[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Israel Sold American Weapons to Azerbaijan to Kill Armenian Christians

Daily MEMES YouTube Hates | YouTube is Fighting ME all the Way | Making ME Remove Memes | Part 188

New fear unlocked while stuck in highway traffic - Indian truck driver on his phone smashes into

RFK Jr. says the largest tech companies will permit Americans to access their personal health data

I just researched this, and it’s true—MUST SEE!!

Savage invader is disturbed that English people exist in an area he thought had been conquered

Jackson Hole's Parting Advice: Accept Even More Migrants To Offset Demographic Collapse, Or Else

Ecuador Angered! China-built Massive Dam is Tofu-Dreg, Ecuador Demands $400 Million Compensation

UK economy on brink of collapse (Needs IMF Bailout)

How Red Light Unlocks Your Body’s Hidden Fat-Burning Switch

The Mar-a-Lago Accord Confirmed: Miran Brings Trump's Reset To The Fed ($8,000 Gold)

This taboo sex act could save your relationship, expert insists: ‘Catalyst for conversations’

LA Police Bust Burglary Crew Suspected In 92 Residential Heists

Top 10 Jobs AI is Going to Wipe Out

It’s REALLY Happening! The Australian Continent Is Drifting Towards Asia

Broken Germany Discovers BRUTAL Reality

Nuclear War, Trump's New $500 dollar note: Armstrong says gold is going much higher

Scientists unlock 30-year mystery: Rare micronutrient holds key to brain health and cancer defense

City of Fort Wayne proposing changes to food, alcohol requirements for Riverfront Liquor Licenses

Cash Jordan: Migrant MOB BLOCKS Whitehouse… Demands ‘11 Million Illegals’ Stay

Not much going on that I can find today

In Britain, they are secretly preparing for mass deaths

These Are The Best And Worst Countries For Work (US Last Place)-Life Balance

These Are The World's Most Powerful Cars

Doctor: Trump has 6 to 8 Months TO LIVE?!

Whatever Happened to Robert E. Lee's 7 Children

Is the Wailing Wall Actually a Roman Fort?

Israelis Persecute Americans

Israelis SHOCKED The World Hates Them

Ghost Dancers and Democracy: Tucker Carlson


Resistance
See other Resistance Articles

Title: Tortured FBI whistleblower warns WikiLeaks fans
Source: examiner.com and Rense.com
URL Source: http://www.examiner.com/human-right ... tleblower-warns-wikileaks-fans
Published: Dec 9, 2010
Author: Deborah Dupré
Post Date: 2010-12-10 07:45:07 by GreyLmist
Keywords: WikiLeaks, Cointelpro, Legal Restorative Justice Revo
Views: 969
Comments: 83

An FBI whistleblower has alerted that supporting WikiLeaks founder, Julius Assange and subsequently calling for revolution due to government cover-ups are intended results of a counterintelligence reverse tactic not in best interest of the public.

Bob Levin, FBI targeted whistleblower since 2000, knows sophisticated counterintelligence tactics designed to manipulate the unwitting.

Levin has lectured Special Agents in Training at the FBI Academy in Quantico, Virginia. He has been requested to brief Counterterrorism Taskforce Agents relating to his skill sets and investigative techniques.

“My background was in codes and local, specialized state and federal law enforcement that ended in the FBI,” Levin wrote to this writer in an email.

Levin is now one of thousands of Targeted Individuals in the United States, battling to survive both a hidden form of CIA torture he knows to be part of the CIA Torture Paradigm inflicting citizens in U.S. neighborhoods plus ongoing Cointelpro tactics used in conjunction with the torure. The combined effect is to ruin lives and even assassinate.

The torture Levin experiences is hidden by nature of military grade Directed Energy technology used on targets and their property. This form of torture is also hidden by mainstream media, another indication that corporate owned media no longer serves best interest of the public.

“I became a validated FBI whistleblower in 2000 and have remained sanctioned in political retribution while targeted under the CIA Torture Paradigm and ongoing illegal Cointelpro operations.

On December 8, Levin distributed an emailed alert using the following example posted by a WikiLeaks supporter:

“People NEED to be supporting Julian Assange through this ridiculous time. What a brave man for sharing the truth with the world. The governments of the world are just digging themselves a hole. IT'S TIME FOR A REVOLUTION!!!”

