[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

The Attack on the USS Liberty (June 8, 1967) - Speech by Survivor Phillip Tourney At the Revisionist History of War Conference (Video)

‘I Smell CIA/Deep State All Over This’ — RFK Jr. VP Nicole Shanahan Blasts Sanctuary Cities,

we see peaceful protests launching in Los Angeles” - Democrat Senator Cory Booke

We have no legal framework for designating domestic terror organizations

Los Angeles Braces For Another Day Of Chaos As Newsom Pits Marxist Color Revolution Against Trump Admin

Methylene Blue Benefits

Another Mossad War Crime

80 served arrest warrants at 'cartel afterparty' in South Carolina

When Ideas Become Too Dangerous To Platform

The silent bloodbath that's tearing through the middle-class

Kiev Postponed Exchange With Russia, Leaves Bodies Of 6,000 Slain Ukrainian Troops In Trucks

Iranian Intelligence Stole Trove Of Sensitive Israeli Nuclear Files

In the USA, the identity of Musk's abuser, who gave him a black eye, was revealed

Return of 6,000 Soldiers' Bodies Will Cost Ukraine Extra $2.1Bln

Palantir's Secret War: Inside the Plot to Cripple WikiLeaks

Digital Prison in the Making?

In France we're horrified by spending money on Ukraine

Russia has patented technology for launching drones from the space station

Kill ICE: Foreign Flags And Fires Sweep LA

6,000-year-old skeletons with never-before-seen DNA rewrites human history

First Close Look at China’s Ultra-Long Range Sixth Generation J-36Jet

I'm Caitlin Clark, and I refuse to return to the WNBA

Border Czar Tom Homan: “We Are Going to Bring National Guard in Tonight” to Los Angeles

These Are The U.S. States With The Most Drug Use

Chabria: ICE arrested a California union leader. Does Trump understand what that means?Anita Chabria

White House Staffer Responsible for ‘Fanning Flames’ Between Trump and Musk ID’d

Texas Yanks Major Perk From Illegal Aliens - After Pioneering It 24 Years Ago

Dozens detained during Los Angeles ICE raids

Russian army suffers massive losses as Kremlin feigns interest in peace talks — ISW

Russia’s Defense Collapse Exposed by Ukraine Strike


History
See other History Articles

Title: Germany and England
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/germanyandengland/1.shtml
Published: Nov 22, 2010
Author: Nesta Webster
Post Date: 2010-11-22 18:20:40 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 195
Comments: 8

Germany and England

by: Nesta Webster

Prefatory comments by Jackie P.

THIS is the little book that opened my eyes about the mass of massive lies we've all been told about Germany under National Socialism, and specifically it's Chancellor, Adolf Hitler.

To my mind the greatest lie was that "Adolf Hitler planned to conquer the world and enslave the inhabitants of all nations". In reality the ones making those accusations are the ones who plan to conquer the world. The defeat of Germany was a defeat for all the inhabitants of the world, just as Adolf Hitler predicted.

The group promulgating that big lie was successful in its efforts to instill a deep sense of both fear and hatred of the man who wanted only to restore some of the areas of land that had been sliced out of Germany by the Versailles Treaty after WWI, bring the German people back into the fold of their natural country borders, and protect western Europe from the Communist/Bolshevik tyranny threatening to wreak its havoc throughout the continent, and the world.

In another small book titled, The Nameless War, Captain A. H. M. Ramsay gives convincing evidence of the above statement. For some of our readers this will be a turning point (as it was for me). The more lies you uncover, the more truth you desire. Those of you who would rather remain blissfully ignorant will leave now. Those of you who know the truth and hate the truth will be frothing at the mouth that the lies are being exposed.

Captain Ramsay was a veteran of the first World War, a former member of His Majesty's Guard, and -- at the time of his arrest and imprisonment -- a member of the British Parliament. He was arrested without formal charges and thrown into Brixton Prison for nearly three years because he discovered and attempted to reveal the culprits who were clamoring for, orchestrating and promulgating what became the Second World War.

Nobody wanted war in England or Germany except Winston Churchill and the War Hawks who controlled him and the press (just like in the U.S. of A. then and today). When Prime Minister Chamberlain returned from a trip to Germany where he had entered into one-on-one conversations with Chancellor Hitler, he announced to the Parliament and the British people that "there will be no war".

