See other Science/Tech Articles
Title: War for Artifacts?
Source:
youtube
URL Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsrqAnKYNOM&feature=related
Published: Aug 03, 2008
Author: youtube
Post Date: 2010-10-10 22:02:00 by Flintlock
Keywords: None
Views: 423
Comments: 33
Poster Comment: Skip to about 2:14 Why would we loot the National Museum of Iraq? There was something there they didn't want us to see or know. It was another inside job. Praise Jeebus!
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 30.
#1. To: Flintlock (#0)
Whenever you see Lloyd Pye, stop listening. The man is a complete and utter fraud. I know this for a fact, FIRST HAND. The man doesn't even have a degree in any kind of history, let alone the bs he writes about in his crappy books.
The man doesn't even have a degree in any kind of history, let alone the bs he writes about in his crappy books. I find the Starchild thing a bit iffy.. but there is truth in a lot of what he says elsewhere.
Only because the truth he's speaking is ripped off from someone else. This genre of study where UFO's are concerned, is pseudo-science, where nothing can be proved, and everything is borrowed from someone else. DO NOT BELIEVE A WORD HE SPEAKS. It's all BS, and more than likely he wrote none of it. He is a failed SCI-FI writer, nothing else.
Could well be. Personally, I prefer Michael Cremo or Graham Hancock, I don't have any books from either man, but I've read some fascinating stuff from them online.
Who the hell is Tommy talking about, who is this "Lloyd Pie"? This article is simply about a video somebody made which included a radio interview of somebody stating that ancient artifacts have been stolen from the National Museum of Iraq. The fact is, there ARE some VERY interesting things concerning the Sumerians, such as how or why they were more advanced than many later civilizations. Their stories of the Annunaki are a bit interesting as well... The Annunaki and the Myth of a 12th Planet Tommy seems to be quite frightened of such things, and instantly dismisses any talk of advanced civilizations from other worlds as fantasy or "sci-fi".
I've heard the name here and there over the years, but only gave attention to his views on a thread a couple of weeks ago, here is his website:
Thanks, fascinating stuff about the alien DNA found in that skull. I should also thank Tommy for pointing out the guy's name.
I tend to be more skeptical myself of the ET side of it, but I could be wrong.
Did you see that picture I posted in post 11? I was waiting for Tommy to answer, but it doesn't look like he's going to. It is an image taken of Mars. Here's a YouTube video on it...
Yes, I've seen it before - on the crop circle thread last week I believe. I substitute "alien" with "demon" when we see such things. As likely these things are of a supernatural origin as an extra terrestrial one. Edit: With anomolous artifacts, I believe those to be man-made.
Here's more info on the statue if you're interested... As far as "demons", that implies a sinister and evil being. If these beings were in fact sinister and evil, they would have wiped us out eons ago. Perhaps there is more than just one civilization coming here, where some could be malevolent. If so, those who have been here for millenia might very well be protecting us, who knows. However, the very term "demon" implies a supernatural force which comes from somewhere other than here. Just as we would appear to be "gods" or "demons" to a very primitive society, those who are MUCH more advanced than us would appear to be "gods" or "demons" to some.
Maybe, maybe not. I dunno. Anyway, thanks for the link, it shows that up a lot clearer, I wasn't sure what I was looking at with the other photos, that is very interesting.
Here's an even better link, it's the NASA page that contains a link to the full resolution image. PIA10210: Details of Layers in Victoria Crater's Cape St. Vincent
PIA10210: Details of Layers in Victoria Crater's Cape St. Vincent When you see "PIA" in the image name, you know there's huge image to be downloaded. lol Thanks for that, very interesting. :)
You're welcome. If you probe around the image (download the TIFF, there's minimal compression artifacts), you might find a few other things that look a bit out of place for the Martian surface.
#32. To: FormerLurker (#30)
If you probe around the image (download the TIFF, there's minimal compression artifacts), you might find a few other things that look a bit out of place for the Martian surface. I saw one of those before - what was officially described as an outcrop of rock, but resembling a stand alone statue.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#3. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#1)
Whenever you see Lloyd Pye, stop listening. The man is a complete and utter fraud. I know this for a fact, FIRST HAND.
#7. To: irishthatcherite (#3)
#13. To: TommyTheMadArtist (#7)
#15. To: irishthatcherite, TommyTheMadArtist (#13)
(Edited)
#17. To: FormerLurker (#15)
#20. To: irishthatcherite, TommyTheMadArtist (#17)
www.lloydpye.com
#22. To: FormerLurker (#20)
Thanks, fascinating stuff about the alien DNA found in that skull.
#23. To: irishthatcherite (#22)
I tend to be more skeptical myself of the ET side of it, but I could be wrong.
#24. To: FormerLurker (#23)
(Edited)
#25. To: irishthatcherite (#24)
#26. To: FormerLurker (#25)
However, the very term "demon" implies a supernatural force which comes from somewhere other than here. Just as we would appear to be "gods" or "demons" to a very primitive society, those who are MUCH more advanced than us would appear to be "gods" or "demons" to some.
#27. To: irishthatcherite (#26)
Anyway, thanks for the link, it shows that up a lot clearer, I wasn't sure what I was looking at with the other photos, that is very interesting.
#29. To: FormerLurker (#27)
ere's an even better link, it's the NASA page that contains a link to the full resolution image.
#30. To: irishthatcherite (#29)
Thanks for that, very interesting. :)
Replies to Comment # 30. You're welcome.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 30.