[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed

Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!!

Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES

Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen

Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances

"NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor

If You're Trying To Lose Weight But Gaining Belly Fat, Watch Insulin

Arabica Coffee Prices Soar As Analyst Warns of "Weather Disasters" Risk Denting Global Production

Candace Owens: : I Know What Happened at the Hamptons (Ackman confronted Charlie Kirk)

Illegal Alien Drunk Driver Mows Down, Kills 16-Year-Old Girl Who Rejected His Lewd Advances

STOP Drinking These 5 Coffees – They’re Quietly DESTROYING Your Gut & Hormones

This Works Better Than Ozempic for Belly Fat

Cinnamon reduces fat

How long do health influencers live? Episode 1 of 3.

'Armed Queers' Marxist Revolutionaries Under Investigation For Possible Foreknowledge Of Kirk's Assassination Plot

Who Killed Charlie Kirk? the Case Against Israel

Sen. Grassley announces a whistleblower has exposed the FBI program “Arctic Frost” for targeting 92 Republican groups

Keto, Ivermectin, & Fenbendazole: New Cancer Treatment Protocol Gains Momentum

Bill Ackman 'Hammered' Charlie Kirk in August 'Intervention' for Platforming Israel Critics

"I've Never Experienced Crime Of This Magnitude Before": 20-Year Veteran Austrian Police Spox

The UK is F*CKED, and the people have had enough

No place for hate apeech

America and Israel both told Qatar to allow Hamas to stay in their country

Video | Robert Kennedy brings down the house.

Owner releases video of Trump banner ripping, shooting in WNC

Cash Jordan: Looters ‘Forcibly Evict’ Millionaires… as California’s “NO ARRESTS” Policy BACKFIRES

Dallas Motel Horror: Immigrant Machete Killer Caught

America has been infiltrated and occupied Netanyahu 1980


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: The Harsh Reality of Federal Supremacy
Source: Southern National Congress
URL Source: http://southernnationalcongress.org/truths/federal_supremacy.shtml
Published: Sep 27, 2010
Author: James Ronald Kennedy
Post Date: 2010-09-27 19:15:56 by Red Jones
Keywords: None
Views: 237
Comments: 24

The Harsh Reality of Federal Supremacy

James Ronald Kennedy

California, Arizona, & Louisiana

We the people of the once sovereign states live in the shadow of Federal tyranny. For example; when the people of California expressed their sovereign will in an open plebiscite a Federal judge nullified the will of the people; when the elected legislature of Arizona passed a law to defend the people of that once sovereign state against armed criminal invasion originating from a foreign country, the Federal President filed a suit in the Federal court to prevent Arizona from executing its inalienable right of self-defense; and when the elected governor of Louisiana attempted to protect his state from a man-made disaster in the Gulf of Mexico the Federal bureaucracy stepped in and halted his efforts—the central theme of all of these examples is the fact of the harsh, oppressive, and unconstitutional reality of America’s current system of Federal supremacy.

At the Federal level in contemporary America there is a great divide between the unrepresented taxpaying class and the Federally represented (and Federally protected) tax consuming class. Those tax consumers who support the political status quo in Washington, D. C. and their political hirelings find nothing unusual, and actually celebrate the outcomes of the three examples above. The perks, privileges, and powers that are derived from the status quo, or the close connections they enjoy with the status quo, benefits the tax consuming class and they therefore find great incentive to encourage the expansion of Federal supremacy. Politicians such as Peter Stark who recently declared that the Federal government could do anything it wanted; or Nancy Pelosi who declared that questions regarding constitutional authority for congressional actions were “not a serious question;” or President Obama’s declaration while running for office that the Federal government had a right to redistribute Joe the Plumber’s wealth demonstrate a thorough repudiation of the Constitution. Whereas our founding fathers created a limited Federal government, today’s “status quo” politicians see only unlimited power to promote their socialists agenda. In their very words and by their actions Stark, Pelosi, and Obama demonstrate the pervasive acceptance by America’s political status quo of the notion that the Constitution, as an instrument to limit Federal powers and protect individual rights reserved to we the people of once sovereign states, is no longer relevant in modern America.

The concept of Federal supremacy is not new; it did not originate with the Obama administration or with the Democratic Party, but is something that began early in America’s constitutional history. The adoption and enthusiastic acceptance of Federal supremacy by the political status quo reflects a strategic shift in the manner in which American liberty is defined. Prior to Appomattox, even in many Northern States, it was accepted as a tenant of American political faith that the States created the Federal government and that we the people of the sovereign states were the final judge as to the constitutionality of the actions of our agent—the Federal government. But as Governor Yates of Illinois noted in 1865 the War for Southern Independence had “tended, more than any other event in the history of the country, to militate against the Jeffersonian idea that the best government is that which governs least.”

Too many modern day “conservatives” take great hope in the upcoming November elections—seeing the possibility of Republicans reclaiming control of Congress as a solution to the harsh reality of Federal supremacy. Unfortunately this is a false hope! As in a military campaign mere tactical victories may be impressive but they do not procure final victory. The heroic victory of Manassas (that’s Bull Run for those schooled in mere Yankee history) did not stave off the final sad reality of Appomattox—tactical victories regardless of how exciting are no substitute for a strategic victory. Yet one more false promise of a Republican “Contract for America” will produce nothing more than possibly one more exciting “conservative” tactical victory—at the end of the day, however, the political status quo in Washington, D.C. and Federal supremacy will remain intact and ready to be harshly applied when next called upon. We the people of the sovereign states do not need tactical victories we need a strategic victory—a victory that permanently deprives the power elite of the unconstitutional perks, privileges, and powers inherent in their system of Federal supremacy!

The only way to gain a strategic victory over the current system of Federal supremacy is to pass a constitutional amendment acknowledging the inalienable right of we the people within our sovereign state to nullify acts of our agent, the Federal government which we judge to be beyond its constitutional authority. How many more times will the we the people of once sovereign states allow our agent, i.e., the Federal government, to act as our master rather than our servant? How much more liberty will we allow the agents of the status quo to trample upon before we demand a REAL change in how we are governed? Going to Washington, D.C., hat in hand, every four years and imploring our masters to “play nice according to the rules of the game” will never defend, let alone reclaim, our liberty. Real state’s rights including the right of nullification and/or secession are the only remedies an otherwise unresponsive Federal government will respond too. For a full explanation of how this can be done, see Nullification: Why and How. A free copy of this book can be downloaded at www.kennedytwins.com

James Ronald (Ron) and Walter Donald (Donnie) Kennedy were born and reared in Mississippi. Each received his Bachelor's degree from the University of Louisiana, Monroe, Louisiana. Ron holds a Master's degree in Health Administration from Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana. Donnie is a graduate of Charlotte Memorial Medical Center School of Anesthesia, Charlotte, North Carolina.

The Kennedy Twins are best known for their bestselling book The South Was Right! which has sold over 120,000 copies as of 2009. Following the success of The South Was Right!, the Kennedy Twins have written six other books and edited, annotated, and republished an 1825 textbook on the United States Constitution by William Rawle. The other books by the Kennedy Twins are as follows: Why Not Freedom! America's Revolt Against Big Government, Was Jefferson Davis Right?, Reclaiming Liberty (Ron), Myths of American Slavery (Donnie), Red Republicans and Lincoln's Marxist (Donnie and Al Benson), A View of the Constitution (William Rawle, 1825), and Nullifying Tyranny (to be released Spring 2010).

Many in the media have noted the Kennedy Twins advocacy of limited government, that is, real State's Rights, which has led to several interviews and TV appearances. The Kennedy Twins have been interviewed by numerous talk radio shows including Col. Oliver North's radio show, Bill Maher's show Politically Incorrect, BBC, and French National TV.

Both have served as Commander of the Louisiana Division Sons of Confederate Veterans. They have received special recognition awards from the National Commander of the Sons of Confederate Veterans, state and local United Daughters of the Confederacy chapters and many other Southern Heritage organizations.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 22.

#3. To: Red Jones (#0)

Anytime a bureaucracy is established and given powers it will keep growing like a weed until it exhausts its resources as is evidenced by the chaotic revenue shortfalls of American cities and governments as well as other countries of the West. Only a powerful political leader can stop bureaucracy creep; otherwise it's a major war or economic collapse.

