Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: Best IRS Help Available
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.anti-irs.com/
Published: Sep 17, 2010
Author: Bill Conklin
Post Date: 2010-09-17 10:00:39 by wakeup
Keywords: None
Views: 2191
Comments: 12

If you presently have IRS troubles or,
want to know the proper way to prepare,
start with this introduction by Bill Conklin
then, go to his site and study. You will be
amazed at how quickly your anxiety disappears.

The truth does literally set you free from the
most powerful weapon the bastards have... fear.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All (#0) (Edited)

Two decades ago, my family was in deep trouble with the IRS. We had knocks on the door, scary letters, phone calls, liens on property, property seizures, Notices of Deficiency, audits, Tax Court issues and general stress related to the corrupt taxing system. Bill Conklin was able to teach us how to overcome in those desperate times.

If his wisdom was to become more popular there would be no more IRS, period. Please, if you have present IRS problems or, just want to know the truth about the Federal Income Tax, start by watching these old clips then, study Bill's site and download his book.

www.anti-irs.com/

Here is a quick look at a profound set of facts:
All individuals who file tax returns waive their Fifth Amendment Rights.
The Government cannot require individuals to waive their Fifth Amendment Rights.
Therefore, the Government cannot require individuals to file tax returns.

That is just a taste of the critical information we can all come to understand by studying Bill Conklin's book and site. Trust me, he knows whereof he speaks. I am fearless today partially because of his help.

Ron Neil

OneDollarDVDProject.com

wakeup  posted on  2010-09-17   10:12:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: wakeup (#1)

Most timely information as I try to throw together some numbers for '09's tribute.

Lod  posted on  2010-09-17   10:39:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: wakeup (#1)

Section. 1. The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.

Section. 2. The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority; — to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; — to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; — to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party; — to Controversies between two or more States; — between a State and Citizens of another State [Modified by Amendment XI]; — between Citizens of different States; — between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.

I am sure you know this but the 16th Amendment, even if it had been legally ratified (which it was not) did not actually give the government any taxing power they didn't already have. And the Supreme Court has so stated. That being the case, how many brain cells do people need to understand that their "compensation" (wages or salaries) are NOT the object of the income tax? It says right there in Article III that the Judges "...shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office..." Does taxing compensation "diminish" it? Only a seriously mentally challenged individual would say that it doesn't. And since Congress has no authority to diminish the salary of the judges and since the Constitution forbids titles of nobility they also have no authority to tax what people earn exercising their RIGHT to work in any common-law occupation. (Privileged occupations, those which require government licenses and permits MAY be taxable depending on the activity).

Another thing. Since it clearly states that "In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction," why did the government and Arizona start out in a district court with their dispute? Original jurisdiction lies with the Supreme Court, not the district courts or appellate courts.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

He (Gordon Duff) also implies that forcibly removing Obama, a Constitution-hating, on-the-down-low, crackhead Communist, is an attack on America, Mom, and apple pie. I swear these military people are worse than useless. Just look around at the condition of the country and tell me if they have fulfilled their oaths to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic.
OsamaBinGoldstein posted on 2010-05-25 9:39:59 ET (2 images) Reply Trace

James Deffenbach  posted on  2010-09-17   10:57:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: James Deffenbach (#3)

Since it clearly states that "In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction," why did the government and Arizona start out in a district court with their dispute? Original jurisdiction lies with the Supreme Court, not the district courts or appellate courts.

Are the terms State and STATE the same ? Is the Arizona Republic the same as AZ. ?

Is The STATE OF AZ a FEDERAL subsidiary of WASHINGTON D.C. ?

"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it."

Jesus Christ speaking to the Rabbis of his day.

noone222  posted on  2010-09-17   11:27:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Lod (#2)

If you choose to fight the filing issue, Bill suggests this approach. Fill out the 1040 then, give the Commissioner of the IRS the power of attorney to sign for you if he can do so without waving your 5th Amendment rights. And of course, he cannot. The IRS is not likely to stand you in front of a jury with that one. I like it. You get put on the back burner hopefully, forever. Be sure and find the info on his site about the frauds out there that would take your money while selling you bogus IRS arguments. It is very interesting. This guy is cutting edge smart.

