[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Massive Property Tax Fraud Exposed - $5.1 Trillion Bond Scam Will Crash System

Israel Sold American Weapons to Azerbaijan to Kill Armenian Christians

Daily MEMES YouTube Hates | YouTube is Fighting ME all the Way | Making ME Remove Memes | Part 188

New fear unlocked while stuck in highway traffic - Indian truck driver on his phone smashes into

RFK Jr. says the largest tech companies will permit Americans to access their personal health data

I just researched this, and it’s true—MUST SEE!!

Savage invader is disturbed that English people exist in an area he thought had been conquered

Jackson Hole's Parting Advice: Accept Even More Migrants To Offset Demographic Collapse, Or Else

Ecuador Angered! China-built Massive Dam is Tofu-Dreg, Ecuador Demands $400 Million Compensation

UK economy on brink of collapse (Needs IMF Bailout)

How Red Light Unlocks Your Body’s Hidden Fat-Burning Switch

The Mar-a-Lago Accord Confirmed: Miran Brings Trump's Reset To The Fed ($8,000 Gold)

This taboo sex act could save your relationship, expert insists: ‘Catalyst for conversations’

LA Police Bust Burglary Crew Suspected In 92 Residential Heists

Top 10 Jobs AI is Going to Wipe Out

It’s REALLY Happening! The Australian Continent Is Drifting Towards Asia

Broken Germany Discovers BRUTAL Reality

Nuclear War, Trump's New $500 dollar note: Armstrong says gold is going much higher

Scientists unlock 30-year mystery: Rare micronutrient holds key to brain health and cancer defense

City of Fort Wayne proposing changes to food, alcohol requirements for Riverfront Liquor Licenses

Cash Jordan: Migrant MOB BLOCKS Whitehouse… Demands ‘11 Million Illegals’ Stay

Not much going on that I can find today

In Britain, they are secretly preparing for mass deaths

These Are The Best And Worst Countries For Work (US Last Place)-Life Balance

These Are The World's Most Powerful Cars

Doctor: Trump has 6 to 8 Months TO LIVE?!

Whatever Happened to Robert E. Lee's 7 Children

Is the Wailing Wall Actually a Roman Fort?

Israelis Persecute Americans

Israelis SHOCKED The World Hates Them


Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: Former Fed Chief Volcker Says Financial System is Insolvent and Broken
Source: WRH/Goldmoney
URL Source: http://goldmoney.com/gold-research/ ... m-is-insolvent-and-broken.html
Published: Oct 1, 2010
Author: Roman Baudzus
Post Date: 2010-10-01 14:34:29 by Original_Intent
Keywords: Financial, Fraud, Federal, Reserve
Views: 323
Comments: 25

Paul Volcker, former head of the American central bank Federal Reserve, announced last Thursday at a conference of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago that the US financial system is largely insolvent and "broken".

Volcker indicated that not only the banks are to blame for this situation, but also the federal regulators. During the last few years, they could have tried a lot harder to stop the investment banks from turning the global markets into a casino. The investment banks were also responsible for attracting large parts of the former core business of the commercial banks, which consequently led to major problems, as everyone could now see.

Thus, Volcker considered that the credit business generally had taken a negative path. The size of the losses from toxic assets so far hidden by banks would not be assessable anymore. Therefore it would not be hard to imagine that the present situation holds big risks for the future stability of the financial system as well as for the broader economy. He blamed the international central banks of overshooting the mark, when trying to acquire skills that were not part of their original fields of activity. Additionally, a lax monetary policy stirred up the existing problems instead of tackling them.

Volcker added that he was not sufficiently content with the new financial markets bill, since the legislation, known as Dodd-Frank, and the included Volcker rule, was strongly diluted by individual lobbies. Nowadays it was not the financial regulators, who provided the banks and lenders with rules that generally had to be observed. In fact, a major part of the market participants resented the financial authorities, since they find the regulations disruptive and bad for business. He lambasted a lack of respect that led to a refusal to obey the federal rules and to fully execute them.

Volcker described the American mortgage market as "completely broken". It would take a long time to get the problems of the housing market under control and to reinstall an economic equilibrium. This situation would weigh on the economic development for a long time, since it causes a big problem for the American consumer and has already led to huge wealth destruction.

Published by GoldMoney Copyright © 2010. All rights reserved. Written by Roman Baudzus - Contributing Writer


Michael Rivero at What Really Happened had a very interesting and well written commentary on this point.

"And the reason is simple. The entire Federal Reserve Bank System is a giant "Ponzi": or pyramid scheme.

This nation fought a war with England to free itself from the predatory banking practices of the Bank of England, enforced on the colonies by King George III's Currency Act, which mandated the use of British Pounds for all commerce. But pounds were only available as loans from the Bank of England, at interest. It took only a few years for this scheme to reduce the formerly prosperous and productive colonies down to the poverty and unemployment typical of London at the same time period.

