[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Media Flips Over Tulsi & Matt Gaetz, Biden & Trump Take A Pic, & Famous People Leave Twitter! 4 arrested in California car insurance scam: 'Clearly a human in a bear suit' Silk Road Founder Trusts Trump To 'Honor His Pledge' For Commutation "You DESERVED to LOSE the Senate, the House, and the Presidency!" - Jordan Peterson "Grand Political Theatre"; FBI Raids Home Of Polymarket CEO; Seize Phone, Electronics Schoolhouse Limbo: How Low Will Educators Go To Better Grades? BREAKING: U.S. Army Officers Made a Desperate Attempt To Break Out of The Encirclement in KURSK Trumps team drawing up list of Pentagon officers to fire, sources say Israeli Military Planning To Stay in Gaza Through 2025 Hezbollah attacks Israeli army's Tel Aviv HQ twice in one day People Can't Stop Talking About Elon's Secret Plan For MSNBC And CNN Is Totally Panicking Tucker Carlson UNLOADS on Diddy, Kamala, Walz, Kimmel, Rich Girls, Conspiracy Theories, and the CIA! "We have UFO technology that enables FREE ENERGY" Govt. Whistleblowers They arrested this woman because her son did WHAT? Parody Ad Features Company That Offers to Cryogenically Freeze Liberals for Duration of TrumpÂ’s Presidency Elon and Vivek BEGIN Reforming Government, Media LOSES IT Dear Border Czar: This Nonprofit Boasts A List Of 400 Companies That Employ Migrants US Deficit Explodes: Blowout October Deficit Means 2nd Worst Start To US Fiscal Year On Record Gaetz Resigns 'Effective Immediately' After Trump AG Pick; DC In Full Blown Panic MAHA MEME noone2222 and John Bolton sitting in a tree K I S S I N G Donald Trump To Help Construct The Third Temple? "The Elites Want To ROB Us of Our SOVEREIGNTY!" | Robert F Kennedy Take Your Money OUT of THESE Banks NOW! - Jim Rickards Trump Taps Tulsi Gabbard As Director Of National Intelligence DC In Full Blown Panic After Trump Picks Matt Gaetz For Attorney General Cleveland Clinic Warns Wave of Mass Deaths Will Wipe Out Covid-Vaxxed Within ‘5 Years’ Judah-ism is as Judah-ism does Danger ahead: November 2024, Boston Dynamics introduces a fully autonomous "Atlas" robot. Robot humanoids are here. Trump names [Fox News host] Pete Hegseth as his Defense secretary

Miscellaneous
See other Miscellaneous Articles

Title: Question concerning Firefox and browsing history
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Nov 10, 2010
Author: F.A. Hayek Fan
Post Date: 2010-11-10 12:44:44 by F.A. Hayek Fan
Keywords: None
Views: 1349
Comments: 136

I have reason to believe that my 16 y.o. son is looking at porn on his laptop. However, he knows how to go to the history tool bar and delete his browsing history. Is there another way that I can look at the browsing history?

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 95.

#2. To: F.A. Hayek Fan (#0)

I have reason to believe that my 16 y.o. son is looking at porn on his laptop. However, he knows how to go to the history tool bar and delete his browsing history. Is there another way that I can look at the browsing history?

Your son is sixteen years old, if he isn't looking at porn, you should worry.

If it is not rape, snuff, or child porn, don't give yourself a heart attack over it.

You should probably be more worried about the possibility that you son might accidentally get his girlfriend pregnant.

PaulCJ  posted on  2010-11-10   12:51:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Your son is sixteen years old, if he isn't looking at porn, you should worry.

If it is not rape, snuff, or child porn, don't give yourself a heart attack over it.

i agree with Paul on this one.

christine  posted on  2010-11-10   13:20:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I'm with you two on this.

Lod  posted on  2010-11-10   14:44:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

PaulCJ never answered F.A. Hayek Fan's original technical question. So why do you think PaulCJ's moral principles of social conduct or behaviour trump a perfectly good technical question?

buckeroo  posted on  2010-11-10   14:49:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

So why do you think PaulCJ's moral principles of social conduct or behaviour trump a perfectly good technical question?

Has FA asks his son directly beforehand about looking at porn? Looking him directly in the eye and ask the question.

To go behind someone's back is not moral. Such hypocrisy is the reason we have so many problems in the world.

PaulCJ  posted on  2010-11-10   14:58:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Has FA asks his son directly beforehand about looking at porn? Looking him directly in the eye and ask the question.

To go behind someone's back is not moral. Such hypocrisy is the reason we have so many problems in the world.

Are your questions/considerations pertinent to F.A. Hayek Fan's original technical question? I don't think so.

Your moral considerations are meaningless to F.A. Hayek Fan's considerations. How do you know he hasn't already had the dialogue you discuss? Aren't YOU fabricating HOT_AIRE without addressing the initial point of view by F.A. Hayek Fan?

buckeroo  posted on  2010-11-10   15:04:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

How do you know he hasn't already had the dialogue you discuss?

I don't. And neither do you.

But, you would walk in blindly into doing immoral acts, such as going behind people's backs, without asking for details beforehand. While I ask for, and point out details.

I believe in making an "informed decision" before taking action. You do not.

PaulCJ  posted on  2010-11-10   15:23:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

I don't. And neither do you.

So why did you decide to impose your own moral principles into a technical question?

But, you would walk in blindly into doing immoral acts, such as going behind people's backs, without asking for details beforehand. While I ask for, and point out details.

Sorry charlie, I discussed technical considerations NOT YOU. You imposed some fucked-upped dialogue that is reminiscent of the Spanish Inquisition. And your often spouted moral principals go no-where with me.

Here is your POST#2:

Your son is sixteen years old, if he isn't looking at porn, you should worry.

