See other 9/11 Articles
Title: CBS Report On 9/11: Ground Level Explosion Caused WTC To Collapse
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.prisonplanet.com/cbs-rep ... on-caused-wtc-to-collapse.html
Published: Oct 15, 2010
Author: Paul Joseph Watson
Post Date: 2010-10-15 12:38:41 by Horse
Keywords: None
Views: 582
Comments: 51
Yet another 9/11 video that NIST tried to block from being released has emerged discussing bombs in the World Trade Center that led to the collapse of the twin towers, indicating once more that the organization attempted to preside over a cover-up to hide evidence of secondary explosives. Every single video that we have been able to study following a lawsuit brought by the International Center for 9/11 Studies, which forced the National Institute of Standards and Technology to release 3 terabytes of material, has contained either direct or eyewitness evidence of controlled demolition, suggesting that NIST’s refusal to release the footage after a FOIA request was a deliberate ploy to try and keep the material out of the public arena. On Wednesday we reported on how footage of WTC 7’s collapse had been edited to try and hide evidence of controlled demolition. The new clip features CBS 2 reporter Marcia Kramer discussing a CNN report about secondary explosions inside the ground level areas of the south tower which caused the building to collapse. “CNN is now reporting that there was a third explosion at the World Trade Center, probably an explosion from the ground that caused World Trade Center 1 to collapse on top of itself,” states reporter Marcia Kramer in the clip. Kramer refers to WTC 1 but is in fact talking about the south tower, which was the first to collapse. The live footage on the clip shows the smoking north tower still standing. “Again there was a third explosion, it is unclear what caused it, whether it was a bomb or whether the first plane that crashed into the tower had somehow been booby trapped with a bomb that was timed to explode later after the crash had occurred. But CNN is reporting that there was a third explosion that caused World Trade Center 1 to collapse within itself,” she adds. Watch the clip. The video dovetails with another clip that NIST attempted to sit on, in which 9/11 firefighters describe secondary explosions in the lobby area of the tower that caused the building to collapse. As we highlighted last week, numerous eyewitnesses, including WTC janitor William Rodriguez, supervisor Anthony Saltalamacchia, and ABM janitorial services employee Kenneth Johannemann, all described explosions in the basement area of the towers before and after they were hit by planes. 15-year WTC worker Marlene Cruz and numerous other WTC basement workers, including Felipe David and Salvatore Giambanco, have all gone public since the attacks to talk about secondary explosions in the lower levels of the towers. The 9/11 Commission completely ignored the hundreds of survivors, professionals, first responders, firefighters and police who reported numerous secondary explosions at all levels of the twin towers. The official story dictates that the collapse of both towers began at the impact point where the planes hit the buildings. Evidence of ground level explosions that contributed to the collapse of the towers would not corroborate with the government’s insistence that the attack was solely the work of 19 hijackers acting on behalf of Osama bin Laden, which is presumably why NIST fought tooth and nail to prevent this and other videos from being released.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 40.
#2. To: Horse, noone222, FormerLurker, Artisan, Original_Intent, *9-11* (#0)
I'm pretty sure the second video is fake. It's very much like they're acting. Where's the dust? The first video sounds like part of the audio is fake. The part with the woman reporter talking about the Jewish conference coming up to get support for Israel's plight with the Palestinians. I'm quite sure both of these videos are hoaxes.
What you're talking about is a high dollar production to rent the FDNY Hazardous Materials response vehicle and other apparatus to set up this scene, and who would go to that expense when a simple e mail to the NYC Film Office and/or the FDNY admin could expose any such film as fake? (There is simply no way that this apparatus can be rented "by stealth" or without permits) I'm quite sure that the NYC admin wouldn't participate in the making of a fake film that invites discussion about "cui bono?" or undermines the official fairie tale. And, these firefighters sound identical to, i.e. speaking in the same frank way and making the same charges as those who were interviewed days later in the firehouse-clips that we know are real interviews of real firefighters. And when the camera angle changed to the guy who said "it's like a movie set" there were clouds of dust/smoke blowing down the street behind him.... Last, if it was a "big budget production intended to pass as real" you wouldn't have seen disgusting scum in the corner of the black "actor's" mouth when he spoke. It would bring complaints from minority members of the New York Division of The Screen Actors' Guild, i.e. "How come da nigga gots scum in his mouth? Why not the blond haired Nazi?"
Lets see, They knew it wasn't over and offered foreshadowing of WTC7 yet to come. It was like a movie set one said... Their were so many Freudian slips that day ..at 1:32 in the back round you can hear the sound of another plane...but nothing happens...the audio fuck ups of the scam are legendary. The fucking building fell on them.. but they are OK...just like the passport that fell from the plane ...They are semi dust covered...but their faces have been wiped, no surprise, what is intriguing is how clean their necks are.. Blondees flash light is also totally dust free as is blondees velcro.... that is some nifty dust that avoids velcro...at o:44-0:46 the unidentified channel 7 reporter asks them "So a plane or whatever hit the building" What Blondee says real softly is REALLY interesting...!! Freudian fuck up again. And Fire fighter number 3 speaks lies with his eyes. If you know how to follow the eyes you can see the he was imagining what to say next....Just a bit of light improve to sell the story. And for escaping a large horrible inferno, a building crash, and what looks like a quick hose down these fire fighters look awfully dry... hell, they ain't even breaking a sweat...check out the black fellow. The back of his head still covered in dust. Not one sweat line despite the hot, high stress enviroment and all the running he must of done he does not have one bead of sweat around his ears or back of head. Fake? Come on, what do yall think?
This world needs more people like you, titorite. Questions: Where are they? Exactly. What are the names of the firemen? Why is there no dust anywhere but on them? Hahahahahha I love the part about the "black, very large plane" that "we" all saw. I could go on you know and I suppose you could too, but all it takes for an intelligent, discerning person to know is to watch it themselves.
Please pause this at 0:02 and tell me what you think?
Minute 3:16 is questionable in comparison to minute 0:02....Also as I look at the smoke I wonder..."real or CGI?" Do the Shadows line up?... from the angle and limited time I can not be sure one way or the other.... And while I have not seen enough evidence to lead me to believe DEWs were involved..The links to the pics are at the site. Judge the pics not the site. Because in my mind, after you commit a crime like this it is only natural to burn the evidence. http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/dewpics/010912_WFC_911_1392.jpg The building in the backround. http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/dewpics/Image165.jpg When in doubt burn all the evidence you can. Their are more strange pics there too...Strange unexplainable things..
Thank you I didn't see that until you told me. What is that at 0:02 supposed to be a picture of? Is that supposed to be the pyroclastic cloud from one of the wtc falling? It sure is sitting there for a long time. Here are the pictures you're talking about: Damage from nuclear devices?
Nuclear devices? No. Not likely. The erratic damage of burned up cars was all over the place. One side of the street was fine and the other side had a row of melted cars...very strange. Their are a number of explanations that could explain it and some explanations that do not fit ...as for the elusive correct answer? I don't know. But I do know a nuke even a .3 kiloton micro nuke has consistent damage patterns... The burn paths of cars were anything but consistent. I noticed the cloud...I thought the same thing..that it was just kinda sitting there... But only about 2 seconds are spent on it...the Camera man is careful not to pan in that direction again except at 3:16...I thought the building itself in front(underneath?) of the cloud might be wtc7.... but like I said given the poor shot and limited time...I can't be sure. And I like to be sure. Thanks for uploading those pics for me!
Like what, please?
You had to ask me... Well their is a possibility it was Direct Energy Weapons. Now I am not a hacker but I do appreciate hacker culture. No where have I ever read of anyone or any government having anything close to capable of emitting the destructive power needed to obliterate metal to dust... and yet... in some frames of the collapse that is exactly what happens... Tesla himself couldn't do this.. but it has been years since Teslas' time.... I can grasp that the concepts of DEWs maybe possible but I have yet to see anyones prototype or theory behind the concept..know what I mean? DEW is very fringe shit. Still..Lacking enough proof I am not sure of this explanation... I also dislike it immensely because of the implications it would mean if true... Can you imagine? Zapping fuckers from space. No rebellion would ever have a chance. But this is just one possibility and by no means is it a certainty. Another explanation could be that the spire that turns to dust on film is CGI like so many other aspects of this hoax fraud. If it was CGI just as a means to throw off investigators then we must account for the melted cars... It could be that everywhere we see some melted cars a "scene" might of gone off in that area. Those involved produce the "scene" and after wards cars,cloths, cameras, whatever ...any linking evidence that needs to be destroyed is, by arson. One could blame the fires on the buildings and then wash their hands of it and here we are 9 years later. Still trying to understand WTF really happened. Another explanation is possible. If it really was thermite then, it is possible that the demo team errored on the side of caution choosing to use too much rather than too little. The buildings go down as planned but some of the thermite flies off in all sorts of directions landing on cars, street , whatever, burning the hell out of what ever it touched after being blasted out of the buildings until it exhausted itself. Last explanation, I am delusional, paranoid, and insane and the government version is right. But I think that is as likely as the gulf of tonkin being legit. I am not 100% on what happened. But I know how to rule out that which is 100% impossible. Sherlocke Holmes logic. Rule out all that can not be and whatever your left with is the freaky fucked up truth.
Directed energy weapons seems like the only thing that would cause this: Paranoia and delusion might do it too.
Seems like.... Being as honest and realistic as I can it could be some kind of thermtic compound... It could be simple destruction of evidence... or DEW. Realistically? Thermite or dew. But I need to see evidence of the reaction. I mean just WTF wave length vibration can make specialized alloys blow apart into grey dust.... what create that kind of energy? High intensity narrow focused microwaves? IDK... But if such a thing is possible it will out itself... knowledge wants to be free.
#42. To: titorite (#40)
Word.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#27. To: wudidiz, Horse, noone222, FormerLurker, Artisan, Original_Intent, christine, Jethro Tull, bluegrass, James_Deffenbach (#2)
I'm pretty sure the second video is fake. It's very much like they're acting. Where's the dust?
#30. To: HOUNDDAWG, wudidiz (#27)
#31. To: titorite (#30)
#32. To: GreyLmist, titorite, All (#31)
#34. To: wudidiz (#32)
Please pause this at 0:02 and tell me what you think?
#35. To: titorite (#34)
Minute 3:16 is questionable in comparison to minute 0:02....
Also as I look at the smoke I wonder..."real or CGI?" Do the Shadows line up?... from the angle and limited time I can not be sure one way or the other....
#36. To: wudidiz (#35)
(Edited)
#37. To: titorite (#36)
Their are a number of explanations that could explain it
#38. To: wudidiz (#37)
(Edited)
Like what, please?
#39. To: titorite (#38)
#40. To: wudidiz (#39)
Directed energy weapons seems like the only thing that would cause this:
Replies to Comment # 40. IDK... But if such a thing is possible it will out itself... knowledge wants to be free.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 40.