[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Media Flips Over Tulsi & Matt Gaetz, Biden & Trump Take A Pic, & Famous People Leave Twitter!

4 arrested in California car insurance scam: 'Clearly a human in a bear suit'

Silk Road Founder Trusts Trump To 'Honor His Pledge' For Commutation

"You DESERVED to LOSE the Senate, the House, and the Presidency!" - Jordan Peterson

"Grand Political Theatre"; FBI Raids Home Of Polymarket CEO; Seize Phone, Electronics

Schoolhouse Limbo: How Low Will Educators Go To Better Grades?

BREAKING: U.S. Army Officers Made a Desperate Attempt To Break Out of The Encirclement in KURSK

Trumps team drawing up list of Pentagon officers to fire, sources say

Israeli Military Planning To Stay in Gaza Through 2025

Hezbollah attacks Israeli army's Tel Aviv HQ twice in one day

People Can't Stop Talking About Elon's Secret Plan For MSNBC And CNN Is Totally Panicking

Tucker Carlson UNLOADS on Diddy, Kamala, Walz, Kimmel, Rich Girls, Conspiracy Theories, and the CIA!

"We have UFO technology that enables FREE ENERGY" Govt. Whistleblowers

They arrested this woman because her son did WHAT?

Parody Ad Features Company That Offers to Cryogenically Freeze Liberals for Duration of TrumpÂ’s Presidency

Elon and Vivek BEGIN Reforming Government, Media LOSES IT

Dear Border Czar: This Nonprofit Boasts A List Of 400 Companies That Employ Migrants

US Deficit Explodes: Blowout October Deficit Means 2nd Worst Start To US Fiscal Year On Record

Gaetz Resigns 'Effective Immediately' After Trump AG Pick; DC In Full Blown Panic

MAHA MEME

noone2222 and John Bolton sitting in a tree K I S S I N G

Donald Trump To Help Construct The Third Temple?

"The Elites Want To ROB Us of Our SOVEREIGNTY!" | Robert F Kennedy

Take Your Money OUT of THESE Banks NOW! - Jim Rickards

Trump Taps Tulsi Gabbard As Director Of National Intelligence

DC In Full Blown Panic After Trump Picks Matt Gaetz For Attorney General

Cleveland Clinic Warns Wave of Mass Deaths Will Wipe Out Covid-Vaxxed Within ‘5 Years’

Judah-ism is as Judah-ism does

Danger ahead: November 2024, Boston Dynamics introduces a fully autonomous "Atlas" robot. Robot humanoids are here.

Trump names [Fox News host] Pete Hegseth as his Defense secretary


Miscellaneous
See other Miscellaneous Articles

Title: Question concerning Firefox and browsing history
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Nov 10, 2010
Author: F.A. Hayek Fan
Post Date: 2010-11-10 12:44:44 by F.A. Hayek Fan
Keywords: None
Views: 1253
Comments: 136

I have reason to believe that my 16 y.o. son is looking at porn on his laptop. However, he knows how to go to the history tool bar and delete his browsing history. Is there another way that I can look at the browsing history?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Comments (1-19) not displayed.
      .
      .
      .

#20. To: buckeroo (#18)

Let's hope that the kiddies dont find about truecrypt and hidden volumes, using a USB drive to surf off of when the subject matter gets a little too "controversial" etc...

Forget I said that. Just forget it. Dont want to give them any funny ideas.


Click for Privacy and Preparedness files

”I say to each man and woman, you are unique and sovereign, the center of a universe. However right I may be in thinking as I do, you may be equally right in thinking otherwise. You can only accomplish your object in life by complete disregard of the opinions of other people.“ - Aleister Crowley

Jesus Never Existed

PSUSA  posted on  2010-11-10   15:37:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#0)
(Edited)

You can view porn online?

