See other Dead Constitution Articles
Title: Rothschild and CIA Publications Attack “Constitution-worshipers”
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.prisonplanet.com/rothsch ... ution-worshipers%E2%80%9D.html
Published: Sep 26, 2010
Author: Kurt Nimmo
Post Date: 2010-09-26 18:45:43 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 286
Comments: 16
The editors of the Economist have declared constitutionalists mentally ill. “Indeed, there is something infantile in the belief of the constitution-worshipers that the complex political arguments of today can be settled by simple fidelity to a document written in the 18th century,” the editors wrote on September 23. “When history is turned into scripture and men into deities, truth is the victim.” The Economist is owned by members of the Rothschild banking family of England. It is run by the Economist Group, a known CIA front. According to the Economist, the framers were aristocrats who “did not believe that poor men, or any women, let alone slaves, should have the vote.” The Constitution does not address the “hard questions thrown up by modern politics,” namely should gays be allowed to marry? The Economist argument against the Constitution is the same one used by liberal academics. The document is antiquated, the product of a bygone era. The founders were afraid of “democracy taking hold,” so they crafted a document designed to exclude the common people and preserve their aristocratic position. Globalists love democracy. It is an easy enough task to fool the people, especially these days with 24-7 media and satellite television. It is a relatively simple matter to have the benighted masses vote away their natural rights under some cooked up false pretense. “Democracy is not freedom. Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to eat for lunch. Freedom comes from the recognition of certain rights which may not be taken, not even by a 99% vote,” wrote Marvin Simkin. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. Soon after the Economist article appeared, the establishment publication Foreign Policy posted an article slamming the idea that we should follow the Constitution. Joshua Keating writes that he suspects “most Americans don’t realize quite how old the Constitution is by world standards,” that is to say globalist standards. In order to make his point, Keating cites an article published in the Onion, a popular satire publication. Foreign Policy was established by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a think tank created by the “internationalist” Andrew Carnegie, who took his advice from Elihu Root, who worked to make the Council On Foreign Relations possible. As Carroll Quigley noted in Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time, the CFR, modeled on the British Round Table Group, “penetrated deeply into university life, the press, and… foreign policy,” and peddled its globalist influence through five American newspapers, including the Washington Post and the New York Times. “The CFR is the American Branch of a society which originated in England, and which believes that national boundaries should be obliterated, and a one-world rule established,” Quigley explains. In 2008, Foreign Policy was bought by the Washington Post Company. The Washington Post is the crown jewel of the CIA’s Operation Mockingbird. Wall Street lawyer Frank Wisner, who ran the Office of Special Projects — later to become part of the CIA — recruited Philip Graham, the publisher of the Washington Post, to run Operation Mockingbird and subvert the free press in the United States. The CFR wants “to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty of the national independence of the United States,” Admiral Chester Ward, a former member of the CFR, warned. In order to realize their one-world government scheme, the CFR and the ruling elite must undermine the sovereignty of the United States. Fresh food that lasts from eFoods Direct (Ad) It must also undermine and subvert the Tea Party movement and the popular move to restore the constitutional foundation of the country. The twin articles appearing in the Economist — at the behest of Rothschild and the City of London banking elite — and Foreign Policy — controlled by the Council On Foreign Relations — are designed to make constitutionalists appear to be not only infantile idealists who idolize an archaic document that the globalists argue has no relevance in our modern era of gay marriage, but also as dangerous people who suffer from mental illness. – Kurt Nimmo edits Infowars.com. He is the author of Another Day in the Empire: Life In Neoconservative America.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Horse (#0)
once we get serious about constitutional enforcement, and enforcing the treason and sedition laws, this stuff all dries up. you arrest, prosecute, and seize assets of pukes like these, and they'll hide under grandmas couch like the little bitch yap dogs they are.
__________________________________ In what way is freedom out of date? In what do "world standards" obviate the need for a written and enforceable Constitution which limits the power of government? And the reason they want to do that is that our Written Constitution has a little addendum which makes global enslavement really difficult. It is called "The Bill of Rights" which forbids government from taking and exercising undue arbitrary power and riding roughshod over the rights of the common man. It is awkward indeed for a cabal seeking to claim for themselves complete and arbitrary power without restraint. It is a burden only to tyrants, and out of date only to those wish to be slaves and those who wish to be slavemasters. "One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator
Rome is burning all around and THIS is the hard question? What a farce!! The Constitution does determine the hard questions like: Who should control the money and when to declare war? Solving these two problems would GREATLY improve this nation.
"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. ... We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of." Edward Bernays, Father of Public Relations
The French knew what to do with these parasites.
