[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Trump Can Stop WW III By Helping Kamala Make History

About that ICBM Russia just launched on Dnipro

These Are America's Safest Cities

Trump's Opportunity To Reset US-Iran Relations

Trump Nominates Pam Bondi For Attorney General After Gaetz Withdraws From Consideration

Judea Snarls: Donald Trump seeks to divide the State of Israel and Create a Palestinian State

Gaetz Withdraws From Consideration For Attorney General

TROUBLE OFF AIR MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow ‘takes $5m pay cut’

CNN’s Jake Tapper STORMS OFF as JD Vance ANNIHILATES Him Over Trump’s ‘Enemy Within’ Remarks!

🚨BREAKING: Hundreds of January 6th Political Prisoners Set FREE, DC Judges PANIC! Trump Pardon Soon

Tulsi Gabbard vs. Democrats and the Media!!

Gaetz Withdraws From Consideration For Attorney General

Putin Threatening Kiev Electricity

Netanyahu seeking a ban on formation of state committee of inquiry into Oct. 7

Dear DOGE: Milton Friedman Wanted to Cut Most of It

Chairman of Arab Americans for Trump claims to have received 100% promise of Palestinian State from President-elect

NASA makes surprising discovery at the end of our universe: 'It shouldn't exist'

TRUMP Begins Fight vs BIG TECH CENSORSHIP CARTEL

Why The U.S. Is Freaking Out Over China’s New Peru Port

Wire thefts leave Hacienda Heights residents without phone, internet service

Yale's Beyonce Course Highlights The Decline Of Higher Education (Tuition $67,250)

They are literally upset about getting rid of toxins in our food

Palestinian representative’s extraordinary reply to US envoy on ceasefire veto

Robert F Kennedy Jr Names Who Killed His Father with Sirhan Sirhan (CIA)

Biden Gets Real About Transgender Holocaust

Jaguar | Copy Nothing (Woke Car Ad Without a Aar)

ICC issues arrest warrant for Benjamin Netanyahu for alleged Gaza war crimes

BIDEN ADMINISTRATION MOVES TO FORGIVE $4.7 BILLION IN LOANS TO UKRAINE

Hezbollah retains Fire for Fire strategy; takes Tel Aviv under ballistic missile barrage

In yet another escalation, Biden regime sending anti-personnel landmines banned in 150 Countries to Ukraine


National News
See other National News Articles

Title: Oath Keepers prep lawsuit against NH bureaucrats
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Oct 16, 2010
Author: Ridley
Post Date: 2010-10-16 22:25:38 by RidleyReport
Keywords: None
Views: 828
Comments: 35

From RidleyReport.com

After using Oath Keepers affiliation as one excuse for taking a baby, New Hampshire's child protective division is now the target of a planned lawsuit. Oath Keepers is a group of current/former military/police who pledge they won't follow unconstitutional orders.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwxLUUkZnU4

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 22.

#7. To: RidleyReport (#0)

I am personally very pleased how quickly Steward Rhodes was able to put together a team of OathKeeper professionals to deal with this baby issue. Let's sick that team on the ADL and SPLC. Since when is a militia a bad thing, anyway. Militia... where have I read that term before.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

In order for a free State to be secure, a group of citizens, not part of the regular army, need to train and become proficient like soldiers. Therefore, the people's right to own and carry weapons shall not be violated.

wakeup  posted on  2010-10-17   1:00:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: wakeup (#7) (Edited)

I am personally very pleased how quickly Steward Rhodes was able to put together a team of OathKeeper professionals to deal with this baby issue.

You missed the boat, pal. Rhodes is only interested in the claim within an affidavit that is legally signed by a judge that uses or otherwise politicizes the good name of the Oath Keepers as a reason or as substantial proof for any reason (outside the solid foundation of the group) which potentially cools first amendment rights, not just for the Oath Keepers but also any political group.

Since when is a militia a bad thing, anyway. Militia... where have I read that term before.

The Oath Keepers are not in any way associated with militias; perhaps individual members are but that is a moot point.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-10-17   1:37:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: buckeroo (#8)

Surely an Oathkeeper in need was the primary cause to action but, shortly the focus went to protecting the reputation of the organization once it was discovered Irish was dirty.

wakeup  posted on  2010-10-17   9:02:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: wakeup, PSUSA, RidleyReport (#13)

See post#9,10,11 & 12 ....

