explain the Great Zimbabwe and the pyramids of Ethiopia? As far as I know they were all built by true blacks. Well, just as The Great Pyramid Of Giza may have blacks huddled around the base at any moment, it was built with technology which we cannot duplicate today. And those huddled blacks are the result of Egyptian slavery and it's highly unlikely that their predecessors built them. In fact breeding with slaves was the primary cause of the destruction of once great civilizations, not the reason for their existence. (Surely you can see how the third world invasion of your state casts serious doubts on the survival of you and yours if you remain there, can you not?) The Egyptians were great before they began excursions into sub-Saharan Africa. They certainly didn't go grab a bunch of blacks, bring them home then demand to be shown the secrets of engineering marvels. This is evidenced by an absence of such marvels then and now in black Africa. And O_I's opinions are highly skewed on this topic and he won't hide the fact that once he exhausts his limited resources he'll substitute hostility, so he'll be of no use. Remember, Hitler said, "8 lames walking arm in arm do not make one gladiator"!, and seven more like him or armadillo won't make one bit of difference ;)
I wasn't talking about the pyramids of Egypt. I was talking about the pyramids in Ethiopia.
Ethiopia is an interesting place. We lose the thread of civilization there because the civilization was so old that it seems to have gone into decline, then collapse, and then a resurgence in the early Second Millenium. The national epic of Ethiopia is the Kebra Nagast (Translation by E. Wallace Budge published in 1922) which was first set to paper in the 1400's but existed in oral form into the time of the Old Testament. The Queen of Sheba, who was black, and her son feature prominently in the epic history of a very civilized ancient Black Culture in Ethiopia. As well one could go to Southern Africa where ruins so old they have mostly been worn down and covered with sand were reported by early explorers. David Hatcher Childress traveled into the area when it was still more or less safe and found hints of ruins, but they are so old and eroded, as well as covered by the drifting sands, that it is inconclusive. Lamestream academic archaeology isn't interested because it would upset too many apple carts. To discover and document ruins that apparently ancient would throw their timelines off and we just couldn't have that. The already printed textbook is much more important than actually doing science and going where the evidence leads. The late Robert Heinlein made an interesting observation that the majority of all major scientific advances are made by people who are widely regarded by many of their unimaginative contemporaries as kooks. I wish I had the quote handy but it would take me a while to locate. However, it is one of his non-fiction essays in the book "Expanded Universe". One could further expand one's horizons and speak of the Olmec Heads, busts, which have been uncovered since the 1800's. The problem that lamestream archaelogy runs into is that many of the "Olmec Heads" have obviously Negroid features. The lamestream has bent over backwards to try and assert that they're really Indians with big lips, but the physical evidence refutes them despite their attempts to explain it away. There is a good introduction by David Hatcher Childress on the Graham Hancock Website to the puzzle of the Olmecs of which we really do not know a lot. However, there is no amount of evidence which will convince the ignoratti of the White Supremacy crowd because like ignorant bigots in all times and places they substitute their delusions and fevered imaginings along with their self inflation to overcome their inadequacy by finding someone whom they can, without evidence of of course, designate as a lower order so that self designated superiority, regardless of whether or not it is justified or apparent to others, can be justified. And yes it is that convoluted. However, racism, positions of racial superiority are an interesting form of psychoses. There is no reason behind it, merely justification for it. All of their evidences of supposed genetic superiority can all be accounted for in terms of cultural and social setting. However, white supemacists have never been long on reason, it is just a matter of their own irrational need to assert that they's sapeerior to sumwhun. And a hearty Sieg Heil to you too. Of course as usual you are compelled by your own pathos to misrepresent my opinions, but there is nothing worse than letting facts and accurate representations get in the way of a little friendly back stabbing. "He ain't a racist pig like'n normul peepul so obviously he ain't got an uhpinion wurth considerin'." Of course you do not have the courage to write a counter to my arguments but instead substitute Argumentum Ad Hominem sniping. Truly an intellectually courageous position.
#68. To: Original_Intent (#67)
Heinlein Bump!
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Many of the smartest people I know are blacks, and I know many stupid whites. Should I project that onto both races?
I have a black coworker (grew up in Africa, educated in America) who can out-think anyone on this forum.
If you judge him by his race, who's the fool?
Are Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams, and Clarence Thomas, inferior?
I can list more if needed...
#45. To: Armadillo (#42)
(Edited)
There is nothing inferior about the intelligence of blacks.
#48. To: HOUNDDAWG, Original_Intent, Armadillo (#45)
Pure black Africans had never built a shelter that would last past the first rainstorm and in a land swarming with docile beasts they had never dreamed of a plow.
#57. To: farmfriend (#48)
Pure black Africans had never built a shelter that would last past the first rainstorm and in a land swarming with docile beasts they had never dreamed of a plow.
#61. To: HOUNDDAWG, Original_Intent (#57)
#67. To: farmfriend, HOUNDDAWG, Armadillo, christine, wudidiz, all (#61)
(Edited)
I wasn't talking about the pyramids of Egypt. I was talking about the pyramids in Ethiopia.
Olmec Heads with obviously Negroid features. And O_I's opinions are highly skewed on this topic and he won't hide the fact that once he exhausts his limited resources he'll substitute hostility, so he'll be of no use.
Remember, Hitler said, "8 lames walking arm in arm do not make one gladiator"!, and seven more like him or armadillo won't make one bit of difference ;)
Replies to Comment # 67. The late Robert Heinlein made an interesting observation that the majority of all major scientific advances are made by people who are widely regarded by many of their unimaginative contemporaries as kooks. I wish I had the quote handy but it would take me a while to locate. However, it is one of his non-fiction essays in the book "Expanded Universe".
End Trace Mode for Comment # 67.