Do all of you know about this?

~~~~~~~
Best Movie Monologue

Defensive Racism Has Its Place

OneDollarDVDProject.com

wakeup  posted on  2010-11-10   16:17:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: buckeroo (#19)

So why did you decide to impose your own moral principles into a technical question?

Because "moral principles", or lack there of, were stated within the "technical question" itself.

PaulCJ  posted on  2010-11-10   16:20:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: wakeup (#21)

Porn?

Online?

Who knew?

Thanks.

Lod  posted on  2010-11-10   16:24:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Lod (#23)

A view a day keeps me alert and remembering what life was all about.

Cynicom  posted on  2010-11-10   16:29:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: PaulCJ, F.A. Hayek Fan, Lod, christine, Original_Intent, PSUSA (#22)

Because "moral principles", or lack there of, were stated within the "technical question" itself.

You remind me of those anti-constitutionalists that argue about the requirements of and about the Second Amendment.

F.A. Hayek Fan posted an establishment preamble that has only meaning to his technical question. On review:

Here is what F.A. Hayek Fan asked:

I have reason to believe that my 16 y.o. son is looking at porn on his laptop. However, he knows how to go to the history tool bar and delete his browsing history. Is there another way that I can look at the browsing history?

His reasons are his business in establishing a premise. But all you did in post#2 was distract away from his interest.

Now, let's look at the Second Amendment which is largely neglected in the SAME WAY (or contextual argument) you attempted to distract F.A. Hayek Fan's post:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

You have garbled F.A. Hayek Fan's meaning similar to Handgun Control Inc. You think because of establishing a forward or principle towards the issue permits some sort of distraction.

You are a bumbling, babbling idiot PaulCJ. No wonder you can't get it quite right yet ... you are always distracted because you can't read.

"The Tea Party represents the true green shoots of a reclaimed America, let us not block it's sunlight while it is still taking roots." -- Flintlock, circa 2010-11-06 13:51:43 ET

buckeroo  posted on  2010-11-10   16:39:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: Cynicom (#24)

I'm always learning something new and stimulating on 4.

Lod  posted on  2010-11-10   16:44:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: PaulCJ (#13)

To go behind someone's back is not moral. Such hypocrisy is the reason we have so many problems in the world.

Kind of like talking about someone while having them on your bozo list so that they are unable to respond to you or insisting that others fight and die for the war you support while you sit on the computer in your parents house nice and safe.

You know nothing of morality but are thoroughly familiar with hypocrisy.

I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. - Benjamin Franklin

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2010-11-10   17:29:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#0)

Boys who aren't interested in porn turn into serial killers. Relax, he's totally normal.

"If ever this vast country is brought under a single government, it will be one of the most extensive corruption, indifferent and incapable of a wholesome care over so wide a spread of surface. This will not be borne, and you will have to choose between reform and revolution. If I know the spirit of this country, the one or the other is inevitable." - Thomas Jefferson

Turtle  posted on  2010-11-10   17:30:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: christine (#3)

i agree with Paul on this one.

I do not believe that I am "having a heart attack over it." Like the overwhelming majority of parents in this country, I do not want my son looking at pornography. He says he isn't, and maybe he's not, but I would like to be sure. 16 year old boys are horny enough without subjecting themselves to pornography everyday.

I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. - Benjamin Franklin

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2010-11-10   17:35:31 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: Turtle (#28)

Boys who aren't interested in porn turn into serial killers. Relax, he's totally normal.

Whether he is normal of not is not the point.

I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. - Benjamin Franklin

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2010-11-10   17:36:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: All (#0)

For those that answered my original question, thank you.

I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. - Benjamin Franklin

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2010-11-10   17:39:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Cynicom (#24)

A view a day keeps me alert and remembering what life was all about.

Sweet Jeebus! We're going to have to change your name to Dirtyom.

Godfrey Smith: Mike, I wouldn't worry. Prosperity is just around the corner.
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)

Esso  posted on  2010-11-10   17:41:52 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Esso, Lod (#32)