Dave Ridley is an outstanding reporter. I wish we had a few more like this true investigative reporter.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-10-17   9:11:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: buckeroo (#15)

I wish we had a few more like this true investigative reporter.

Yeah. He did well on this one. He went right to the source of info he was looking for; the father.

If everyone else involved had gone directly to the source(s) and simply verified the info provided, this never would have become an issue.

The only group that benefits from all this crap is OK. They're milking it for all it's worth.

.

PSUSA  posted on  2010-10-17   9:21:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: PSUSA, RidleyReport, Artisian, FormerLurker, Original_Intent, wakeup (#16)

If everyone else involved had gone directly to the source(s) and simply verified the info provided, this never would have become an issue.

I won't mention any names but some initials come to mind like: Artisian, FormerLurker and Original_Intent.

The only group that benefits from all this crap is OK. They're milking it for all it's worth.

Have you ever read the the Extremist Lexicon by the US Department of Homeland Security - circa 2009? Rhodes has every right to ensure his group of Oath Keepers are not included.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-10-17   9:34:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: buckeroo (#18) (Edited)

Artisian, FormerLurker

Both Good Guys afaiac. OI is a pseudo-intellectual punk. Ever hear him admit "I don't know" or "I was wrong" to anything? I haven't seen it. He always has an answer. And when he doesn't, he distracts.

Rhodes has every right to ensure his group of Oath Keepers are not included.

True. But if it was included due to error, and it was an error to call them a militia because they failed to verify that, then OK wasn't harmed intentionally, from what I've seen so far. It's the militias themselves that have good reason to be alarmed, unless this reflects a bias on the part of whoever filled out these forms (or ordered that info to be included on these forms) and was not the result of official policy.

.

PSUSA  posted on  2010-10-17   9:44:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: PSUSA (#19)

But if it was included due to error, and it was an error to call them a militia because they failed to verify that, then OK wasn't harmed intentionally, from what I've seen so far.

Beyond any affiliation with militias, are you aware that the Extremist Lexicon poses (in OFFICIAL US government documented fashion) a method of targeting terrorist organizations? Think about what you said when you consider that many active duty military and police and veterans working for government at various levels can be eliminated from their own livelihood by the simple DOD refusal to renew or even potentially revoke active security clearances which are required to do their own day-to-day jobs.

The Oath Keepers are an outstanding organization designed to do nothing more than support an already fragile US Constitution torn to smithereens by politicians and power zealots. Surely you don't want people taking an oath and then become afraid of the same, do you?

buckeroo  posted on  2010-10-17   9:53:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: buckeroo (#20)

The Oath Keepers are an outstanding organization designed to do nothing more than support an already fragile US Constitution torn to smithereens by politicians and power zealots. Surely you don't want people taking an oath and then become afraid of the same, do you?

The .mil already took their oaths. I don't know what oaths LEO take, or if they take any at all. Anyone can take an oath at any time. No .org is needed.

I see no need to give any online .org their names and addresses to be a "member", and in order to take an oath. It imo does no good, and has the potential to do a lot of harm, when they potentially place themselves on the PTB radar.

That's just my opinion. I don't like the idea of giving out to anyone my personal info when they have no business knowing that info. You don't know what they will do with that info.

If you take an oath telling the PTB to fuck off and die if they get too big for their britches, then it's wise to maintain privacy, and just OBEY the oath. It's important to obey it. It isnt important to blow a trumpet heralding that the oath was taken. Taking an oath does not nullify a persons right to privacy.

But how many honor their oaths? Taking an oath publicly doesn't mean it will be honored when real pressure is applied to violate it.

.

PSUSA  posted on  2010-10-17   10:07:54 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: PSUSA (#21)

But how many honor their oaths?

That's why I posted Rhodes 2009 video in post#20, above. The Oath Keepers are a result of the government response in Katrina and other calamities wherein folks taking an oath don't really understand that same oath.

You should review Rhodes' video.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-10-17   10:14:40 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 22.

#23. To: buckeroo (#22)

folks taking an oath don't really understand that same oath.

Then they must be really dense, if they can't understand a plainly worded oath.

IMO they just see taking an oath as a mere formality, and is to be forgotten just as soon as they lower their right hands.

I'll check out that vid, but I bet it's nothing but feel-good fluff.

.

PSUSA  posted on  2010-10-17 10:32:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 22.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]