Behind the exuberant celebrations of the people in both Germany and England, the planners went to work. Inside of one week, the controlled press was printing lies about the Prime Minister and began clamoring for his resignation. He was blamed for a military blunder that had actually been committed under Churchill's orders as Admiral of the Navy. Instead of Churchill standing accused, it was Mr. Chamberlain.

Chamberlain was out; Churchill was in, and on the very evening of the day Churchill became Prime Minister (May 11, 1941), England began indiscriminate bombing of Germany. . . homes, churches, schools, hospitals, slaughtering defenseless men, women and children (just like the U.S. has done in Afghanistan, Iraq, and dozens of other nations).

The situation is the same now as it was then, and the same unseen hand at work today is the same force behind every revolution and war carried out since time immemorial. . . the English Revolution in the 1600's (which resulted in the entrenchment of the Bank of England); the French Revolution, Russian Revolution (creation of the U.S.S.R), and the foiled (thanks to Mussolini and Hitler) Spanish revolution which Mrs. Webster relates in this book.

Germany and England was presented to me by a friend in her senior years, along with several boxes of books she had been accumulating over the past four decades. As I sat reading this book, in the privacy of my home, I was silently (and sometimes audibly) gasping in shock at the revelations herein.

First, Mrs. Webster's reference to the 'Jews' who controlled the U.S.S.R. and whose minions were over-running western Europe and literally running Germany under the Weimar Republic created a first-impression that she was "anti-Semitic". Until that time, any information sent or given to me about the Jews, was set aside without a glance, believing that the givers of this information were 'Jew haters'. I wasn't. And I'm not today.

However, there is no denying that the plan for World Dominion is a millenia-old plan, and those born into the 'religion' of Talmudism (they call themselves Jews) are being used by their Elders to push the plan -- along with tens of millions of "Christian-Zionists". The word 'religion' is emphasized, because Judaism is not a religion, according to Moses Mendelsohn, a learned Jew well-known and respected by Jews. Mendelsohn said that:

"Judaism is not a religion, it is a LAW, religionized".

While researching and writing the book-in-progress titled "Jewish Persecution", it became clear that Mendelsohn meant what he said, and it is true. There is no such religion as Judaism anyway; the religion is 'Talmudism' or 'Pharisaism'. It IS a LAW which contains the plan for World Dominion, and it is well-hidden 'neath its cloak of religion.

Second, Mrs. Webster's comments about and quoted statements by Adolf Hitler presented an absolutely shocking portrait of an individual whose words -- and more importantly, his actions -- spoke volumes for his love of Germany and her people, as well as his abhorrence for the Jews who had spoiled Germany mentally, emotionally and morally, while totally devastating the economy and well-being of the German population. They controlled the banks (economy), the government, education, the press, and entertainment (just like today in America).

Unfortunately, their 'lesser brethren' Jews were always the brunt of the machinations of their Elders, as told by Benjamin Freedman in his speech to a group of people in the late 1960's. When you read that speech, if you haven't already, you see parts of it could have been a speech made fairly recently. He mentioned the forces building toward World War III by the orchestrated unrest in the Middle East.

The historical preview given at the beginning of the first chapter was confusing and little understood by me on the first reading. That is because I had NO knowledge or understanding of the history of the meddlesome creatures who call themselves Jews, and who have succeeded in infiltrating every government and nation that has ultimately been destroyed by their machinations.

If the reader takes a look at the names and backgrounds of individuals in very high places in the U.S. (and now state governments) today, it will become obvious that Jews -- who purportedly constitute only 3% of the U.S. population -- hold disproportionate numbers of positions of great power and influence in administrative, legislative and judicial branches of government, as well as all branches of the military under the Department of Defense. Not only that, they are advisors, speech-writers, and so forth, to non-Jews in high places.

If our reader is in the beginning stages of awakening to the lies, it may be helpful to return to the beginning of chapter one for a re-read after finishing the book. That may be totally unnecessary and maybe I only suggest it because I realized on the second reading that I had not fully understood those first few pages of pre-history review the first time 'round.

We present Germany and England for your reading with deep gratitude to Karen A., who transcribed it for us. . . for you.

The book from which this was transcribed showed no publication date. It was apparently taken from the paper or newsletter Mrs. Nester published, titled "The Patriot" (as referenced below the title). In this writing she alluded to the "England of 1938. . ." as well as a quote by Adolf Hitler in October, 1938, so we are fixing the date of writing in late 1938 or very early 1939.

