Title: Get in the Game Source:
YT URL Source:[None] Published:Oct 19, 2010 Author:Some marketing guy Post Date:2010-10-19 22:18:33 by Prefrontal Vortex Keywords:None Views:328 Comments:20
This tyranny doesn't give a shit who you vote for as long as the charade ain't let out of the bag! The fewer people that vote, the quicker the jig will be up.
If everybody in a state agreed not to vote except 1 person, that person's vote would win. There should be a "None of the above" choice on all ballots. If a majority votes for "None of the above" it would be like a vote of "No Confidence" and should mean the candidates/issues on those ballots are disqualified.
Think about it: ALL of what has happened to date has "been voted for" by a majority either implicitly or directly, no? Sure has!
The war, its literal bank-rupting expense, its fruits of domestic tyranny, etc., etc., et al., and etc., has all been supported by the majority!!
That's what we're told but I suspect our elections have been rigged more than a few times if the majority doesn't vote as the electioneers want.
You could maybe write in "None of the Above" as a candidate to make a statement of No Confidence but the Communistic Totalitarian types who've been hellbent on Sovietizing America would be more than glad if they were the only ones who showed up to vote, uncontested.
It's our system, not theirs. We don't need their permission to do anything. If all we do is despair and be absent on election day, they'll keep trying to get away with their agenda to dismantle the Constitution. We need our own elections not open to any disloyalists or their UnConstitutional "issues". Then, if we want to decide that a majority of votes for None of the Above means find new candidates or send an issue back for alterations, we can do that efficiently.
It's obviously a charade to anyone paying any attention whatsoever and even halfway intelligent.
So let's not play their rigged game by their "rules". Imagine if every precinct set-up an Exit Poll paper-ballot option (on carbon paper so that we could keep a copy if we wanted to as insurance against miscounts, etc.),
and an online Polling option scanned from them too (with a timestamped copy showing the precinct totals then for every category),
so that we could "Count my vote as None of the Above" for each candidate run- off and issue by those verifiable procedures. Then we could vote in the elections to increase the Commie-Totalitarians' data processing workload, as well as prevent them from monopolizing our system for themelves, and also send high-volume No Confidence signals to them and around the world that We the People of the Constitution don't really support their subversive agents and activities.
Criminy. Doing nothing because of Tyranny typically trying to get in the way and squelch what it doesn't like isn't going to change that problem one iota. That just compunds it with more heapings of the same old same old and worse. Are there any workable alternatives possible besides just moping around despondent but hoping that maybe someday, somehow, the Tyrannosaurus Rex crowd will experience a Constitutional conversion en masse -- if we or some generation in the future can ever manage to get them to quit thrashing around destructively long enough to listen and choose to see things our way? We don't need to disturb the sheople with the arrangements and we don't need them to cast any votes in our Exit Polling system. It's inexpensive - some paper, pens, a safety box, 1 borrowed computer per precinct with a scanner and voila! We could all maybe chip in to rent a yard nearby and we certainly don't need police permission or any other officials to conduct such an informal and volunteer survey. If the tyrannicals don't like the results, great! That would mean it's working correctly. The object isn't to make them comfy. It's to make them answerable to us as best we can under the current circumstances. I vote "Yes" on the project. If you want to take bets on the odds, you can still help even if all you do is give it some advertisement among your associates.