[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

These Are 2025's 'Most Livable' Cities

Nicotine and Fish

Genocide Summer Camp, And Other Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix

This Can Create Endless Green Energy WITHOUT Electricity

Geoengineering: Who’s Behind It and How We Stop It

Pam Bondi Ordered Prosecution of Dr. Kirk Moore After Refusing to Dismiss Case

California woman bombarded with Amazon packages for over a year

CVS ordered to pay $949 MILLION in Medicaid fraud case.

Starmer has signed up to the UNs agreement to raise taxes in the UK

Magic mushrooms may hold the secret to longevity: Psilocybin extends lifespan by 57% in groundbreaking study

Cops favorite AI tool automatically deletes evidence of when AI was used

Leftist Anti ICE Extremist OPENS FIRE On Cops, $50,000 REWARD For Shooter

With great power comes no accountability.

Auto loan debt hits $1.63T. 20% of buyers now pay $1,000+ monthly. Texas delinquency hits 7.92%.

Quotable Quotes from the Chosenites

Tokara Islands NOW crashing into the Ocean ! Mysterious Swarm continues with OVER 1700 Quakes !

Why Austria Is Suddenly Declaring War on Immigration

Rep. Greene Wants To Remove $500 Million in Military Aid for Nuclear-Armed Israel From NDAA

Netanyahu Lays Groundwork for Additional Strikes on Iran: 'We Didn't Deal With The Enriched Uranium'

Sweden Cracks Down On OnlyFans - Will U.S. Follow Suit?

Joe Rogan CALLS OUT Israel's Media CONTROL

Communist Billionaire Accused Of Funding Anti-ICE Riots Mysteriously Vanishes

6 Factors That Describe China's Current State

Trump Thteatens to Bomb Moscow and Beijing

Little Bitty

Vertiv Drops After Amazon Unveils In-House Liquid Cooling System, Marking Pivot To Liquid

17 Out-Of-Place Artifacts That Suggest High-Tech Civilizations Existed Thousands (Or Millions) Of Years Ago

Hamas Still Killing IDF Soldiers After 642 Days

Copper underpins every part of the economy. If you want to destroy the U.S. economy this is how you would do it.

Egyptian Pres. Gamal Abdel Nassers Chilling Decades-Old Prediction About Israel-Palstine Conflict.


Sports
See other Sports Articles

Title: Man Accused Of Having Two Wives
Source: Click On Detroit
URL Source: http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/4248185/detail.html
Published: Mar 3, 2005
Author: Click On Detroit
Post Date: 2005-03-03 13:39:12 by crack monkey
Keywords: Accused, Having, Wives
Views: 2798
Comments: 57

Local Man Accused Of Having Two Wives Suspect Could Be Charged With Four-Year Felony

POSTED: 6:30 pm EST March 2, 2005 UPDATED: 7:10 pm EST March 2, 2005

A local man faces charges after it was discovered that he apparently has two wives, Local 4 reported.

Devorah Brooks said she married Randy Brooks (pictured, left) in Ohio in 1995.

"(There was) a lot of lying, a lot of manipulating," Brooks said. "He was messing around when we got married and he just kept going. He never stopped."

Video: Woman Discovers Husband Has Second Wife

But Brooks told Local 4 although she and her husband had problems, she never expected to hear that he was married to a second woman.

"I was shocked; she was shocked," Brooks said.

Randy Brooks apparently married his second wife at a Ferndale church in December, the station reported.

A man accused of having two wives sent teddy bears to his first wife each time he betrayed her, she said.

Local 4 learned that in addition to his two wives, Brooks has three four children with three different women. His second wife is also pregnant, according to the station's reports.

Devorah Brooks said her husband owes her several years of back child support payments. A mountain of stuffed teddy bears in her home represents the difficulties in their marriage, the station reported. Brooks said each time her husband betrayed her, she was given a teddy bear and an apology, the station reported.

"You can't keep doing wrong to people and expect nothing to happen to you," she said.

Randy Brooks is now facing a felony polygamy charge, which is punishable by up to four years in prison.

Local 4 attempted to contact Brooks and his attorney, but the phone calls were not returned. Brooks' second wife also did not want to discuss the possible charges against her husband.