While the state-run schools teach that the revolution was about the Stamp act and the Tea tax, it was the rage created by the enforced impoverishment of the Currency Act which fueled the revolution. Following the American Revolution, the Founding Fathers reverted back to the system which had worked so well before the Currency Act. Government issued the public currency and spent it into circulation where it was used by the public free of interest. Then the money was taxed back into the governments hands, then to be re-spent back into circulation. This is a system which has worked very well for the civil population throughout history and which for the obvious reasons, bankers loathe to the point of starting wars to prevent it!

The US has been cursed with three private central banks issuing the public currency at interest and all three brought this nation to the edge of ruin. The mechanism is simple. Because all currency is the product of a loan, the moment that first bill goes into circulation, more money is owed to the Federal Reserve banking system than is actually in existence, and the population is trapped; sold into debt-slavery by their own government, as happened to us all in 1913.

The system perpetuates only so long as an ever-larger group of new borrowers can be found to create new money to pay the interest on the old money. That is what makes it a pyramid. That is why the government and media always talk about the "growth" of the economy. "Growth" may sound like a good thing to the unenlightened, but in a debt-based economy, "growth" means "deeper in debt. And because it is a pyramid, if the economy does not grow, that is, if more new debt cannot be created to service the interest on the old debt, the pyramid collapses, which is what is happening now.

The Federal Reserve System is designed to suck the real wealth out of the nation and put it in the pockets of the bankers, and now that they have succeeded, the system is breaking down, too cash-poor to operate efficiently, just as it did in the colonies in the early 1770s. The system is broken because the bankers have all the wealth, and absent a new source of wealth to pay the bankers' interest charges and fees, the system is locking up.

Of course, it is all paper debts and make-believe obligations. The money owed to the bankers by the government never existed in the first place. It's just part fo the scam by which the bankers enslave the world, which is the real essence of banking; to hold nations and people perpetually in debt-servitude or indentured service, with the government bribed to not take action to ameliorate the situation!"

"This is the very essence of the banking industry,; to make us all, whether we be nations or individuals, slaves to debt!" -- mp3 clip from the film "The International"

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 21.

#3. To: christine, Deacon Benjamin, Kamala, James Deffenbach, Lod, TwentyTwelve, wudidiz, all (#0)

((((((Thought youse' guys might be interested Ping.))))))

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-10-01   14:58:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Original_Intent (#3)

Thanks. I was able to pull up a WSJ article on the speech.

* September 23, 2010, 4:38 PM ET

Volcker Spares No One in Broad Critique

By Damian Paletta

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker scrapped a prepared speech he had planned to deliver at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago on Thursday, and instead delivered a blistering, off-the-cuff critique leveled at nearly every corner of the financial system.

Standing at a lectern with his hands in his pockets, Volcker moved unsparingly from banks to regulators to business schools to the Fed to money-market funds during his luncheon speech.

He praised the new financial overhaul law, but said the system remained at risk because it is subject to future “judgments” of individual regulators, who he said would be relentlessly lobbied by banks and politicians to soften the rules.

“This is a plea for structural changes in markets and market regulation,” he said at one point.

Here are his views on a variety of topics.

1) Macroprudential regulation — “somehow those words grate on my ears.”

2) Banking — Investment banks became “trading machines instead of investment banks [leading to] encroachment on the territory of commercial banks, and commercial banks encroached on the territory of others in a way that couldn’t easily be managed by the old supervisory system.”

3) Financial system — “The financial system is broken. We can use that term in late 2008, and I think it’s fair to still use the term unfortunately. We know that parts of it are absolutely broken, like the mortgage market which only happens to be the most important part of our capital markets [and has] become a subsidiary of the U.S. government.”

4) Business schools — “We had all our best business schools in the United States pouring out financial engineers, every smart young mathematician and physicist said ‘I don’t want to be a civil engineer, a mechanical engineer. I’m a smart guy, I want to go to Wall Street.’ And then you know all the risks were going to be sliced and diced and [people thought] the market would be resilient and not face any crises. We took care of all that stuff, and I think that was the general philosophy that markets are efficient and self correcting and we don’t have to worry about them too much.

5) Central banks and the Fed — “Central banks became…maybe a little too infatuated with their own skills and authority because they found secrets to price stability…I think its fair to say there was a certain neglect of supervisory responsibilities, certainly not confined to the Federal Reserve, but including the Federal Reserve, I only say that because the Federal Reserve is the most important in my view.”

6) The recession — “It’s so difficult to get out of this recession because of the basic disequilibrium in the real economy.”

7) Council of regulators — “Potentially cumbersome.”

8) On judgment — “Let me suggest to you that relying on judgment all the time makes for a very heavy burden whether you are regulating an individual institution or whether you are regulating the whole market or whether you are deciding what might be disturbing or what might not be disturbing. It’s pretty tough and it’s subject to all kinds of political and institutional blockages as well.”

