[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Elon Goes "DARK MAGA" - Joins Trump ON STAGE! Media Melt Down Ensues

The Truth About the Memphis Belle (No Hollywood)

JD Vance ENDS CNN Dana Bash’s Career LIVE on Air

Hell Let Loose - MOATS with George Galloway

Important Message: Our Country Our Choice

Israel is getting SLAUGHTERED in Lebanon, Americans are trapped | Redacted

Warren Buffett has said: “I could end the deficit in five minutes.

FBI seizes Diddy tape showing Hillary Clinton killing a child at a 'Freak Off' party

Numbers of dairy cow deaths from bird flu increasing to alarming rates

Elites Just Told Us How They'll SILENCE US!

Reese Report: The 2024 October Surprise?

Americans United in Crisis: Mules Carry Supplies to Neighbors Trapped by Hurricanes Devastation in NC

NC STATE POLICE WILL START ARRESTING FEDS THAT ARE BLOCKING AIDE FROM OUTSIDE SOURCES

France BANS ARMS SALES To Israel & Netanyahu LASHES OUT At Macron | Iran GETS READY

CNN Drops Bomb on Tim Walz, Releases Blistering Segment Over Big Scandals in His Own State

EU concerned it has no influence over Israel FT

How Israels invasion of Lebanon poses risks to Turkiye

Obama's New Home in Dubai?,

Vaccine Skeptics Need To Be Silenced! Bill Gates

Hillary Clinton: We Lose Total Control If Social Media Companies Dont Moderate Content

Cancer Patients Report Miraculous Recoveries from Ivermectin Treatment

Hurricane Aid Stolen By The State Of Tennessee?

The Pentagon requests $1.2bn to continue Red Sea mission

US security officials warn of potential threats within two weeks, ramped-up patrols.

Massive Flooding Coming From Hurricane Milton

How the UK is becoming a ‘third-world’ economy

What Would World War III Really Look Like? It's Already Starting...

The Roots Of The UK Implosion And Why War Is Inevitable

How The Jew Thinks

“In five years, scientists predict we will have the first ice-free Arctic summer" John Kerry in 2009


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Three reasons Christine O’Donnell might actually win
Source: TheHill
URL Source: http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-bl ... ne-odonnell-might-actually-win
Published: Sep 19, 2010
Author: John Feehery
Post Date: 2010-09-19 11:04:07 by TooConservative
Keywords: O, Delaware
Views: 672
Comments: 77

Three reasons Christine O’Donnell might actually win

John Feehery - 09/16/10 11:33 AM ET

I got caught up in the moment Tuesday night and expressed my disgust with the primary victory in Delaware of Christine O’Donnell.

I didn’t (and don’t) think she is qualified to be a United States senator. I bought into the notion that Delaware is a traditionally blue state and that it required a moderate like Mike Castle to win. And I expressed, in fairly tough terms, how frustrated I was with conservative activists who seemingly would rather lose elections on purpose than have candidates they agree with 60 percent of the time win.

My principal frustration has to do, though, with Christine O’Donnell. I might agree with her position on all of the big issues (I am pro-life, anti-tax increase, pro-spending cuts), but I still don’t think she has exhibited the character necessary to occupy a Senate office. I think you have to pay your bills, pay your taxes, pay your tuition and generally be a good citizen who keeps your financial commitments to be qualified to be a United States senator. O’Donnell has a spotty track record on all counts, from what I hear.

I disagree with Mike Castle on many of his positions and votes, but I think he is a good person and a great public servant. I think he voted wrong on cap-and-trade, and his efforts on the Disclose Act were wrong-headed and anti-Republican. So I can see why conservatives wanted to vote against him. Believe me, I get it.

All that being said, the primary is over, and now we have to look at the election ahead of us. Here are four reasons O’Donnell, despite all her flaws, might very well win.

Her opponent: Chris Coons is terrible. He has been terrible when it comes to protecting the taxpayers and the fiscal integrity of the county he currently runs. According to a National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) analysis: “As New Castle County’s spending skyrocketed by 10 percent under Coons’s leadership, he shifted the burden for his irresponsibility to taxpayers with three massive property tax hikes of 5 percent, 17.5 percent and 25 percent respectively. In 2008, Fitch Ratings downgraded the county’s ‘rating outlook’ from stable to negative because the county’s cash balances were decreasing under Coons’s reckless stewardship.”

