See other (s)Elections Articles
Title: Conway Coverup: Rand Paul Opponent Involved in Obstruction of Justice
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.infowars.com/conway-cove ... ved-in-obstruction-of-justice/
Published: Oct 27, 2010
Author: Kurt Nimmo
Post Date: 2010-10-27 15:43:08 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 635
Comments: 49
Forget the corporate media dust-up over a Rand Paul supporter attacking a MoveOn.org activist. That incident pales in comparison to a story about the brother of Paul’s opponent in the race for Kentucky’s Senate seat, Jack Conway. On Saturday, the Louisville Courier-Journal published a story about Conway’s brother, Matthew, who resigned from the Jefferson County, Kentucky, attorney’s office to enter private practice after he was tipped off by Louisville narcotics detectives twice in the past two years that he was under investigation for possible drug use or trafficking. Matthew C. Conway was an assistant commonwealth’s attorney, a position he still holds, when detectives tipped him off on a second drug-related investigation. In a clear case of preferential treatment and a cover-up to protect Jack Conway, the Jefferson County Attorney’s Office decided in August that no charges would be filed against Matthew Conway or the narcotics detectives involved in tipping him off. In addition, Jack Conway became involved in criminal behavior. According to R. G. Dunlap of the Louisville Courier-Journal, the Conway brothers conferred with an attorney about the investigation. “The lawyer, Bart Adams of Louisville, then met with Police Chief Robert White to discuss [narcotics detective] Carthan’s conduct, according to the records,” writes Dunlap. Commonwealth’s Attorney David Stengel told the newspaper that he had reviewed all of the evidence gathered by police and was convinced that Conway was neither a drug user nor trafficker. Stengel told the newspaper that he concluded that Conway had done nothing wrong except to make a “well-intended but boneheaded statement” when he denied to police that he had been tipped off by narcotics detectives. Stengel said he decided not to discipline Conway for lying because “he went back and corrected that immediately,” in other words he was allowed to change his story. Stengel accepted Conway’s “corrected account four days later, and after another witness advised him that he had told investigators a different story.” * Stengel is hardly a neutral party. In fact, he is a Jack Conway supporter. “According to Fec.gov, Mr. David Stengel has donated $500 to Jack Conway’s campaign in the past,” writes CapitalistBanner.com. “Do we really want a former Jack Conway donor overlooking this?” Or more pt the point, engaging in a cover-up as Jack Conway attempts to beat Rand Paul and become the next senator from Kentucky. Louisville attorney Scott Roby is also as Conway supporter. Roby told Matthew Conway that the cops were investigating him for either drug use or trafficking, thus allowing him to avoid a police raid. LMPD Detective Scott Wilson had told Roby about the investigation. Conway and Wilson both attended St. Xavier High School at about the same time and are longtime acquaintances, according to the newspaper. Scott Roby donated $1250 to the Conway campaign. But it gets worse. It turns out that a Jack Conway supporter, businessman Charles Alexander, was the man who overheard cops talking about the Matthew Conway case in a downtown Louisville restaurant. The narcotics detectives described Matthew Conway as “dirty” (corrupt). Alexander called Jack Conway and informed him of the overheard conversation. “According to Fec.gov, Charles Alexander is a $2400 donor to Jack Conway and a $4600 donor to Barack Obama, so there is little doubt Mr. Alexander was concerned about the troubling allegations,” notes CapitalistBanner.com. Jack Conway and his supporters are involved in a cover-up and an attempt to obstruct justice, but this does not seem to be on the corporate media’s radar screen. Instead, we are harangued with absurd stories about Rand Paul, Aqua Buddha, and a fraternity prank invented by an anonymous woman. Jack Conway is involved in a brazen attempt to cover-up a police investigation of his brother. Supporters of his political campaign facilitated obscuration of justice. Is this the sort of man the people of Kentucky want representing them in Washington? In the name of objective journalism and fairness, the corporate media needs to cover this story immediately instead of inventing new ways to tear down the Rand Paul campaign.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: christine (#0)
Jack Conway and his supporters are involved in a cover-up and an attempt to obstruct justice, but this does not seem to be on the corporate media’s radar screen. Of course, the "stomping" nonsense about some dizzy chick who rushed Rand Paul's vehicle gets more attention from the goobers and the MSM than a story in regard to aiding and abetting the obstruction of a criminal investigation involving a candidate for the US Senate.
I would like to direct this to the distinguished members of the panel: You lousy cork-soakers. You have violated my farging rights. Dis somanumbatching country was founded so that the liberties of common patriotic citizens like me could not be taken away by a bunch of fargin iceholes... like yourselves. Thank you. - Roman Moroni
Bump to y'all. I know that extraterrestrials are a lot higher on the radar screen than our dope dealing elites, but I'd like to know what you guys think about this little story.
I would like to direct this to the distinguished members of the panel: You lousy cork-soakers. You have violated my farging rights. Dis somanumbatching country was founded so that the liberties of common patriotic citizens like me could not be taken away by a bunch of fargin iceholes... like yourselves. Thank you. - Roman Moroni
Thanks. I had heard about this even before AJ broke it yesterday on his show. Frankly, I would have given my brother a heads up too, so Conway should just admit what he did and move on.
Jack Conway needs to serve another term...in Federal prison WWGPD? - (What Would General Pinochet Do?)
deleted
The relationship between morality and liberty is a directly proportional one. "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." - Ben Franklin
Con-way and Xlinton are two peas in a pod in more ways than one. I would like to direct this to the distinguished members of the panel: You lousy cork-soakers. You have violated my farging rights. Dis somanumbatching country was founded so that the liberties of common patriotic citizens like me could not be taken away by a bunch of fargin iceholes... like yourselves. Thank you. - Roman Moroni
Dope bump.
I would like to direct this to the distinguished members of the panel: You lousy cork-soakers. You have violated my farging rights. Dis somanumbatching country was founded so that the liberties of common patriotic citizens like me could not be taken away by a bunch of fargin iceholes... like yourselves. Thank you. - Roman Moroni
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." -- Samuel Adams (1722-1803)‡
Well, Conway has Clinton campaigning for him/with him so that must mean he's dirty. Anyone Clinton is in bed with, literally or figuratively, can't be trusted.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. He (Gordon Duff) also implies that forcibly removing Obama, a Constitution-hating, on-the-down-low, crackhead Communist, is an attack on America, Mom, and apple pie. I swear these military people are worse than useless. Just look around at the condition of the country and tell me if they have fulfilled their oaths to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic. Politics is a dirty business.
That is a sad generalization, and one we imbibe with our mother's milk. Never-the-blinking-less, some politicians are much cleaner than others, and it behooves us to support men with some integrity. We will need some cool heads and clean hands at the helm as this republic of ours totters its way into the future. I'm sick of DOPES like Bush and Clinton and their like in DC.
I would like to direct this to the distinguished members of the panel: You lousy cork-soakers. You have violated my farging rights. Dis somanumbatching country was founded so that the liberties of common patriotic citizens like me could not be taken away by a bunch of fargin iceholes... like yourselves. Thank you. - Roman Moroni
In all my years of backroom politics, I met ONE honest politician, with no baggage. A farmer. The rest all were dishonest to one degree or another, plus all dragged dirty baggage of alcohol, drugs and sex.
I have respect for the people here at 4um for the most part. But, I have to ask if you folks will go to your graves still voting for the lesser of the two criminals ?
"Politics and Religion are the building blocks of slavery and oppression. Greed is the mortar that bonds them" and bankers are the masons with trowels in hand !
I don't vote in Kentucky, so I can't vote for Paul or his opponent. But I would like to know: Is Rand Paul a criminal?
I would like to direct this to the distinguished members of the panel: You lousy cork-soakers. You have violated my farging rights. Dis somanumbatching country was founded so that the liberties of common patriotic citizens like me could not be taken away by a bunch of fargin iceholes... like yourselves. Thank you. - Roman Moroni
I haven't done that in years. I have written some folks in, none of which counted but I wasn't trying to choose "the lesser evil." I decided a long time ago that a vote for what you knew to be evil, even a lesser amount, was still a vote for evil. If there is no good choice I will either not bother--I mean why waste time and gas when it's a "choice" between Tweedledumb and his ideological twin, Tweedledumber?--or write someone in that I would be proud to cast my vote for. Either that or just write in Homey D. Clown. He's better than the critters the establishment runs.
Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. He (Gordon Duff) also implies that forcibly removing Obama, a Constitution-hating, on-the-down-low, crackhead Communist, is an attack on America, Mom, and apple pie. I swear these military people are worse than useless. Just look around at the condition of the country and tell me if they have fulfilled their oaths to protect the nation from all enemies foreign and domestic. They're merely a reflection of the two legged pigs that pass as humans today. I HATE 99.9% of most people I meet, and with good reason. To twist a Reagan-ism; VERIFY first, then trust.
According to Sandra O'Connor: She sez FUCK YOU, JT.
"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET
One thing's for sure, buck. Your posts always gotta lotta class.
I would like to direct this to the distinguished members of the panel: You lousy cork-soakers. You have violated my farging rights. Dis somanumbatching country was founded so that the liberties of common patriotic citizens like me could not be taken away by a bunch of fargin iceholes... like yourselves. Thank you. - Roman Moroni
O'Connor was appointed by President Ronald Reagan (JT's idol) in 1981. Tell JT... he can believe all he wants in this two-party scam ... but he is just as much the problem than any solution. There shall be no change; no change, no hope, no future ... until after the next blood bath; and then, it is only questionable at best because of smoking guns.
