[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The INCREDIBLE Impacts of Methylene Blue

The LARGEST Eruptions since the Merapi Disaster in 2010 at Lewotobi Laki Laki in Indonesia

Feds ARREST 11 Leftists For AMBUSH On ICE, 2 Cops Shot, Organized Terror Cell Targeted ICE In Texas

What is quantum computing?

12 Important Questions We Should Be Asking About The Cover Up The Truth About Jeffrey Epstein

TSA quietly scraps security check that every passenger dreads

Iran Receives Emergency Airlift of Chinese Air Defence Systems as Israel Considers New Attacks

Russia reportedly used its new, inexpensive Chernika kamikaze drone in the Ukraine

Iran's President Says the US Pledged Israel Wouldn't Attack During Previous Nuclear Negotiations

Will Japan's Rice Price Shock Lead To Government Collapse And Spark A Global Bond Crisis

Beware The 'Omniwar': Catherine Austin Fitts Fears 'Weaponization Of Everything'

Roger Stone: AG Pam Bondi Must Answer For 14 Terabytes Claim Of Child Torture Videos!

'Hit Us, Please' - America's Left Issues A 'Broken Arrow' Signal To Europe

Cash Jordan Trump Deports ‘Thousands of Migrants’ to Africa… on Purpose

Gunman Ambushes Border Patrol Agents In Texas Amid Anti-ICE Rhetoric From Democrats

Texas Flood

Why America Built A Forest From Canada To Texas

Tucker Carlson Interviews President of Iran Mosoud Pezeshkian

PROOF Netanyahu Wants US To Fight His Wars

RAPID CRUSTAL MOVEMENT DETECTED- Are the Unusual Earthquakes TRIGGER for MORE (in Japan and Italy) ?

Google Bets Big On Nuclear Fusion

Iran sets a world record by deporting 300,000 illegal refugees in 14 days

Brazilian Women Soccer Players (in Bikinis) Incredible Skills

Watch: Mexico City Protest Against American Ex-Pat 'Invasion' Turns Viole

Kazakhstan Just BETRAYED Russia - Takes gunpowder out of Putin’s Hands

Why CNN & Fareed Zakaria are Wrong About Iran and Trump

Something Is Going Deeply WRONG In Russia

329 Rivers in China Exceed Flood Warnings, With 75,000 Dams in Critical Condition

Command Of Russian Army 'Undermined' After 16 Of Putin's Generals Killed At War, UK Says

Rickards: Superintelligence Will Never Arrive


(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Americans Renew Call for Third Party
Source: gallop
URL Source: http://www.gallup.com/poll/143051/A ... ns-Renew-Call-Third-Party.aspx
Published: Sep 19, 2010
Author: Jeffrey M. Jones
Post Date: 2010-09-19 14:03:13 by abraxas
Keywords: None
Views: 897
Comments: 79

Americans Renew Call for Third Party

Fifty-eight percent of Americans, and 62% of Tea Party supporters, favor third partyb y Jeffrey M. Jones

PRINCETON, NJ -- Americans' desires for a third political party are as high as they have been in seven years. Fifty-eight percent of Americans believe a third major political party is needed because the Republican and Democratic Parties do a poor job of representing the American people. That is a significant increase from 2008 and ties the high Gallup has recorded for this measure since 2003.

The finding, based on an Aug. 27-30 USA Today/Gallup poll, comes at a time when Americans are widely dissatisfied with the way things are going in the United States and give relatively weak approval ratings to the president and Congress.

Though the rise in support for a third party could be linked to the Tea Party movement, Tea Party supporters are just about average in terms of wanting to see a third party created. Sixty-two percent of those who describe themselves as Tea Party supporters would like a third major party formed, but so do 59% of those who are neutral toward the Tea Party movement. Tea Party opponents are somewhat less likely to see the need for a third party.

The desire for a third party is fairly similar across ideological groups, with 61% of liberals, 60% of moderates, and 54% of conservatives believing a third major party is needed. That is a narrower gap than Gallup has found in the past; conservatives have typically been far less likely than liberals and moderates to support the creation of a third party.

Independents, as might be expected given their lack of primary allegiance to either of the two major parties, express a greater degree of support (74%) for a third party than do Republicans (47%) and Democrats (45%). Over time, independents have consistently been the political group most eager to see a third party formed. But each party group is more likely now than in 2008 to support the formation of a third major party. At that time, about two months before the presidential election, 38% of Democrats, 40% of Republicans, and 63% of independents thought a third party was necessary.

Bottom Line

Election results in recent years and polls from this year indicate Americans are frustrated with the job the two major parties have been doing. In 2006, voters elected a Democratic majority in Congress to replace the Republican majority, and in 2008 they elected a Democratic president to replace an outgoing Republican president. Polling on voters' 2010 voting intentions suggests that they may be poised to replace the Democratic majority in Congress with a Republican majority. But that seems to be as much because voters are rejecting Democrats as embracing Republicans.

Given the lack of alternatives, it perhaps is no surprise that Americans' desires for a third party are as high as they've been in at least the last seven years. And while the formation of an official third party is not imminent, that desire may be manifested in voters' strong anti-incumbent sentiments this year.

Survey Methods Results for this USA Today/Gallup poll are based on telephone interviews conducted Aug. 27-30, 2010, with a random sample of 1,021 adults, aged 18 and older, living in the continental U.S., selected using random-digit-dial sampling.

For results based on the total sample of national adults, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points.

Interviews are conducted with respondents on landline telephones (for respondents with a landline telephone) and cellular phones (for respondents who are cell phone-only). Each sample includes a minimum quota of 150 cell phone-only respondents and 850 landline respondents, with additional minimum quotas among landline respondents for gender within region. Landline respondents are chosen at random within each household on the basis of which member had the most recent birthday.

Samples are weighted by gender, age, race, education, region, and phone lines. Demographic weighting targets are based on the March 2009 Current Population Survey figures for the aged 18 and older non-institutionalized population living in continental U.S. telephone households. All reported margins of sampling error include the computed design effects for weighting and sample design.

In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.

View methodology, full question results, and trend data.

For more details on Gallup's polling methodology, visit http://www.gallup.com/.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 39.

#8. To: abraxas, farmfriend (#0)

A "third" party is a bad idea. Here's why.
If a third party is right-of-center it will be compete with the Republican party for a finite vote pool.
That means any leftest candidate can win by plurality.

You get election after election of leftest wins while the right-of-center voters sort out their two parties.
I know, I know. We've got that already with Rino Republicans. It would be worse.
By the time they get their act together, it's too late.

Multiple viable parties on all sides of the political spectrum might be better, but still one would win by plurality.

The best solution is to take over the Republican party and turn it into what a third party would have been.

Armadillo  posted on  2010-09-20   0:41:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Armadillo (#8)

You are missing the point in the problem with the two party fraud, Dillo.

This right of center, left of center, dog and pony show ignores that both parties, no matter the degree from center, DON'T REPRESENT THE PEOPLE. Both parties are CORPORATE WHORES.

Yes, multiple parties would be great. But, first people need to accept the painful truth that neither the Dems nor the Pubbies represent the interests of the people or the Constitution. Until this happens, you will see more of the same, not less.

abraxas  posted on  2010-09-20   12:21:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: abraxas (#15)

This right of center, left of center, dog and pony show ignores that both parties, no matter the degree from center, DON'T REPRESENT THE PEOPLE. Both parties are CORPORATE WHORES.
Yes, multiple parties would be great. But, first people need to accept the painful truth that neither the Dems nor the Pubbies represent the interests of the people or the Constitution. Until this happens, you will see more of the same, not less.

I do not disagree with any of that.
My issue is that a third party attempting to usurp the Repubs will spit the vote giving the Dems a win by plurality.
The Repubs are not perfect, but they are still better than a Dem.
They are the lesser or two evils.

Instead of challenging the Repubs with a third party and ensuring leftest domination, take over the Repubs from within.
Make the party what we want.

If you go the 3rd party route, you might as well vote for the Democrat, because that's what we will get regardless.
Who then shall I blame?

Armadillo  posted on  2010-09-20   20:11:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Armadillo (#23)

Instead of challenging the Repubs with a third party and ensuring leftest domination, take over the Repubs from within. Make the party what we want.

Well, Dillo, GW Bush made it painfully clear to me that the Pubbie party CANNOT be saved. Just look at it will ya: Linsay Graham, McConnell, McCain, Ensign. Corporate Toadies every one. It's too corrupt.....just like the Dems.

