[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed

Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!!

Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES

Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen

Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances

"NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor

If You're Trying To Lose Weight But Gaining Belly Fat, Watch Insulin

Arabica Coffee Prices Soar As Analyst Warns of "Weather Disasters" Risk Denting Global Production

Candace Owens: : I Know What Happened at the Hamptons (Ackman confronted Charlie Kirk)

Illegal Alien Drunk Driver Mows Down, Kills 16-Year-Old Girl Who Rejected His Lewd Advances

STOP Drinking These 5 Coffees – They’re Quietly DESTROYING Your Gut & Hormones

This Works Better Than Ozempic for Belly Fat

Cinnamon reduces fat

How long do health influencers live? Episode 1 of 3.

'Armed Queers' Marxist Revolutionaries Under Investigation For Possible Foreknowledge Of Kirk's Assassination Plot

Who Killed Charlie Kirk? the Case Against Israel

Sen. Grassley announces a whistleblower has exposed the FBI program “Arctic Frost” for targeting 92 Republican groups

Keto, Ivermectin, & Fenbendazole: New Cancer Treatment Protocol Gains Momentum

Bill Ackman 'Hammered' Charlie Kirk in August 'Intervention' for Platforming Israel Critics

"I've Never Experienced Crime Of This Magnitude Before": 20-Year Veteran Austrian Police Spox

The UK is F*CKED, and the people have had enough

No place for hate apeech

America and Israel both told Qatar to allow Hamas to stay in their country

Video | Robert Kennedy brings down the house.


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: The Harsh Reality of Federal Supremacy
Source: Southern National Congress
URL Source: http://southernnationalcongress.org/truths/federal_supremacy.shtml
Published: Sep 27, 2010
Author: James Ronald Kennedy
Post Date: 2010-09-27 19:15:56 by Red Jones
Keywords: None
Views: 244
Comments: 24

The Harsh Reality of Federal Supremacy

James Ronald Kennedy

California, Arizona, & Louisiana

We the people of the once sovereign states live in the shadow of Federal tyranny. For example; when the people of California expressed their sovereign will in an open plebiscite a Federal judge nullified the will of the people; when the elected legislature of Arizona passed a law to defend the people of that once sovereign state against armed criminal invasion originating from a foreign country, the Federal President filed a suit in the Federal court to prevent Arizona from executing its inalienable right of self-defense; and when the elected governor of Louisiana attempted to protect his state from a man-made disaster in the Gulf of Mexico the Federal bureaucracy stepped in and halted his efforts—the central theme of all of these examples is the fact of the harsh, oppressive, and unconstitutional reality of America’s current system of Federal supremacy.

At the Federal level in contemporary America there is a great divide between the unrepresented taxpaying class and the Federally represented (and Federally protected) tax consuming class. Those tax consumers who support the political status quo in Washington, D. C. and their political hirelings find nothing unusual, and actually celebrate the outcomes of the three examples above. The perks, privileges, and powers that are derived from the status quo, or the close connections they enjoy with the status quo, benefits the tax consuming class and they therefore find great incentive to encourage the expansion of Federal supremacy. Politicians such as Peter Stark who recently declared that the Federal government could do anything it wanted; or Nancy Pelosi who declared that questions regarding constitutional authority for congressional actions were “not a serious question;” or President Obama’s declaration while running for office that the Federal government had a right to redistribute Joe the Plumber’s wealth demonstrate a thorough repudiation of the Constitution. Whereas our founding fathers created a limited Federal government, today’s “status quo” politicians see only unlimited power to promote their socialists agenda. In their very words and by their actions Stark, Pelosi, and Obama demonstrate the pervasive acceptance by America’s political status quo of the notion that the Constitution, as an instrument to limit Federal powers and protect individual rights reserved to we the people of once sovereign states, is no longer relevant in modern America.

The concept of Federal supremacy is not new; it did not originate with the Obama administration or with the Democratic Party, but is something that began early in America’s constitutional history. The adoption and enthusiastic acceptance of Federal supremacy by the political status quo reflects a strategic shift in the manner in which American liberty is defined. Prior to Appomattox, even in many Northern States, it was accepted as a tenant of American political faith that the States created the Federal government and that we the people of the sovereign states were the final judge as to the constitutionality of the actions of our agent—the Federal government. But as Governor Yates of Illinois noted in 1865 the War for Southern Independence had “tended, more than any other event in the history of the country, to militate against the Jeffersonian idea that the best government is that which governs least.”

