[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Daily MEMES YouTube Hates | YouTube is Fighting ME all the Way | Making ME Remove Memes | Part 188 New fear unlocked while stuck in highway traffic - Indian truck driver on his phone smashes into RFK Jr. says the largest tech companies will permit Americans to access their personal health data I just researched this, and it’s true—MUST SEE!! Savage invader is disturbed that English people exist in an area he thought had been conquered Jackson Hole's Parting Advice: Accept Even More Migrants To Offset Demographic Collapse, Or Else Ecuador Angered! China-built Massive Dam is Tofu-Dreg, Ecuador Demands $400 Million Compensation UK economy on brink of collapse (Needs IMF Bailout) How Red Light Unlocks Your Body’s Hidden Fat-Burning Switch The Mar-a-Lago Accord Confirmed: Miran Brings Trump's Reset To The Fed ($8,000 Gold) This taboo sex act could save your relationship, expert insists: ‘Catalyst for conversations’ LA Police Bust Burglary Crew Suspected In 92 Residential Heists Top 10 Jobs AI is Going to Wipe Out It’s REALLY Happening! The Australian Continent Is Drifting Towards Asia Broken Germany Discovers BRUTAL Reality Nuclear War, Trump's New $500 dollar note: Armstrong says gold is going much higher Scientists unlock 30-year mystery: Rare micronutrient holds key to brain health and cancer defense City of Fort Wayne proposing changes to food, alcohol requirements for Riverfront Liquor Licenses Cash Jordan: Migrant MOB BLOCKS Whitehouse… Demands ‘11 Million Illegals’ Stay Not much going on that I can find today In Britain, they are secretly preparing for mass deaths These Are The Best And Worst Countries For Work (US Last Place)-Life Balance These Are The World's Most Powerful Cars Doctor: Trump has 6 to 8 Months TO LIVE?! Whatever Happened to Robert E. Lee's 7 Children Is the Wailing Wall Actually a Roman Fort? Israelis Persecute Americans Israelis SHOCKED The World Hates Them Ghost Dancers and Democracy: Tucker Carlson Amalek (Enemies of Israel) 100,000 Views on Bitchute

Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: Everything you wanted to know about Wikileaks but didn't know to ask
Source: Brasscheck.tv
URL Source: http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/988.html
Published: Dec 6, 2010
Author: Not Given
Post Date: 2010-12-06 13:21:18 by Original_Intent
Keywords: WikiLeaks, Assange, Intelligence, PsyOp
Views: 413
Comments: 45

Julian Assange

He's a guy with a vague history...

Who travels the world without visible means of support...

His parents: Members of an LSD "cult" that abused kids...

Hmmm...

He's not against war...

He hates the 9/11 truth movement...

He has no info about the Bush or Obama White House...or the Federal Reserve Bank...or Goldman Sachs (but he is helping take down Bank of America)...

His "leaks" paint Pakistan as a threat and foreign politicians the CIA doesn't like as jerks...

He believes Osama is alive...and probably in Pakistan...

Everything else he "leaks" is stuff we all already knew...

The mainstream media loves him...

The right wingers love to hate him and are using him as a justification to censor the Net...

If it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck and smells like a duck...

Another intelligence agency spectacle.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 33.

#1. To: Original_Intent (#0)

Why don't you post more trivia based on fact as opposed to some off-the-wall BS website?

buckeroo  posted on  2010-12-06   13:27:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Why don't you post more trivia based on fact as opposed to some off-the-wall BS website?

Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth: The Rules of Disinformation

3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method which works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such 'arguable rumors'. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a 'wild rumor' from a 'bunch of kids on the Internet' which can have no basis in fact.

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-12-06   13:42:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Why do you re-post that same old monotonous BS all the time when anyone criticizes you?

buckeroo  posted on  2010-12-06   13:49:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Only when it applies.

If you use disinformation tactics I will point out that they ARE disinformation tactics and in exactly which way.

Don't it just piss ya' off? LOL!

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-12-06   14:08:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Don't it just piss ya' off?

No... it reflects upon your own character to NOT stand on your own legs as you fall back on silly and tired rants.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-12-06   14:11:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Julian Assange

He's a guy with a vague history...

Who travels the world without visible means of support...

