[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Media Flips Over Tulsi & Matt Gaetz, Biden & Trump Take A Pic, & Famous People Leave Twitter! 4 arrested in California car insurance scam: 'Clearly a human in a bear suit' Silk Road Founder Trusts Trump To 'Honor His Pledge' For Commutation "You DESERVED to LOSE the Senate, the House, and the Presidency!" - Jordan Peterson "Grand Political Theatre"; FBI Raids Home Of Polymarket CEO; Seize Phone, Electronics Schoolhouse Limbo: How Low Will Educators Go To Better Grades? BREAKING: U.S. Army Officers Made a Desperate Attempt To Break Out of The Encirclement in KURSK Trumps team drawing up list of Pentagon officers to fire, sources say Israeli Military Planning To Stay in Gaza Through 2025 Hezbollah attacks Israeli army's Tel Aviv HQ twice in one day People Can't Stop Talking About Elon's Secret Plan For MSNBC And CNN Is Totally Panicking Tucker Carlson UNLOADS on Diddy, Kamala, Walz, Kimmel, Rich Girls, Conspiracy Theories, and the CIA! "We have UFO technology that enables FREE ENERGY" Govt. Whistleblowers They arrested this woman because her son did WHAT? Parody Ad Features Company That Offers to Cryogenically Freeze Liberals for Duration of TrumpÂ’s Presidency Elon and Vivek BEGIN Reforming Government, Media LOSES IT Dear Border Czar: This Nonprofit Boasts A List Of 400 Companies That Employ Migrants US Deficit Explodes: Blowout October Deficit Means 2nd Worst Start To US Fiscal Year On Record Gaetz Resigns 'Effective Immediately' After Trump AG Pick; DC In Full Blown Panic MAHA MEME noone2222 and John Bolton sitting in a tree K I S S I N G Donald Trump To Help Construct The Third Temple? "The Elites Want To ROB Us of Our SOVEREIGNTY!" | Robert F Kennedy Take Your Money OUT of THESE Banks NOW! - Jim Rickards Trump Taps Tulsi Gabbard As Director Of National Intelligence DC In Full Blown Panic After Trump Picks Matt Gaetz For Attorney General Cleveland Clinic Warns Wave of Mass Deaths Will Wipe Out Covid-Vaxxed Within ‘5 Years’ Judah-ism is as Judah-ism does Danger ahead: November 2024, Boston Dynamics introduces a fully autonomous "Atlas" robot. Robot humanoids are here. Trump names [Fox News host] Pete Hegseth as his Defense secretary

Miscellaneous
See other Miscellaneous Articles

Title: Question concerning Firefox and browsing history
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Nov 10, 2010
Author: F.A. Hayek Fan
Post Date: 2010-11-10 12:44:44 by F.A. Hayek Fan
Keywords: None
Views: 1275
Comments: 136

I have reason to believe that my 16 y.o. son is looking at porn on his laptop. However, he knows how to go to the history tool bar and delete his browsing history. Is there another way that I can look at the browsing history?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 62.

#2. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#0)

I have reason to believe that my 16 y.o. son is looking at porn on his laptop. However, he knows how to go to the history tool bar and delete his browsing history. Is there another way that I can look at the browsing history?

Your son is sixteen years old, if he isn't looking at porn, you should worry.

If it is not rape, snuff, or child porn, don't give yourself a heart attack over it.

You should probably be more worried about the possibility that you son might accidentally get his girlfriend pregnant.

PaulCJ  posted on  2010-11-10   12:51:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Your son is sixteen years old, if he isn't looking at porn, you should worry.

If it is not rape, snuff, or child porn, don't give yourself a heart attack over it.

i agree with Paul on this one.

christine  posted on  2010-11-10   13:20:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I'm with you two on this.

Lod  posted on  2010-11-10   14:44:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

PaulCJ never answered F.A. Hayek Fan's original technical question. So why do you think PaulCJ's moral principles of social conduct or behaviour trump a perfectly good technical question?

buckeroo  posted on  2010-11-10   14:49:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

So why do you think PaulCJ's moral principles of social conduct or behaviour trump a perfectly good technical question?

Has FA asks his son directly beforehand about looking at porn? Looking him directly in the eye and ask the question.

To go behind someone's back is not moral. Such hypocrisy is the reason we have so many problems in the world.

