See other Miscellaneous Articles
Title: To: Bill D Berger, ALL, Notice of Banning
Source:
[None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Dec 7, 2010
Author: unowho
Post Date: 2010-12-07 07:12:04 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 846
Comments: 75
#240. To: Bill D Berger, ALL, Notice of Banning (#84) You are banned. The reason is in comment #84. You cannot EVER call anyone a child molester on this website. YOU, and no one else, forfeit your membership here. Goldi-Lox posted on 2010-12-06 19:37:50 ET
Poster Comment: http://libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=299366&Disp=240#C240
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 60.
#40. To: Itistoolate (#0)
He doesn't appear to have been banned after all. #17. To: Chuck_Wagon (#16) Any different than Janet Reno? Those two could pass for twins! Bill D Berger posted on 2010-12-07 20:38:42 ET Reply Trace
Actually, it appears that I was allowed back, on "probation"...5 posts per day. I got fed up for good after reading the exchanges leading up to this post where she sided with the lying shill assholes, yukon, Mad Dog and Grand Island, (because they are good little Palin-bots) and threatened sneakypete for telling them off, even though he was the only one telling the truth and having the gall to point out that Sarah Palin is not at all what she portrays herself to be on her TV show.. I requested that Goldi delete my account for good. Open letter to Goldi First off, I appreciate the fact that you re-instated my account, although on a probationary status only. Perhaps you actually read the exchanges between myself and Mad Dog that led up to my response, and decided that I was provoked to make my somewhat over-the-top comment to the sleaze-bag. You have been more than gracious by allowing me the privilege of posting again, and under normal circumstances, I would be happy to continue doing so. However, with all due respect, you have capitulated to evil by allowing this once great site to become infested with the likes of mentally disturbed, psychotic, juvenile delinquents like Mad Dog, yukon, Grand Island and a myriad of others who do nothing but respond with vitriol and hatred to any topic and/or poster they don't agree with, and your lack of tolerance for honest criticism of Sarah Palin is also a reason for my request to have my account deleted from the roster of Liberty Post. You are blind Goldi. Sarah Palin is not a conservative, and your blindness is not allowing you to see that. And here you are threatening sneakypete with banishment for simply pointing out, politely I might add....that Sarah is portraying herself as something she's not, while once again ignoring the shit-slinging from your pets yukon and Mad Dog. You have banned others before for arbitrary reasons, for simply stating their own opinions, while ignoring the real disruptors who refuse to abide by the stated objectives set forth on the home page : We do insist that all users abide by the rules of civility. We challenge all users to exercise their manners in the way our Founding Fathers did. Our audience will be made of men, and women of all ages, as well as teens, and educated youngsters. As such, we insist that manners must be adhered to, in order to respect each other. No past personal issues or grievances will be allowed to interrupt discussions of the news and current events. I realize it's your site, Goldi, and you have the right to ban anyone you like for any reason. But....if I may be blunt, you are a hypocrite, by ignoring the real problem here. Posters such as the ones mentioned above do nothing but drive people away from Liberty Post, with their egregious, deplorable behavior and their flagrant disregard for common courtesy and respect for others. One particular instance comes to mind : the time that yukon posted a gay porn picture a while back and received no sanction from you. It's your site, I realize that...but to allow cyber-bullies like the above named posters and others to run rough-shod over other posters who are here for civil debate is in my opinion, disingenuous. Once again, I appreciate the re-instatement, but please delete my account for good.
Well said, and quite true. Goldi-Schmuck is a flaming hypocrite who has pets based upon their allegiance to Shittylittlestan. I am convinced that is why she likes Sarah - not her political views so much as that she is a "Christian Zionist". From my perspective you are most welcome here as a voice which speaks reason and frequently with eloquence. Although you may find it a bit tame at first since most of the posters here rarely rise above the level sternly stated disagreement when they do disagree. So, little opportunity for a little friendly "'bot tossing". ;-) However, it is also conducive to thought and the exchange of reasoned views.
Oh pshaw, Billy left out Magician and Marguerite for starters. A good letter cites everything not just a few obvious issues.
They're good ones to leave out.
#61. To: Original_Intent (#60)
HAHAHHAHAHA! Good one.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#52. To: F.A. Hayek Fan, Itistoolate (#40)
He doesn't appear to have been banned after all.
#54. To: Bill D Berger (#52)
#56. To: Original_Intent (#54)
Well said, and quite true
#60. To: buckeroo, Bill D Berger (#56)
Oh pshaw, Billy left out Magician and Marguerite for starters.
Replies to Comment # 60.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 60.