Ron Neil

OneDollarDVDProject.com

wakeup  posted on  2010-09-17   12:21:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: wakeup (#5)

Be sure and find the info on his site about the frauds out there that would take your money while selling you bogus IRS arguments. It is very interesting. This guy is cutting edge smart.

Thanks for this thread, the information, and the link.

Lod  posted on  2010-09-17   12:36:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: noone222 (#4)

Are the terms State and STATE the same ? Is the Arizona Republic the same as AZ. ?

Is The STATE OF AZ a FEDERAL subsidiary of WASHINGTON D.C. ?

Point taken but do they not want the people to *think* that they pay some attention to the Constitution? And anyone who knows the Constitution should know that point,* should they not?

*The point about original versus appellate jurisdiction.

Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end.
Lord Acton

He (Gordon Duff) also implies that forcibly removing Obama, a Constitution-hating, on-the-down-low, crackhead Communist, is an attack on America, Mom, and apple pie. I swear these military people are worse than useless. Just look around at the condition of the country and tell me if they have fulfilled their oaths to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic.
OsamaBinGoldstein posted on 2010-05-25 9:39:59 ET (2 images) Reply Trace

James Deffenbach  posted on  2010-09-17   13:26:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: noone222 (#4)

Since it clearly states that "In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction," why did the government and Arizona start out in a district court with their dispute? Original jurisdiction lies with the Supreme Court, not the district courts or appellate courts.

even that is questionable, when you are speaking of Ambassadors of Christ, who is the one who has ultimate jurisdiction of His own...

"....TWO REFERENCES TO BELIEVERS CALLED "AMBASSADORS:"

 1 Cor. 5:20

 In Ephesians 6:19-20, Paul requests prayer 33;that utterance may be given unto me, that I may open my mouth boldly, to make known the mystery of the gospel, For which I am an ambassador in bonds: that therein I may speak boldly, as I ought to speak.33;

1. The MEANING of an ambassador (His worth as representative).

1. An official agent of one country on a mission in another country. They represent their country in a foreign country.

1. As an agent / deputy he acts on the behalf of another. When our ambassador goes to a foreign country he or she can act with the full authority of our government in areas where our leader has given them permission. They can only act or speak as they have been authorized.

2. An ambassador is not there to represent himself or his own views. He simply says what he has been commissioned to say.

3. An ambassador does not speak to please his audience, but the King who sent him.

4. An ambassador does not take rejection personally 33; he is accepted or rejected not on his own merit but because of who he represents.

2. A representative. He stands in the place of his sovereign. The honor and reputation of his country are in his hands. Everything he does and says reflects on the one who sent him.

We are representatives of THE KING OF KINGS.

3. An ambassador is not elected, but appointed. We are appointed by Christ (2 Cor. 5:18-20).

4. A foreigner. An ambassador is not a citizen of the country where he is sent. His loyalties is to where his citizenship resides. We are citizens of heaven (Phil. 3:20)......"

http://www.biblebaptistportorchard.com/?row=34

"The Issue of Heaven and Earth -- AUTHORITY

Pastor Al V. Hughes

....Authority is the imparted right to bring the power of another into operation. One stands at the crossing of two great intersections. Crowds of people are surging by; multitudes of high-powered automobiles rush along. A man in a uniform raises a hand. Instantly the traffic ceases. He beckons to the waiting hosts on the cross street, and they flow across. What is the explanation? The traffic officer has very little physical "power." His most strenuous efforts could not avail to hold back one of those passing cars. But he has something far better. He is vested with the "authority" of the state whose servant he is. The moving crowds recognize the authority and obey it. Authority, then, is DELEGATED POWER. Its value depends upon the force behind the user.

II. THE SOURCE OF AUTHORITY

All authority comes from God who is the final authority. The Bible says that God removes kings and He sets up kings (Dan. 2:21). When Jesus was brought before the Roman governor Pontius Pilate, Pilate asked Him, "Speakest thou not unto me? knowest thou not that I have power "authority" to crucify thee, and have power to release thee?" However, Jesus answered, "Thou couldest have no power at all against me, except it were given thee from above" (John 19:10-11). Daniel 4:17 says, "The most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will, and setteth up over it the basest of men."

