See other Dead Constitution Articles
Title: Implementing Sustainable Development
Source:
Freedom Advocates
URL Source: http://www.freedomadvocates.org/
Published: Sep 21, 2010
Author: Freedom Advocates
Post Date: 2010-09-21 15:27:07 by angK
Keywords: None
Views: 82
Comments: 5
The authors of Agenda 21 have said it will affect every area of life, grouped according to three objectives: Equity, Economy, and Environment (known commonly as “the 3 E’s”). By defining these terms vaguely, a litany of abuse has resulted. Furthermore, by rubber-stamping pre-conceived plans, using manipulative “visioning” sessions to garner the appearance of public buy-in, and acquiring grants from sources with questionable motives, the entire process of implementing Sustainable Development policies is suspect. Equity: Using the Law to Restructure Human Nature The authors of the Sustainable Development action plan recognized that their environmental and economic objectives, and the corresponding transformation of the American system of justice, are radically divergent from the views and objectives of the average person. Therefore, in order to achieve their objectives, they call for a shift in attitudes, that can be seen in the educational programs developed by its proponents. This is the premise of Sustainable Development: That individual human wants, needs, and desires are to be conformed to the views and dictates of planners. Harvey Ruvin, Vice Chair of the International Council on Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI), and Clerk of the Circuit and County Court in Miami-Dade County, Florida, has said that “individual rights will have to take a back seat to the collective” in the process of implementing Sustainable Development. Economy: The International Redistribution of Wealth and the Creation of Public/Private Partnerships “...current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class – involving high meat intake, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable.” – Maurice Strong, Secretary General, U.N. Conference on Environment and Development, 1992. (Also known as the Rio Earth Summit, where Agenda 21 was unveiled.) According to its preamble, “The developmental and environmental objectives of Agenda 21 will require a substantial flow of new and additional financial resources to developing countries.” Language throughout Agenda 21 erroneously assumes that life is a zero-sum game (the wealth of the world was made at the expense of the poor, making them even poorer). This critique of economic ills denies the ingenuity of private action, individual determination, and truly free market innovation, and leads inevitably to the conclusion that if the conditions of the poor are to be improved, wealth must be taken from the rich. Sustainable Development embodies this unjust redistribution of wealth both in theory and in implementation, effectively lowering the standard of living in America to that of the rest of the world. The Draft Covenant on Environment and Development states in Article 8: “…equity will be achieved through implementation of the international economic order ... and through transfers of resources to developing countries....” In addition to its appeal for the international redistribution of wealth, Sustainable Development is actually restructuring the economy, molding it not on private enterprise, but on public/private partnerships. Public/private partnerships bring businesses desiring the protection offered by government’s legalized force together with government agents that want the power that comes with economic control. The power of economics, and the force of government, must serve as a check and balance on each other; combining the two will ultimately result in tyranny. Free enterprise is lost amid subsidies, incentives, tax-breaks, and insider privilege, and with it goes the notion that the customer is the final determiner of how resources are allocated in production. The Sustainable Development “partnerships” involve some corporations – domestic and multinational – some tax-exempt family foundations, select individuals, and collectivist politicians and their administrations. Of these participants, only elected politicians are accountable to the public for their actions. Environment: Nature Above Man Americans support laws and regulations that are designated to effectively prevent pollution of the air, water, or the property of another. Yet, it is increasingly clear that Sustainable Development uses the environment simply as the means to promote a political agenda. For example, Al Gore says that Sustainable Development will bring about “a wrenching transformation” of American society. Sustainable Development is ostensibly concerned with the environment; it is more concerned with restructuring the governmental system of the world’s nations so that all the people of the world will be the subjects of a global collective. Many of its proposed implementation strategies require the surrender of unalienable rights. This fact alone casts a serious shadow of doubt on the motives of Sustainable Development planners who would discard the unalienable rights to life, liberty, and property in order to pursue dubious programs. When Sustainable Development is implemented, ordinary people will be left unprotected from de facto decrees placing nature above man, while relegating man to the status of a “biological resource.” Educating the Youth to Mold the Minds of Tomorrow “All who have meditated on the art of governing mankind have been convinced that the fate of empires depends on the education of youth.” – Aristotle One means that Sustainable Developers have to ensure continuing support of their anti-human programs is through molding the minds of the next generation. Chapter 25 of the U.N. Sustainable Development Agenda 21 calls for the need to “enlist and empower children and youth in reaching for sustainability.” Even a cursory look at the federally-mandated curriculum being taught in classrooms in every government school in America would show that the doctrines of Sustainable Development are finding their way into every subject. French classes are used to teach students to “save the earth;” economics classes feature lectures discouraging individual initiative in the marketplace and decrying private ownership; history classes obscure the importance of America’s founding documents; mandatory “service-learning” programs enlist students to work for government-approved Sustainable Development partner organizations. The list goes on and on. While taxpayers foot the bill for the increasing costs of government education, parents are increasingly shut out of decisions crucial to the molding of their child’s mind. Controversial programs designed for “values clarification” are being performed in government schools that employ “powerful behavior control techniques and peer pressure to make [a] developing child question his or her individual worth and values,” and are designed to disrupt parental oversight in the upbringing of their children, according to Professor of Organizational Behavior, Brent Duncan.