Too many modern day “conservatives” take great hope in the upcoming November elections—seeing the possibility of Republicans reclaiming control of Congress as a solution to the harsh reality of Federal supremacy. Unfortunately this is a false hope! As in a military campaign mere tactical victories may be impressive but they do not procure final victory. The heroic victory of Manassas (that’s Bull Run for those schooled in mere Yankee history) did not stave off the final sad reality of Appomattox—tactical victories regardless of how exciting are no substitute for a strategic victory. Yet one more false promise of a Republican “Contract for America” will produce nothing more than possibly one more exciting “conservative” tactical victory—at the end of the day, however, the political status quo in Washington, D.C. and Federal supremacy will remain intact and ready to be harshly applied when next called upon. We the people of the sovereign states do not need tactical victories we need a strategic victory—a victory that permanently deprives the power elite of the unconstitutional perks, privileges, and powers inherent in their system of Federal supremacy!

The only way to gain a strategic victory over the current system of Federal supremacy is to pass a constitutional amendment acknowledging the inalienable right of we the people within our sovereign state to nullify acts of our agent, the Federal government which we judge to be beyond its constitutional authority. How many more times will the we the people of once sovereign states allow our agent, i.e., the Federal government, to act as our master rather than our servant? How much more liberty will we allow the agents of the status quo to trample upon before we demand a REAL change in how we are governed? Going to Washington, D.C., hat in hand, every four years and imploring our masters to “play nice according to the rules of the game” will never defend, let alone reclaim, our liberty. Real state’s rights including the right of nullification and/or secession are the only remedies an otherwise unresponsive Federal government will respond too. For a full explanation of how this can be done, see Nullification: Why and How. A free copy of this book can be downloaded at www.kennedytwins.com

James Ronald (Ron) and Walter Donald (Donnie) Kennedy were born and reared in Mississippi. Each received his Bachelor's degree from the University of Louisiana, Monroe, Louisiana. Ron holds a Master's degree in Health Administration from Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana. Donnie is a graduate of Charlotte Memorial Medical Center School of Anesthesia, Charlotte, North Carolina.

The Kennedy Twins are best known for their bestselling book The South Was Right! which has sold over 120,000 copies as of 2009. Following the success of The South Was Right!, the Kennedy Twins have written six other books and edited, annotated, and republished an 1825 textbook on the United States Constitution by William Rawle. The other books by the Kennedy Twins are as follows: Why Not Freedom! America's Revolt Against Big Government, Was Jefferson Davis Right?, Reclaiming Liberty (Ron), Myths of American Slavery (Donnie), Red Republicans and Lincoln's Marxist (Donnie and Al Benson), A View of the Constitution (William Rawle, 1825), and Nullifying Tyranny (to be released Spring 2010).

Many in the media have noted the Kennedy Twins advocacy of limited government, that is, real State's Rights, which has led to several interviews and TV appearances. The Kennedy Twins have been interviewed by numerous talk radio shows including Col. Oliver North's radio show, Bill Maher's show Politically Incorrect, BBC, and French National TV.

Both have served as Commander of the Louisiana Division Sons of Confederate Veterans. They have received special recognition awards from the National Commander of the Sons of Confederate Veterans, state and local United Daughters of the Confederacy chapters and many other Southern Heritage organizations.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 20.

#3. To: Red Jones (#0)

Anytime a bureaucracy is established and given powers it will keep growing like a weed until it exhausts its resources as is evidenced by the chaotic revenue shortfalls of American cities and governments as well as other countries of the West. Only a powerful political leader can stop bureaucracy creep; otherwise it's a major war or economic collapse.

Tatarewicz  posted on  2010-09-28   4:16:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Tatarewicz (#3)

if that is true, then self-rule among the people may be impossible. we simply can't form a government that won't be a tyrant.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-09-28   10:47:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Red Jones (#4)

if that is true, then self-rule among the people may be impossible. we simply can't form a government that won't be a tyrant.

Self-rule is possible as has been demonstrated for generations by the Swiss. Just requires great vigilance and active participation in all levels of politics, not just voting and leaving it to others to run the show. Ratification by plebiscite of government proposals seems to be a necessity.

