[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Sign-in] [Mail] [Setup] [Help]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
|
Pious Perverts See other Pious Perverts Articles Title: Schwarzenegger's son "Just got payed 500 dollars for walking and talking to people on a beach completely naked" ... In 1977, Schwarzenegger described orgies and drug use he participated in. During the recall election in 2003 he also had to answer for a 'gay porn cameo'. In this clip from 1977, Arnold strips on a television show. Since becoming governor Arnold has banned guns, promoted gay marriage, funded embryonic stem cell research, called for a "free flow of people" across the nation's borders, destroyed our economy, borrowed us into servititude via bonds that must be paid back by taxpayers, and enacted all sorts of tyrannical laws such as the cell phone law. The Kennedy family and Schwarzenegger are big nanny state authoritarians who ignore their own petty laws. [See Kerry, Schwarzenegger, Shriver: Elitist scofflaws abound in Los Angeles]. In early October, Schwarzenegger signed AB 12 and a gaggle of other 'child welfare' laws, enhancing and empowering the foster system for kids whom the state seizes from their parents. But who is safeguarding Arnold's children? A week before his minor child reported accepting money to strip nude for strangers on a beach, Schwarzenegger gave a keynote speech at the occultic Bohemian Grove club in Northern California. In 1991, William Kennedy Smith was tried and aquitted of rape charges. Arnold's daughter Katherine recently wrote an essay for him on father's day, noting that when he faces criticism, he brushes it off: "I hear what they’re saying, but it doesn’t matter to me.” Perhaps this is one of those times. But there are some unanswered questions which deserve to be answered. Who was Patrick Schwarzenegger with at Cape Cod? Who took him to Nantucket? What really happened there? If an ordinary 'peon', or citizen of the State of California had a kid who went to school and announce to the teacher that they were paid to strip naked and walk around, what would the teacher do? Would they ignore it? No. Matter of fact, if they did ignore it, they would be open to criminal charges themselves. There are 'mandatory reporting' laws. Would the 'authorities' and law enforcement laugh off the charge as a funny story? A whimsical vacation perhaps? We live in a society that arrrests and charges parents with crimes for innocent bathtime pictures of their children. Police arrest and charge teenagers with crimes based on what they post on facebook. Police arrest and charge people with crimes after they post videos on youtube. Law enforcement is constantly monitoring and scrutinizing what goes on the internet. Is the case of Patrick Schwarzenegger immune from such invasive police state scrutiny? If so, why? Why the difference? (please click here for full article)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
#1. To: Artisan (#0)
There are no replies to Comment # 1. End Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
||
|
[Home]
[Headlines]
[Latest Articles]
[Latest Comments]
[Post]
[Sign-in]
[Mail]
[Setup]
[Help]
|
||