[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
War, War, War See other War, War, War Articles Title: Lady Qaeda' Gets 86 Years - Aaifa Siddiqui Sentenced For Shooting At US Soldiers Lady Qaeda' Gets 86 Years - Aaifa Siddiqui Sentenced For Shooting At US Soldiers By RICHARD ESPOSITO Sept. 23, 2010 — Aafia Siddiqui was sentenced to 86 years in federal prison this morning, following her conviction in February for attempted murder of US government officials. Siddiqui was allegedly caught in Afghanistan with cyanide, documents indicating attack on the US, including landmarks in New York City, but the MIT-trained neuroscientist was tried and convicted in a simple criminal case for firing a rifle at FBI agents and US soldiers. Before Judge Richard Berman announced the sentence, Siddiqui gave a meandering 30 minute speech. "I didn't take any notes," said Siddiqui. "I wasn't planning on speaking. I was planning on sleeping." She also asked the Muslims in the courtroom to forgive the court. "I don't want any bloodshed," she said. "I don't want any violence in my name." Though Siddiqui was not charged with terrorism, terrorism enhancements were applied to her sentence. As Judge Berman was about to announce the sentence of 86 years, Siddiqui supporter Sara Flounders, an activist with the International Action Center, yelled, "Shame! Shame! Shame on this court!" Siddiqui, 38, was convicted in February, after an often raucous trial that ended the way it began, with Siddiqui yelling at jurors and shouting to spectators. Siddiqui threw up her arms after the jury found her guilty and heckled the jurors as they left the court room, shouting "This is a verdict coming from Israel, not America." Siddiqui's three week trial in a Manhattan federal courtroom was repeatedly interrupted by her outbursts, which were frequently anti-Semitic or delusional. She was twice removed from her own trial by U.S. marshals. The jury deliberated for three days before finding the U.S.-educated Pakistani mother of three guilty of attempted murder, armed assault, using and carrying a firearm, and assault of U.S. officers and employees. Though never charged with terrorism, U.S. authorities say Siddiqui was an Al Qaeda sympathizer who was arrested in Afghanistan in 2008 carrying plans for a "mass casualty attack" on New York landmarks,including the Statue of Liberty and the Brooklyn Bridge. Prosecutors said that while being held for questioning at an Afghan police station in July 2008, she grabbed an unattended rifle, shouted "Allah Akbar," and fired two rounds at U.S. soldiers and FBI agents before being shot in return. Siddiqui denied the charges. "It's just ridiculous& I never attempted murder, no way. It's a heavy word," Siddiqui, said while on the stand. Her lawyers told jurors there was no ballistic, fingerprint or other physical evidence proving the weapon was "touched by Dr. Siddiqui, let alone fired by her." A petite woman who kept all but her eyes hidden behind a white headscarf and veil, Siddiqui fought with her own lawyers to testify in her own defense. Her defense team told the court that Siddiqui was "driven by her severe mental illness" and feared she would incriminate herself. Prosecutors argued she was more cagey than crazy and should not be denied the right to defend herself if she chose. Lady Qaeda Trial Interrupted by Her Outbursts Her lawyers argued that putting Siddiqui on the stand would "turn the trial into a spectacle," but some observers could argue that the trial was turned into a spectacle weeks ago when jury selection began. During jury selection last month, Siddiqui said she was "boycotting" the trial and demanded Jews be excluded from serving on the jury. "I have a feeling everyone here is them [Jews], subject to genetic testing& They should be excluded if you want to be fair," she told federal Judge Richard Berman. That same day she tossed a note across the courtroom to prosecutors asking for time off to pray. Last week, a soldier who was at the police station when Siddiqui allegedly began shooting, broke down on the witness stand while describing the injuries he sustained during his tour in Afghanistan. Siddiqui interrupted his testimony, lunging across the table where she sat, and while pointing at the soldier shouted: "I was never planning a bombing! You're lying!" The outburst resulted in two federal marshals restraining her, and ejecting her from the courtroom. It was the second time she was removed following an outburst. Also last week, two jurors were excused from duty after they told the judge that a man in the visitors' gallery made a hand motion as if he were firing a gun at them and mouthed an obscenity. One of the jurors told the judge he was "really freaked out" by the incident and another said he could not remain impartial "anytime anyone makes what I view as a death threat." When she took the stand to testify, Siddiqui came off as combative and intelligent, but sometimes appeared to be bordering on the delusional. She denied shooting soldiers and FBI agents with the unattended M4 rifle saying: "What does an M4 look like?" Siddiqui, who was shot by U.S. soldiers and taken to a military hospital, claims she was shot while trying to escape. She said she had been tortured in a secret prison and feared being taken back there. She told jurors her case is an example of how authorities "frame people" and that she chose to testify because she alone "can end the war She said there were anonymous American agents acting against the interests of the U.S., people she called "fake Americans" who she could expose to end the war.
Poster Comment: this woman has been treated very unjustly. the government arrested her and tortured her because she was muslim. During the interrogation process which involves torture techniques she was purposely given the opportunity to grab a gun. Likely under extreme sleep deprivation she is said to have grabbed the gun. Nobody was hurt. It is her word against the FBI interrogators' words as to what happened. They won't even let her argue that their version is incorrect. If she committed a crime, she was provoked to do it. in our country many muslims have been arrested simply for being muslim, and then tortured, and then had charges against them that are frivilous resulting in prison sentences. 86 years is a very long sentence. yet police officers beat people up and threaten people with guns routinely.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
#2. To: Red Jones (#0)
Sounds like bullshit to me. How many US soldiers leave "unattended rifles" hanging around interrogation rooms?
she was likely sleep-deprived, angry and desperate. she was given an opportunity to do what she did. that is if she did what they say. and from what I understand she is not allowed to even say in court what her version of the incident is. that is how american courts are working. the judge will not let the defendent be defended. she was shot in the torso in response to this.
The story doesn't make sense. For one, the probability of a rifle just hanging around an interrogation room is about nil. For two, the probability of the rifle being loaded, with a round in the chamber and safety off, is less than nil. If the rifle WASN'T ready to fire, I'm sure they would have shot her to death before she had a chance to fire the rifle herself, being she may not even have known HOW to chamber a round and turn the safety off. And IF she HAD picked up a loaded rifle and fired, they DEFINITELY would have shot her to death, and it would have been more than just one shot fired at her. Let me guess, she was represented by "court appointed attorneys". Am I right?
you're right. it is amazing the injustice that routinely occurs in our country. This lady has been kidnapped from a foreign country, terrorized and now finally imprisoned for the rest of her life. and she committed no crime in reality. This is similar to how early Puritans in our country (1600's) would accuse some people of witchcraft and then have them killed. For hundreds of years 'we' use that as a negative example and show how wrong it is for government to treat people like that. and yet, in our world today, this type of thing happens regularly. and 'our' mass media is silent. In Pakistan and Iran they print the truth. while 'we' pursue war against them.
There are no replies to Comment # 7. End Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||