You still aren't getting it. These two parties are two sides of the SAME COIN. This notion that one is better than the other is silly and only by an insignificant degree. We need a party FOR the people, neither R nor D will do FOR the people.

We will never make the Pubbies what we want. They are corporate whores, not whores for the people. Ditto for Dems. I don't care if you blame me, but I will not continue on with the farce that there is a rats hair worth of

abraxas  posted on  2010-09-20   20:30:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: abraxas, farmfriend (#26)

No, I "get it" just fine, thanks.

I'm just not willing to commit national suicide by giving the Dems unfettered control of everything while the 3rd party ensures your voice is never heard.
The people you rant against win by plurality while the other parties fight among themselves.

When the revolution comes (courtesy of the Dems) the 3rd party you long for will be up against the execution wall, along with the lawyers, press, and any others.

To claim there is no difference between Repubs and Dems is a popular thing to say, and many times is true, but certainly not always. I'm not interested in rhetoric, but in truth. Not all Repubs are RINOs. In fact RINOs are in the process of being purged from the party. The Tea Party is a good start, but they have a ways to go.

I dont care about rhetoric or populism. I care about results.
Take over the Repubs and make the party what you want, and America has a chance.
Go 3rd party, and you give the people you rant against MORE power and MORE time to enact their damage.
3rd party HELPS the people you are AGAINST, by giving them power by plurality.

Armadillo  posted on  2010-09-20   22:37:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Armadillo, Farmfriend (#38)

you give the people you rant against MORE power and MORE time to enact their damage.

This is what is done every time the people elect the same crop of corrupt Reps and Dems.

Soon, there will be nothing left to save. Third party is the only way to give an honest candidate a chance. Like I said the difference between the two parties is by degree, not in the least bit meaningful. Both parties serve the same interests, Dillo, and they are NOT your interests. Keep pretending that they are if it makes you feel better, but the state of this nation IS the truth of the matter.

The revolution will be courtesy of the two party fraud. The only difference will be who is the majority at the time it happens. What good will electing

abraxas  posted on  2010-09-20   22:48:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 39.

#41. To: abraxas (#39)

Soon, there will be nothing left to save.

There's nothing left to save now.

Third party is the only way to give an honest candidate a chance.

Are you calling Rand Paul dishonest?

difference between the two parties is by degree, not in the least bit meaningful.

Only at the CFR top

Both parties serve the same interests, Dillo, and they are NOT your interests. Keep pretending that they are if it makes you feel better, but the state of this nation IS the truth of the matter.

Repeat: Only the CFR top

Flintlock  posted on  2010-09-20 23:23:53 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: abraxas, farmfriend (#39)

This is what is done every time the people elect the same crop of corrupt Reps and Dems.
What makes you think 3rd partiers will be pure?
Third party is the only way to give an honest candidate a chance.
A chance at what? Being defeated by a Democrat who gets 35% of the vote, while the Republican gets 33%.
Keep pretending that they are if it makes you feel better, but the state of this nation IS the truth of the matter.
I dont care about pretend, or feelings, or rhetoric. I care about RESULTS.
The revolution will be courtesy of the two party fraud.
True.
The only difference will be who is the majority at the time it happens.
The "who" will be a radical leftest government at all levels. Thanks to the 3rd party that cares about pretending, feelings, and rhetoric instead of results.

Here are some future election results if a 3rd party happens.
Dems- 40%.
Reps- 35%
3rd- 25%
YOU LOOSE.


Dems- 45%.
Reps- 30%
3rd- 25%
YOU LOOSE.
Dems- 35%.
Reps- 33%
3rd- 32%
YOU LOOSE.
Dems- 35%.
Reps- 32%
3rd- 33%
YOU LOOSE.
After four election cycles (16 years) of all Democrat run government at all levels, America is dead.
Thanks, 3rd party. Not.

Take over the Republicans, make it what you want.
The marxests did it to the Democrat party, so it can be done.
DO IT. It's being done now partially by the Tea Party. Reagan Conservatism isnt too far removed from "Classic Liberal".
Ron and Rand Paul are Republicans.
They know what I say is true.

Armadillo  posted on  2010-09-20 23:56:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 39.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]