Her supporters: O’Donnell has become the newest media superstar, and that has helped her get the money necessary to run a decent campaign. The NRSC changed course and gave her the maximum donation allowed under law, and most Republican senators and presidential candidates will follow suit. In fact, she reportedly raised more than $500,000 the day after her primary win, with some reports saying she raised close to a million. That is a pretty impressive take for a woman who has no chance of winning.

Her state: Yes, Delaware has been a blue state, but it is not clear if that is because of the politicians or because of the voters themselves. Tom Carper, for example, is one of the most moderate Democrats out there. He is not from the Bernie Sanders school of Democrats, because he knows he can’t be. And while Mike Castle has been a very moderate Republican, his moderation came not because he had to vote that way, but because, as a former governor, he wanted to vote that way. Sure, Joe Biden had been unchallenged for a generation, but that doesn’t mean the state is deep-blue. It just means that Biden had been around for a long time. Delaware has one big city (Wilmington) and the rest is as rural as Alabama. The rural voters, given the choice, will vote like Alabamans. And as they showed in this election, they are motivated to vote, more so than the moderates.

The times: This is one of those elections where no incumbent is safe, and nobody with a record of raising taxes and raising spending is the favorite. This midterm election is a referendum on President Obama, and those who dislike him are much more likely to come out to vote. As Dick Morris points out in The Hill today, because fiscal issues are front and center in this election, conservatives are much more likely to do better, because people trust conservatives not to raise their taxes.

O’Donnell has a real shot at winning this thing. I don’t know if she will, given her flaws as a candidate, but I do know that my instant analysis that this seat was a goner was hasty and premature. This ain’t over till it’s over. And this year, who knows what will happen?


Poster Comment:

The latest news coverage from Taiwan:

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 41.

#6. To: TooConservative (#0)

Three reasons Christine O’Donnell might actually win

1. Pro-Israel.

2. Pro-Israel.

3. Pro-War

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-09-19   11:24:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Original_Intent (#6) (Edited)

1. Pro-Israel.

2. Pro-Israel.

3. Pro-War

AFAIK, the wars and Israel haven't been mentioned by either party in these primaries in DE.

TooConservative  posted on  2010-09-19   11:44:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: TooConservative (#13)

the wars and Israel haven't been mentioned by either party in these primaries in DE.

Right.....see no evil, hear no evil and speak no evil. Modern day campaign method of operations.

I find O'Donnell's $6.9 million dollar lawsuit against the think tank that formerly employed her and and then fired her compelling. She dropped the suit, due to lack of money to pay the attorneys according to her.....but I think she didn't have much of a case and was chasing millions via lawsuit. She's a real politician at heart....She will fit right in in DC.

abraxas  posted on  2010-09-19   12:21:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: abraxas (#19)

I find O'Donnell's $6.9 million dollar lawsuit against the think tank that formerly employed her and and then fired her compelling. She dropped the suit, due to lack of money to pay the attorneys according to her.....but I think she didn't have much of a case and was chasing millions via lawsuit.

I'm not saying she's a great candidate.

I'm saying Coons is really lousy too. And in an anti-Obongo election.

I'd like to see some bumper stickers like:

No Marxist Coons In DC

That would be a lovely political item.

TooConservative  posted on  2010-09-19   12:26:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: TooConservative (#23)

lol......all I am saying is Give Third Parties a chance......

It's NOW or NEVER, this land can't wait.

Screw Green and O'Donnell......no need for a comparative analysis of who is less qualified. Isn't there an Independent, a Constitutionalist, or, dare I say, a Libertarian in the state to stand up and expose the idiocy of the two party fraud?

I can't stand ANY incumbents at this time, but the Dem/Rep offering is like picking between the last hard crouton and raisin at the end of the buffet line.

abraxas  posted on  2010-09-19   12:39:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: abraxas (#27)

lol......all I am saying is Give Third Parties a chance......

I agree with Ron Paul. Trying to stay on the ballot and form organizations in fifty states is too hard. Much easier to take over an existing party, just as the Republicans took over the Whig party.

