Title: LTC Allen West - The Revolution / American Freedom Tour Source:
youtube URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VP2p91dvm6M Published:Oct 19, 2010 Author:Allen West Post Date:2010-10-19 19:45:49 by Flintlock Keywords:Allen West, Fix Bayonets! Views:568 Comments:76
Otherwise I don't particularly care to discuss this again with someone stuck in failing mode in remedial logic.
And I'm not interested in debating people who have no solution to a problem.
That problem being: Barry Soetoro and his RAT cronies have control of the entire government and are ramming socialism down the throats of the American people.
Currently Ron Klein, a complete scumbag and Obama buttboy is the Congressman from the 22d district of FL. Klein is as bad as they get.
Now YOU'RE giving me shit for backing West, a guy who calls the gov Tyrannical?
Eric, the difference between you and I , is that I want Klein O-U-T, and I have a candidate and a plan to get him out.
You have???
Please, tell us how you're going to get did of Klein? You do have a plan, don't you?
He's no fan of the UN Another completely irrelevant issue post-9/11.
Today, in 2010, our own US FedGov is far more dangerous to our life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness than the UN ever was or could possibly be if we had a sovereign nation not run by Zionists!
This truly is not a difficult concept, yet so many here seem to struggle with it.
If this/these wars are not terminated, the costs thereby reduced drastically, and our "homeland" not restored to a pre-9/11 condition, sorry, but we're simply fucked. There's no use in sugar-coating it. It'll be Orwell's 1984 coming alive.
I'VE NEVER SEEN SUCH A DISPLAY OF IGNORANCE COMING FROM YOU!
1. The United Nations has its own Constitution. Any member "STATE" must abide by that Constitution. The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld that any Treaty made by the U.S. with an outside entity supercedes the U.S. Constitution. The UN, which has its headquarters in New York, the land and building being donated by the Rockefellers, (or was it the Rothschilds? doesn't matter- no difference)is slated to be the military seat of the New World Order. In fact the NNPT is just a weapons confiscations program to arm the UN. The Zionists do not have a seat on the Security Council of the UN. They have signed no Treaties with them. Make of that what you can!
2. True we are a ZOG and have been fighting endless wars for Israel, but to restore our COUNTRY to pre 9/11 conditions is the pipe dream of a complete fool. We need to go back to 1913 to restore this country to pre-Federal Reserve status or we're simply fucked. Re: the Zionists - as Ahmedinejad has said - the Zionist Regime must be ended. That may mean more war, this time with a well armed nuclear state. We signed the NNPT, as did many other nations. Our armed forces are exhausted and depleted.
This truly is not a difficult concept, yet so many here seem to struggle with it.
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
Also refer to the Charter of the United Nations - Chapter 2, Article 3:
The original Members of the United Nations shall be the states which, having participated in the United Nations Conference on International Organization at San Francisco, or having previously signed the Declaration by United Nations of 1 January 1942, sign the present Charter and ratify it in accordance with Article 110.
Refer to Article 110:
1. The present Charter shall be ratified by the signatory states in accordance with their respective constitutional processes. 2. The ratifications shall be deposited with the Government of the United States of America, which shall notify all the signatory states of each deposit as well as the Secretary-General of the Organization when he has been appointed. 3. The present Charter shall come into force upon the deposit of ratifications by the Republic of China, France, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America, and by a majority of the other signatory states. A protocol of the ratifications deposited shall thereupon be drawn up by the Government of the United States of America which shall communicate copies thereof to all the signatory states. 4. The states signatory to the present Charter which ratify it after it has come into force will become original Members of the United Nations on the date of the deposit of their respective ratifications.
This means the Treaty with the United Nations according to Article six of the U.S. Constitution is now a part of the Supreme Law of the Land, the Constitution notwithstanding. Also it has been fully ratified according to the Articles 3 and 110 of the Charter of the United Nations. We're Fucked! Get over it.
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
"To the Contrary notwithstanding" means that federal law and those protections stated in U.S. constitution overrules treaties.
A treaty cannot overrule the U.S. constitution. If a treaty could then we would have an absolute dictatorship overnight by a simple two-thirds vote in the U.S. senate.
The founding father understood this, that is why they included "To the Contrary notwithstanding".
To the Contrary notwithstanding" means that federal law and those protections stated in U.S. constitution overrules treaties.
Paul, Are you Dim? Let me translate for you, using your dictionary definition of notwithstanding in a sentence that you can understand.
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, without being opposed or prevented by any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary.
Paul, Are you Dim? Let me translate for you, using your dictionary definition of notwithstanding in a sentence that you can understand.
Do I need to clarify further?
The only 'dim' person here is you.
You are the only who needs to point to be further clarified.
I quoted the key phrase of words; "to the Contrary notwithstanding". A lot of the U.S. Constitution has little loopholes to prevent the tyranny of what you argue for.
You don't not understand what you are talking about. You are arguing for tyranny, whereas I am arguing for freedom.
Even if you win you still lose, because all you would have done is shackled yourself to chains.
You are willing to foolishly enough to condemn everyone just to proof you are 'right'. Such stupidity on your part is one of the major problems in this world.
Now admit I am right, because the alternative, which is 'tyranny', cannot be allowed to be defended.
You are willing to foolishly enough to condemn everyone just to proof you are 'right'. Such stupidity on your part is one of the major problems in this world.
Now admit I am right, because the alternative, which is 'tyranny', cannot be allowed to be defended.
This is the last time I will respone to your inane comments. I am not trying to proof, or even prove, that I am right. I am trying to educate you, so you can comprehend the dire situation in which we find ourselves.
I am certainly not defending tyranny. Tyranny is already a fact of life, which is what I am showing you. Just because you wish it were not so, does not make you right. Don't you understand that? IF YOU CAN'T STAND THE HEAT,GET OUT OF THE KITCHEN!
You are like a poor little boy who wishes he was rich so he goes out and buys a car, just to proof-prove he can afford it.
No, it's not. You have just convinced yourself it is. And you will argue that it is to try to justify how much you limit yourself. You are the sad one here.
Paul, tyranny is a fact of life in America everyday Congress is in session. You see the same practiced every day in America and not just on the federal level but ALL levels of government.
Even dog catchers on the local level are caught asleep ignoring their own responsibilities and mushrooming to the federal level is the same but magnified by BILLIONS of times ... just look at the illegal alien issue which includes 9/11.