Poster Comment: Still more to come or go to http://www.freedomadvocates.org/ to read complete document. Sample: SMART GROWTH: A typical day in the Orwellian society created by Smart Growth would consist of an individual waking up in his government provided housing unit, eating a ration of government-subsidized foods purchased at a government-sanctioned grocery store, walking his children (if he has any) to the government-run child care center, boarding government-subsidized public transit to go to his government job, then returning home later that evening
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 4.
#1. To: angK (#0)
You forgot to post a cross a hot-link to your earlier thread, Understanding Sustainable Development: UN Agenda 21. As a world or any nation faced with HUGE population increases ... what are we to do when faced with simultaneously diminishing natural resources? Despite the lack of publick comment on your earlier thread, there are only two methods: 1) eliminate human population growth through controlled methods and 2) resource development through controlled methods. The days of personal or individual dignity are all over unless you live on your own island; even then, depending upon the national jurisprudence you are subject to international regulations AND must abide. The days of individual freedoms, liberties and rights are gone; those concepts are vanquished forever within modern government roles as government responsibility is about the control of masses of people and that means FORCE even if applied unnecessarily. The days after 1792 ( small government in America ) are all gone. And there is no way back, come HELL or HIGH-WATER even if you pray to some GOD or believe some boogieman ( or groups, thereof ) took away what you rightfully deserve as a matter of respect and dignity. Keep up the good work, angK. You are showing this forum another way to view how the world is changing before our eyes.
We can stride down the path of smaller government by dismissing everyone's false claims to our system who are working against it. We can begin developing resources for our more compact ranks on our own and smarter -- like wind and solar and tidal energy -- just by rejecting the funny money boondoggles of gluttonous profiteers and keeping track of our time investments in those projects. Sheesh, that wasn't so hard to see as doable now was it?
Of course not. In my case I have maintained a photo-voltaic system for years; this same system amply supplies all the electrical power my family needs while simultaneously ensuring a high quality of life style. How can government become smaller with a rising population base here in America? Lets take a quick peek at a graph showing population growth since 1790, shall we: Note the non-linear (geometrical) growth. It is easy to see as in 1900 (roughly 100 years into our history) we were at 80M folks. Today, in 2010, America is about 320M folks .... off the charts, of course; but the point is, the government size and structure is constantly increasing beyond the rate of the population base. The post 1900 rapid rise of government (on all levels) is a function of the HUGE population explosion occurring. To think that government can be reduced is fantasy in the land of milk and honey.
Solar power. Splendid! Everyone should be so fortunate and it shouldn't depend at all on whether or not profiteers think it's a lucrative enough enterprise for them if we use natural resources like the sun, wind, and tidal currents as wisely, cleanly, and efficiently. That should be done just because it's the right thing to do. The gangsters that wannabe in charge of everything who are habituated to maniacal greed and control-freakism are like dinosaurs. Just typing the word Militia gets them petrified, so we can get to work on those projects right quick. [population graph] Note the non-linear (geometrical) growth. It is easy to see as in 1900 (roughly 100 years into our history) we were at 80M folks. Today, in 2010, America is about 320M folks .... off the charts, of course; but the point is, the government size and structure is constantly increasing beyond the rate of the population base. The post 1900 rapid rise of government (on all levels) is a function of the HUGE population explosion occurring. To think that government can be reduced is fantasy in the land of milk and honey. Let's take a look at the Constitution and see if it says that the government gets to grow bigger and more intrusive as the poplulation increases: http://www.usconstitution.net/ Nope. It doesn't say that at all. It just says we get more representation in Congress if our numbers increase. We can reduce the population here by about 20 million just by deporting illegal alien invaders. We could put a moratorium on any immigration until there is no more unemployment here and that would stop the chart from skyrocketing so. Do you think the so-called government would be moved then to reduce itself accordingly? Probably not. If it won't downsize and confine itself to the limits of the Constitution, it's not our system. It's inane fiction with no legitimate authority over us.
There are no replies to Comment # 4. End Trace Mode for Comment # 4.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: buckeroo (#1)
#3. To: GreyLmist, angK (#2)
Sheesh, that wasn't so hard to see [renewable resources] as doable now was it?
We can stride down the path of smaller government by dismissing everyone's false claims to our system who are working against it.
#4. To: buckeroo (#3)
In my case I have maintained a photo-voltaic system for years; this same system amply supplies all the electrical power my family needs while simultaneously ensuring a high quality of life style.
How can government become smaller with a rising population base here in America? Lets take a quick peek at a graph showing population growth since 1790, shall we:
Replies to Comment # 4.