The only authority anyone possesses is whatever authority that has been delegated by God. God is the only real authority. He has merely deputized us to do business for Him. Even the state is not sovereign. Only God is sovereign. "Jesus is the Lord." The only authority that the state has is was has been delegated of God. When any delegated authority loses sight of the Source of it?s authority corruption and abuses will follow. ...."

III. THE PURPOSE OF AUTHORITY

Authority is to be used (1) to serve and please the one who gave you your authority and (2) to protect those under your authority. It is given for the purpose of fulfilling the agenda of the one who delegated the authority. ......"

http://www.biblebaptistportorchard.com/?row=62

Of course, such thinking is labeled by the "Anti-Defamation" League and CorpUSA as "extremism", i.e., terrorism. But moving along....

Give unto God what is God's:

Haggai 2:8 The silver is mine and the gold is mine,' declares the Lord of hosts. bible.cc/haggai/2-8.htm

Haggai 2:9 The glory of this latter house shall be greater than of the former, saith the LORD of hosts: and in this place will I give peace, saith the LORD of hosts. bible.cc/haggai/2-9.htm

"One cannot have two masters."

ECC - ECCLESIASTIC COMMONWEALTH COMMUNITY -

The Unusual Way That Jesus Paid Taxes and How It May Be a Message to Modern Christians

By: Loy Robert: Bost, III

Jesus and His disciples had traveled to Capernaum. The tax collectors asked Peter if his Master, Jesus, paid tribute to Caesar; Peter told the tax collector that Jesus did pay tribute to Caesar. When Peter returned to the house that they were staying in, Jesus was upset with what Peter had done, and He prevented him from entering the house. He asked Peter, what he was thinking when he gave his answer to tax collector (Bible, Matthew 17: 24 and 17:25). Jesus was of the Royal Bloodline of King David. Jesus was, and is, the King of kings. God33;s only begotten Son surely owed no tax to any man; however, Jesus did not wish to offend anyone by not being true to the word of His disciple, so He instructed Peter to go to the sea, and cast a hook into the water. He further instructed Peter to take the first fish that he caught, and open its mouth and remove a piece of money therein, and use that piece of money to pay the tax for both of them (Bible, Matthew: 1:1 and 17:27).

What is the meaning of this strange ritual? Why didn33;t Jesus tell Peter to take a coin from his pocket or money pouch? Why not ask Peter to take a coin from under a rock? Jesus performed miracles; this was an opportune time to perform the old coin behind the ear trick, but instead he had Peter perform this unusual ritual instead; why? What message was Jesus trying to tell Christians by his actions?

The Pharisees apparently saw an opportunity to discredit Jesus when He paid the tax to Caesar. They asked Jesus if it was lawful to pay tribute to Caesar. Jesus asked the Pharisees to show Him a coin used to pay the tax, which they did. Jesus then asked them whose name and superscription was on the coin; they answered, Caesar33;s. Then Jesus told them to give to Caesar the things that are Caesar33;s, and give God the things that are God33;s. They marveled at his words and went on their way (Bible, Matthew: 22: 15 through 22:22, Mark: 12:12 through 12:17, Luke: 20:19 through 20:25).

Why did the Pharisees marvel so? Was Caesar trying to take something that was God33;s? If Caesar were not trying to take something that was God33;s, there would have been no point to the Pharisees even bringing up the subject, would there? Was there some process in the Roman tax laws that required the taxpayer to worship Caesar or some pagan god? If so, how would the unusual manner in which Jesus paid the tax prevent such worship from taking place? Just as importantly, are there any similarities between the tax laws of today and those of Jesus33; time, which should cause modern day Christians to be careful of how they pay their taxes? Does pagan Roman law still exist in the modern world? These are the questions being addressed in this treatise.

It is difficult to know the exact procedure used to pay Roman taxes in Jesus33; time on earth. However, it is interesting to note that Joseph and Mary, full with child, had gone to Bethlehem, the City of David, to be counted for what may have been the very first world-wide tax. While they were there, Jesus was born (Bible, Luke: 2:1 through 2:6). It is noteworthy to understand that God never wanted His people to be numbered. This practice has always been the work of Satan (Bible, 1 Chronicles: 21:1). In this instance, God may have used an evil work of men to fulfill an earlier prophesy; Jesus was to be numbered with the transgressors (Bible, Isaiah: 53:12). So it seems that Jesus was numbered by men, and with men, from the very day of His birth, and so the prophesy was fulfilled in Him. Though we do not know the exact procedure of worldwide Roman taxation, we do know that it started at essentially the same time as Jesus33; birth. We also know that this taxation was based on pagan Roman laws, and thus it was not based upon Gods laws.