Sweet Jeebus! We're going to have to change your name to Dirtyom.

Well, I was doin fine til Sir Lod sent me sumpin bad last week.

I had to do the viewing afore I deleted them, dont you know?

Cynicom  posted on  2010-11-10   18:10:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Cynicom, Esso, 4 (#33)

As some judge or justice, once remarked, "I know porn when I see it."

These things bear our personal investigation to see if they are true, or not.

Lod  posted on  2010-11-10   18:16:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Lod (#34)

These things bear our personal investigation to see if they are true, or not.

You are leading Esso down the Primrose path, at his early age.

Cynicom  posted on  2010-11-10   18:20:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Cynicom, Esso, 4 (#35)

Back when sex education was being introduced into the pubic school system, and commenting on the great outcry that arose, some pundit commented, "We don't need any classes on sex education, let'em learn it in the gutter, like I did."

It would have saved us tons of money had his advice been followed.

We only existed for thousands of years without any classroom explanations...

Lod  posted on  2010-11-10   18:34:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: Lod (#36)

We only existed for thousands of years without any classroom explanations...

Many of my teachers were unable to teach the subjects they were paid to teach.

Cynicom  posted on  2010-11-10   18:37:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Cynicom (#35)

Don't worry, Dad. Until the internet shows some potential beyond simple text, I'll stick with my dial-up connection.

I don't really care for all that video crap anyway. Makes the internet too much like TeeVee for my taste.

Godfrey Smith: Mike, I wouldn't worry. Prosperity is just around the corner.
Mike Flaherty: Yeah, it's been there a long time. I wish I knew which corner.
My Man Godfrey (1936)

Esso  posted on  2010-11-10   18:40:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Esso (#38)

I shot my TV years ago, b est thing I ever did.

Cynicom  posted on  2010-11-10   18:46:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: Esso (#38)

As was said, don't knock it, 'till you've tried it.

After having ATT's semi-fast 5mbs, I'm going to go with TW cable, and hope to get 20, or better.

The cost is the same, it will just require some cabling to the machine.

Lod  posted on  2010-11-10   19:13:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#41. To: buckeroo (#25)

You remind me of those anti-constitutionalists that argue about the requirements of and about the Second Amendment.

You remind me of those rabid teachers that were more concerned with disciplining children, than teaching children.

PaulCJ  posted on  2010-11-10   19:21:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#42. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#27)

You know nothing of morality but are thoroughly familiar with hypocrisy.

You are ignorant of both.

It you have a possible problem, you face it directly, eye to eye. Any other way ends in tragedy.

PaulCJ  posted on  2010-11-10   19:25:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#43. To: PaulCJ (#41)

You remind me of those rabid teachers that were more concerned with disciplining children, than teaching children.

Lets take another peek at your own #2 post, shall we?

Your son is sixteen years old, if he isn't looking at porn, you should worry.

If it is not rape, snuff, or child porn, don't give yourself a heart attack over it.

You should probably be more worried about the possibility that you son might accidentally get his girlfriend pregnant.

You are a fool, PaulCJ. What do want me to do on the Internet, beg a bailiff to whack your pee-pee (borrowed cliché from Arlo Guthrie's infamous ... Alice's Restaurant)?

"The Tea Party represents the true green shoots of a reclaimed America, let us not block it's sunlight while it is still taking roots." -- Flintlock, circa 2010-11-06 13:51:43 ET

buckeroo  posted on  2010-11-10   19:32:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#44. To: Pinguinite (#7)

Sorry to ask you another question. Why do some posts on 4um run outside the margins requiring one to scan back and forth to read them? When this happens, I just forget that post and the replys and move on. To me they are a waste of banwidth and a persons time.

LACUMO  posted on  2010-11-10   19:38:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#45. To: Lod, Cynicom, Esso (#34)

As some judge or justice, once remarked, "I know porn when I see it."

These things bear our personal investigation to see if they are true, or not.

You know you are getting up there when you remember jokes dependent upon obsolete technology.

"But gee, I don't even own a Pornograph."

"One of the least understood strategies of the world revolution now moving rapidly toward its goal is the use of mind control as a major means of obtaining the consent of the people who will be subjects of the New World Order." K.M. Heaton, The National Educator

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-11-10   20:03:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#46. To: LACUMO (#44)

Why do some posts on 4um run outside the margins requiring one to scan back and forth to read them?