If it is not rape, snuff, or child porn, don't give yourself a heart attack over it.

You should probably be more worried about the possibility that you son might accidentally get his girlfriend pregnant.

Where did you answer the TECHNICAL question? Ohhhhh, it was too easy to FORCE your moral principals into a pile of blabbering BULLSHIT.

I believe in making an "informed decision" before taking action. You do not.

You don't know diddly-squat.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-11-10   15:35:17 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

So why did you decide to impose your own moral principles into a technical question?

Because "moral principles", or lack there of, were stated within the "technical question" itself.

PaulCJ  posted on  2010-11-10   16:20:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Because "moral principles", or lack there of, were stated within the "technical question" itself.

You remind me of those anti-constitutionalists that argue about the requirements of and about the Second Amendment.

F.A. Hayek Fan posted an establishment preamble that has only meaning to his technical question. On review:

Here is what F.A. Hayek Fan asked:

I have reason to believe that my 16 y.o. son is looking at porn on his laptop. However, he knows how to go to the history tool bar and delete his browsing history. Is there another way that I can look at the browsing history?

His reasons are his business in establishing a premise. But all you did in post#2 was distract away from his interest.

Now, let's look at the Second Amendment which is largely neglected in the SAME WAY (or contextual argument) you attempted to distract F.A. Hayek Fan's post:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

You have garbled F.A. Hayek Fan's meaning similar to Handgun Control Inc. You think because of establishing a forward or principle towards the issue permits some sort of distraction.

You are a bumbling, babbling idiot PaulCJ. No wonder you can't get it quite right yet ... you are always distracted because you can't read.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-11-10   16:39:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

You remind me of those anti-constitutionalists that argue about the requirements of and about the Second Amendment.

You remind me of those rabid teachers that were more concerned with disciplining children, than teaching children.

PaulCJ  posted on  2010-11-10   19:21:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

You remind me of those rabid teachers that were more concerned with disciplining children, than teaching children.

Lets take another peek at your own #2 post, shall we?

Your son is sixteen years old, if he isn't looking at porn, you should worry.

If it is not rape, snuff, or child porn, don't give yourself a heart attack over it.

You should probably be more worried about the possibility that you son might accidentally get his girlfriend pregnant.

You are a fool, PaulCJ. What do want me to do on the Internet, beg a bailiff to whack your pee-pee (borrowed cliché from Arlo Guthrie's infamous ... Alice's Restaurant)?

buckeroo  posted on  2010-11-10   19:32:48 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

You are a fool, PaulCJ. What do want me to do on the Internet, beg a bailiff to whack your pee-pee (borrowed cliché from Arlo Guthrie's infamous ... Alice's Restaurant)?

I understand human nature. And I was pointing out, barring a few exceptions, this was not as bad as some would think.

There are far, far worse things than porn.

And two others people on this board agree with me.

buckeroo, grow up and realize that people are human beings, and not walking robots with no emotions.

PaulCJ  posted on  2010-11-10   21:18:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

And two others people on this board agree with me.

Well you lost christine in post #80. So that leaves Lod.

BTW, can't you stand on your own legs voicing a personal opinion without some sort of phantasmal, flag-waving requirement to cheer you on?

You were trounced on this thread. And brutally beaten to a pulp of mere fluid DNA.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-11-11   12:50:01 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

BTW, can't you stand on your own legs voicing a personal opinion without some sort of phantasmal, flag-waving requirement to cheer you on?

As opposed to you, whom has only throwns insults at every chance possible.

By not answering my question, you admit that you believe that honesty and trust are outdated concepts.

I pity you for a number of reasons. Including the above.

Another reason, buckeroo, is you love to inflate your sad ego by pinging several people when you reply to me. Just because you ping them, you automatically think they agree with you.

Unless they state otherwise, they probably don't give a damn about what either of us say. And you dragging them into this argument only makes you even a more sadder excuse for a person than you already are.

PaulCJ  posted on  2010-11-11   14:08:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Insults?

Where on this thread has one insult been thrown? You are misplacing criticism about your own attempt to force some sort of moral opinion when none is required.

But, please feel free to review the entire thread and show one insult that you feel I elicited towards you or anyone.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-11-11   14:18:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Where on this thread has one insult been thrown?

I see you cannot even read. Here are some of the insults you have stated.

Post 19: You imposed some fucked-upped dialogue that is reminiscent of the Spanish Inquisition.

Post 25: You are a bumbling, babbling idiot PaulCJ. No wonder you can't get it quite right yet ... you are always distracted because you can't read.

Post 43: You are a fool, PaulCJ.

PaulCJ  posted on  2010-11-11   14:19:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

But my writing capability is at question since you feel I have thrown insult(s) towards you. Again, show me the insults.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-11-11   14:21:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

But my writing capability is at question since you feel I have thrown insult(s) towards you. Again, show me the insults.

See post 92.

PaulCJ  posted on  2010-11-11   14:23:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Post 19: You imposed some fucked-upped dialogue that is reminiscent of the Spanish Inquisition.

Post 25: You are a bumbling, babbling idiot PaulCJ. No wonder you can't get it quite right yet ... you are always distracted because you can't read.

Post 43: You are a fool, PaulCJ.

Those comments aren't insults; collectively they are ATTA_BOYZ about yourself and your awkward capability and capacity to see yourself. You take it all wrong ... those kind remarcks are just my considerate way of suggesting you are a cretin.

Relax and take it easy.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-11-11   14:28:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#96. To: buckeroo (#95)

Those comments aren't insults;

Yes, they are insults. You really do want to debate the meaning of "is".

If you don't realize what demeaning statements are than you really are not ready to even understand what morality is.

PaulCJ  posted on  2010-11-11 14:33:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]