This country has only ever had two real political parties. The system is self-reinforcing.

TooConservative  posted on  2010-09-19   12:47:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: TooConservative (#29)

This country has only ever had two real political parties. The system is self-reinforcing.

Right, continue to do what is distructive and corrupt to the core simply because the corrupt and failing system has been in place and is self reinforcing. Hello!!! Where's the logic in that?

Why take over a party you don't believe in, that has a proven track record of pissing on the people and NOT representing the people? Both Dems and Reps fall into THIS catagory. Who wants either one of them and if you do, why?

You don't keep trying to modify a recipe when the ingredients are rotten and moldy, TC. If you do, you are destined to create more of what you find distasteful. Better to trash it.......the sooner the better.

abraxas  posted on  2010-09-19   13:00:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: abraxas (#31)

You don't keep trying to modify a recipe when the ingredients are rotten and moldy, TC.

The view of a political neophyte.

This is, of course, why George Washington and others disdained political parties entirely.

But politics was and is a messy business. You have to recognize that or decide to ignore it and stop voting.

TooConservative  posted on  2010-09-19   13:06:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: TooConservative (#33)

The view of a political neophyte.

No, I am simply a person who gages success realistically. We are in this piss poor state due to the two party fraud. The people are only destined for MORE failure and corruption on this path.

To think that you can "fix" it by treading on the same path is to bury your head in the sand and completely discard all facts to the contrary. IMHO, THIS is the naive and neophyte perspective. Especially this silly argument that it's been this way for a long time, so we are "helpless" to do anything other than get behind the same worthless parties election in and election out.

This mentality leads to a nation of American'ts not Americans. No, not voting

abraxas  posted on  2010-09-19   13:19:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: abraxas (#35)

Well, I'm not sure that O'Donnell means much either way in the big picture.

She is driving those like Snowe/Collins to the right so she isn't all bad. The Dims are a little more scared too, those like Nelson.

The rest of your remarks are simple anti-partisan complaints. Maybe you should come up with a better system. Good luck with that.

TooConservative  posted on  2010-09-19   13:48:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: TooConservative (#36)

The rest of your remarks are simple anti-partisan complaints. Maybe you should come up with a better system. Good luck with that.

Sheesh, a good start would be to NOT continue to do the same damn thing and expect something different TC. What you will get is more failure and corruption, as I stated before. Why is this so difficult for you to grasp? Looking for "change" or "hope" in the two party fraud is as naive as voting for Obama. It's a case of an inability to see the forest for the two party fraud trees.

O'Donnell isn't really going to make any difference at all......that's my point. But, getting her into office paves the way for more of the same, no difference candidates who take up space and suck of the taxpayers teat while driving another nail in the coffin of the USA--more war, more partisan bickery, more blame game and no real solutions to ANYTHING. Why cheer for that?

abraxas  posted on  2010-09-19   13:57:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: abraxas (#37)

O'Donnell isn't really going to make any difference at all......that's my point. But, getting her into office paves the way for more of the same, no difference candidates who take up space and suck of the taxpayers teat while driving another nail in the coffin of the USA--more war, more partisan bickery, more blame game and no real solutions to ANYTHING. Why cheer for that?

Well, you make the status quo ante argument well enough.

However, there are a few things that a Senator O'Donnell won't do that a Senator Castle would do.

He is a long-time antigun legislator.

So you won't have the Feinstein-Castle "Ban Guns For The Children" Bill of 2011.

GOA was right to totally oppose Castle just for his awful record on the Second.

TooConservative  posted on  2010-09-19   14:18:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 41.

#43. To: TooConservative (#41)

I think the real value in her getting in is that more people will demand a third party. Gallop is already reporting that this is what people want. This picking the lesser of two evils because they actually fall in some small area of agreement with voters is a tired and worn out outcome of our election process, resulting in a country riddled with failure and corruption.

I support GOA myself. Castle had worn out his usefulness after his first term and I'm happy to see him gone. I'd simply like to see him replaced with a candidate who isn't placing more concern on masterbation than continual warring while crapping on the Constitution. This is another dog and pony show.

abraxas  posted on  2010-09-19 14:26:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 41.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]