PaulCJ  posted on  2010-11-10   14:58:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Has FA asks his son directly beforehand about looking at porn? Looking him directly in the eye and ask the question.

To go behind someone's back is not moral. Such hypocrisy is the reason we have so many problems in the world.

Are your questions/considerations pertinent to F.A. Hayek Fan's original technical question? I don't think so.

Your moral considerations are meaningless to F.A. Hayek Fan's considerations. How do you know he hasn't already had the dialogue you discuss? Aren't YOU fabricating HOT_AIRE without addressing the initial point of view by F.A. Hayek Fan?

buckeroo  posted on  2010-11-10   15:04:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

How do you know he hasn't already had the dialogue you discuss?

I don't. And neither do you.

But, you would walk in blindly into doing immoral acts, such as going behind people's backs, without asking for details beforehand. While I ask for, and point out details.

I believe in making an "informed decision" before taking action. You do not.

PaulCJ  posted on  2010-11-10   15:23:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I don't. And neither do you.

So why did you decide to impose your own moral principles into a technical question?

But, you would walk in blindly into doing immoral acts, such as going behind people's backs, without asking for details beforehand. While I ask for, and point out details.

Sorry charlie, I discussed technical considerations NOT YOU. You imposed some fucked-upped dialogue that is reminiscent of the Spanish Inquisition. And your often spouted moral principals go no-where with me.

Here is your POST#2:

Your son is sixteen years old, if he isn't looking at porn, you should worry.

If it is not rape, snuff, or child porn, don't give yourself a heart attack over it.

You should probably be more worried about the possibility that you son might accidentally get his girlfriend pregnant.

Where did you answer the TECHNICAL question? Ohhhhh, it was too easy to FORCE your moral principals into a pile of blabbering BULLSHIT.

I believe in making an "informed decision" before taking action. You do not.

You don't know diddly-squat.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-11-10   15:35:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

So why did you decide to impose your own moral principles into a technical question?

Because "moral principles", or lack there of, were stated within the "technical question" itself.

PaulCJ  posted on  2010-11-10   16:20:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Because "moral principles", or lack there of, were stated within the "technical question" itself.

You remind me of those anti-constitutionalists that argue about the requirements of and about the Second Amendment.

F.A. Hayek Fan posted an establishment preamble that has only meaning to his technical question. On review:

Here is what F.A. Hayek Fan asked:

I have reason to believe that my 16 y.o. son is looking at porn on his laptop. However, he knows how to go to the history tool bar and delete his browsing history. Is there another way that I can look at the browsing history?

His reasons are his business in establishing a premise. But all you did in post#2 was distract away from his interest.

Now, let's look at the Second Amendment which is largely neglected in the SAME WAY (or contextual argument) you attempted to distract F.A. Hayek Fan's post:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

You have garbled F.A. Hayek Fan's meaning similar to Handgun Control Inc. You think because of establishing a forward or principle towards the issue permits some sort of distraction.

You are a bumbling, babbling idiot PaulCJ. No wonder you can't get it quite right yet ... you are always distracted because you can't read.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-11-10   16:39:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

You remind me of those anti-constitutionalists that argue about the requirements of and about the Second Amendment.

You remind me of those rabid teachers that were more concerned with disciplining children, than teaching children.

PaulCJ  posted on  2010-11-10   19:21:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

You remind me of those rabid teachers that were more concerned with disciplining children, than teaching children.

Lets take another peek at your own #2 post, shall we?

Your son is sixteen years old, if he isn't looking at porn, you should worry.

If it is not rape, snuff, or child porn, don't give yourself a heart attack over it.

You should probably be more worried about the possibility that you son might accidentally get his girlfriend pregnant.

You are a fool, PaulCJ. What do want me to do on the Internet, beg a bailiff to whack your pee-pee (borrowed cliché from Arlo Guthrie's infamous ... Alice's Restaurant)?

buckeroo  posted on  2010-11-10   19:32:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

You are a fool, PaulCJ. What do want me to do on the Internet, beg a bailiff to whack your pee-pee (borrowed cliché from Arlo Guthrie's infamous ... Alice's Restaurant)?

I understand human nature. And I was pointing out, barring a few exceptions, this was not as bad as some would think.

There are far, far worse things than porn.

And two others people on this board agree with me.

buckeroo, grow up and realize that people are human beings, and not walking robots with no emotions.

PaulCJ  posted on  2010-11-10   21:18:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I understand human nature. And I was pointing out, barring a few exceptions, this was not as bad as some would think.

There are far, far worse things than porn.

And two others people on this board agree with me.

buckeroo, grow up and realize that people are human beings, and not walking robots with no emotions.

Regardless of what you and others on this board believe, the overwhelming majority of parents do not approve of their children viewing pornography on the internet.

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2010-11-10   21:57:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Regardless of what you and others on this board believe, the overwhelming majority of parents do not approve of their children viewing pornography on the internet.

You really don't get what I am saying to you. It isn't the porn I am talking about. It is the going behind the back of you son that is the problem.

This is how the mentality of those in government thinking it alright to spy on on people of their own nation gets started. It is a lack of trust. A lack of trust that starts a home.

A lack of trust where people don't have the courage to

You want to invade someone else privacy.

That is no difference between immorality a cop searching a person's home, and a parent searching their teenager.

You want to get proof before confronting you son, because you don't trust you son AT ALL!

Because you believe the government commercials that it is okay invade someone else's privacy.

This is how some of the major problems in our nation got started. A COMPLETE LACK OF TRUST AT HOME!!

This level of decay in the morality of this nation disgusts me.

You ask your son point blank, weather he is looking at porn, without going behind his back, one of two things will happen.

Either he will admit to you, and you can discuss, like a parent and child should.

Or, he will lie. If he lies to you, he will likely quit looking at porn for a while.

If you present that you went behind his back, you will have a make argument with your son that will likely lead to more problems THAT ARE WORSE THAN WHAT YOU WORRY ABOUT NOW!!

You son may need you in a life or death situation for himself in the future, and if he cannot trust you now, he will not trust you then, which will make the situation he will be in worse.

I watched my younger brother sever all ties with my family due to a situation like what you are creating.

I saw how it started, I don't want to see that happen again.

I miss him a lot, but there is no way I can contact him.

PaulCJ  posted on  2010-11-10   23:04:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#64. To: PaulCJ (#62) (Edited)

You have a severe reading comprehension problem. I stated back in my post 29 to Christine that I had talked to him. I also told you that I already talked to him in post 50, yet you keep on making these nonsensical accusations.

This level of decay in the morality of this nation disgusts me.

LOL! You are defending a child's ability to look at pornography unmolested and you want to talk about the decay of morality?

You are a nut job, plain and simple.

F.A. Hayek Fan  posted on  2010-11-10 23:14:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

You ask your son point blank, weather [sic] he is looking at porn, without going behind his back, one of two things will happen.

Either he will admit to you, and you can discuss, like a parent and child should.

Or, he will lie. If he lies to you, he will likely quit looking at porn for a while.

How do you know there are only two ways of presentation? You have no facts at all. Suppose F.A. Hayek Fan's next door neighbour or his own son's girl-friend came sneaking into the son's room wanting to use the laptop for their own carnal sins? HELL, perhaps it was your own wife (PaulCJ) because you don't give her any Good&Plenty?

As is always, you have two ways of looking at things... and there is an entire spectrum of considerations that are beyond your own capabilities to grasp.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-11-10 23:40:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Oh my you would really hate me and think I am out of line!!! But then again when it comes to MY KIDS I don't really care what you or anyone else really thinks.

I will and would watch my kids like a hawk. If I do not know what they are doing then I can't correct them.

You must have been quite the angelic kid when you were growing up because most of the parents I know do not want their kids to mess up and go in the direction they did when they were teens. We want better for our kids. But then again parents were not to bright in the 60's, 70's, and even early 80's. They were clueless.

As long as a parent is legally responsible for their kids they have every right to know what they are doing.

Who is paying for the internet? Who is paying for the electricity? Who is paying for the home? Who has paid for the kid his whole life and invested much time and love in the kid? Who will be heartbroken and care if that kid is in trouble? Who will the kid call when trouble is there? You or their parent?

You know everyone does not watch porn. I would not want to be with someone who had those types of sexual problems. I would not want my kids to have those type of problems. It is not healthy. I have seen a few marriages and relationships break up over this. And usually the dudes that are watching the porn are inadequate.....at least according to what I have heard.

MiracleRose7  posted on  2010-11-11 04:58:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]