Levin’s email warned about “FBI, CIA and NSA counterintelligence reverse tactics used to bait passionate persons into an actionable trap.”

The recent operation on Somali and Nicaraguan youths that psychologically herded them into acts of terrorism need be a warning to Americans about PSYOPS master-minded so that innocent people are roped into actions against their best interest according to Levin.

“I’ve trained agents to do this against criminal targets, but as we know, these agencies have increasingly been politicized like the Gestapo,” he stated.

Legal Restorative Justice Revolution

Answering the call to support WikiLeaks and revolt, Levin advocates a restorative revolution under lawful terms of the U.S. Declaration of Independence.

This type of revolution “begins with a series of nation strikes and boycotts, followed by insistence that the USDOJ prosecute culpable congressional actors under FBI investigations as named by whistleblower patriots.”

Beyond that, Levin says, “It is imperative that no person allow their passions to exceed lawful conduct or solicit any manner of harm to another human being.”

“We the people must stand with a greater moral compass than the continuing criminal enterprise operating beneath the mask of the U.S. government.”

“What is important for activists not coming from my background to remember is that there are regular good people in the FBI, CIA and other agencies. There are exceptions in most things and we notice the outlaws more than those following their oaths.

How many FBI are good guys?

“At least 85% of one FBI field office shares my views,” says Levin.

“Hollywood's depiction of the FBI has a lot of BS.”

According to Levin, agents curse like sailors behind closed doors, some hold their own drinking bourbon, and others are incredible bakers and dinner party hosts.

“The point is that we are only as strong as the weakest of our parts and cannot allow the corrupt ruling class to turn us against ourselves.”

Countering sophisticated psychological operations calls for knowledge and restraint, else targets in the WikiLeaks scenario, including the American public, can be easily be led to act against its best interest.

“I hope you will share my thoughts with others and please do not support any violent or unlawful activities possibly solicited by others who do not possess your good character”

Levin’s opinions can be viewed online within All Voices and Scribd.

According to Levin, when his Blackfile summary report is published, its pages of truth will dwarf present embarrassment of the government from Julian Assange and WikiLeaks' released diplomatic communications.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 55.

#2. To: GreyLmist (#0)

Beyond that, Levin says, “It is imperative that no person allow their passions to exceed lawful conduct or solicit any manner of harm to another human being.”

Fuck that kike and the horse he rode in on.

Does anyone really think that our "leaders" will respect the law and not try and do us harm? Is anyone here really that fucking stupid? Anyone?

It has nothing to do with "passions" either, you fucking kike. It has everything to do with THEIR passions and THEIR actions.

.

PSUSA  posted on  2010-12-10   9:47:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: PSUSA, F.A. Hayek Fan (#2)

He didn't say not to defend ourselves if being fired upon by them.

GreyLmist  posted on  2010-12-10   10:28:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: GreyLmist (#3) (Edited)

He didn't say not to defend ourselves if being fired upon by them.

That is not how I read it.

Look at it in context:

This type of revolution “begins with a series of nation strikes and boycotts, followed by insistence that the USDOJ prosecute culpable congressional actors under FBI investigations as named by whistleblower patriots.”

Beyond that, Levin says, “It is imperative that no person allow their passions to exceed lawful conduct or solicit any manner of harm to another human being.”

“We the people must stand with a greater moral compass than the continuing criminal enterprise operating beneath the mask of the U.S. government.”

Now, piece by piece:

This type of revolution “begins with a series of nation strikes and boycotts, followed by insistence that the USDOJ prosecute culpable congressional actors under FBI investigations as named by whistleblower patriots.”

OK, that is where it begins. But that is not where it ends. Fat fucking chance of these investigations ever happening anyway, no matter what pressure is applied. The government will have no choice but to escalate things.

Beyond that, Levin says, “It is imperative that no person allow their passions to exceed lawful conduct or solicit any manner of harm to another human being.”

This is suicidal non-violence crap. There is no such thing as "beyond that". That is a limitation that he is attempting to impose on us. It is not a limitation that our government will honor. They have no honor.

One cannot simply take the violence option off the table, because violence will be used against us. They will be the ones to fire the first shot, imo, and not us. This is a limitation that the PTB will never accept, and we shouldn't either. They are the murderers and thieves, not us.

“We the people must stand with a greater moral compass than the continuing criminal enterprise operating beneath the mask of the U.S. government.”

