[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Attack on the USS Liberty (June 8, 1967) - Speech by Survivor Phillip Tourney At the Revisionist History of War Conference (Video)

‘I Smell CIA/Deep State All Over This’ — RFK Jr. VP Nicole Shanahan Blasts Sanctuary Cities,

we see peaceful protests launching in Los Angeles” - Democrat Senator Cory Booke

We have no legal framework for designating domestic terror organizations

Los Angeles Braces For Another Day Of Chaos As Newsom Pits Marxist Color Revolution Against Trump Admin

Methylene Blue Benefits

Another Mossad War Crime

80 served arrest warrants at 'cartel afterparty' in South Carolina

When Ideas Become Too Dangerous To Platform

The silent bloodbath that's tearing through the middle-class

Kiev Postponed Exchange With Russia, Leaves Bodies Of 6,000 Slain Ukrainian Troops In Trucks

Iranian Intelligence Stole Trove Of Sensitive Israeli Nuclear Files

In the USA, the identity of Musk's abuser, who gave him a black eye, was revealed

Return of 6,000 Soldiers' Bodies Will Cost Ukraine Extra $2.1Bln

Palantir's Secret War: Inside the Plot to Cripple WikiLeaks

Digital Prison in the Making?

In France we're horrified by spending money on Ukraine

Russia has patented technology for launching drones from the space station

Kill ICE: Foreign Flags And Fires Sweep LA

6,000-year-old skeletons with never-before-seen DNA rewrites human history

First Close Look at China’s Ultra-Long Range Sixth Generation J-36Jet

I'm Caitlin Clark, and I refuse to return to the WNBA

Border Czar Tom Homan: “We Are Going to Bring National Guard in Tonight” to Los Angeles

These Are The U.S. States With The Most Drug Use

Chabria: ICE arrested a California union leader. Does Trump understand what that means?Anita Chabria

White House Staffer Responsible for ‘Fanning Flames’ Between Trump and Musk ID’d

Texas Yanks Major Perk From Illegal Aliens - After Pioneering It 24 Years Ago

Dozens detained during Los Angeles ICE raids

Russian army suffers massive losses as Kremlin feigns interest in peace talks — ISW

Russia’s Defense Collapse Exposed by Ukraine Strike


History
See other History Articles

Title: You don't even have to be 'religious' to understand this. Genesis Disclosed- Adam- means "BLOOD IN THE FACE"
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Oct 23, 2010
Author: Eli James
Post Date: 2010-10-23 12:15:14 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 634
Comments: 30

The bloodline of Adam are the Caucasian people, the Anglo Saxon, not the Canaanites who changed their name to "JEWS".

This is a HISTORY lesson NOT a religious sermon.

tinyurl.com/2asjkhp (mp3)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 23.

#4. To: Itistoolate (#0)

God save us all from Jewish, Christian and queer "identity".

bluegrass  posted on  2010-10-23   13:33:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: bluegrass, FormerLurker (#4)

Two SEED LINES explained (mp3)

Itistoolate  posted on  2010-10-23   15:22:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Itistoolate (#5)

Genesis Disclosed- Adam- means "BLOOD IN THE FACE"

You certainly fall for the most outrageous lies IATL.

Here's the reference on the word Adam in Hebrew, from a Christian site I might add..

The KJV Old Testament Hebrew Lexicon

Transliterated Word
'adam

Definition

man, mankind
man, human being
man, mankind (much more frequently intended sense in OT)
Adam, first man
city in Jordan valley

FormerLurker  posted on  2010-10-23   15:30:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: FormerLurker (#6)

Ya tried. That's all you can do. : )

bluegrass  posted on  2010-10-23   17:25:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: bluegrass (#12)

ADAM THE FIRST WHITE MAN

Adam is translated from the Hebrew word "AWDAWM" and means White Man. The basic derivative means: "Ruddy complexion, show blood in the face, transparent white skin. " The skin of the black and yellow races is not transparent nor is it with mongrels.

Even the ability to blush (show blood in the face) is confined to the White Race. This is caused by your sub-conscious which only God controls, as He breathed His Living Spirit into Adam who passed it on to you, his White descendants. You are an infinitesimal projection of your Creator, so when you do or say something embarrassing, your sub-conscious rushes excess blood to your face. The colored races, not having been. endowed with God's Spirit, have no abstract sense of right or wrong, consequently are never embarrassed.

NON- WHITES EXISTED BEFORE ADAM (cont'd) www.churchoftrueisrael.com/verboten/vb-02.html

Itistoolate  posted on  2010-10-23   18:05:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Itistoolate (#13)

Your grasp of Hebrew is very slight. It's rather difficult to find "white man - blood in the face" from two syllables (Adam).

In Biblical Hebrew, Adam means a man, a human being -- but whether the species took its name from the first man or the first man took his name from the species isn't clear. Awdom means red, either naturally or from a dye. Dawm means blood, any blood - from human or animal, and whether it is related to the name of the first human isn't clear either. But Adamah means ground, soil, the surface of the earth, and this is undoubtedly related to the name of the first human, who was, the Bible says, fashioned from the soil.

I do not know if only the white race blushes. But I do know that the Talmud contains a teaching that causing someone to be embarassed or humiliated is regarded as a violation of the commandment against shedding blood. How does shedding blood relate to this? Because the blush of embarassment is regarded as blood being shed. This is a teaching of the Jews, in the Holy Land, in the last centuries of the Roman Empire. So if those Jews knew what blushing was, then presumably they fall within that species of human that you credit with being white men. Likewise their dewscendants.

Shoonra  posted on  2010-10-25   0:24:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Shoonra (#21)

Likewise their dewscendants.

Do you mean Likewise their jewscendants.

THE KOL NIDRE

When reading this 'Kol Nidre" prayer, doesn't it make you wonder how any elected government official in these United States of America, whether it be at the local, state or federal level, could ever take a meaningful vow to defend and protect the Constitution for the United States of America? No matter what vow they take, the prayer absolves them of adherence. In other words, their word means NOTHING!

How would you like to have a Talmudic (Jewish) president? Of course, it doesn't really matter, and hasn't for a long time, because the Talmudists have been in power as the Shadow Government for so long -- maybe since the inception of the U.S. Constitution, and it becomes more and more clear that Americans are governed by them and are oppressed under the Talmudic / Commercial / International laws.

Here is the prayer, and an explanation of it from the Jewish Encyclopedia, on line

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=340&letter=K

(snippet)

Thereupon the cantor chants the Aramaic prayer beginning with the words "Kol Nidre," with its marvelously plaintive and touching melody, and, gradually increasing in volume from pianissimo to fortissimo, repeats three times the following words:

"All vows , obligations, oaths, and anathemas, whether called '?onam,' '?onas,' or by any other name, which we may vow, or swear, or pledge, or whereby we may be bound, from this Day of Atonement until the next (whose happy coming we await), we do repent.

May they be deemed absolved, forgiven, annulled, and void, and made of no effect; they shall not bind us nor have power over us. The vows shall not be reckoned vows; the obligations shall not be obligatory; nor the oaths be oaths."


Why would a group of people "blush" if the take a vow to absolve themselves of keeping any other oath they take?

Itistoolate  posted on  2010-10-25   0:45:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Itistoolate (#22)

You had the encyclopedia article in front of you yet you ignored the section on "Refers only to individual vows."

Anyway, typical change-the-subject sleight of hand I'd expect from the likes of you.

Shoonra  posted on  2010-10-27   7:00:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 23.

        There are no replies to Comment # 23.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 23.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]