Yet another 9/11 video that NIST tried to block from being released has emerged discussing bombs in the World Trade Center that led to the collapse of the twin towers, indicating once more that the organization attempted to preside over a cover-up to hide evidence of secondary explosives.
Every single video that we have been able to study following a lawsuit brought by the International Center for 9/11 Studies, which forced the National Institute of Standards and Technology to release 3 terabytes of material, has contained either direct or eyewitness evidence of controlled demolition, suggesting that NIST’s refusal to release the footage after a FOIA request was a deliberate ploy to try and keep the material out of the public arena.
On Wednesday we reported on how footage of WTC 7’s collapse had been edited to try and hide evidence of controlled demolition.
The new clip features CBS 2 reporter Marcia Kramer discussing a CNN report about secondary explosions inside the ground level areas of the south tower which caused the building to collapse.
“CNN is now reporting that there was a third explosion at the World Trade Center, probably an explosion from the ground that caused World Trade Center 1 to collapse on top of itself,” states reporter Marcia Kramer in the clip.
Kramer refers to WTC 1 but is in fact talking about the south tower, which was the first to collapse. The live footage on the clip shows the smoking north tower still standing.
“Again there was a third explosion, it is unclear what caused it, whether it was a bomb or whether the first plane that crashed into the tower had somehow been booby trapped with a bomb that was timed to explode later after the crash had occurred. But CNN is reporting that there was a third explosion that caused World Trade Center 1 to collapse within itself,” she adds.
Watch the clip.
The video dovetails with another clip that NIST attempted to sit on, in which 9/11 firefighters describe secondary explosions in the lobby area of the tower that caused the building to collapse.
As we highlighted last week, numerous eyewitnesses, including WTC janitor William Rodriguez, supervisor Anthony Saltalamacchia, and ABM janitorial services employee Kenneth Johannemann, all described explosions in the basement area of the towers before and after they were hit by planes.
15-year WTC worker Marlene Cruz and numerous other WTC basement workers, including Felipe David and Salvatore Giambanco, have all gone public since the attacks to talk about secondary explosions in the lower levels of the towers.
The 9/11 Commission completely ignored the hundreds of survivors, professionals, first responders, firefighters and police who reported numerous secondary explosions at all levels of the twin towers.
The official story dictates that the collapse of both towers began at the impact point where the planes hit the buildings. Evidence of ground level explosions that contributed to the collapse of the towers would not corroborate with the government’s insistence that the attack was solely the work of 19 hijackers acting on behalf of Osama bin Laden, which is presumably why NIST fought tooth and nail to prevent this and other videos from being released.
#2. To: Horse, noone222, FormerLurker, Artisan, Original_Intent, *9-11* (#0)
I'm pretty sure the second video is fake. It's very much like they're acting. Where's the dust?
The first video sounds like part of the audio is fake. The part with the woman reporter talking about the Jewish conference coming up to get support for Israel's plight with the Palestinians.
I'm pretty sure the second video is fake. It's very much like they're acting. Where's the dust?
What you're talking about is a high dollar production to rent the FDNY Hazardous Materials response vehicle and other apparatus to set up this scene, and who would go to that expense when a simple e mail to the NYC Film Office and/or the FDNY admin could expose any such film as fake? (There is simply no way that this apparatus can be rented "by stealth" or without permits)
I'm quite sure that the NYC admin wouldn't participate in the making of a fake film that invites discussion about "cui bono?" or undermines the official fairie tale.
And, these firefighters sound identical to, i.e. speaking in the same frank way and making the same charges as those who were interviewed days later in the firehouse-clips that we know are real interviews of real firefighters.
And when the camera angle changed to the guy who said "it's like a movie set" there were clouds of dust/smoke blowing down the street behind him....
Last, if it was a "big budget production intended to pass as real" you wouldn't have seen disgusting scum in the corner of the black "actor's" mouth when he spoke. It would bring complaints from minority members of the New York Division of The Screen Actors' Guild, i.e. "How come da nigga gots scum in his mouth? Why not the blond haired Nazi?"
Lets see, They knew it wasn't over and offered foreshadowing of WTC7 yet to come. It was like a movie set one said... Their were so many Freudian slips that day ..at 1:32 in the back round you can hear the sound of another plane...but nothing happens...the audio fuck ups of the scam are legendary. The fucking building fell on them.. but they are OK...just like the passport that fell from the plane ...They are semi dust covered...but their faces have been wiped, no surprise, what is intriguing is how clean their necks are.. Blondees flash light is also totally dust free as is blondees velcro.... that is some nifty dust that avoids velcro...at o:44-0:46 the unidentified channel 7 reporter asks them "So a plane or whatever hit the building" What Blondee says real softly is REALLY interesting...!! Freudian fuck up again. And Fire fighter number 3 speaks lies with his eyes. If you know how to follow the eyes you can see the he was imagining what to say next....Just a bit of light improve to sell the story. And for escaping a large horrible inferno, a building crash, and what looks like a quick hose down these fire fighters look awfully dry... hell, they ain't even breaking a sweat...check out the black fellow. The back of his head still covered in dust. Not one sweat line despite the hot, high stress enviroment and all the running he must of done he does not have one bead of sweat around his ears or back of head. Fake? Come on, what do yall think?
Before I argue any more perhaps I'm missing something crucial that you can help clarify.
Who (do you believe) would benefit from faking these vids?
And, at what point in the collapse scenarios do you believe they were trying to duplicate in their attempt at deception?
One thing though. "The guy's flashlight is clean" is a pretty thin reed on which to argue fakery. How dirty should it have been and why? Could he have wiped it (and his mask) in order to illuminate his egress from a dark and dust choked disaster area?
Here's a little experiment. Take a large cup full of any kind of fine powder or dust mixture (dry) and throw it against a sealed beam headlight for example, then take pix to show us how much actually sticks to convex, non porous glass. You can do this without walking to shake any off, and you needn't allow for the wind which is moving pretty fast as we saw behind the third man on the right. Just try to make as much as you can stick and show us the results.