To understand why the Pharisees took offense to Jesus33; tax paying, one must have a basic understanding of the laws of pagan Rome. The Romans worshiped a multitude of false gods; the belief in the powers of these false gods influenced the laws of pagan Rome. The god, Mars, was the Roman god of war. It is common knowledge that Martial law and Maritime law, which are generally enforced in Admiralty courts, are modern legal descendants of Roman law (Concentes Dii. Page 1).

Martial law is implemented in times of war or national emergency, and Maritime law is used primarily on the high seas. It is a commonly known historical fact that the expansion of ancient Rome was advanced largely by military action; therefore, the Roman33;s belief in the false god, Mars, was likely to have been influential in the ruling of the lands conquered by Rome. The false god, Mercury, was the messenger of the gods. He was also the god of commerce; law Merchant and Mercantile law are also modern day descendants of Roman law. The wealth and commerce of the lands conquered by ancient Rome was likely to have been a motivational factor for invading the lands to begin with, so the Roman33;s belief in the false god, Mercury, may have been very influential in the laws governing the lands conquered by Rome as well (Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law 33;1996. See: Admiralty, Law Merchant, Maritime, Martial law. Concentes Dii. page 1. A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States and of the Several States of the American Union, Revised Sixth Edition, 1856, See: Admiralty, Maritime, Maritime Law, War).

The pagan god worship associated with Roman laws, combined with the fact that there were temples in some Roman cities that were erected for the worship of Caesar himself, makes it easy to see why the Pharisees may have thought that Jesus was honoring false gods by paying taxes to Rome. However, it is not quite clear how the ritualistic methodology used by Jesus clearly showed to the Pharisees that no such honor to false gods was being bestowed. Therefore, in order to understand Jesus33; instructions to Peter, one must first understand what the sea, the fish, and the coin symbolize under the Roman law. Only then can the full magnitude of Christ33;s instructions be completely understood. Therefore, it is convenient for the sake of this treatise that Roman law is still in existence today, and can be studied in its present form quite carefully (8. Historical Setting. Page 1).

The following may seem off topic at first; however, it is relevant to the subject at hand, which will be obvious later in this treatise. The people of the United States are subject to the Civil law; Civil law is legally defined simply as 33;Roman Law33; by Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law 33;1996. Thus, a look at our own laws might give some insight as to the function of the laws in Jesus33; time on earth. Contrary to popular belief, it is an established fact that the United States Federal Government was dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719. It was declared by President Roosevelt to be bankrupt and insolvent. The 33;Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause33; [H. J. R. 192, 73rd. Congress in session June 5, 1933] dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Government Offices, Officers and Departments (United States Congressional Record. page H-1303).

If the United States Federal Government exists today, it is in name only. The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International Bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. All United States Offices, Officials, and Departments now operate within a de facto status under Emergency War Powers. These International Bankers have become the 33;Caesars33; of the modern world. Just as in Jesus33; time on earth, the government, the people, and the money are in the hands of a foreign power (Caesar) and the rules of Roman law (United States Congressional Record. page H-1303).

To understand how Roman law is enforced in the United States, one must understand that the Federal Reserve System is a sovereign power structure separate and distinct from the federal United States government. It operates exclusively under Admiralty/Maritime law. The Maritime law compels specific performance in paying the interest (tax), or premiums on the National Debt. The Federal Government borrows as much of the credit based 33;money substitute33; [debt based credit] that it wishes from the privately owned Federal Reserve System. In return, the Government has "hypothecated" all of the property within the federal United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve. The U.S. citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a "beneficiary" of an alleged trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets and labor of their "subjects," the 14th Amendment U.S. citizens, to the Federal Reserve System. The purported tax that is paid by US citizens is merely interest being paid on the government33;s debt obligations to the Federal Reserve System. Thus, the Federal U.S. bankruptcy is serviced. This may seem irrelevant to the subject at hand; however, it illustrates the very essence of the basic mechanics of modern Roman law (United States Congressional Record. page H-1303)