Because some element in such articles or threads are not subject to proper wrapping, such as very wide pictures or, sometimes, web addresses that are a mile long. Browsers routinely expand a view window beyond the screen width in those cases, and then set word wrapping of text at that width.

To deal with it with the software would require some fancy stuff beyond ordinary HTML. It's really the responsibility of the person posting to watch out for that, but it shouldn't be a big problem as ordinary content, with photos or not, shouldn't do that.

When this happens, I just forget that post and the replys and move on. To me they are a waste of banwidth and a persons time.

I agree.

Pinguinite  posted on  2010-11-10   20:46:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#47. To: buckeroo (#43)

You are a fool, PaulCJ. What do want me to do on the Internet, beg a bailiff to whack your pee-pee (borrowed cliché from Arlo Guthrie's infamous ... Alice's Restaurant)?

I understand human nature. And I was pointing out, barring a few exceptions, this was not as bad as some would think.

There are far, far worse things than porn.

And two others people on this board agree with me.

buckeroo, grow up and realize that people are human beings, and not walking robots with no emotions.

PaulCJ  posted on  2010-11-10   21:18:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#48. To: buckeroo (#43)

beg a bailiff to whack your pee-pee (borrowed cliché from Arlo Guthrie's infamous ... Alice's Restaurant)?

That was a Cheech and Chong piece, I believe it was "Trippin in Court." The judge said "Bailiff, whack his pee-pee!"

Bill Crowe  posted on  2010-11-10   21:29:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#49. To: PaulCJ, F.A. Hayek Fan (#47)

buckeroo, grow up and realize that people are human beings, and not walking robots with no emotions.

Sure.. the framework of F.A. Hayek Fan's original post weas fairly simple to read:

I have reason to believe that my 16 y.o. son is looking at porn on his laptop. However, he knows how to go to the history tool bar and delete his browsing history. Is there another way that I can look at the browsing history?

And you attempted to clobber F.A. Hayek Fan in post #2:

Your son is sixteen years old, if he isn't looking at porn, you should worry.

If it is not rape, snuff, or child porn, don't give yourself a heart attack over it.

You should probably be more worried about the possibility that you son might accidentally get his girlfriend pregnant.

You are a laff a minute, pal. You are diversionary to this thread similar to both the Republicans or Democrats attempting to impose some sort of POWER trip under the guise of moral principle... you are kinda like GWBush begging for a "compassionate conservatives".

"The Tea Party represents the true green shoots of a reclaimed America, let us not block it's sunlight while it is still taking roots." -- Flintlock, circa 2010-11-06 13:51:43 ET

buckeroo  posted on  2010-11-10   21:41:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#50. To: PaulCJ (#42)

It you have a possible problem, you face it directly, eye to eye. Any other way ends in tragedy.

You have zero idea of what you are talking about. You assume that because I asked the question about Firefox that I did not speak with my son about the subject. That is an assumption based upon no facts whatsoever. However, you are dead wrong. I did ask. We had long talk about the subject. However I am a proponent of trust and verify and I don't give a shit if some immoral neocon such as yourself approves or not.

I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. - Benjamin Franklin

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2010-11-10   21:52:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: PaulCJ (#47)

I understand human nature. And I was pointing out, barring a few exceptions, this was not as bad as some would think.

There are far, far worse things than porn.

And two others people on this board agree with me.

buckeroo, grow up and realize that people are human beings, and not walking robots with no emotions.

Regardless of what you and others on this board believe, the overwhelming majority of parents do not approve of their children viewing pornography on the internet.

I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. - Benjamin Franklin

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2010-11-10   21:57:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#52. To: buckeroo (#49)

I'm thinking that PaulCJ is either teenage boy or a pedophile who lures teenage boys to his home by using pornography.

I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. - Benjamin Franklin

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2010-11-10   22:00:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#53. To: buckeroo, all, f. a. hayek fan (#25)

you are correct. the guy asked a technical question. everyone piping in about how a porn addiction is good for his son and how a parent has no moral right to monitor their children are insane whackos. the end, no further bickering needed. Next?

"if I have all faith so as to move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing." 1 Cor 12:31—13:13
"I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him"
George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html

Artisan  posted on  2010-11-10   22:17:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#54. To: Pinguinite (#46)

To deal with it with the software would require some fancy stuff beyond ordinary HTML. It's really the responsibility of the person posting to watch out for that, but it shouldn't be a big problem as ordinary content, with photos or not, shouldn't do that.

Thank you!

LACUMO  posted on  2010-11-10   22:19:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: Artisan (#53)

Next?

How come libertarians aren't considered responsible both personally, family, business and socially and yet the well-practised democrats and their own counter-parts, the republicans, are?

"The Tea Party represents the true green shoots of a reclaimed America, let us not block it's sunlight while it is still taking roots." -- Flintlock, circa 2010-11-06 13:51:43 ET

buckeroo  posted on  2010-11-10   22:23:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#56. To: Original_Intent (#45)

You know you are getting up there when you remember jokes dependent upon obsolete technology.

Good point.

To quote the oldies, you're either an oldie, or very, very, well read.

I'll cop to the former, and some of the latter.

Lod  posted on  2010-11-10   22:33:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#57. To: buckeroo (#55)

i am almost leery of identifying myself as a libertarian. people like schwarzenegger, socialist statists who like fag 'marriage' & killing unborn babies are referred to as libertarians. they are disgusting as that gary nolan character who thinks he has hope for the presidency. i prefer the label paleoconservative. most people never heard of that though. it will confuse them.much of the general public, when they hear the term libertarian, conjure up someone who they think just doesnt like rules.

"if I have all faith so as to move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing." 1 Cor 12:31—13:13
"I don't know where Bin Laden is. I truly am not that concerned about him"
George W, Bush, 3/13/02 http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html

Artisan  posted on  2010-11-10   22:35:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#58. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#52) (Edited)

I'm thinking that PaulCJ is either teenage boy or a pedophile who lures teenage boys to his home by using pornography.

Says the person whom states family matters publicly.

You asked two questions, in one question. You indirectly asked if it was okay to go behind your son's back, otherwise, you have just asks how to get a history folder back without giving details.

If you think your son is looking at porn, be a man and ask him directly. Don't go behind his back.

He is sixteen, according you. Legally speaking, if he committed a crime, he would be charged as an adult.

The government considers him mature enough to know right and wrong from a legal standpoint. I will hold him to the same standard.

This is not a ten year old we are talking about.

The hard fact is, at sixteen, if a boy is not thinking about girls and sex at least occasionally, there is something SERIOUSLY wrong with him.

PaulCJ  posted on  2010-11-10   22:46:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#59. To: Artisan (#57)

i am almost leery of identifying myself as a libertarian.

And, as a result, you are afraid of individual rights, liberties and freedoms while clinging onto gossip, innuendo and mass paranoia.

Or, did you mean something else and I interpreted your perspective incorrectly?

"The Tea Party represents the true green shoots of a reclaimed America, let us not block it's sunlight while it is still taking roots." -- Flintlock, circa 2010-11-06 13:51:43 ET

buckeroo  posted on  2010-11-10   22:47:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#60. To: PaulCJ (#58)

You asked two questions, in one question. You indirectly asked if it was okay to go behind your son's back, otherwise, you have just asks how to get a history folder back without giving details.

I asked one question and one question only. If I had wanted to know the opinion of a moral degenerate such as yourself I would have asked for your opinion.

If you think your son is looking at porn, be a man and ask him directly. Don't go behind his back.

You go from making unfounded assumptions based on no facts whatsoever to outright accusations based on no facts whatsoever.

He is sixteen, according you. Legally speaking, if he committed a crime, he would be charged as an adult.

The government considers him mature enough to know right and wrong from a legal standpoint. I will hold him to the same standard.

This is not a ten year old we are talking about.

The hard fact is, at sixteen, if a boy is not thinking about girls and sex at least occasionally, there is something SERIOUSLY wrong with him.

The law does not consider a 16 year old boy old enough to view pornography. Neither do I. The fact that you do matters not a whit.

I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. - Benjamin Franklin

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2010-11-10   22:58:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (61 - 136) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]