#48. To: FormerLurker, jethro tull, cynicom, indietx, psusa (#2)
I don't dislike or distrust Rhodes. it's more an examination of the wide array of abuses which sworn law enforcement officers practice, as policy, across the country on a daily basis. One could make the case that if you are a cop in the u.s. today, you are by definition, not an oath keeper.
if there are really active duty cops who are oathkeepers, they would have to refuse a majority of their orders and job descriptions.
it would take some time to compile and detail a list of such cop practices that i am talking about.