[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Keir Starmer’s Hidden Past: The Cases Nobody Talks About

BRICS Bombshell! Putin & China just DESTROYED the U.S. Dollar with this gold move

Clashes, arrests as tens of thousands protest flood-control corruption in Philippines

The death of Yu Menglong: Political scandal in China (Homo Rape & murder of Actor)

The Pacific Plate Is CRACKING: A Massive Geological Disaster Is Unfolding!

Waste Of The Day: Veterans' Hospital Equipment Is Missing

The Earth Has Been Shaken By 466,742 Earthquakes So Far In 2025

LadyX

Half of the US secret service and every gov't three letter agency wants Trump dead. Tomorrow should be a good show

1963 Chrysler Turbine

3I/ATLAS is Beginning to Reveal What it Truly Is

Deep Intel on the Damning New F-35 Report

CONFIRMED “A 757 did NOT hit the Pentagon on 9/11” says Military witnesses on the scene

NEW: Armed man detained at site of Kirk memorial: Report

$200 Silver Is "VERY ATTAINABLE In Coming Rush" Here's Why - Mike Maloney

Trump’s Project 2025 and Big Tech could put 30% of jobs at risk by 2030

Brigitte Macron is going all the way to a U.S. court to prove she’s actually a woman

China's 'Rocket Artillery 360 Mile Range 990 Pound Warhead

FED's $3.5 Billion Gold Margin Call

France Riots: Battle On Streets Of Paris Intensifies After Macron’s New Move Sparks Renewed Violence

Saudi Arabia Pakistan Defence pact agreement explained | Geopolitical Analysis

Fooling Us Badly With Psyops

The Nobel Prize That Proved Einstein Wrong

Put Castor Oil Here Before Bed – The Results After 7 Days Are Shocking

Sounds Like They're Trying to Get Ghislaine Maxwell out of Prison

Mississippi declared a public health emergency over its infant mortality rate (guess why)

Andy Ngo: ANTIFA is a terrorist organization & Trump will need a lot of help to stop them

America Is Reaching A Boiling Point

The Pandemic Of Fake Psychiatric Diagnoses

This Is How People Actually Use ChatGPT, According To New Research


Health
See other Health Articles

Title: New prostate cancer drugs
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/Dai ... 2010/November/18/Provenge.aspx
Published: Nov 24, 2010
Author: staff
Post Date: 2010-11-24 06:49:55 by Tatarewicz
Keywords: None
Views: 78
Comments: 3

A new treatment for prostate cancer called Provenge won a vote of confidence from a Medicare coverage advisory committee Wednesday, suggesting the federal program is likely to pay for the $93,000-per-patient medicine," The Wall Street Journal reports. The committee's health industry experts, doctors and researchers "found enough evidence to support the use of the medicine for late-stage prostate-cancer patients whose disease has metastasized, but not for those whose cancer hasn't progressed." Its maker, Dendreon, says 100,000 Americans have advanced prostate cancer, the condition for which the FDA approved the treatment in April 2010. Medicare usually covers FDA-approved drugs like Provenge, but "the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services sparked a new controversy in June when it decided to put Provenge through a national coverage review." The review raised concerns that Medicare, "which isn't supposed to consider price when making coverage decisions," was trying "to ration treatments to save money" (Mundy, 11/18).

CBS: "The makers of Provenge call the drug a value at $93,000. They argue it can be less expensive than chemotherapy, with none of the horrible side effects." Medicare's ruling on whether to cover Provenge, and under which medical conditions, is "a crucial decision because typically most private insurance companies follow Medicare's lead" (Andrews, 11/17).

HealthDay/Bloomberg Businessweek: A study published in the New England Journal of Medicine in July showed that the Provenge vaccine "extends survival by about four months on average," according to clinical trials. The therapeutic vaccine, which is developed by treating a patient's extracted white blood cells with Provenge, was also less toxic than chemotherapy. Once placed back inside the patient, the treated white blood cells "trigger an immune response that in turn kills cancer cells, leaving normal cells unharmed" (Reinberg, 11/17).

The Associated Press: "Most analysts expect Medicare to pay for the drug, giving drugmaker Dendreon Corp. a blockbuster product worth up to $2 billion in sales per year. The agency already pays for other innovative cancer drugs from companies such as Genentech and Eli Lilly that have similar price tags and survival benefits." The leader of a health consulting firm said that "Medicare's review of Provenge is primarily a signal to drugmakers that the agency will not automatically pay for drugs just because they have been cleared by the FDA." A Medicare representative defended the federal programs against accusations that the Provenge review was tied to the high cost of the drug, and said the review was instead "aimed at clearing up bureaucratic confusion among Medicare carriers across the country, some of whom already pay for Provenge, while others do not" (Perrone, 11/17).

The New York Times reports on another prostate cancer drug under development. Early testing revealed that the experimental drug XL184, "is showing what some experts say is intriguing effectiveness in treating a major cause of death and disability for men with prostate cancer — tumors that have spread to the bone." XL184, developed by the biotechnology company Exelixis, "is believed to block the formation of blood vessels that feed tumors and also inhibits a protein called MET that helps spur tumor growth," while Provenge "trains the patient's immune system to attack the tumor." Testing on XL184 revealed that "19 of 20 patients showed an improvement in the scans used to determine whether cancer has spread to the bone," but the tests had a small sample size, did not include a control group and did not follow patients over time (Pollack, 11/18).

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 3.

#2. To: Tatarewicz (#0) (Edited)

http://www.naturalcancerremedies.com/auto/A-Cancer-Free.html

Bill Henderson's site: http://www.beating-cancer-gently.com/

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2010-11-24   9:20:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#2)

Henderson's advice sounds good, particularly avoidance of preservatives which if they inhibit bacteria growth and make food inert should put them in the poison category.

Also, good Vit D piece in his recent free newsletter:

Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, October 2, 2008

Vitamin D Stops Cancer; Cuts Risk In Half American Cancer Society Drags its Feet

(OMNS, October 2, 2008) A new study of 3,299 persons has shown that those with higher levels of vitamin D cut their risk of dying from cancer in half. (1) Another recent study shows that ample intake of vitamin D, about 2,000 IU per day, can cut breast cancer incidence by half. (2) Still more research found that inadequate Vitamin D is 'associated with high incidence rates of colorectal cancer' and specifically urges that 'prompt public health action is needed to increase intake of Vitamin D-3 to 1000 IU/day.' (3) Vitamin D's anticancer properties are so evident, and so important, that the Canadian Cancer Society now recommends supplementation with 1,000 IU of Vitamin D per day for all adults in winter, and year-round for persons at risk. (4)

The American Cancer Society, however, is dragging its feet, still maintaining that 'More research is needed to define the best levels of intake and blood levels of vitamin D for cancer risk reduction.'(5)

What is taking them so long? Researchers in 2006 noted that 'The evidence suggests that efforts to improve vitamin D status, for example by vitamin D supplementation, could reduce cancer incidence and mortality at low cost, with few or no adverse effects.' (6)

If you search the US National Institutes of Health's Medline online database for 'cancer vitamin D,' you will find over five thousand papers. . . some dating back nearly 60 years. It's true: physician reports on vitamin D stopping cancer have been ignored for decades. In 1951, T. Desmonts reported that vitamin D treatment was effective against Hodgkin's disease (a cancer of the lymphatic system). (7) That same year, 57 years ago, massive doses of vitamin D were also observed to improve epithelioma. (8) In 1955, skin cancer was again reported as cured with vitamin D treatment. (9) In 1963, there was a promising investigation done on vitamin D and breast cancer. (10) Then, in 1964, vitamin D was found to be effective against lymph nodal reticulosarcoma, a non-Hodgkin's lymphatic cancer. (11)

The American Cancer Society has been obsessed with finding a drug cure for cancer. Pharmaceutical researchers are not looking for a vitamin cure. And when one is presented, as independent investigators and physicians have continuously been doing since 1951, it is ignored.

No longer. Michael Holick, MD, Boston University Professor of Medicine, has come right out and said it: 'We can reduce cancer risk by 30 to 50% by increasing vitamin D. We gave mice colon cancer, and followed them for 20 days. Tumor growth was markedly reduced simply by having vitamin D in the diet. There was a 40% reduction in tumor size. And, casual sun exposure actually decreases your risk of melanoma. Everyone needs 1,000 IU of vitamin D3 each day.' (12) What about safety? Yes, it is possible to get too much vitamin D, but it is not easy. 'One man took one million IU of vitamin D per day, orally, for six months,' says Dr Holick. 'Of course, he had the symptoms of severe vitamin D intoxication. His treatment was hydration (lots of water), and no more vitamin D or sunshine for a while. He's perfectly happy and healthy. This was published in the New England Journal of Medicine.(13) I have no experience of anyone dying from vitamin exposure. In thirty years, I've never seen it.'"

Well, folks, I hope you don't need more information to get started taking at least 6,000 I.U per day of Vitamin D3. You don't have cancer? It is even more important for you to take it for prevention. I do...every day. We get ours from www.PuritansPride.com Their small pills are each 2,000 I.U. of Vitamin D3. I take 3 per day. I know of no better source for D3 in this concentrated amount. When you buy one bottle of 100 pills for $11.39, you get another bottle free. Buy 2 and get 3 more free. That works out to less than 5 cents per pill. If you find a better source, please let me know.

Tatarewicz  posted on  2010-11-25   2:58:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 3.

        There are no replies to Comment # 3.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 3.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]