Deadly force is a moral option when facing deadly force from others. To pretend otherwise is to commit suicide by proxy. I think it's funny how a kike is attempting to teach us anything about "moral compasses", like they are experts at it or something. .

PSUSA  posted on  2010-12-10   10:52:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: PSUSA (#7)

Self defense is not exceeding lawful conduct. People pushing for war to harm other human beings as punishment isn't self-defense and sinking down to their level. Surely you know the difference, PSUSA. If I thought he was calling for us to be suicidal and taking off the table the right to protect ourselves and our loved ones with arms if under attack, I wouldn't even have posted it. I believe he meant to caution us against warmongers who are on a path to get us and ours fired at and to encourage those seeking to demonstrate that it is not us who are in revolt against America's rightful form of government but those imposters opposed to it who have no legitimate authority here.

GreyLmist  posted on  2010-12-10   11:49:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: GreyLmist (#10)

Self defense is not exceeding lawful conduct.

OK, I agree, but that is not what the kike said.

He said, and I quote, " Beyond that (strikes, silly protests, etc), Levin says, “It is imperative that no person allow their passions to exceed lawful conduct or solicit any manner of harm to another human being.” "

Those were his words, not mine, and the meaning is clear. HE is the one that takes self defense off the table.

If I thought he was calling for us to be suicidal and taking off the table the right to protect ourselves and our loved ones with arms if under attack, I wouldn't even have posted it.

I know that. It's not you that I directed this at, but the kike. It is HIS words, not yours. HE, by his words, want us to be defenseless. He couches it in some high-minded ideals, as if a kike can do such a thing, but revolutions are not fought by high-minded ideals. They are fought with force. And force is the only thing that the PTB fear. They don't give a flying fuck about protests. He is trying to take away the only real weapon that we have.

Tell me, what do you think a revolution is? Is it done by debate and reason by people wearing Brooks Brothers suits? Or is it done through force, violence and death? Which is it?

I dont like the idea of killing and probably dying myhself, any more than you do. But it is foolish to ignore it and hope it all goes away, or that somehow our leaders suddenly develop a conscience and do the right thing. When is the last time they did that? Psychopaths aren't known for having a conscience.

I believe he meant...

This is where our difference in opinion is coming from. I go by what he said, not what I believe he meant. To me, his meaning is clear.

.

PSUSA  posted on  2010-12-10   12:31:44 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#51. To: PSUSA (#18) (Edited)

He said, and I quote, " Beyond that (strikes, silly protests, etc), Levin says, “It is imperative that no person allow their passions to exceed lawful conduct or solicit any manner of harm to another human being.” "

Those were his words, not mine, and the meaning is clear. HE is the one that takes self defense off the table.

Well, I'm putting it on the table myself, alongside the 2nd Amendment. Of course I believe it's best if war doesn't erupt around us and prayerfully hope that it doesn't but of course do use your lawful rights to defend yourself and others if you must from attack. Being destroyed as suicidal sitting ducks would be most unwise and worse than no resistance to the despicable depopulation agendas, etc., of the Tyrannicals. There's some chance that a return to the Constitution can be accomplished with no war casualties inflicted on us if we try to work for that peacefully and determinedly but almost no chance by warpath of accomplishing that without mass casualties and devastation. My opinion is that the only sensible option we have, really, is to peacefully do the best we can to reach our objectives without warmongering and hopefully without being forced into war.

revolutions are not fought by high-minded ideals. They are fought with force. And force is the only thing that the PTB fear. They don't give a flying fuck about protests. He is trying to take away the only real weapon that we have.

Tell me, what do you think a revolution is? Is it done by debate and reason by people wearing Brooks Brothers suits? Or is it done through force, violence and death? Which is it?

It can be done by debate and reason but I prefer a casual dress code. It can be done through force, violence and death. It can be done through both options:

“The Revolution was effected before the War commenced. The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people; a change in their religious sentiments of their duties and obligations. This radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments, and affections of the people, was the real American Revolution.” -- John Adams

That shouldn't be construed as an endorsement by me of John Adams as a Founding model of perfection. He wasn't, imo, but I do believe those words are true. I also believe war isn't inevitable if we resist the illusions that it's in our best interest to choose that route as most efficient, most Patriotic, and so on.