The above described Maritime law is the law of the sea. The sea was where Jesus told Peter to cast his hook; perhaps the "sea," that Jesus spoke of, may have been representative of the pagan Roman legal system, which still exists today. Spurning further similarities to His parable, the Certified Birth Certificates that are now issued to all children born in the United States are presently used as a commercial paper hypothecated to back the Federal Reserve Notes. A "certificate" by legal definition can be defined as: a document that is proof of ownership or indebtedness." The all capitalized name on the Certified Birth Certificates indicates that the individual named is a "legal person." A "legal person" is legally defined as "a body of persons or an entity (as a corporation) considered as having many of the rights and responsibilities of a natural person and esp. the capacity to sue and be sued." Thus, the people of the United States have become a corporate entity, both individually and collectively as part of the Gross National Product (Gross National Product. Page 1). Further, a "corporation" is defined as: "an invisible, intangible, artificial creation of the law existing as a voluntary chartered association of individuals that has most of the rights and duties of natural persons but with perpetual existence and limited liability". It is obvious that a fish owes its existence and charter powers to the sea, so perhaps the "first fish" that Jesus spoke of might be referring to the corporate "person" created at birth by the Roman civil law, which owes its existence and powers to the law of the sea (Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law 1996. See: corporation).

In present times people in the United States are legally considered corporate (legal) persons created by the State through the application of Roman law. This is evident by the fact that U.S. citizens are legally required to get permission from the State in the form of licenses and permits to engage in rights that were originally considered God given but are now legally considered to be civil rights granted by the State. To support this contention, consider the requirement to get driver33;s licenses, building permits, fishing licenses, hunting licenses, passports, zoning permits, and marriage licenses just to name a few. All of these licenses and permits bear the all capitalized and/or initialed names of persons created by the State under Roman civil law.

A Christian name is not properly spelled with all capital letters or initials (Style Manual, Chapter 3 at 33; 3.2). It is interesting to note that the translators of the King James Version of the Holy Bible translated Jesus33; name in all capital letters six times in the New Testament: Matthew:1:21, Matthew:1:25, Matthew:27:37, Luke:1:31, Luke:2:21, and John:19:19. All of these verses refer to Jesus33; name given at His birth or His death. The modern day birth and death certificates bear similar all capitalized names.

Perhaps Jesus was falsely considered to be a 33;legal person33; by the Roman authorities of His day, just as we are today. New Testament Scripture states that God has no respect for persons at: Acts: 10:34, Romans: 2:11, Ephesians: 6:9, Colossians: 3:25, James: 2:9 and 1 Peter: 1:17. Simon Peter warned the Christians that 33;false teachers33; through greed and lies would make merchandise of them (Bible, 2 Peter: 2:1 through 2:3). It seems quite plausible that the same situation might still exist today. When one looks at modern day 1040 tax forms, instructions, and Subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code, one will notice that the instructions apply to certain 33;persons33; as distinguished from 33;people.33; The word 33;people33; refers to men and women. Men and women are the creation of God (Bible, Genesis: 1:26 through 1:27 and Genesis: 2:7 through 2:8). No matter which legal dictionary one chooses, 33;man33; nor 33;woman33; nor 33;people33; will ever be used in the definition of a 33;person.33; Further, no legal dictionary attempts to define 33;people33; at all. Therefore, one must conclude that 33;persons33; and 33;people33; are not considered to be synonymous in the eyes of the law (A Dictionary of Law 1893, A Law Dictionary 1856, Websters Dictionary of Law 1996. See: person, 33;people33; not listed in any source).

When one fills out a 1040 tax form, he/she is apparently admitting, by swearing an oath under the penalty of perjury, to being a legal person, which is a creation of Roman civil law. 33;Perjury33; is legally defined as: 33;the act or crime of knowingly making a false statement (as about a material matter) while under oath or bound by an affirmation or other officially prescribed declaration that what one says, writes, or claims is true.33; 33;Oath33; is legally defined as: a solemn attestation of the truth of one's words or the sincerity of one's intentions33; specifically: 33;one accompanied by calling upon a deity as a witness33; (A Dictionary of Law 1893, See: perjury, and oath). Jesus warned Christians that above all they should not to swear any oaths or they would fall into condemnation (Bible, James: 5:12). Jesus told Peter that He would give him the keys to the Kingdom of Heaven, but in the same verse He told Peter that whatever is bound on earth is also bound in Heaven; further, he stated that what is lost on earth is also lost in heaven (Bible, Matthew: 16:19).

