#48. To: FormerLurker, jethro tull, cynicom, indietx, psusa (#2)
I don't dislike or distrust Rhodes. it's more an examination of the wide array of abuses which sworn law enforcement officers practice, as policy, across the country on a daily basis. One could make the case that if you are a cop in the u.s. today, you are by definition, not an oath keeper.
if there are really active duty cops who are oathkeepers, they would have to refuse a majority of their orders and job descriptions.
it would take some time to compile and detail a list of such cop practices that i am talking about.
you know, another thing about oathkeepers that has bothered me in the past. There is almost this grovelling to try and get cops and military 'on our side'., on the patriot side. I personally don't give a $h!t what pigs think. they are the muscle behind every single petty tyranny enacted today.
i am not going to grovel and hope they will be good guys. I have a friend who promoted oathkeepers to cops. he always reached out to cops to try and share the truth, etc. to save the republic. The last time he did this, they twisted his conversation, lied about him and arrested him and charged him with terrorism. he was interviewed on the alex jones show. This is a really good man and he is now facing jail on terrorist charges because he made the mistake of trying to talk to and befriend police!
This is what grovelling to f-ing pigs will get you. I say F em. leave me alone and i leave them alone. i am not interested in converting some f-ing pig or returing army man. excuse my language but it is sometimes the only thing that conveys my point.