His parents: Members of an LSD "cult" that abused kids...

Hmmm...

He's not against war...

He hates the 9/11 truth movement...

He has no info about the Bush or Obama White House...or the Federal Reserve Bank...or Goldman Sachs (but he is helping take down Bank of America)...

His "leaks" paint Pakistan as a threat and foreign politicians the CIA doesn't like as jerks...

He believes Osama is alive...and probably in Pakistan...

Everything else he "leaks" is stuff we all already knew...

The mainstream media loves him...

The right wingers love to hate him and are using him as a justification to censor the Net...

If it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck and smells like a duck...

And which of the above points are you most trying to avoid addressing?

You are simply trying to draw the thread out to obscure the simplicity of the entire WeakeyLinks FRAUD.

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-12-06   14:16:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

The only problem with your redundant post is that it is founded on speculation, innuendo, rumour and a wild-eyed rant. Not one solid fact is presented. In fact, I could easily counter every one of your sentences that you cling onto. But, its a wild goose chase and not worth my time.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-12-06   15:29:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

And specifically, besides vague general unsupported assertions, what points do you disagree with and based on what FACTS?

You are posting nothing beyond generalities in an attempt to attack not the facts but the chronicler of the facts.

To put it formally your so-called argument amounts to nothing more than Argumentum Ad Hominem.

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-12-06   15:37:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

In case you don't know Mr. Young, here is one of his own critiques on Assange. It is convincing, too.....

1 December 2010

Wikileaks No Excuse for Violent Assault

The virtues Wikileaks should not obscure a just and prompt handling of the sexual allegations against Julian Assange.

The Swedish Prosecution Authority has been abusively delinquent in advancing a case against Julian Assange for sexual offenses. Presume him innocent until proven guilty.

Assange's claims of consensual sex ring hollow for they are habitually used by offenders to excuse their aggression against sexual victims. So too for the Swedish Prosecution Authority's delinquency in prompt justice and smear campaign of Assange which is an assault of the powerful against the weak.

Calls for the death of Assange presage violent assaults deserving prosecution and condemnation.

Violent assault against the weak is a more important issue than battling official secrecy and deserves priority. In particular men, women and nations should guard against prejudice in excusing assault and demonizing alleged victims. These are ingrained dominant-male-and-female excuses for violence against the weak. Narcissists are virulent practitioners of blaiming their victims, become enraged if resisted and indignant when caught.

Nations, governments and authoritatives are narcissitic in their dominant-male-and-female defenses for national security and perquisite-protection aggressions. Violent assaults by individuals are inexcusible and moreso for military, diplomatic and justice prime offenders.

This from a still-testosterone-driven Department of Defense description of sexual assault and appropriate responses as a parable for all forms of dominant-male-and-female-and-national aggressions:

Department of Defense Directive 6495.01 October 6, 2005 Incorporating Change 1, November 7, 2008

E2.1.13. Sexual Assault. For the purpose of this Directive and Sexual Assault Prevention and Response (SAPR) Program awareness training and education, the term “sexual assault” is defined as intentional sexual contact, characterized by use of force, threats, intimidation, abuse of authority, or when the victim does not or cannot consent. Sexual assault includes rape, forcible sodomy (oral or anal sex), and other unwanted sexual contact that is aggravated, abusive, or wrongful (to include unwanted and inappropriate sexual contact), or attempts to commit these acts. “Consent” means words or overt acts indicating a freely given agreement to the sexual conduct at issue by a competent person. An expression of lack of consent through words or conduct means there is no consent. Lack of verbal or physical resistance or submission resulting from the accused’s use of force, threat of force, or placing another person in fear does not constitute consent. A current or previous dating relationship by itself or the manner of dress of the person involved with the accused in the sexual conduct at issue shall not constitute consent. ...

E3.1.4. The Department of Defense is committed to ensuring victims of sexual assault are protected, treated with dignity and respect, and provided support, advocacy and care. DoD policy also strongly supports effective command awareness and prevention programs, as well as law enforcement and criminal justice procedures that enable persons to be held accountable for their actions, which includes appropriate criminal dispositions for sexual assault. To achieve these dual objectives, DoD policy prefers complete reporting of sexual assaults to activate both victims’ services and accountability actions. However, recognizing a mandate of complete reporting may represent a barrier for victims to access services when the victim desires no command or law enforcement involvement, there is a need to provide an option for confidential restricted reporting.