9) On procyclicality — “It’s the hardest thing as a regulator in my opinion…when things are really going well, the economy is going well, the market is not disturbed, but you see developments in an institution or in markets that is potentially destabilizing, doing something about it is extremely difficult. Because the answer of the people in the markets is, ‘what are you talking about? Things are going really well. We know more about banking and finance than you do, get out of my hair, if you don’t get out of my hair I’m going to write my congressman.’”

10) Risk management — “Markets that are prone to excesses in one direction or another are not simply managed under the assumption that we can assume that everybody follows a normal distribution curve. Normal distribution curves — if I would submit to you — do not exist in financial markets. Its not that they are fat tails, they don’t exist. I keep hearing about fat tails, and Jesus, it’s only supposed to occur every 100 years, and it appears every 10 years.”

11) Derivatives — “I’ve heard so many stories about how important” derivatives are but “there doesn’t seem to be much doubt that the creation of derivatives has far exceeded any pressing need for hedging.”

12) Money market funds — “Money market funds have encroached so much on the banking market. They are nothing, in my view, but a regulatory arbitrage. The purpose that they serve in handling payments and short term paper is a commercial banking function” but they don’t hold the capital or face the regulation of banks.

13) The Fed and Dodd-Frank — Volcker said it was a “miracle” that despite all the criticism aimed at the Fed the central bank “came out with enhanced regulatory authorities rather than reduced regulatory authorities.”

DeaconBenjamin  posted on  2010-10-01   17:14:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: DeaconBenjamin (#11)

6) The recession — “It’s so difficult to get out of this recession because of the basic disequilibrium in the real economy.”

Like, uh, Duh Dude.

When the fundamental productive capability i.e., the production of real value added goods is shipped out of the country then you have shipped out the basis from which everything else derives.

"Money is an idea backed by confidence."

That confidence derives from the willingness of a country's people to work and to produce valuable goods and services. And that is the source of all real wealth.

When the ability to work and produce is inhibited by government regulation, taxation, cronyism between government the financial markets and other industries, and the outsourcing of industry to other climes then the fundamental confidence is eroded. It is now vanishing rapidly.

With the confidence goes the value of the currency and the productive capability that made that currency of value.

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-10-01   18:04:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Original_Intent (#13)

That confidence derives from the willingness of a country's people to work and to produce valuable goods and services. And that is the source of all real wealth.

A person's willingness to produce excess wealth is predicated on his expectation that he will be able to save that wealth for later use. Without a functioning currency or other means of "storing" wealth, very little production would take place above what is needed for survival. So the confidence actually precedes the (excess) production.

duckhunter  posted on  2010-10-01   18:37:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: duckhunter (#19)

That confidence derives from the willingness of a country's people to work and to produce valuable goods and services. And that is the source of all real wealth.

A person's willingness to produce excess wealth is predicated on his expectation that he will be able to save that wealth for later use. Without a functioning currency or other means of "storing" wealth, very little production would take place above what is needed for survival. So the confidence actually precedes the (excess) production.

A currency facilitates ease and speed of transactions resulting in greater expansion at a more rapid rate, but is not sufficient unto itself nor is it a prerequisite. Barter, and exchange of commodities preceded formal currencies. Prior to the establishment of modern formal currencies means of exchange were items such as salt, pepper, and other items of more or less enduring value - even Tulip Bulbs (see Dutch History). Gold became a common and accepted medium, along with silver, as far back as the Roman Empire and likely before. The first paper money was gold deposit receipts issued by medieval goldsmiths who had secure vaults and so would store gold for others - for a fee of course. Traders discovered that they could exchange receipts and they would very often exchange hands many times before they were redeemed. Goldsmiths quickly figured out that they could issue more receipts than they had gold because it was unlikely for everyone to show up at once demanding payment in gold. Thus fractional reserve banking was born.

People left unfettered almost naturally produce more than mere survival necessity dictates. Real survival, beyond mere subsistence, requires production in abundance. However, I do agree that a store of nonperishable wealth does inspire greater production as it makes exchange much easier. I would even go a bit further in suggesting that inheritance taxes cut directly against that desire to accumulate wealth beyond immediate needs as one of the manifestations of the urge to survive, the common denominator of human existence, is to ensure the welfare of the next generation(s). Where the confidence derives from is the knowledge that the individual has that others will accept these pieces of paper for goods and services. When that confidence lessens the value of the currency recedes and vice versa. Inflation could almost be called a crisis in confidence as price signals, brought about by an excess of currency in circulation, cause prices to be bid upwards and thus each individual unit of currency becomes that much less valuable.

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-10-01   18:55:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 21.

#22. To: Original_Intent (#21)

Prior to the establishment of modern formal currencies means of exchange were items such as salt, pepper, and other items of more or less enduring value - even Tulip Bulbs (see Dutch History)

Which made them de-facto currencies. Liquidity and marketability may vary.

Mises called money the "most marketable commodity".

duckhunter  posted on  2010-10-01 19:10:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 21.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]