WWGPD? - (What Would General Pinochet Do?)
One little change to a spot-on comment. The Constitution does determine the hard questions like: Who should control the money and when, and who, can declare war?
is it a funny coincidence that lewrockwell.com also ran a great article this week (posted here too) titled 'i'm fed up with constitution worshipers!'? that writer derides it for better reasons than the 'globalists' though.
"if I have all faith so as to move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing." 1 Cor 12:31—13:13 Excellent mark up Loddy. I'll let you be my editor, but I can only afford to pay you with kind words and praise. : )
"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. ... We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of." Edward Bernays, Father of Public Relations
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
The Constitution addresses this quite adequately. Apparently, the people at the Economist are not familiar with the 10th Amendment. What they are actually complaining about (or just plain refuse to admit) is that the Constitution doesn't give complete power to the fed gov. That notion apparently has never entered their puny brains. As for the other thread bashing Constitution Worshippers, I can agree with at least some of what it said (or maybe all of it, I forget now). Eventually you reach a point where you just have to admit that a constitution only has meaning and significance if it's obeyed, and if it's not, it's just a G-D piece of paper just like W said it was.
GuideLINES. You know just like the Pirate Code in Pirates of the Caribbean. "They are just guidlines anyway". At least that's what just about every fed payee thinks it is.
1st, most women should not be allowed to vote. Sorry girls, but women tend towards the more handsome, cute, funny etc., candidate rather than the qualified person. (I know, I'm a chauvinist). 2nd, whether queers marry each other or not doesn't concern me and could never rate being a "hard question" with any bearing whatsoever on the Constitution. The faggots and paedophiles that VOTERS elect will never run my life. Voting itself is meaningless when the fundamental laws are either ignored or "unknown" and the basic principles necessary to each individual's liberty dismissed in favor of mob rule. My response is: Constitution "Haters" are usually queers, paedophiles, communists, people wishing to suck off of the working class through taxation, warmongers, and elitist control freaks that want to make laws to circumvent the Constitution. Man up, steel up and get your act together because the attacks upon your ability to run your own life are just ramping up !
"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." Jesus Christ speaking to the Rabbis of his day.
It does ??? You'd never know it !!! You're absolutely correct !!!
"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." Jesus Christ speaking to the Rabbis of his day.
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one.
This is an example of why Constitutional illiterates and enemies of it should not be allowed to vote in our system of government.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
REALITY REPORT #63 - Constitutionalists Under Siege
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
________________________________
#2. To: Horse (#0)
Soon after the Economist article appeared, the establishment publication Foreign Policy posted an article slamming the idea that we should follow the Constitution. Joshua Keating writes that he suspects “most Americans don’t realize quite how old the Constitution is by world standards,” that is to say globalist standards. In order to make his point, Keating cites an article published in the Onion, a popular satire publication.
The CFR wants “to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty of the national independence of the United States,” Admiral Chester Ward, a former member of the CFR, warned. In order to realize their one-world government scheme, the CFR and the ruling elite must undermine the sovereignty of the United States.
"Necessity' is the plea for every infringement of human liberty; it is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves." ~ William Pitt
#3. To: Horse (#0)
The Constitution does not address the “hard questions thrown up by modern politics,” namely should gays be allowed to marry?
#4. To: gengis gandhi (#1)
you arrest, prosecute, and seize assets of pukes like these, and they'll hide under grandmas couch like the little bitch yap dogs they are.
#5. To: abraxas (#3)
The Constitution does determine the hard questions like: Who should control the money and when to declare war?
#6. To: gengis gandhi, horse, original_intent, lod, eric stratton (#1)
"I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him"
George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html
#7. To: Lod (#5)
#8. To: Horse (#0)
#9. To: Artisan (#6)
#10. To: Horse (#0)
According to the Economist, the framers were aristocrats who “did not believe that poor men, or any women, let alone slaves, should have the vote.” The Constitution does not address the “hard questions thrown up by modern politics,” namely should gays be allowed to marry?
#11. To: Eric Stratton (#9)
The Constitution is merely a guide.
#12. To: Horse (#0)
According to the Economist, the framers were aristocrats who “did not believe that poor men, or any women, let alone slaves, should have the vote.” The Constitution does not address the “hard questions thrown up by modern politics,” namely should gays be allowed to marry?
#13. To: Lod (#5)
The Constitution does determine the hard questions like: Who should control the money and when, and who, can declare war?
#14. To: Pinguinite (#11)
#15. To: Horse (#0)
#16. To: Horse (#0)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest