See other (s)Elections Articles
Title: Get in the Game
Source:
YT
URL Source: [None]
Published: Oct 19, 2010
Author: Some marketing guy
Post Date: 2010-10-19 22:18:33 by Prefrontal Vortex
Keywords: None
Views: 205
Comments: 20
Poster Comment: Abadaba Honeymoon! Never look a gift horse in the mouth.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#0)
Sweet Baby Jesus. I cannot believe what I just saw.
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." - Ben Franklin
Everytime Ms. BO closes her mouth she looks like she's trying to swallow a canary.
I want either less corruption or more opportunity to participate in it. Ashleigh Brilliant
Move forward to what? Third world status? Or as chipped slaves to the Jews? I guess they had to make the commercial though, otherwise the election show wouldn't look as good.
God is always good!
If everybody in a state agreed not to vote except 1 person, that person's vote would win. There should be a "None of the above" choice on all ballots. If a majority votes for "None of the above" it would be like a vote of "No Confidence" and should mean the candidates/issues on those ballots are disqualified.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
The charade is losing its luster. We need to tear down the FED RESERVE brick by brick ! Any politician that isn't running on a platform of honest money and END THE FED is just another FED.
"Politics and Religion are the building blocks of slavery and oppression. Greed is the mortar that bonds them".
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." - Ben Franklin
The war, its literal bank-rupting expense, its fruits of domestic tyranny, etc., etc., et al., and etc., has all been supported by the majority!! That's what we're told but I suspect our elections have been rigged more than a few times if the majority doesn't vote as the electioneers want. You could maybe write in "None of the Above" as a candidate to make a statement of No Confidence but the Communistic Totalitarian types who've been hellbent on Sovietizing America would be more than glad if they were the only ones who showed up to vote, uncontested. It's our system, not theirs. We don't need their permission to do anything. If all we do is despair and be absent on election day, they'll keep trying to get away with their agenda to dismantle the Constitution. We need our own elections not open to any disloyalists or their UnConstitutional "issues". Then, if we want to decide that a majority of votes for None of the Above means find new candidates or send an issue back for alterations, we can do that efficiently.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
Even worse the second time around.
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." - Ben Franklin
So let's not play their rigged game by their "rules". Imagine if every precinct set-up an Exit Poll paper-ballot option (on carbon paper so that we could keep a copy if we wanted to as insurance against miscounts, etc.), and an online Polling option scanned from them too (with a timestamped copy showing the precinct totals then for every category), so that we could "Count my vote as None of the Above" for each candidate run- off and issue by those verifiable procedures. Then we could vote in the elections to increase the Commie-Totalitarians' data processing workload, as well as prevent them from monopolizing our system for themelves, and also send high-volume No Confidence signals to them and around the world that We the People of the Constitution don't really support their subversive agents and activities.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." - Ben Franklin
Criminy. Doing nothing because of Tyranny typically trying to get in the way and squelch what it doesn't like isn't going to change that problem one iota. That just compunds it with more heapings of the same old same old and worse. Are there any workable alternatives possible besides just moping around despondent but hoping that maybe someday, somehow, the Tyrannosaurus Rex crowd will experience a Constitutional conversion en masse -- if we or some generation in the future can ever manage to get them to quit thrashing around destructively long enough to listen and choose to see things our way? We don't need to disturb the sheople with the arrangements and we don't need them to cast any votes in our Exit Polling system. It's inexpensive - some paper, pens, a safety box, 1 borrowed computer per precinct with a scanner and voila! We could all maybe chip in to rent a yard nearby and we certainly don't need police permission or any other officials to conduct such an informal and volunteer survey. If the tyrannicals don't like the results, great! That would mean it's working correctly. The object isn't to make them comfy. It's to make them answerable to us as best we can under the current circumstances. I vote "Yes" on the project. If you want to take bets on the odds, you can still help even if all you do is give it some advertisement among your associates.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." - Ben Franklin
I'm thinking we can get started right away with a webpage where people could vote No Confidence in governmental UnConstitutionals at their convenience, not just on election days -- mirror it in all 50 states so there are lots of copies for the record. The tyrannicals undoubtedly wouldn't want to vote No Confidence in our poll and it would not behoove them to be too oppositional to it because that would make them appear even more twisted than they already do. I would like to see centers where people could vote on public computers for that purpose only and they could spend a dime to print out their own copies of their vote if they wanted one or do that from home. The voters could be listed by number if they prefer to remain anonymous and a copy would print automatically for handcounts and data re-entry in case of any computer glitches. I'd also like to see an option to vote "Yes" or "No" for taking the oath to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Theoretically, there could be a poll, too, that is open to everybody in the world to vote No Confidence in Unconstitutional governance here. which party now do you think is in a better position to quell the other? Keep in mind, you won't rally too much support for this. The Democrats have been shooting themelves in the foot, so to speak, ever since they tookover so they are not well positioned, imo. What we need is a Constitution Party that requires membership in it before any subcategories of Republican or Democrat or Independent -- Communists disqualified from our system of government as antithetical.
------- "They're on our left, they're on our right, they're in front of us, they're behind us...they can't get away this time." -- Col. Puller, USMC
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." - Ben Franklin
On the threshold of civil war is not a far throw from it.
I would like to direct this to the distinguished members of the panel: You lousy cork-soakers. You have violated my farging rights. Dis somanumbatching country was founded so that the liberties of common patriotic citizens like me could not be taken away by a bunch of fargin iceholes... like yourselves. Thank you. - Roman Moroni
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." - Ben Franklin
That's true, but after November 2, we'll be choosing sides. Long ways to go yet before the game starts.
I would like to direct this to the distinguished members of the panel: You lousy cork-soakers. You have violated my farging rights. Dis somanumbatching country was founded so that the liberties of common patriotic citizens like me could not be taken away by a bunch of fargin iceholes... like yourselves. Thank you. - Roman Moroni
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." - Ben Franklin
#2. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#0)
(Edited)
#3. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#0)
Never look a gift horse in the mouth
#4. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#0)
#5. To: Eric Stratton (#2)
This tyranny doesn't give a shit who you vote for as long as the charade ain't let out of the bag! The fewer people that vote, the quicker the jig will be up.
#6. To: Eric Stratton (#2)
The fewer people that vote, the quicker the jig will be up.
#7. To: GreyLmist (#5)
#8. To: Eric Stratton (#7)
Think about it: ALL of what has happened to date has "been voted for" by a majority either implicitly or directly, no? Sure has!
#9. To: Prefrontal Vortex (#0)
#10. To: GreyLmist (#8)
#11. To: Eric Stratton (#10)
(Edited)
It's obviously a charade to anyone paying any attention whatsoever and even halfway intelligent.
#12. To: GreyLmist (#11)
#13. To: Eric Stratton (#12)
(Edited)
#14. To: GreyLmist (#13)
#15. To: Eric Stratton (#14)
(Edited)
On a separate topic, yet related:
#16. To: GreyLmist (#15)
#17. To: Eric Stratton (#16)
Let's see where things stand on Nov. 4th, eh.
#18. To: randge (#17)
#19. To: Eric Stratton (#18)
#20. To: randge (#19)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest