[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Russia's Dark Future A Missile Shield for America - A Trillion Dollar Fantasy? Kentucky School Board Chairman Resigns After Calling for People to ‘Shoot Republicans’ These Are 2025's 'Most Livable' Cities Nicotine and Fish Genocide Summer Camp, And Other Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix This Can Create Endless Green Energy WITHOUT Electricity Geoengineering: Who’s Behind It and How We Stop It Pam Bondi Ordered Prosecution of Dr. Kirk Moore After Refusing to Dismiss Case California woman bombarded with Amazon packages for over a year CVS ordered to pay $949 MILLION in Medicaid fraud case. Starmer has signed up to the UNs agreement to raise taxes in the UK Magic mushrooms may hold the secret to longevity: Psilocybin extends lifespan by 57% in groundbreaking study Cops favorite AI tool automatically deletes evidence of when AI was used Leftist Anti ICE Extremist OPENS FIRE On Cops, $50,000 REWARD For Shooter With great power comes no accountability. Auto loan debt hits $1.63T. 20% of buyers now pay $1,000+ monthly. Texas delinquency hits 7.92%. Quotable Quotes from the Chosenites Tokara Islands NOW crashing into the Ocean ! Mysterious Swarm continues with OVER 1700 Quakes ! Why Austria Is Suddenly Declaring War on Immigration Rep. Greene Wants To Remove $500 Million in Military Aid for Nuclear-Armed Israel From NDAA Netanyahu Lays Groundwork for Additional Strikes on Iran: 'We Didn't Deal With The Enriched Uranium' Sweden Cracks Down On OnlyFans - Will U.S. Follow Suit? Joe Rogan CALLS OUT Israel's Media CONTROL Communist Billionaire Accused Of Funding Anti-ICE Riots Mysteriously Vanishes 6 Factors That Describe China's Current State Trump Thteatens to Bomb Moscow and Beijing Little Bitty Vertiv Drops After Amazon Unveils In-House Liquid Cooling System, Marking Pivot To Liquid 17 Out-Of-Place Artifacts That Suggest High-Tech Civilizations Existed Thousands (Or Millions) Of Years Ago

Miscellaneous
See other Miscellaneous Articles

Title: Question concerning Firefox and browsing history
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Nov 10, 2010
Author: F.A. Hayek Fan
Post Date: 2010-11-10 12:44:44 by F.A. Hayek Fan
Keywords: None
Views: 2213
Comments: 136

I have reason to believe that my 16 y.o. son is looking at porn on his laptop. However, he knows how to go to the history tool bar and delete his browsing history. Is there another way that I can look at the browsing history?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 75.

#2. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#0)

I have reason to believe that my 16 y.o. son is looking at porn on his laptop. However, he knows how to go to the history tool bar and delete his browsing history. Is there another way that I can look at the browsing history?

Your son is sixteen years old, if he isn't looking at porn, you should worry.

If it is not rape, snuff, or child porn, don't give yourself a heart attack over it.

You should probably be more worried about the possibility that you son might accidentally get his girlfriend pregnant.

PaulCJ  posted on  2010-11-10   12:51:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Your son is sixteen years old, if he isn't looking at porn, you should worry.

If it is not rape, snuff, or child porn, don't give yourself a heart attack over it.

i agree with Paul on this one.

christine  posted on  2010-11-10   13:20:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I'm with you two on this.

Lod  posted on  2010-11-10   14:44:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

PaulCJ never answered F.A. Hayek Fan's original technical question. So why do you think PaulCJ's moral principles of social conduct or behaviour trump a perfectly good technical question?

buckeroo  posted on  2010-11-10   14:49:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

So why do you think PaulCJ's moral principles of social conduct or behaviour trump a perfectly good technical question?

Has FA asks his son directly beforehand about looking at porn? Looking him directly in the eye and ask the question.

To go behind someone's back is not moral. Such hypocrisy is the reason we have so many problems in the world.

PaulCJ  posted on  2010-11-10   14:58:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Has FA asks his son directly beforehand about looking at porn? Looking him directly in the eye and ask the question.

To go behind someone's back is not moral. Such hypocrisy is the reason we have so many problems in the world.

Are your questions/considerations pertinent to F.A. Hayek Fan's original technical question? I don't think so.

Your moral considerations are meaningless to F.A. Hayek Fan's considerations. How do you know he hasn't already had the dialogue you discuss? Aren't YOU fabricating HOT_AIRE without addressing the initial point of view by F.A. Hayek Fan?

buckeroo  posted on  2010-11-10   15:04:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

How do you know he hasn't already had the dialogue you discuss?

I don't. And neither do you.

But, you would walk in blindly into doing immoral acts, such as going behind people's backs, without asking for details beforehand. While I ask for, and point out details.

I believe in making an "informed decision" before taking action. You do not.

PaulCJ  posted on  2010-11-10   15:23:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I don't. And neither do you.

So why did you decide to impose your own moral principles into a technical question?

But, you would walk in blindly into doing immoral acts, such as going behind people's backs, without asking for details beforehand. While I ask for, and point out details.

Sorry charlie, I discussed technical considerations NOT YOU. You imposed some fucked-upped dialogue that is reminiscent of the Spanish Inquisition. And your often spouted moral principals go no-where with me.

Here is your POST#2:

Your son is sixteen years old, if he isn't looking at porn, you should worry.

If it is not rape, snuff, or child porn, don't give yourself a heart attack over it.

You should probably be more worried about the possibility that you son might accidentally get his girlfriend pregnant.

Where did you answer the TECHNICAL question? Ohhhhh, it was too easy to FORCE your moral principals into a pile of blabbering BULLSHIT.

I believe in making an "informed decision" before taking action. You do not.

You don't know diddly-squat.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-11-10   15:35:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

So why did you decide to impose your own moral principles into a technical question?

Because "moral principles", or lack there of, were stated within the "technical question" itself.

PaulCJ  posted on  2010-11-10   16:20:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Because "moral principles", or lack there of, were stated within the "technical question" itself.

You remind me of those anti-constitutionalists that argue about the requirements of and about the Second Amendment.

F.A. Hayek Fan posted an establishment preamble that has only meaning to his technical question. On review:

Here is what F.A. Hayek Fan asked:

I have reason to believe that my 16 y.o. son is looking at porn on his laptop. However, he knows how to go to the history tool bar and delete his browsing history. Is there another way that I can look at the browsing history?

His reasons are his business in establishing a premise. But all you did in post#2 was distract away from his interest.

Now, let's look at the Second Amendment which is largely neglected in the SAME WAY (or contextual argument) you attempted to distract F.A. Hayek Fan's post:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

You have garbled F.A. Hayek Fan's meaning similar to Handgun Control Inc. You think because of establishing a forward or principle towards the issue permits some sort of distraction.

You are a bumbling, babbling idiot PaulCJ. No wonder you can't get it quite right yet ... you are always distracted because you can't read.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-11-10   16:39:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

you are correct. the guy asked a technical question. everyone piping in about how a porn addiction is good for his son and how a parent has no moral right to monitor their children are insane whackos. the end, no further bickering needed. Next?

Artisan  posted on  2010-11-10   22:17:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Next?

How come libertarians aren't considered responsible both personally, family, business and socially and yet the well-practised democrats and their own counter-parts, the republicans, are?

buckeroo  posted on  2010-11-10   22:23:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

i am almost leery of identifying myself as a libertarian. people like schwarzenegger, socialist statists who like fag 'marriage' & killing unborn babies are referred to as libertarians. they are disgusting as that gary nolan character who thinks he has hope for the presidency. i prefer the label paleoconservative. most people never heard of that though. it will confuse them.much of the general public, when they hear the term libertarian, conjure up someone who they think just doesnt like rules.

Artisan  posted on  2010-11-10   22:35:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

i prefer the label paleoconservative. most people never heard of that though. it will confuse them.much of the general public, when they hear the term libertarian, conjure up someone who they think just doesnt like rules.

I prefer the term classic liberal as that is the true label.

Classical liberalism

Classical liberalism is a political ideology that developed in the nineteenth century in Western Europe, and the Americas. It was committed to the ideal of limited government and liberty of individuals including freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and free markets.[1] It drew on the economics of Adam Smith, a psychological understanding of individual liberty, natural law and utilitarianism, and a belief in progress. Classical liberals established political parties that were called "liberal", although in the United States classical liberalism came to dominate both existing major political parties.[1]

Although classical liberalism built on ideas that had already developed by the end of the eighteenth century, it advocated a specific kind of society, government and public policy required as a result of the Industrial Revolution and urbanization.[2] Notable individuals who have contributed to classical liberalism include Jean-Baptiste Say, Thomas Malthus, and David Ricardo.[3] There was a revival of interest in classical liberalism in the twentieth century led by Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman.[4]

The term classical liberalism was applied in retrospect to distinguish earlier nineteenth-century liberalism from the newer social liberalism.[5] The phrase classical liberalism is also sometimes used to refer to all forms of liberalism before the twentieth century, and some conservatives and libertarians use the term classical liberalism to describe their belief in the primacy of economic freedom and minimal government. It is not always clear which meaning is intended.

farmfriend  posted on  2010-11-11   0:16:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

if you told the typical republican tea partier your views on war, torture, taxes, 911, etc , theyd declare you a 'librul' anyway, & you could insist they add 'classical' to it. of course they would have no clue as to what it meant :-)

Artisan  posted on  2010-11-11   0:25:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#76. To: Artisan (#75)

stupidity is everywhere.

farmfriend  posted on  2010-11-11 00:26:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]