Horse posted this a few days back, about fifty threads back; it's still even on the sidebar. I notice the two threads use the same clip but from two different YouTube pages which would explain why you didn't get a dupe warning from 4um when posting it.
Dylan is a lightweight grandstander though, kind of takes away from Greenwald's more serious and systemic criticisms. Ratigan doesn't have half the brains Greenwald has. As usual, the repulsive neocon was kind of a set prop.
Dylan is a lightweight grandstander though, kind of takes away from Greenwald's more serious and systemic criticisms. Ratigan doesn't have half the brains Greenwald has. As usual, the repulsive neocon was kind of a set prop.
I agree with your astute analysis TC. I thought that the commentary on elementary name calling was funny......if not for such a serious topic.
I thought that the commentary on elementary name calling was funny......if not for such a serious topic.
I actually kept the previous thread here at 4um open for the last few days and watched it several times. I liked the way Greenwald pressed the argument that May was a warmonger and forced him to admit he is a warmonger which was then followed by the neocon trying to defend his warmongering by pretending that Iran had called someone Bad Names.
It was a fun piece to watch. Greenwald is one of the best lib writers, probably the best among their younger generation of writers. I often admire his blogs, his doggedness.
Ratigan is no threat to May and his ilk. But Greenwald is.