Title: Get in the Game Source:
YT URL Source:[None] Published:Oct 19, 2010 Author:Some marketing guy Post Date:2010-10-19 22:18:33 by Prefrontal Vortex Keywords:None Views:320 Comments:20
This tyranny doesn't give a shit who you vote for as long as the charade ain't let out of the bag! The fewer people that vote, the quicker the jig will be up.
If everybody in a state agreed not to vote except 1 person, that person's vote would win. There should be a "None of the above" choice on all ballots. If a majority votes for "None of the above" it would be like a vote of "No Confidence" and should mean the candidates/issues on those ballots are disqualified.
Think about it: ALL of what has happened to date has "been voted for" by a majority either implicitly or directly, no? Sure has!
The war, its literal bank-rupting expense, its fruits of domestic tyranny, etc., etc., et al., and etc., has all been supported by the majority!!
That's what we're told but I suspect our elections have been rigged more than a few times if the majority doesn't vote as the electioneers want.
You could maybe write in "None of the Above" as a candidate to make a statement of No Confidence but the Communistic Totalitarian types who've been hellbent on Sovietizing America would be more than glad if they were the only ones who showed up to vote, uncontested.
It's our system, not theirs. We don't need their permission to do anything. If all we do is despair and be absent on election day, they'll keep trying to get away with their agenda to dismantle the Constitution. We need our own elections not open to any disloyalists or their UnConstitutional "issues". Then, if we want to decide that a majority of votes for None of the Above means find new candidates or send an issue back for alterations, we can do that efficiently.