Perhaps through ignorance of the mechanics of Roman civil law, many Christians are unwittingly swearing an oath to God, via 1040 tax forms, stating that they are 33;persons33; created by the operation of pagan Roman law and are therefore not 33;people33; created by God the Father; if so, this would be a direct breach of the First Commandment (Bible. Exodus: 20:3). In the opinion of this author, the unusual way that Jesus paid taxes was an example to all Christians as to how they should pay their taxes. Jesus knew full well that He was not a creation of pagan Roman law, the law of the sea." He had Peter remove a coin from the mouth of the 33;first fish33; that he caught, and instructed Peter to use that coin to pay the tax. Therefore, by removing the money from the mouth of the fish, Jesus was refusing to speak as a creation of the law of the 33;sea.33; Thus, one can conclude that Christians should speak as the man/women and living soul that God created and pay the tax that is requested without compromising the lawful stature granted to them by God (Bible. Genesis: 2:7). In this manner Jesus rendered unto Caesar the things that were Caesars, and rendered unto God the things that were Gods. If this hypothesis is correct then it is no wonder that the Pharisees marveled at Jesus33; words.

Works Cited

God. The Holy Bible. King James Version

The Speaker - Rep. James Traficant, Jr. (Ohio) addressing the House. United States Congressional Record. March 1, 1993 VOL. 33, page H-1303.

Merriam-Webster, Incorporated. Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law. 1996 ed.

United States Government Printing Office. Style Manual. March 1984 ed. [provides comprehensive grammar, style and usage for all government publications, including court and legal writing]. William C. Anderson.

A Dictionary of Law: A Dictionary and Compendium of American and English Jurisprudence. T. H. Flood and Company: Chicago, 1893.

Bouvier, John. A Law Dictionary: Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States of America and of the Several States of the Union: With References to the Civil and other Systems of Foreign Law. 6th ed. Childs and Peterson, Philadelphia, 1856.

Concentes Dii. Internet Source. Available at: http://members.tripod.com/~onespiritx/gods35.htm#Mars Ares .

8. Historical Setting. Internet Source. Available at: http://www.apocalipsis.org/rev-hist.htm.

Gross National Product. Internet Source. Available at: http://www.cftech.com/BrainBank/...RATION/GrossNatlProd.html.

Loy Robert: Bost, III
Edited by - loybost on 29 May 2005...."

http://ecclesia.org/forum/topic.asp?topic_id=450

Give unto Caesar's what is Caesar's: PAPER! He stole God's gold and silver from God's temple [ bible.cc/1_corinthians/3-16.htm / www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55421 ]. Caesar created paper in their place. Give it back to him!

http://www.truthsetsusfree.com/HJR192.htm

["..... (a) every provision contained in or made with respect to any obligation which purports to give the obligee a right to require payments in gold or a particular kind of coin or currency, or in an amount in money of the United States measured thereby, is declared to be against public policy; and no such provision shall be contained in or made with respect to any obligation hereafter incurred. Every obligation, heretofore or hereafter incurred, whether or not any such provision is contained therein or made with respect thereto, shall be discharged upon payment, dollar for dollar, in any coin or currency which at time of payment is legal tender for public and private debts.......Note: "payment of debt" is now against Congressional and "public policy" and henceforth, "Every obligation . . . Shall be discharged."

As a result of HJR 192, and from that day forward (June 5, 1933), no one in this nation has been able to lawfully pay a debt or lawfully own anything. The only thing one can do, is tender in transfer of debts, with the debt being perpetual. The suspension of the gold standard, and prohibition against paying debts, removed the substance for our common law to operate on, and created a void as far as the law is concerned. This substance was replaced with a "PUBLIC NATIONAL CREDIT SYSTEM" where debt is "LEGAL TENDER" money.

HJR 192 was implemented immediately. The day after President Roosevelt signed the resolution, the treasury offered the public new government securities, minus the traditional "payable in gold" clause.

