Title: Hurry!: FBI really do NOT like this video ( 3rd time uploaded due to 2nd privacy complaint) Source:
YouTube URL Source:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjDXmI3WATI&feature=player_embedded Published:Dec 5, 2010 Author:staff Post Date:2010-12-05 21:38:38 by buckeroo Keywords:None Views:325 Comments:24
I would have stopped the interview as soon as they refused to ID the complainant who called in. A citizen has every right to confront their accuser. That's it. Period. No more conversation. The gal did well, but people become ensnared in the system with what they say, not from what they refuse to discuss.
I would have stopped the interview as soon as they refused to ID the complainant who called in.
How? Would you have simply shut the door? Give them the finger? Go dancing in the streets? Get on the Internet to explore pornography?
A citizen has every right to confront their accuser. That's it. Period. No more conversation. The gal did well, but people become ensnared in the system with what they say, not from what they refuse to discuss.
Totally agree yet, by your very own words: you silence yourself; this is a crime by government avoiding the first amendment.
By simply saying I have nothing more to say until you produce the complaint. Should you agree, I'll be happy to consider speaking to you *and* the complainant, all in the company of my attorney. The interview will be be in my home and it will both filmed and audio taped. I'd then tell the sputtering goofs to have a lovely day and shut the door. Simple stuff.
It was obvious they considered the lady to be stupid, any question she asked, their answer was we cant tell you.
And we know they could have told her, they simply didn't want to. Hell, she could have a civil action against the complainant, so that's one reason I'd demand to know who it was, and the nature of the matter. Frankly, the gal in the house gets an A for being feisty, but an F in the art of dealing with a law enforcement interview.