"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET
Tell JT... he can believe all he wants in this two-party scam ... but he is just as much the problem than any solution. There shall be no change; no change, no hope, no future ... buck, that isn't my position. I'm not about to get into a pissing contest with a drunk so I'm asking you to either back up this --->Ronald Reagan (JT's idol) in 1981 <---- now, or take it back , now.
buckeroo: O'Connor was appointed by President Ronald Reagan (JT's idol) in 1981. I think you have a wild hair up your ass. I used O'Connor to categorically PROVE your esteen for presidential BS is worthless, since Sandra (Reagan's appointee to the USSC) just shot down the same concept.
"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET
This is complete BS. Prove it or take it back. This is my last attempt with you tonight.
Once again... you attempted to use Reagan for a method of on-line quoting characteristics. What's the matter, that presidential brain dead muther-fucker has you cackling about him? Historically, one of Reagan's touted GREAT accomplishments was the selection of O'Connor to the USSC (she was the first woman ever on the black-robed board of trustees for American tyranny). Just yesterday she shot your same quote in the foot; similar to your same anxiety about a fact. Learn to read... and cool having a cow about it.
"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET
I don't have to defend JT. He's a big boy and can take care of himself. I did want to say that "She sez FUCK YOU, JT" is the kind of back-handed passive aggressive stuff you are famous for here. I mean "she sez" it is a way of saying you're not saying it but - you get to say "FUCK YOU, JT." Threads always go downhill once this sort of unprovoked crap gets thrown into the hopper. It's tedious. My two cents.
I would like to direct this to the distinguished members of the panel: You lousy cork-soakers. You have violated my farging rights. Dis somanumbatching country was founded so that the liberties of common patriotic citizens like me could not be taken away by a bunch of fargin iceholes... like yourselves. Thank you. - Roman Moroni
I won't argue with a drunk. This is a lie.
So you are taking offense to my earlier post just because of syntax? Keep in mind, you brought up Reagan crapola... I slammed it back 'atcha, pal!
"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET
All you did buck is slam your dick in the door.
And, come to think of it.... you have been suggesting on this forum how the GOP is a political party to die for. Years ago, the ol' JT would have died to say some of the things you have recently said in publick. Times must be rough for ya, JT.... sorry to hear that.
"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET
Gotcha
You can't take the 'heat' anymore, JT. You are so afraid of anything "leftist"
you think you have to go "rightist" while equating the two freaked-out
positions that can NEVER permit a third party. You have opted to no more
stayings power than one of Reagan-esque BS expressions attempting to slide
yourself as a Limbaugh supporter in drag.
"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET
This is as far as I go with you. The comment
above is BS and when I asked you for proof, you begin a drunken tango, swaying
off in various absurd directions. Reagan isn't my idol, and only a wine
drenched brain like yours could link my use of a contorted line he used years
ago to that of praise.
LQQk at yourself misquoting or mischaracteiezing me in publiok as though I
drink wine. I NEVER touch the stuff... some of us have honour, you know.
"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET
it is
tedious. buck, you're skating on thin ice.
Truthfully, the political elites have used the media to ruin the reputations of men that should have been made saints, like John Wilkes Booth for instance. I'd like to see about 50 Senators stopped dead in their tracks during an Election cycle ... that would "make my millenium" as well as help reinforce the survivor's committments to the Consti-stupid.!
"Politics and Religion are the building blocks of slavery and oppression. Greed is the mortar that bonds them" and bankers are the masons with trowels in hand !
I always have, christine. Adventure without a wee bit of exploitative behaviour to stimulate the heart is worthless diatribe. Now, let's take a brief peek at JTs awesome example of playing around on the Internet.... shall we: And, I picked-upped on his post (which is in a way) a method of saying OHGOSHGOLLY, a brilliant remarck and said the following: She was a Reagan appointee to the USSC by JT's same bedroom poster child's quote. He just doesn't get the humour. Betcha others do. But now, there is another problem. He has taken a minor syntactical consideration into an issue because he is offended. After-all, that is why YOU decided to show up, correct?
"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET
i've read down the thread. that's not what JT took issue with. it's your claiming erroneously that Reagan is JT's idol. he didn't and hasn't posted anything as evidence for that. you're intentionally misrepresenting him. he's asked you to prove it or retract it. how about it?
This is between me and you. I called you out on a blatant lie and gave you
more than enough time to either prove it or retract. You did neither because
it is a lie and therefore can't be proven and your ego prevents you from
admitting it. It's too late for games and lies.
Please explain to JT that he owns his Reagan-esque quote. He deserves HELL for the same. I understand I have 4 more minutes before being banned.... AND, I just want you to know something more: I only use chit-chat channels as laughable material. It should be remarcked that this is all fun, more than often and oly the old salts such as JT... get in the way of doing anything worthwhile.... as he takes everything as though he was a professional. Being banned is nothing new to me; it will never be.
