i watch DWTS. Bristol is a lovely young woman, imo, far more poised and likeable than her mother. she's been at the bottom of the leader board the last two weeks (these are the judges scores) but home viewers vote on who they want to stay. apparently Bristol is very well liked because of her endearing personality and beat out Rick Fox and Kurt Warner.
Bristol is very well liked because of her endearing personality and beat out Rick Fox and Kurt Warner.
I never thought you still watched tv christine. She didn't beat out Rick Fox and Kurt Warner with her talent. She was low scorer but the stupid folks who are enamoured with her stupid mother have given enough votes to keep her on. Tell it like it is. It's not because of her endearing personality. It's because of momma period! DWTS is just another pissing contest. No wonder we can't get the attention of the masses so we can get them to see Rome(US) is burning. They are being dumbed down by the tube and crap like DWTS..
Are you aware that all the so-called contestants called "STARS" receive a salary of about 100K? It's not a game show as you think, pal. It is glamour and fame and publick attention and of course, a bit of cash.
That's why BRISTOL for 2012! Show me a another candidate that can do her stellar routine!
Show me a another candidate that can do her stellar routine!
You mean watdhing all her whale blubber jiggling . I wouldn't wasre my time. The stupid people who watch that crap are paying for it in more ways than they realize.
The stupid people who watch that crap are paying for it in more ways than they realize.
I see what you say... and yet, in an earlier post on this very thread, you suggested:
She didn't beat out Rick Fox and Kurt Warner with her talent. She was low scorer but the stupid folks who are enamoured with her stupid mother have given enough votes to keep her on.
Since you suggested within your own above post with absolute authority .. didn't you watch the same? And if so, are you pointing at your own-self?
Since you suggested within your own above post with absolute authority .. didn't you watch the same? And if so, are you pointing at your own-self?
Nice try buck. I read the thing on my computer homepage news on Armstrong cable. Sorry to inform you the truth. The endearing personality was what christine wrote. I wouldn't watch that crap unless forced at gunpoint.
I read the thing on my computer homepage news on Armstrong cable. Sorry to inform you the truth.
Then why didn't you attribute your comment to the same reference? Are you lazy? Or are you a Plagiarist Maximo?
Frankly I don't feel compelled to answer your questions unless it is at gun point. It is no concern of yours. But I will give you an answer just once and only once. It wasn't on a forum but a news item.
Apparently you watched DWTS. Are you a regular viewer? You seem to be like a lot of dirty old men who get off on the Palin's. That's it! I got you figured out.
Frankly I don't feel compelled to answer your questions unless it is at gun point. It is no concern of yours. But I will give you an answer just once and only once. It wasn't on a forum but a news item.
Yet, you were compelled to create a post with some sort of rebuttal on this thread because of your personal defensive posture.
OK ... so let me ask you a series of other questions: since you take the time for posting leisure and are such a critic about "Dancing With The Starz" since you don't watch the show or have time to acknowledge Internet references that you take responsibility for... why can't you defend your own posts other than some off-the-wall remarck of using a gun.... ??????
Of course, I am not attempting to pin you down for anything other than being responsible for your own remarcks.
dazzling me with brilliance comes across as trying to baffle me with bullshit.
More plagiarist tendencies? Why can't you stand on you own two feet and make a sincere attempt at describing your own ideas?
In post#9 of this thread, you stated:
You mean watdhing all her whale blubber jiggling . I wouldn't wasre my time.
But you didn't stop there. I can understand your comment all by its own merit. BUT OHHHH NO .... you had to borrow ideas from some home page that you confessed to at a later point after I asked you about your next remarck:
The stupid people who watch that crap are paying for it in more ways than they realize.
Why do I have to read other opinions, don't you have your own? Or are you plagiarizing again?
You know, one of the reasons why this government and society in America is so nasty is because of the perpetual capability to re-cycle or play silly remarcks that go unchecked.
You epitomize the reasons why America is broke, busted and losing; you just sat at home watching your web page influence your personal opinion without really knowing much of anything.