[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Tariff Windfall Drives Surprise $27 Billion US Budget Surplus In June

Tucker Carlson Reveals Who He Thinks Funded Jeffrey Epstein's Crimes

Russia's Dark Future

A Missile Shield for America - A Trillion Dollar Fantasy?

Kentucky School Board Chairman Resigns After Calling for People to ‘Shoot Republicans’

These Are 2025's 'Most Livable' Cities

Nicotine and Fish

Genocide Summer Camp, And Other Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix

This Can Create Endless Green Energy WITHOUT Electricity

Geoengineering: Who’s Behind It and How We Stop It

Pam Bondi Ordered Prosecution of Dr. Kirk Moore After Refusing to Dismiss Case

California woman bombarded with Amazon packages for over a year

CVS ordered to pay $949 MILLION in Medicaid fraud case.

Starmer has signed up to the UNs agreement to raise taxes in the UK

Magic mushrooms may hold the secret to longevity: Psilocybin extends lifespan by 57% in groundbreaking study

Cops favorite AI tool automatically deletes evidence of when AI was used

Leftist Anti ICE Extremist OPENS FIRE On Cops, $50,000 REWARD For Shooter

With great power comes no accountability.

Auto loan debt hits $1.63T. 20% of buyers now pay $1,000+ monthly. Texas delinquency hits 7.92%.

Quotable Quotes from the Chosenites

Tokara Islands NOW crashing into the Ocean ! Mysterious Swarm continues with OVER 1700 Quakes !

Why Austria Is Suddenly Declaring War on Immigration

Rep. Greene Wants To Remove $500 Million in Military Aid for Nuclear-Armed Israel From NDAA

Netanyahu Lays Groundwork for Additional Strikes on Iran: 'We Didn't Deal With The Enriched Uranium'

Sweden Cracks Down On OnlyFans - Will U.S. Follow Suit?

Joe Rogan CALLS OUT Israel's Media CONTROL

Communist Billionaire Accused Of Funding Anti-ICE Riots Mysteriously Vanishes

6 Factors That Describe China's Current State

Trump Thteatens to Bomb Moscow and Beijing

Little Bitty


Editorial
See other Editorial Articles

Title: Marriage Sinks to New Low, Recession Blamed…
Source: SpearHead
URL Source: http://www.the-spearhead.com/2010/0 ... s-to-new-low-recession-blamed/
Published: Oct 5, 2010
Author: W.F. Price
Post Date: 2010-10-05 14:21:34 by Lysander_Spooner
Keywords: None
Views: 911
Comments: 45

Marriage Sinks to New Low, Recession Blamed… by W.F. Price on September 28, 2010

Recently released Census Bureau figures reveal that in 2009 the proportion of married Americans fell lower than ever, dropping 5% in the last 9 years alone. Compared to 57% in 2000, today only 52% of all adults are married. The institution of marriage is crumbling under a combined feminist and federal assault, which has legislated it into something that is roughly the opposite of what it used to be.

Pointing to the recession as the primary reason for the death of marriage is entirely off the mark. The decline of marriage has been ongoing since at least the early 1970s, when no-fault divorce created an explosion of divorces and started to make men more reluctant to tie the knot.

Spearhead contributor Charles Martel wrote a piece on the decline of the marriage rate that suggests that if current trends continue, marriage will cease to exist within roughly twenty years.

In the earlier days of the decline, men were generally blamed, but perhaps the recession provides an even more convenient excuse. Or, maybe, those who still support the institution are simply holding out in the impossible hope that the trend will turn around when times are better.

They are deluding themselves. As long as marriage remains an institution designed to suck the lifeblood out of men for the benefit of lawyers, the government and women, it will continue to weaken until it meets its well-deserved demise.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 42.

#6. To: Lysander_Spooner (#0)

As long as marriage remains an institution designed to suck the lifeblood out of men for the benefit of lawyers, the government and women, it will continue to weaken until it meets its well-deserved demise.

What? Marriage isn't a 50/50 type of deal and committment anymore? It's all the ebil women who are to blame and men are just "victims" in marriage.

Women get the lifeblood sucked out of them too......especially if they had assets prior to marriage.

abraxas  posted on  2010-10-05   18:09:18 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: abraxas (#6)

While that can be true it is likely about 98% males getting the hose job and 2% of the females. Theft is theft and the 'Divorce Racket' is clearly biased against the productive male. A few females also get a taste of the bitterness.

I for one would never 'do it' again, and I know lots of males who feel the exact same way. Feminists and greedy lawyers/judges have stacke deck, and we are not playing the game. So-called 'marriage' is dying a justifiable death in my view. Peace.

Lysander_Spooner  posted on  2010-10-06   10:21:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Lysander_Spooner (#11)

Feminists and greedy lawyers/judges have stacke deck, and we are not playing the game

Where is the personal responsibility? At least I can admit that I wouldn't have been hosed if I had a pre-nup. It's not theft when people don't protect their assets.

And, although it was a rough learning experience, I'm not bitter at all. I will simply be better educated and prepared if I do it again.

This victim mentality doesn't work for me.....

abraxas  posted on  2010-10-06   11:09:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: abraxas (#16)

This victim mentality doesn't work for me.....

I will simply be better educated and prepared if I do it again.

Yes it likely does. My guess is you are a woman?

If you support the present system it based entirely on women being the victim.

Pre-nups aren't worth the paper they are written on, just another way lawyers fleece the unsuspecting and the uninformed, and usually men pay for these. The judge will flap his lips with some comment to the effect: "The pre-nup is null and void because it is not in the interests of society". Then proceeds to toss it in the circular file.

As far as doing it again, good luck with that, marginal males seem to be the only ones getting married these day, and even their numbers are declining. Please see my post today of the Death of Marriage. I for one will never 'do it' again. My sons, both 21, are wise to the system and it seems as most of their male piers are also. Mean while, the girls their age for the most part have a strategic plan of wearing slut gear, getting tossed around from guy to guy, while dreaming of marrying a rich guy, and going shopping on his credit card the rest of their lives. It would be funny if it wern't so tragic. Peace.

Lysander_Spooner  posted on  2010-10-06   11:31:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Lysander_Spooner (#17)

My post got cut off.....

Most pre-nups are air tight. In fact, less than 1% of pre-nups get thrown out in court. The scenario you presented is often stated by those who did not have a pre-nup in place prior to marriage. But, it's not how it is played out in court.

abraxas  posted on  2010-10-06   11:47:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: abraxas (#21)

In fact, less than 1% of pre-nups get thrown out in court.

Do you have a source for this 'fact'.

Everyone I have know in my personal life who had a pre-nup and divorced were sorry they spent the money on something that ended up in the trash.

Lysander_Spooner  posted on  2010-10-06   12:19:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Lysander_Spooner (#27)

Again, this varies from state to state. But there are general guidlelines to make the pre-nup air-tight. This would be for pre-nups to be drafted in a timely manner, meaning several months prior to the wedding, both parties are represented by an individual attorney, not the same attorney, and the interests of both parties are represented in the document. Lastly, the parties need to honestly disclose all assets in the document.

The most common reason that pre-nups are tossed out is due to FAILURE TO DISCLOSE all assets within the document. This isn't failure of the document, but failure of the party to be honest in content.

abraxas  posted on  2010-10-06   12:37:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: abraxas (#34) (Edited)

I'm not buying it.

In todays environment I would need a small fortune in gold as ransom from my partner in civil union to sign. Say like $1,000,000 in gold bullion to even begin to think about it.

The system is not only broke, it is immoral and down right evil.

Lysander_Spooner  posted on  2010-10-06   12:56:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Lysander_Spooner (#37)

lol.....the most air-tight pre-nups are made for folks who really don't have a lot in the first place--a few houses, a business, retirement. It often reduces the costs of litigation a great deal because it places many assets off the table and there is no haggling over them.

If the partner to be doesn't want to sign, then that's probably not the right partner, IMHO. I say both parties should keep what they had. : )

abraxas  posted on  2010-10-06   13:19:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: abraxas (#40) (Edited)

You obviously 'believe' in the so-called 'family court system', I do not.

It is a sham, and criminal.

It is indefensible and should be dismantled. It will be by attrition, by those like me who refuse to enter into so-called 'marriage', when in fact what we are signing away are our rights as parents and rights to our property. This "system" will not stand.

Lysander_Spooner  posted on  2010-10-08   12:12:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 42.

#43. To: Lysander_Spooner, abraxas (#42)

The more people stay out of the "justice" system, the better it is for all involved.

Turtle  posted on  2010-10-08 12:19:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: Lysander_Spooner (#42)

I'm a pragmatist Lysander. The best defense is still a good offense.

abraxas  posted on  2010-10-08 17:55:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 42.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]