"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET
You did not of any sort or kind. You want me to explain to you how to read in your dying ol' age. Get a life, pal.
"we ought to lay off the criticism" -- Pinguinite, circa 2010-05-26 22:17:22 ET
Banned my ass, you're going to the Mayberry Drunk Tank with Otis. You know the terms. I told you in PM. Sober up, it would be the best thing you could do for your nasty self.
I'd like to know too ! I think all FED's are criminal. (But he hasn't been elected yet).
"Politics and Religion are the building blocks of slavery and oppression. Greed is the mortar that bonds them" and bankers are the masons with trowels in hand !
Comments (42 - 49) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestJack Conway is involved in a brazen attempt to cover-up a police investigation of his brother. Supporters of his political campaign facilitated obscuration of justice.
#2. To: Original_Intent, Jethro Tull, HAPPY2BME-4UM, Cynicom, Eric Stratton, Flintlock, ghostdogtxn, James Deffenbach, christine, All (#1)
#3. To: randge (#2)
#4. To: randge (#2)
#5. To: randge (#2)
#6. To: Flintlock (#4)
#7. To: octavia, Shoonra (#6)
#8. To: randge (#2)
#9. To: randge (#2)
I know that extraterrestrials are a lot higher on the radar screen than our dope dealing elites, but I'd like to know what you guys think about this little story.
Lord Acton
OsamaBinGoldstein posted on 2010-05-25 9:39:59 ET (2 images) Reply Trace
#10. To: christine (#0)
#11. To: Cynicom (#10)
Politics is a dirty business.
#12. To: randge (#11)
#13. To: All (#0)
#14. To: noone222 (#13)
still voting for the lesser of the two criminals ?
#15. To: noone222 (#13)
I have respect for the people here at 4um for the most part. But, I have to ask if you folks will go to your graves still voting for the lesser of the two criminals ?
Lord Acton
OsamaBinGoldstein posted on 2010-05-25 9:39:59 ET (2 images) Reply Trace
#16. To: Cynicom, 4, Pigs of all assorted sizes, shapes, colors and religions. (#12)
The rest all were dishonest to one degree or another
#17. To: Jethro Tull (#16)
To twist a Reagan-ism; VERIFY first, then trust.
Retired Sandra Day O’Connor has had a busy month this month despite her retirement. Just this week she sat in on a federal appellate panel which struck down as unconstitutional Arizona’s law which requires voters prove that they are citizens. Apparently, it is an undue burden on non-citizens to prove that they actually are allowed to vote before giving them a ballot. Nice to see circular reasoning still prevails on the 9th Circuit.
#18. To: buckeroo (#17)
#19. To: randge, Jethro Tull (#18)
Your posts always gotta lotta class.
#20. To: buckeroo (#19)
O'Connor was appointed by President Ronald Reagan (JT's idol) in 1981.
#21. To: Jethro Tull (#20)
Jethro Tull: To twist a ; VERIFY first, then trust.
#22. To: buckeroo (#21)
O'Connor was appointed by President Ronald Reagan (JT's idol) in 1981.
#23. To: Jethro Tull (#22)
#24. To: buckeroo (#17)
#25. To: buckeroo (#23)
President Ronald Reagan (JT's idol)
#26. To: Jethro Tull (#25)
#27. To: buckeroo (#26)
I slammed it back 'atcha, pal!
#28. To: Jethro Tull (#25)
#29. To: buckeroo (#28)
#30. To: Jethro Tull (#27)
#31. To: buckeroo (#30)
O'Connor was appointed by President Ronald Reagan (JT's idol)
in 1981.
#32. To: Jethro Tull (#31)
#33. To: randge, buckeroo (#24)
Threads always go downhill once this sort of unprovoked
crap gets thrown into the hopper. It's tedious.
#34. To: James Deffenbach (#15)
#35. To: christine (#33)
you're skating on thin ice.
To twist a Reagan-ism; VERIFY first, then trust.
According to Sandra O'Connor:
Retired Sandra Day O’Connor has had a busy month this month despite her retirement. Just this week she sat in on a federal appellate panel which struck down as unconstitutional Arizona’s law which requires voters prove that they are citizens. Apparently, it is an undue burden on non-citizens to prove that they actually are allowed to vote before giving them a ballot. Nice to see circular reasoning still prevails on the 9th Circuit.
She sez FUCK YOU, JT.
#36. To: buckeroo (#35)
He has taken a minor syntactical consideration into an issue because he is offended.
#37. To: buckeroo (#35)
#38. To: christine (#36)
#39. To: Jethro Tull (#37)
I called you out on a blatant lie
#40. To: buckeroo (#39)
#41. To: randge (#14)
But I would like to know: Is Rand Paul a criminal?
.
.
.