Tatarewicz  posted on  2010-09-28   21:24:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Tatarewicz (#14)

Switzerland is a very small inconsequential nation compared to ours'. You're saying that our experience has no bearing on this matter? My point of view is different. I feel that our experience is the defining experience for truth in this matter.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-09-28   21:34:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Red Jones (#15)

I wouldn't say Switzerland is inconsequential when for much of the last century the world's wealthy put their money there.

The rank and file Swiss have been a credit to the concept of democracy by keen participation in all aspects of it whereas "lazy and ignorant" Americans let the political process slip into the hands of the "conniving Jew" with the result that American military and other resources are being squandered to support the criminal activities of the illegal Israeli state to the total detriment of US taxpayers specifically because these taxpayers have let Organized Jewry fund (and man) the election campaigns of the Democratic and Republican parties with the taxpayers' own money.

Thus democracy in America is a total farce as is the concept of a free press when it is controlled and manipulated in favor of Israeli interests. Where is the "truth" in this?

Tatarewicz  posted on  2010-09-29   6:04:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Tatarewicz (#16)

Where is the "truth" in this?

that is a provocative question.

I have come to the conclusion that the ideology of democracy where we have democratic institutions like elections and a constitution is simply dysfunctional in that it does not lead to something good and it does not result in the government serving the interests of the people. that is my opinion, you have not changed my mind with the Switzerland example.

I ask you to consider that America is a large country of over 300 million while Switzerland is a small country of less than 8 million. We are a prominent nation and they are not. Yet you say that we are the aberration and they are the norm. I'm America-centric. We've tried democracy. We've failed. It doesn't work.

Also, I advise that killing all the jews will not help democracy to work either. Hitler was elected by a democracy. He did away with the democracy, that is true, but he was initially brought to power by it. Hitler is another negative example that democracy does not result in good things or the will of the people being done. He did not represent the germans, he brought great harm to germany (and to others). Democracy failed in that case. I argue that it normally fails. and in time it will always fail.

not only that it is an inaccurate description as to how things work. There are always the real powers in any given nation. and those real powers simply manage the democracy institutions as they please. Our voting process doesn't really impact very much our government. Other people besides 'we the people' control our government.

I prefer the 'divine providence' ideology that our civilization previously believed in before the democracy ideology got so popular. Our government is powerful evidence that democracy facilitates evil in part by fooling people into thinking that somehow the people rule. Under the divine providence ideology it is god who appoints a leadership group in every given nation. and once this is done the people of that nation fall in line like sheep. I think this is a more accurate description of how things work.

Many people might be upset by this ideology. People love to think that god would only give us good rulers. God will give us evil rulers if it suits god's purpose is my response.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-09-29   6:29:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Red Jones (#17) (Edited)

We are not a "Democracy". We are a Republic. Democracy is only valid here within the parameters of the Constitution. You have failed to see that and insist on reinforcing the illusions that any majority rules in America as if we are no more than another version of the UN. You are enabling what you supposedly are complaining about.

GreyLmist  posted on  2010-09-29   6:54:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: GreyLmist (#18)

our form of government may be a 'democratic republic' from a technical point of view. but we as a people believe in the democracy ideology and try to implement it.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-09-29   7:12:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Red Jones (#19) (Edited)

You at #10: I feel that the US Constitution does not facilitate that 'we the people' are sovereign here. In the federalist papers it was specifically argued that the US Constitution would cause the people of our country to be sovereign like a king would be. and I feel that on this standard the US Constitution has been a failure.

I also feel that faith in this democracy ideology or the idea that 'we the people' rule is a handicap that we have. It causes some people to be unable to see how incredibly anti-American our government really is. Some people presume that our government somehow represents us and therefore they cannot see the evil in it.

Many people in China will openly say that in their country even though they do not have a 'democracy' they have a government that serves their nation whereas we do not

You at #12: Certainly, the people who rule us and use government power do not respect that document, the US Constitution. If it was respected, then everything would be much different. that is true.

You at #17: I have come to the conclusion that the ideology of democracy where we have democratic institutions like elections and a constitution is simply dysfunctional in that it does not lead to something good and it does not result in the government serving the interests of the people.
.
We've tried democracy. We've failed. It doesn't work.
.
There are always the real powers in any given nation. and those real powers simply manage the democracy institutions as they please. Our voting process doesn't really impact very much our government. Other people besides 'we the people' control our government.

I prefer the 'divine providence' ideology that our civilization previously believed in before the democracy ideology got so popular. Our government is powerful evidence that democracy facilitates evil in part by fooling people into thinking that somehow the people rule. Under the divine providence ideology it is god who appoints a leadership group in every given nation. and once this is done the people of that nation fall in line like sheep. I think this is a more accurate description of how things work.

Many people might be upset by this ideology. People love to think that god would only give us good rulers. God will give us evil rulers if it suits god's purpose is my response.

You at #18: our form of government may be a 'democratic republic' from a technical point of view. but we as a people believe in the democracy ideology and try to implement it.

Correct me if I'm wrong about this but I get the impression from your posts that you prefer a form of government so dominant that you have no choice and therefore no responsiblity -- it's God's will if it's evil and not His will that the evil be resisted. In short, only the evil are gifted with freewill and those who aren't evil-inclined should effectively return that gift to Him by opting not to utilize it in good conscience to counter what's evil. Rather like the parable of a person who chose to return what was given to him "as is" by hiding it away rather than run the risk of investing it to maybe be able to present his master with a profit.

If a majority of the people in this country have no interest in democracy within the parameters of the Constitution as intended, just in getting a consensus for whatever they want whether it's Constitutional or not, then you do have a form of government by democracy that represents and serves the whims and interests of the people there but does not represent or serve the Constitution or the will of the people aligned with it. Unconstitutional democracy has not failed those in favor of "majority rules no matter what". I don't get the impression that you'd prefer democracy in check by the Constitution if that would not work to suit what you want, such as the Federal government overstepping its bounds to squash State's Rights and facilitate illegal alien invaders.

Why complain about any form of government if "divine providence" is your prefered ideology? Is there some reason you think the misrule in D.C. isn't "divine providence"? What is it you want besides to blame the Constitution and its supporters as failures for an evil takeover here? Instead of exercising your freewill to stand with us and add to our strength in numbers, you seem more freewill motivated to insist we somehow deserve it; like "you and the Constitution weren't dressed properly"; like "no one on God's side wants to help you even if you resist loudly because you're still an unpopular minority in America and He'd give D.C. the order Himself to govern according to the Constitution if that's what He wanted for us instead of the evil running rampant."

That last part is my impression of your "divine providence" ideology. Like I said, if I've misread you, please clarify.

GreyLmist  posted on  2010-09-30   4:26:31 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 20.

#21. To: GreyLmist (#20)

you prefer a form of government so dominant that you have no choice and therefore no responsiblity

you're assuming and imagining on that one.

like the parable of a person who chose to return what was given to him "as is" by hiding it away rather than run the risk of investing it to maybe be able to present his master with a profit.

that parable is in Mattew 25 (I think). jesus was giving that parable. It was to demonstrate how judgment would be. the idea was that his master gave him some money and wanted him to invest it. and he did not invest it, but he protected it instead and gave it back 'as is'. He was trying to demonstrate that god gives us tasks and expects us to be enthusiastic and go out and do the job. judgment depends on whether you did the assignments given. that parable has nothing to do with government.

On the rest of your post I'm not really following your logic. I was trying to communicate that even though we have democratic processes to provide leaders in our republic these democratic processes are fraudulent. they don't work. that is no a real description of how things are. we're taught that the people rule, but I'm saying they don't. there is always a clique that is appointed to rule actually by god or allowed to rule by god. and once this is done the people fall in line like sheep. the democracy is an illusion - always is my opinion.

I don't advocate any particular government. I think that the world is made so that evil people end up dominating our powerful governments. this is done on purpose (by the creator), to create a world where we have choices. where we can choose which side, the side god calls life and the side god calls death. I think that one day god will call an end to this era where we are put to such tests. Jesus will return at that time. He will direct the building of his kingdom of heaven here on earth. The people will be judged. Some will be included in this kingdom to come and some will be excluded. these events I feel are the solution and not man-made solutions.

don't believe in the idols or ideologies that mankind sells. Under this 'divine providence' or traditional idea we Americans would be considering that we have an evil government. We would feel it was given to us on purpose. and we'd be repenting and asking god for help. I feel that is our only solution.

I like the slogan that some of the early patriots used - 'no king but jesus'. They wanted to keep government weak because they knew government would facilitate evil. they were right.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-09-30 10:34:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 20.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]