E3.1.5. Assuring privacy and providing a confidential disclosure option for sexual assault victims is critical to discharging the military’s commitment to providing care and support for victims of sexual assault. Sexual assault is one of the most under-reported violent crimes in our society and in the military. Although the victim’s decision to report is a crucial step following a sexual assault, reporting is often precluded by the victim’s desire for no one to know what happened. The Commanders have a responsibility to ensure community safety and due process of law, but they must also recognize the importance of protecting the privacy of victims under their command. Subject matter experts agree that a system which promotes privacy and confidentiality can have a positive impact in bringing victims forward to provide information about being assaulted.

E3.1.6. Recognizing these DoD interests as a matter of DoD policy, Service members who are sexually assaulted will now have the following reporting options:

E3.1.6.1. Unrestricted Reporting. A Service member who is sexually assaulted and desires medical treatment, counseling, and an official investigation of his or her allegation should use existing reporting channels (e.g., chain of command, law enforcement, or report the incident to the SARC). When notified of a reported sexual assault, the SARC will immediately assign a VA. Additionally, at the victim’s discretion or request, the healthcare provider shall arrange a SAFE (see paragraph E2.1.13.) to be conducted, which may include the collection of evidence. Details regarding the incident will be limited to only those personnel who have a legitimate need to know.

E3.1.6.2. Restricted Reporting. Restricted reporting allows a sexual assault victim to confidentially disclose the details of his or her assault to specified individuals and receive medical treatment and counseling, without triggering the official investigative process. Service members who are sexually assaulted and desire restricted reporting under this policy may only report the assault to the SARC, Victim Assistant (VA), or healthcare personnel (HCP). However, consistent with current policy, they may also report the assault to a chaplain. Although a report to a chaplain is not a restricted report under this policy or the provisions of this Directive, it is a communication that may be protected under the Military Rules of Evidence (MRE) or applicable statutes and regulations. The restricted reporting process does not affect any privilege recognized under the MRE. This Directive and its policy on restricted reporting is in addition to the current protections afforded privileged communications with a chaplain, and does not alter or affect those protections.

E3.1.6.2.1. Healthcare personnel will initiate the appropriate care and treatment, and report the sexual assault to the SARC instead of reporting the assault to law enforcement or the command. When notified of a reported sexual assault, the SARC will immediately assign a VA. The assigned VA will provide the victim accurate information on the reporting process, including both restricted and unrestricted reporting procedures. Additionally, at the victim’s discretion or request, the healthcare provider, if appropriately trained and/or supervised, shall conduct a SAFE, which may include the collection of evidence. If the healthcare provider is not appropriately trained to conduct a SAFE, the healthcare provider shall help arrange for a properly-trained DoD healthcare provider, if available. In the absence of a DoD healthcare provider, the victim will be appropriately referred to a non-DoD healthcare provider for the SAFE. When SAFE is performed at local civilian medical facilities, those facilities are bound by State and local laws, which may require reporting the sexual assault. The victim will acknowledge, in writing, his or her understanding of restricted reporting, the exceptions to, and limitations on, restricted reporting. This acknowledgement will also include the victim’s understanding that restricted reporting may limit the ability of the Government to prosecute the assailant and an understanding of the reasons DoD policy favors unrestricted reporting.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-12-06   15:47:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

In particular men, women and nations should guard against prejudice in excusing assault and demonizing alleged victims. These are ingrained dominant-male-and-female excuses for violence against the weak. Narcissists are virulent practitioners of blaiming their victims, become enraged if resisted and indignant when caught.

Bullshit.

People who make false accusations need to be discredited and then prosecuted or sued.

strepsiptera  posted on  2010-12-06   20:47:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

People who make false accusations need to be discredited and then prosecuted or sued.

Sweden already has dismissed the case. It was picked up later and now Assange is to be arraigned tomorrow in the UK.

buckeroo  posted on  2010-12-06   21:21:34 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

        There are no replies to Comment # 33.

End Trace Mode for Comment # 33.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]