Copyright 2005 by ClickOnDetroit.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. (1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-17) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#18. To: Don (#17)

Yeah, we are past the stage where men are supposed to look after women, aren't we?

I "look after" a lot of 'em, depending on the jeans or shorts they're wearin...

Samuel Gray  posted on  2005-03-03   15:27:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Don (#17)

Yeah, we are past the stage where men are supposed to look after women, aren't we?

There's no reason for a man to be bound to provide support for a woman beyond that which they mutually agreed to at the start of the union. None whatsoever.

Mr Nuke Buzzcut  posted on  2005-03-03   15:28:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#19)

What about the children, if any?

Don  posted on  2005-03-03   15:31:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Samuel Gray (#18)

I "look after" a lot of 'em, depending on the jeans or shorts they're wearin...

That is a good, accurate comment. Women have become only sexual objects in our society.

Don  posted on  2005-03-03   15:32:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Don (#20)

What about the children, if any?

If children are going to be a byproduct of the marital union, then it would behoove both parties to spell out the details of custody and support in advance of entering into the union. After all, as has been thoroughly demonstrated, leaving it for the government to define is the worst for all parties.

Mr Nuke Buzzcut  posted on  2005-03-03   15:38:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Don (#21)

Women have become only sexual objects in our society.

To you maybe, but I find many of them completely worthless in that respect, even though they may be very good at other endeavors.

Mr Nuke Buzzcut  posted on  2005-03-03   15:39:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#22)

Ok, I am convinced. Equal opportunity and equality for all.

Don  posted on  2005-03-03   15:40:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#23)

Well, I wasn't talking about all of them.

Don  posted on  2005-03-03   15:40:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Don (#24)

Ok, I am convinced. Equal opportunity and equality for all.

How about plain old justice and respect for individual rights?

Mr Nuke Buzzcut  posted on  2005-03-03   15:41:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Samuel Gray (#2)

She works cheap. Usually costs me at least dinner and roses, possibly up to an automobile.

Can I have an automobile anyway???

Oh, wait - I can't drive!

CAPPSMADNESS  posted on  2005-03-03   15:41:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Don (#25)

Well, I wasn't talking about all of them.

Hey, it was your generalization I was responding to.

Mr Nuke Buzzcut  posted on  2005-03-03   15:41:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#26)

How about plain old justice and respect for individual rights?

If you expect to find those things, you need to go to another planet.

Don  posted on  2005-03-03   15:42:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#28)

Hey, it was your generalization I was responding to.

I didn't think I had to spell the whole thing out.

Don  posted on  2005-03-03   15:42:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Don (#29)

If you expect to find those things, you need to go to another planet.

I may never achieve them, but so long as I hold them as the ideal, there exists the opportunity to move toward them. I shall not surrender to the mongrel hoardes.

Mr Nuke Buzzcut  posted on  2005-03-03   15:43:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#31)

I shall not surrender to the mongrel hoardes.

You had better watch those windmills. Those arms can be dangerous.

Don  posted on  2005-03-03   15:43:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Don (#30)

I didn't think I had to spell the whole thing out.

Okay. Here's what you wrote:

Women have become only sexual objects in our society.
I contend that very few women have become nothing but sexual objects, and even then to only a very small segment of society. In other words, I am challenging your generalization.

Mr Nuke Buzzcut  posted on  2005-03-03   15:46:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Don (#17)

Yeah, we are past the stage where men are supposed to look after women, aren't we?

We have been past it since the whole Wimmin's Lib thing started - women GOT what they were asking for and now they complain about it.

As I tell my friends, YOU CANNOT HAVE IT BOTH WAYS. You are either gonna be a Bra-burnin' feminist, or a loving and devoted wife.

Example - My one friend, works from home on the internet for an insurance company, making good money. He husband owns, runs and cleans his own business. But she expects him to come home, cook dinner and help with chores. I don't get that - If I were at home all day, I would get dinner cooked at least.

Me and Yadda "share the wealth", so to speak. We Both work and we both are responsible for household duties. I told him the day I quit working is the day that I will do everything in the house and vice versa.

CAPPSMADNESS  posted on  2005-03-03   15:51:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Don (#32)

You had better watch those windmills. Those arms can be dangerous.

