[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats

Texas Flood

Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas

Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Mosoud Pezeshkian

PROOF Netanyahu Wants US To Fight His Wars

RAPID CRUSTAL MOVEMENT DETECTED- Are the Unusual Earthquakes TRIGGER for MORE (in Japan and Italy) ?

Google Bets Big On Nuclear Fusion

Iran sets a world record by deporting 300,000 illegal refugees in 14 days

Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills

Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole

Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands

Why CNN & Fareed Zakaria are Wrong About Iran and Trump

Something Is Going Deeply WRONG In Russia

329 Rivers in China Exceed Flood Warnings, With 75,000 Dams in Critical Condition

Command Of Russian Army 'Undermined' After 16 Of Putin's Generals Killed At War, UK Says

Rickards: Superintelligence Will Never Arrive

Which Countries Invest In The US The Most?

The History of Barbecue

‘Pathetic’: Joe Biden tells another ‘tall tale’ during rare public appearance

Lawsuit Reveals CDC Has ZERO Evidence Proving Vaccines Don't Cause Autism

Trumps DOJ Reportedly Quietly Looking Into Criminal Charges Against Election Officials

Volcanic Risk and Phreatic (Groundwater) eruptions at Campi Flegrei in Italy

Russia Upgrades AGS-17 Automatic Grenade Launcher!

They told us the chickenpox vaccine was no big deal—just a routine jab to “protect” kids from a mild childhood illness

Pentagon creates new military border zone in Arizona

For over 200 years neurological damage from vaccines has been noted and documented

The killing of cardiologist in Gaza must be Indonesia's wake-up call

Marandi: Israel Prepares Proxies for Next War with Iran?

"Hitler Survived WW2 And I Brought Proof" Norman Ohler STUNS Joe Rogan

CIA Finally Admits a Pyschological Warfare Agent from the Agency “Came into Contact” with Lee Harvey Oswald before JFK’s Assassination


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Three reasons Christine O’Donnell might actually win
Source: TheHill
URL Source: http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-bl ... ne-odonnell-might-actually-win
Published: Sep 19, 2010
Author: John Feehery
Post Date: 2010-09-19 11:04:07 by TooConservative
Keywords: O, Delaware
Views: 983
Comments: 77

Three reasons Christine O’Donnell might actually win

John Feehery - 09/16/10 11:33 AM ET

I got caught up in the moment Tuesday night and expressed my disgust with the primary victory in Delaware of Christine O’Donnell.

I didn’t (and don’t) think she is qualified to be a United States senator. I bought into the notion that Delaware is a traditionally blue state and that it required a moderate like Mike Castle to win. And I expressed, in fairly tough terms, how frustrated I was with conservative activists who seemingly would rather lose elections on purpose than have candidates they agree with 60 percent of the time win.

My principal frustration has to do, though, with Christine O’Donnell. I might agree with her position on all of the big issues (I am pro-life, anti-tax increase, pro-spending cuts), but I still don’t think she has exhibited the character necessary to occupy a Senate office. I think you have to pay your bills, pay your taxes, pay your tuition and generally be a good citizen who keeps your financial commitments to be qualified to be a United States senator. O’Donnell has a spotty track record on all counts, from what I hear.

I disagree with Mike Castle on many of his positions and votes, but I think he is a good person and a great public servant. I think he voted wrong on cap-and-trade, and his efforts on the Disclose Act were wrong-headed and anti-Republican. So I can see why conservatives wanted to vote against him. Believe me, I get it.

All that being said, the primary is over, and now we have to look at the election ahead of us. Here are four reasons O’Donnell, despite all her flaws, might very well win.

Her opponent: Chris Coons is terrible. He has been terrible when it comes to protecting the taxpayers and the fiscal integrity of the county he currently runs. According to a National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) analysis: “As New Castle County’s spending skyrocketed by 10 percent under Coons’s leadership, he shifted the burden for his irresponsibility to taxpayers with three massive property tax hikes of 5 percent, 17.5 percent and 25 percent respectively. In 2008, Fitch Ratings downgraded the county’s ‘rating outlook’ from stable to negative because the county’s cash balances were decreasing under Coons’s reckless stewardship.”

Her supporters: O’Donnell has become the newest media superstar, and that has helped her get the money necessary to run a decent campaign. The NRSC changed course and gave her the maximum donation allowed under law, and most Republican senators and presidential candidates will follow suit. In fact, she reportedly raised more than $500,000 the day after her primary win, with some reports saying she raised close to a million. That is a pretty impressive take for a woman who has no chance of winning.

Her state: Yes, Delaware has been a blue state, but it is not clear if that is because of the politicians or because of the voters themselves. Tom Carper, for example, is one of the most moderate Democrats out there. He is not from the Bernie Sanders school of Democrats, because he knows he can’t be. And while Mike Castle has been a very moderate Republican, his moderation came not because he had to vote that way, but because, as a former governor, he wanted to vote that way. Sure, Joe Biden had been unchallenged for a generation, but that doesn’t mean the state is deep-blue. It just means that Biden had been around for a long time. Delaware has one big city (Wilmington) and the rest is as rural as Alabama. The rural voters, given the choice, will vote like Alabamans. And as they showed in this election, they are motivated to vote, more so than the moderates.

The times: This is one of those elections where no incumbent is safe, and nobody with a record of raising taxes and raising spending is the favorite. This midterm election is a referendum on President Obama, and those who dislike him are much more likely to come out to vote. As Dick Morris points out in The Hill today, because fiscal issues are front and center in this election, conservatives are much more likely to do better, because people trust conservatives not to raise their taxes.

O’Donnell has a real shot at winning this thing. I don’t know if she will, given her flaws as a candidate, but I do know that my instant analysis that this seat was a goner was hasty and premature. This ain’t over till it’s over. And this year, who knows what will happen?


Poster Comment:

The latest news coverage from Taiwan:

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 39.

#6. To: TooConservative (#0)

Three reasons Christine O’Donnell might actually win

1. Pro-Israel.

2. Pro-Israel.

3. Pro-War

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-09-19   11:24:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Original_Intent (#6) (Edited)

1. Pro-Israel.

2. Pro-Israel.

3. Pro-War

AFAIK, the wars and Israel haven't been mentioned by either party in these primaries in DE.

TooConservative  posted on  2010-09-19   11:44:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: TooConservative (#13)

the wars and Israel haven't been mentioned by either party in these primaries in DE.

Right.....see no evil, hear no evil and speak no evil. Modern day campaign method of operations.

I find O'Donnell's $6.9 million dollar lawsuit against the think tank that formerly employed her and and then fired her compelling. She dropped the suit, due to lack of money to pay the attorneys according to her.....but I think she didn't have much of a case and was chasing millions via lawsuit. She's a real politician at heart....She will fit right in in DC.

abraxas  posted on  2010-09-19   12:21:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: abraxas (#19)

I find O'Donnell's $6.9 million dollar lawsuit against the think tank that formerly employed her and and then fired her compelling. She dropped the suit, due to lack of money to pay the attorneys according to her.....but I think she didn't have much of a case and was chasing millions via lawsuit.

I'm not saying she's a great candidate.

I'm saying Coons is really lousy too. And in an anti-Obongo election.

I'd like to see some bumper stickers like:

No Marxist Coons In DC

That would be a lovely political item.

TooConservative  posted on  2010-09-19   12:26:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: TooConservative (#23)

lol......all I am saying is Give Third Parties a chance......

It's NOW or NEVER, this land can't wait.

Screw Green and O'Donnell......no need for a comparative analysis of who is less qualified. Isn't there an Independent, a Constitutionalist, or, dare I say, a Libertarian in the state to stand up and expose the idiocy of the two party fraud?