-- Jackie

July 11th, 2003

P.S. Just before sending this to our webmaster (and he IS a "master" webmaster), Darren Weeks, we received a forward from a BBC item on the death of a Lord Shawcross, who led the British prosecution at the Nuremberg war crimes tribunal. The following statement attributed to Shawcross is relevant and confirms the information Mrs. Webster presents in Germany and England. We have not seen the speech given at Stourbridge. If our reader has access to the entire speech we would appreciate notification. Thank you.

July 28th, 2003

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Itistoolate (#0)

To my mind the greatest lie was that "Adolf Hitler planned to conquer the world and enslave the inhabitants of all nations". In reality the ones making those accusations are the ones who plan to conquer the world. The defeat of Germany was a defeat for all the inhabitants of the world, just as Adolf Hitler predicted.

Adolph Hitler was, from the few truthful accounts of the man that exist, quite a noble character. He abhorred weapons of mass destruction and eschewed the development of the A-bomb which was within the capacity of Germany in that era.

He held his troops back from attacking English soldiers that were caught in extreme vulnerable situations in the field.

He helped the Zionists, (not without motives of his own) to get the jews out of Germany and into Palistine before the war started, when anti-semitism was rife in Germany.

In truth we cannot trust most of the canned history we have been taught for generations. Those writing the history books have had much to hide.

I want either less corruption or more opportunity to participate in it. Ashleigh Brilliant

angK  posted on  2010-11-22   18:53:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: angK (#1)

thank you for your historical assessment of Adolf Hitler.

One thing that shocked me was the historical record on the bombing of civilians during WW2. In our history books we are taught that the germans pioneered the tactic of bombing civilians by bombing London and other locations in great britain. The British were extremely good at propaganda to convince people of this view. When in reality it was the British who first bombed german civilians and then the germans used the tactic. And the Germans actually tried to negotiate an end to that tactic. the British were the ones who declined and insisted on using it. Once the British got the upper hand in the fight they used that tactic ruthlessly. I believe there is much of history falsified in our sources now. Because there are sources that show a large number of german civilians were killed in bombing of them. Millions of people were killed for no reason at all. The Germans killed very few from the air by comparison.

I think that Hitler was a monster, a psychopath who did great evil. But I also think that it is not unusual for big political leaders to be monsters or psychopaths. Some of our presidents I would call monsters. and sometimes these big political leaders do project positive images at least to their supporters. So it is believable that Hitler had a presentable and endearing side.

It is important to understand that the Germans were among the many victims of WW2 events. and obviously if french and british officials had not insisted on punishing germany after WW1, then WW2 would not have happened. Who caused the war? It is not rational to blame the peoples of either britain or germany. but it is rational to blame the leaders of various nations over time.

Psalms 137:1 By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down, yea, we wept, when we remembered Zion.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-11-23   6:49:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: angK (#1)

Adolph Hitler was, from the few truthful accounts of the man that exist, quite a noble character.

He would have to be in order to fit the honorable nature of the German character. For generations European nations skirmished with each other as a means of getting surplus manpower and rowdies off the streets and into the army to make "men" out of them, taking some territory from the foe, then it being recovered it in a subsequent war. A state of war gave monarchs (most of whom were related to one another) and politicians an opportunity to assert a firmer hold on the populace. Hitler followed this same script and tried to negotiate and end of the conflict as soon as Germany got its former territory back. But Organized Jewry came up with a different script to expand the war by bringing America in, a diversionary script which would allow it to steal the land of Palestinians rather than pay for it. It's an old trick that London pickpockets used: got a fight going among two of their ilk then picked the pockets of a the crowd of spectators.

Tatarewicz  posted on  2010-11-23   7:16:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Red Jones (#2)

I think that Hitler was a monster, a psychopath who did great evil

What makes you think that?

I want either less corruption or more opportunity to participate in it. Ashleigh Brilliant

angK  posted on  2010-11-23   16:41:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: angK (#4)

his general reputation. he had a lot of people killed both in his rise to power and while in power.

Psalms 137:1 By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down, yea, we wept, when we remembered Zion.

Red Jones  posted on  2010-11-23   18:49:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Red Jones, angK (#5)

Germany and England

by: Nesta Webster

Chapter II.

Governessing Europe

Great indignation has been aroused in certain circles lacking in a sense of humour by Herr Hitler’s recent remark that England would be well advised to stop “governessing” Europe.