Your attempt at analogy falls flat. The windmills represented a hallucinated threat that Don (go figure) Quixote felt the need to slay. I don't see individual rights as a threat. Quite the contrary. They are an ideal to work toward.

Keep trying, though.

Mr Nuke Buzzcut  posted on  2005-03-03   15:54:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#23)

To you maybe, but I find many of them completely worthless in that respect, even though they may be very good at other endeavors.

Say what?

Zipporah  posted on  2005-03-03   15:54:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Zipporah (#36)

Say what?

Janet Reno has no value as a sexual object in my book. However, she might make an excellent source of garden fertilizer.

Mr Nuke Buzzcut  posted on  2005-03-03   15:56:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#37)

LOL.. ah ya have a point. I do remember several years ago though Japanese men found her rather 'hot'.. make sense of that..

Zipporah  posted on  2005-03-03   15:59:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Zipporah (#38)

I do remember several years ago though Japanese men found her rather 'hot'.. make sense of that..

Yes, I remember that survey. Those Japanese men sure do have a lot of strange fetishes, eh?

Mr Nuke Buzzcut  posted on  2005-03-03   16:00:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#39)

hose Japanese men sure do have a lot of strange fetishes, eh?

Do we really want to go there?? Blech.

Zipporah  posted on  2005-03-03   16:03:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: Zipporah (#40)

Do we really want to go there?? Blech.

No, not really. Just one observation, though. It seems that the more regimented and conformist a society becomes, the more perverse the deviations that squeeze out of the seams.

Mr Nuke Buzzcut  posted on  2005-03-03   16:10:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: CAPPSMADNESS (#27)

Can I have an automobile anyway???

Sorry, I only buy high ticket items for women who hate my guts. :P

Samuel Gray  posted on  2005-03-03   16:12:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: christine (#4)

i don't the state should have any say so in this. marriage is supposed to be a private contract.

Oh oh that is politically incorrect.

I like what Elizabeth Joseph wrote for the New York Times some years ago, the headline:

My Husband's Nine Wives

1776  posted on  2005-03-03   16:48:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: Zipporah (#36)

Say what?

Don't bother. It isn't worth the effort.

Don  posted on  2005-03-03   17:36:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: Don (#13)

maybe she'd choose her life partner more wisely then.

christine  posted on  2005-03-03   18:10:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: christine (#45)

maybe she'd choose her life partner more wisely then.

Maybe so. BTW, how long is life?

Don  posted on  2005-03-03   18:15:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: 1776 (#43)

Oh oh that is politically incorrect.

uh huh. i tend to be that way. :P

christine  posted on  2005-03-03   18:17:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: Don (#46)

you got me on that one. :P

christine  posted on  2005-03-03   18:18:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: Don (#46)

BTW, how long is life?

Approximately 1,117,665,000 kilometers - if you live near the equator.

Mr Nuke Buzzcut  posted on  2005-03-03   18:32:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#49)

Approximately 1,117,665,000 kilometers

that damn metric system

1776  posted on  2005-03-03   21:53:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: crack monkey, christine, zipporah (#0)

Sports
See other Sports Articles

Title: Man Accused Of Having Two Wives
Source: Click On Detroit

So that's what it is!
GENTLEMEN! START YOUR ENGINES!

1776  posted on  2005-03-03   21:55:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: 1776 (#51)

So that's what it is! GENTLEMEN! START YOUR ENGINES!

LOL!! I think they'll need than reving their engines.. some type of pharmaceutical perhaps :P

Zipporah  posted on  2005-03-03   21:59:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: 1776 (#51)

that made me burst out laughing. :P

christine  posted on  2005-03-03   22:03:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: christine (#53)

that made me burst out laughing. :P

Hilarious!

Zipporah  posted on  2005-03-03   22:04:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: crack monkey (#0)

You put this in "Sports"?

Oooooooookay.

Neil McIver  posted on  2005-03-23   19:27:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: Mr Nuke Buzzcut (#15)

Hear! Hear!

Jhoffa_  posted on  2005-03-23   19:29:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: All (#55)

Dang. An old thread. Got it off the headlines page.

We don't get many Sports articles here, apparently.

Neil McIver  posted on  2005-03-23   19:29:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]