Tatarewicz  posted on  2010-09-28   4:16:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Tatarewicz (#3)

if that is true, then self-rule among the people may be impossible. we simply can't form a government that won't be a tyrant.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-09-28   10:47:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Red Jones (#4)

if that is true, then self-rule among the people may be impossible. we simply can't form a government that won't be a tyrant.

Self-rule is possible as has been demonstrated for generations by the Swiss. Just requires great vigilance and active participation in all levels of politics, not just voting and leaving it to others to run the show. Ratification by plebiscite of government proposals seems to be a necessity.

Tatarewicz  posted on  2010-09-28   21:24:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Tatarewicz (#14)

Switzerland is a very small inconsequential nation compared to ours'. You're saying that our experience has no bearing on this matter? My point of view is different. I feel that our experience is the defining experience for truth in this matter.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-09-28   21:34:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Red Jones (#15)

I wouldn't say Switzerland is inconsequential when for much of the last century the world's wealthy put their money there.

The rank and file Swiss have been a credit to the concept of democracy by keen participation in all aspects of it whereas "lazy and ignorant" Americans let the political process slip into the hands of the "conniving Jew" with the result that American military and other resources are being squandered to support the criminal activities of the illegal Israeli state to the total detriment of US taxpayers specifically because these taxpayers have let Organized Jewry fund (and man) the election campaigns of the Democratic and Republican parties with the taxpayers' own money.

Thus democracy in America is a total farce as is the concept of a free press when it is controlled and manipulated in favor of Israeli interests. Where is the "truth" in this?

Tatarewicz  posted on  2010-09-29   6:04:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Tatarewicz (#16)

Where is the "truth" in this?

that is a provocative question.

I have come to the conclusion that the ideology of democracy where we have democratic institutions like elections and a constitution is simply dysfunctional in that it does not lead to something good and it does not result in the government serving the interests of the people. that is my opinion, you have not changed my mind with the Switzerland example.

I ask you to consider that America is a large country of over 300 million while Switzerland is a small country of less than 8 million. We are a prominent nation and they are not. Yet you say that we are the aberration and they are the norm. I'm America-centric. We've tried democracy. We've failed. It doesn't work.

Also, I advise that killing all the jews will not help democracy to work either. Hitler was elected by a democracy. He did away with the democracy, that is true, but he was initially brought to power by it. Hitler is another negative example that democracy does not result in good things or the will of the people being done. He did not represent the germans, he brought great harm to germany (and to others). Democracy failed in that case. I argue that it normally fails. and in time it will always fail.

not only that it is an inaccurate description as to how things work. There are always the real powers in any given nation. and those real powers simply manage the democracy institutions as they please. Our voting process doesn't really impact very much our government. Other people besides 'we the people' control our government.

I prefer the 'divine providence' ideology that our civilization previously believed in before the democracy ideology got so popular. Our government is powerful evidence that democracy facilitates evil in part by fooling people into thinking that somehow the people rule. Under the divine providence ideology it is god who appoints a leadership group in every given nation. and once this is done the people of that nation fall in line like sheep. I think this is a more accurate description of how things work.

Many people might be upset by this ideology. People love to think that god would only give us good rulers. God will give us evil rulers if it suits god's purpose is my response.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-09-29   6:29:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Red Jones (#17)

There are always the real powers in any given nation. and those real powers simply manage the democracy institutions as they please.

Not in Switzerland where they've matured sufficiently to realize that the governing political structure is as important as job and family and give it the same amount of attention. Swiss realize that without such attention government tends to fall into the hands of the inept who mainly use it for their own ends which then can lead to destruction of jobs and family for all through economic mismanagement or wars.

Jews of Europe had a legacy over the centuries of being too inept to produce wealth because of physical and other shortcomings so they had to resort to theft to survive, individually and then on a grand scale by taking over at gunpoint land and businesses from productive Russians, then hopelessly mismanaging the entire country. Jews are doing the same thing in Palestine, taking land at gunpoint from indigenous Arabs with the help of the US government which their duals control through the sponsorship of Israel-friendly members of Congress.

The SNAFU in American politics is due to the failure of education as well as the family to develop the kind of political savvy the Swiss exhibit; Americans seem to be more interested in spectator sports and entertainment events/personalities than the very vital political process.

Tatarewicz  posted on  2010-10-01   0:30:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 22.

        There are no replies to Comment # 22.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 22.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]