1965: Griswold v. Connecticut - right to marital privacy for contraception. 1972: Eisenstadt v. Baird - right to privacy extended to single persons for contraception.
1973: Roe v. Wade - reproductive right to privacy, due process
1973: Doe v. Bolton - abortion restrictions infinged on privacy, personal liberty
1976: Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth - reproductive right to privacy for minors without parental consent
Poster Comment:
The last three cases cited above are heinous examples of USSC privacy decisions on issues related to sexuality and reproduction. Now comes the TSA and mobile imaging vehicles onto the scene, basically declaring that we have no uninfringed right to choose or any privacy rights at all regarding sexual exposure, radiation exposure, communicable health risks from pat downs and shoe removal, or any reproductive rights from endangerment to DNA, embryos, and fetuses by state "security" stealth and deceit. Also: Uncle Sam Wants Your DNA: Privacy a price to pay for travel ticket? [YouTube video]
Ref at whatreallyhappened.com Oct 06 07:37
Anger is growing in Europe about new Washington data sharing demands, in what they call a move to stop potential terrorists from entering the U.S. The requirements include fingerprints, DNA samples and cross border payments - data considered by many as private and sensitive. Travellers from countries refusing to share the information will have to apply for a visa to enter the U.S. However some EU states - like Austria and Germany - have already agreed to hand over the personal data of its citizens.