I can't stand ANY incumbents at this time, but the Dem/Rep offering is like picking between the last hard crouton and raisin at the end of the buffet line.

abraxas  posted on  2010-09-19   12:39:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: abraxas (#27)

lol......all I am saying is Give Third Parties a chance......

I agree with Ron Paul. Trying to stay on the ballot and form organizations in fifty states is too hard. Much easier to take over an existing party, just as the Republicans took over the Whig party.

This country has only ever had two real political parties. The system is self-reinforcing.

TooConservative  posted on  2010-09-19   12:47:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: TooConservative (#29)

This country has only ever had two real political parties. The system is self-reinforcing.

Right, continue to do what is distructive and corrupt to the core simply because the corrupt and failing system has been in place and is self reinforcing. Hello!!! Where's the logic in that?

Why take over a party you don't believe in, that has a proven track record of pissing on the people and NOT representing the people? Both Dems and Reps fall into THIS catagory. Who wants either one of them and if you do, why?

You don't keep trying to modify a recipe when the ingredients are rotten and moldy, TC. If you do, you are destined to create more of what you find distasteful. Better to trash it.......the sooner the better.

abraxas  posted on  2010-09-19   13:00:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: abraxas (#31)

You don't keep trying to modify a recipe when the ingredients are rotten and moldy, TC.

The view of a political neophyte.

This is, of course, why George Washington and others disdained political parties entirely.

But politics was and is a messy business. You have to recognize that or decide to ignore it and stop voting.

TooConservative  posted on  2010-09-19   13:06:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: TooConservative (#33)

The view of a political neophyte.

No, I am simply a person who gages success realistically. We are in this piss poor state due to the two party fraud. The people are only destined for MORE failure and corruption on this path.

To think that you can "fix" it by treading on the same path is to bury your head in the sand and completely discard all facts to the contrary. IMHO, THIS is the naive and neophyte perspective. Especially this silly argument that it's been this way for a long time, so we are "helpless" to do anything other than get behind the same worthless parties election in and election out.

This mentality leads to a nation of American'ts not Americans. No, not voting

abraxas  posted on  2010-09-19   13:19:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: abraxas (#35)

Well, I'm not sure that O'Donnell means much either way in the big picture.

She is driving those like Snowe/Collins to the right so she isn't all bad. The Dims are a little more scared too, those like Nelson.

The rest of your remarks are simple anti-partisan complaints. Maybe you should come up with a better system. Good luck with that.

TooConservative  posted on  2010-09-19   13:48:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: TooConservative (#36)

The rest of your remarks are simple anti-partisan complaints. Maybe you should come up with a better system. Good luck with that.

Sheesh, a good start would be to NOT continue to do the same damn thing and expect something different TC. What you will get is more failure and corruption, as I stated before. Why is this so difficult for you to grasp? Looking for "change" or "hope" in the two party fraud is as naive as voting for Obama. It's a case of an inability to see the forest for the two party fraud trees.

O'Donnell isn't really going to make any difference at all......that's my point. But, getting her into office paves the way for more of the same, no difference candidates who take up space and suck of the taxpayers teat while driving another nail in the coffin of the USA--more war, more partisan bickery, more blame game and no real solutions to ANYTHING. Why cheer for that?

abraxas  posted on  2010-09-19   13:57:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: abraxas (#37)

It's a little GOP Tea Party sideshow.

Her stealing the Castle crown and catching both parties so unprepared tickles me to no end. Women like that aren't supposed to be able to do that.

The Dims ran a sacrifice candidate against an unstoppable old RINO, Castle. Except Christine grabbed the RINO crown and ran off with it, cackling at them. You just don't have a sense of political irony if you don't find that humorous.

The fact that both she and Coons are such awful candidates just makes it all even funnier.

However, her primary demonstrated just how vulnerable both GOP and Dims are in a lot of states considered to be quite Blue. Delaware is nothing like Alaska with Miller or Kentucky with Rand Paul.

TooConservative  posted on  2010-09-19   14:12:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 39.

        There are no replies to Comment # 39.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 39.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]