192 states that one cannot demand a certain form of currency that they want to receive if it is dollar for dollar. If you review the Modern Money Mechanics article you will discover that all currency is your credit! The Federal Reserve calls it "monetized debt." "

"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2010-09-19   14:58:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#8)

p.s.

search "WHY THE UCC FILING?"

because....

"....He who has the gold pays the debt...."

"...as long as there..remain active enemies of the Christian church, we may hope to become Master of the World...the future Jewish King will never reign in the world before Christianity is overthrown - B'nai B'rith speech http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/luther.htm / http://bible.cc/psalms/83-4.htm

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2010-09-19   15:13:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#8)

Just a short response so that you know I'm studying your post.

My personal situation operates under the premise of your post, meaning I chose to repent of my shortcomings and let God be my master and Sovereign. Otherwise, I don't think I could have been confident of my (earthly) future. (If God be for me who can be against me ?)

Anyhow, I've been blessed with a pretty trouble-free experience because I look at things from every perspective I can imagine before acting upon anything. I've witnessed many very good people with very good concepts and the best of intentions get into trouble because they were inconsiderate of their secular brethern. What I mean is that often times the truth is stranger than fiction to such a degree that those among us of a secular nature that are sometimes making decisions affecting us are incapable of seeing through the fog that was created through the education process ... and they see us as insane.

Then, even though they feel badly, they rule against us because our presentation appears too extreme or too far out of the realm of their reality.

I don't know if I have ever mentioned this to you before, but I was once profiled for a job through a 500 (plus) question test. The test inquired as to whether I was a secret agent of God (at about question number 550) and I answered "yes" ! [I said yes because I thought they were assholes for asking.) However, 40 years later I have to wonder if some other reason was intended by my ultimate Master.

I've watched a lot of people try a lot of things that cost them everything. And while you and I might accept someone's testimony that they're an Ambassador of God deserving immunity from man's sense of law ... I don't think anyone being tried in one of our courts would find 12 (or even 6) people that would agree.

Patience and study are a virtue.

Last thing: When I determined to operate my life by God's standards I also understood that persecution was likely. I'm not perfect by any stretch but I can say that God is and has more than kept His Word as far as protection is concerned.

"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it."

Jesus Christ speaking to the Rabbis of his day.

noone222  posted on  2010-09-20   6:13:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#8)

When Peter returned to the house that they were staying in, Jesus was upset with what Peter had done, and He prevented him from entering the house. He asked Peter, what he was thinking when he gave his answer to tax collector (Bible, Matthew 17: 24 and 17:25). Jesus was of the Royal Bloodline of King David. Jesus was, and is, the King of kings. God33;s only begotten Son surely owed no tax to any man; however, Jesus did not wish to offend anyone by not being true to the word of His disciple, so He instructed Peter to go to the sea, and cast a hook into the water. He further instructed Peter to take the first fish that he caught, and open its mouth and remove a piece of money therein, and use that piece of money to pay the tax for both of them (Bible, Matthew: 1:1 and 17:27).

Personally, I think this commentary is bullshit and misleading.

Here's the relevant scripture: Matthew 17:24 And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute?

25 He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers?

26 Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free.

To me it's very clear that Jesus was differentiating between "BIRTHRIGHT" and "PRIVILEGE" !

If someone is born in a place they have a (birth) RIGHT to LIVE THERE [FREE]. RIGHTS cannot be legitimately taxed because as the Supreme Court has stated "the power to tax is the power to destroy" ... The commentary makes Jesus as a Sovereign immune to the tax when the clear meaning of Jesus' words is about BIRTHRIGHT.

The tax collector was "asking" if Jesus paid the tribute because he didn't recognise him as a native or citizen, thinking him to be a foreigner or "stranger" !

In the Bible it says "they will make merchandise of your soul" ... whether people realize it or not ... a soul is and always has been a "physical body" = your physical body ... and the Socialist Security system of today has done exactly that !

Why else would they send and record your (soul) birth certificate to THE COMMERCE DEPARTMENT ?

"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it."

Jesus Christ speaking to the Rabbis of his day.

noone222  posted on  2010-09-20   7:01:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Lod (#2)

Most timely information as I try to throw together some numbers for '09's tribute.

I haven't filed in 21 years. Still watching the windows, though.

~~~~~~~
Best Movie Monologue

OneDollarDVDProject.com

wakeup  posted on  2010-10-28   1:24:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest