Why does Stewart have that flag with the "Gold Fringe" on it?
For God's sake IATL, do you see an ulterior motive behind everything? There are certainly enough conspiracies that ARE in fact true, we don't need to see something sinister in things that aren't.
There's no legitimate evidence which indicates the claims that the fringe means anything special are true.
We all live our lives based on falsehoods, myths and misunderstandings. Who knows the truth anyway about anything?
My latest wakeup call was a Larken Rose video clip about the Constitution. It was like being slapped while asleep and I am near 60. What have I been thinking all this time? Where exactly is the human refresh button? 'Want to see what I mean?
Weird, huh, starting a thread about OathKeepers who are re-affirming a sworn oath to protect a document that a bunch of guys wrote up a few hundred years ago and then showing how ridiculous our allegiance to such a document may be. Are we all nuts or, is it just me?
I may very well prefer the truths in the Declaration over the so called chains of the Constitution.
What about all the info. about how we have been controlled by atheistic "Jews" since the time of Jesus?
It also seems we are the true "chosen people" of the Bible and we may have the God given right to kill all the money changers of the day. Should we be pleased?
So, someone, tell me a universal truth that cannot be debated? I need to adjust my moral compass.
I'd rather live under the US Constitution than any other.
I can't see what is apparently a flash video you posted, it's not showing up.
My point is, you have to draw the line somewhere as to what constitutes acceptable government, and if the government were to truly follow the Constitution, we wouldn't be in the mess we find ourselves in today.
We can decide for ourselves whom we wish to trust, but if you can't trust anyone, then you're pretty much on your own.
As fine of a dramatic exercise in futility that Larken Rose presents in the video you posted, it stinks to high heaven.
Larken makes the claim of "moral right to steal" between the basis of the US Constitution and himself granting the same to himself as a function of a piece of paper or script. If he had chosen "immoral right" Larken would have been closer to the truth but he didn't; in fact, he avoids the term altogether, yet "immoral right" is the underscore of his presentation.
The fact is, the US Constitution grants POWER to Congress to levy AND collect taxes ... the concept of morality is moot to any issues regarding POWER much less considering nonsensical considerations of moral equivalency; government has no conscience; government is power.