The expression in reality was singularly apt and indicated no hostility to the British people, but conveyed advice that many of us would be glad to see laid to heart by our politicians. For it is as much to England’s interest as to Europe’s that she would refrain from putting her finger into every Continental pie and thereby burning it severely. The Daily Express, though in no way sympathetic to Nazi-ism or Fascism, has from the beginning persistently repeated the slogan of “Keep out!” – unless our own vital interests were threatened.

As I observed in the opening words of “The Surrender of an Empire,” Britain until 1914 had remained in lofty isolation from the dusty arena of Continental strife. So might she have of that infernal machine – the League of Nations, devised, as we now know, at the head Lodge of the Grand Orient of France on the 28th and 29th of June, 1917.

That it was an infernal machine constructed to blow up the foundations of Europe – for America, whose President was its principal advocate, carefully kept out of it herself – was evident to all but the most incorrigible optimists. For since disputes were henceforth to be settled by a tribunal composed of all the Powers, any conflict between two nations would automatically draw in all the rest so that every war, instead of remaining localized, was bound to develop into a world war.

Thus, far from proving a scheme for ensuring perpetual peace, its real effect would be to keep Europe in a state of perpetual warfare.

Moreover, since the sympathies of the League lay clearly on the side of the Left, it’s influence was to promote internal strife and encourage the class war, and those countries which resolutely put down Bolshevism were liable to find the forces of the League arrayed against them.

Now the League having after some twelve years proved its futility – and in the opinion of many people its harmfulness – and having been deserted in consequence by some of the leading Powers, might have been left to collapse quietly, like a deflating balloon on the shores of Lac Léman and Europe might have been allowed to return to its former method of settling quarrels between nations by conflict between those concerned, without interference from the rest of the world.

But to this neither England nor France – or, rather, the Leaguists of those countries, for in both there were many disbelievers in the League from the time of its inception – would consent.

Since the League was defunct the Governments of England and France in close co-operation with Soviet Russia, formed themselves into a coalition described as the Democracies. That is a most ridiculous term since the "Democracies" include Monarchist England, passionately loyal to its King, attached to its ancient traditions and predominantly Conservative, and at the same time Soviet Russia, the most brutal tyranny the world has ever seen.

However, the countries variously described as the “totalitarian States” – a word not to be found in the dictionary but presumably implying absolute autocracies – or the Dictatorships, are Italy and Germany led by men of the people primarily concerned with improving the lot of the working-classes and supported by the overwhelming majority of the population.

The Democracies then proceeded to take up the role of the League and arrogate to themselves the right to interfere in the affairs of all other nations, thus constituting themselves a tribunal for – as Hitler expressed it – “governessing” the world.

Now the first qualifications of a governess are calmness, orderly habits, firmness and an even temper; a woman who perpetually quarreled with her own family, boxed her sisters’ ears, hurled the furniture about and defied the parental authority could hardly be expected to maintain discipline or command respect in the schoolroom.

The French Chambre des Députés, divided into warring factions, some of them bitterly opposed to their own Government and actually coming to fisticuffs during debates. The rulers of Russia are busily shooting their former colleagues, later on their generals, admirals and airmen. The British Government is battling with rebels against the Constitution in the House of Commons and sending troops out to Palestine in order to crush the revolt of the Arabs at the loss of the freedom promised them.

All these Democracies seem -- both to Germany and Italy -- hardly qualified to “governess” the rest of Europe, and certainly not those States in which a united people live contentedly under one man who, if a Dictator, nevertheless dictates according to the will of the people.

Hitler in asking us to “look at home” is really not unreasonable; indeed he showed considerable restraint in not drawing more invidious comparisons between the unrest prevailing in Democracies and the happiness which travelers in Germany observe everywhere amongst the population of that country.

We are frequently told that there are many secret malcontents in Hitler’s Germany and that in private conversations with travelers they admit their dissatisfaction with the Führer. That may be so, since no form of Government can content everybody and there were many rebels against the German monarchy, still more against the Republic that followed on the war. And foreign travelers on the look-out for grievances are still sure to find them.

As Monsieur Madelin observes in his book on the French Revolution, men are always discontented under whatever government they live, however excellent it may be, and if people are asked to complain they will do so loudly.

Doubtless the equalitarian schemes of Herr Hitler, with which we as anti-Socialists must strongly disagree, have met with resentment from the possessing classes but have satisfied the great majority of the population.

At any rate it is the Germans’ own affair, not ours, and we have no more right to attack the Führer for his system of government than he would have to attack us for our administration of the dole, demanding that it should be replaced by his plan of Labour camps as leading to happier results – which no doubt is true.

As to the concentration camps of Germany, about which we hear so much, what are we to believe? Returning travelers bring back totally conflicting accounts; the rest of us only know what our papers tell us, and but a short time ago they were telling us that the inmates of our own prisons were treated with inconceivable brutality. We did not believe that; why, then, should we believe all that they tell us about Germany?

Neither in the internal nor in the external policy of foreign Governments have the Democracies the right to interfere except where their own interests or security are concerned.

If in the case of Czechoslovakia England and France as victors in the Great War held they were entitled to maintain the conditions laid down in the Treaty of Versailles, however unworkable they had become, what earthly right had they to intervene between Italy, their former ally, and Abyssinia, or between the opposing parties in Spain, which had remained neutral?

In each case their policy was based on opposition to Fascism, and its only effect was to deprive Abyssinia of any independence it might have enjoyed and to prolong the civil war in Spain. It will be said that Germany and Italy also intervened in Spain, but the fact habitually ignored by our Press and Left politicians is that intervention by the French, Russians, and a few British Communists began in August, 1936, and by the Germans and Italians not until four months later.

Moscow had determined to set up a Soviet Republic in Spain, and the “totalitarian” states [Italy and Germany] resolved to prevent the execution of a plot which might have set all Western Europe aflame. That was their crime.

Again, what is the reason for the hatred stirred up against Japan? If that country had begun by attacking us in Hong Kong or Shanghai we should have had every right to oppose her. But she had begun as early as 1919 by resolutely opposing Bolshevism while China allowed itself to be penetrated by the influence of Moscow; in 1920 Lenin declared that it was in China the British Empire would be overthrown.

So, in spite of the hostile attitude shown to us by the Chinese from the time of the Boxer riots onwards, the kidnapping of the Englishwomen and by the murder of missionaries, the agitation carried out after 1924 by the Kuomingtang working in close co-operation with Soviet Russia, under whose inspiration anti-British riots broke out at Shanghai and Shameen in 1926, the British concession in Hankow was attacked in 1927 to the cry of “Down with British Imperialism!" and finally handed over to Chinese control.

In spite of all this British sympathies are with “martyred China,” whilst Japan, the land of “bushido,” our ally in the Great War, Japan – who showed us no hostility until we acted for the League of Nations in intervening between her and China – is reviled as the enemy of Great Britain.

It is now the fashion to speak of the cruelty of the Japanese character and we are asked to believe that the nation which supplied the Cheka with Chinese torturers is kindly in comparison.

I have been in both countries long ago, and during the week I spent in China I saw cruelty such as I shall never forget all my life. During two months in Japan I saw nothing but kindness, love of nature and of children. And whilst in Canton we passed through terrifying mobs howling execrations at us as “foreign devils", in Japan we met nothing but smiling villagers who crowded round us in welcome and showed never a trace of xenophobia.

We are told that British businessmen much prefer the Chinese to the Japanese; so they did then, simply because the Chinaman was more to be depended on than the temperamental Japanese. Nevertheless in 1931 it was from British business men in China that my “Surrender of an Empire” containing a chapter on the Chinese question received the greatest encouragement; a series of extracts from it were contributed by them to the Hong Kong Daily Press and republished in pamphlet form at their expense. *

*See Appendix 1

Can it be mere coincidence that all those countries we are now taught to hate [Japan, Italy and Germany] are those which have shown the strongest opposition to Bolshevism?

Itistoolate  posted on  2010-11-23   19:21:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Itistoolate (#6)

Can it be mere coincidence that all those countries we are now taught to hate [Japan, Italy and Germany] are those which have shown the strongest opposition to Bolshevism?

No, it's no coincidence, is it? Thanks for the excellent article.

I want either less corruption or more opportunity to participate in it. Ashleigh Brilliant

angK  posted on  2010-11-23   19:45:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Red Jones (#5)

his general reputation. he had a lot of people killed both in his rise to power and while in power.

His "general reputation" has been greatly exaggerated!

I want either less corruption or more opportunity to participate in it. Ashleigh Brilliant

angK  posted on  2010-11-23   19:49:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]