I dont like the idea of killing and probably dying myhself, any more than you do. But it is foolish to ignore it and hope it all goes away, or that somehow our leaders suddenly develop a conscience and do the right thing. When is the last time they did that? Psychopaths aren't known for having a conscience.

Yes, it would be foolish to ignore it and it's not likely to all go away if we do nothing constructive to banish it. Hope and work for the best but prepare for other possibilities because they're so habituated to oppression and greed and whatnot. It would be like a miracle if they suddenly developed a conscience and did the right thing but try not to think of them as "our leaders" if they don't do that -- or even if they surprisingly do. My advice is to think of the Constitution as America's leader in governance and people in elected office or appointments or other such capacities as temp-workers who either serve Constitutionally and honorably or don't belong there and forfeit their official assignments and authorizations by breach of contract.

This is where our difference in opinion is coming from. I go by what he [Levin] said, not what I believe he meant. To me, his meaning is clear.

I'm going to try rewording his statement to explain it as I see it: “It is imperative that no person allow their passions to exceed lawful conduct or solicit any manner of harm to another human being.”

It is imperative that no person allow their passions to solicit any manner of harm to another human being or exceed lawful conduct.

Maybe he's just not a top-notch sentence structurer and thought he was implicitly conveying self-defense as obviously within lawful conduct while drawing a distinction between that and unlawful intent to inflict bodily harm as motivated by emotions like vengeance? Goodness knows I'm no expert in judging sentence structure but, if it's still a sticking place with you, I'd say just do what you can to set it aside some and try to focus on his overall message. I got the impression that he was mostly trying to warn WikiLeaks supporters against being hyped-up by entrapment designers to commit violence in revolt and retribution for government cover-ups and Assange's arrest. I'm not a WikiLeaks supporter but thought it was kindly of the author to make the effort to help if he could.

GreyLmist  posted on  2010-12-10   21:57:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#55. To: GreyLmist (#51)

My opinion is that the only sensible option we have, really, is to peacefully do the best we can to reach our objectives without warmongering and hopefully without being forced into war.

I agree with that. So do some of the revolutionary guerrilla leaders that I've read. It's not their politics that I care about, but it's their tactics and strategy that matters.

Just so that the PTB know that violence is a real possibility. We might be outgunned, but they are outnumbered and can't be everywhere at once.

IMO force is the only thing they respect, and fear. But if it can be done by peaceful means, I'm all for it. I'd like nothing better than to live out my life in peace, and I wish that for everyone. But like Burgess Meredith said in Grumpy Old Men, 'you can wish in one hand and crap in the other, and see which fills up first'.

“The Revolution was effected before the War commenced. The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people; a change in their religious sentiments of their duties and obligations. This radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments, and affections of the people, was the real American Revolution.” -- John Adams

That shouldn't be construed as an endorsement by me of John Adams as a Founding model of perfection. He wasn't, imo, but I do believe those words are true. I also believe war isn't inevitable if we resist the illusions that it's in our best interest to choose that route as most efficient, most Patriotic, and so on.

I think we have what Adams describes, and I think we have it right now. He referred to "the people", but there were only a relatively few patriots at the beginning. I read somewhere between 3-5% showed up to actually fight at the beginning. I think it's safe to say that we have that number, easily. We'll get more as time goes on.

And I agree that war is not the most efficient and patriotic option. It's the last option. The only thing we get in war is death. And there are other groups out there besides the JBTs and Patriots, that will take advantage of the situation, like they always do. They have to be dealt with as well.

My advice is to think of the Constitution as America's leader in governance and people in elected office or appointments or other such capacities as temp-workers who either serve Constitutionally and honorably or don't belong there and forfeit their official assignments and authorizations by breach of contract.

I agree with that. Ideally, that is how it should work. But it doesn't work that way in real life. You know that as well as I do. What do we do about it? They have run this country into the ground. I dont see that as being their ultimate goal like some here do, but more the result of acting like criminals instead of stewards.

Goodness knows I'm no expert in judging sentence structure but, if it's still a sticking place with you, I'd say just do what you can to set it aside some and try to focus on his overall message. I got the impression that he was mostly trying to warn WikiLeaks supporters against being hyped-up by entrapment designers to commit violence in revolt and retribution for government cover-ups and Assange's arrest.

Fair enough. Let's consider it a warning to wikileaks supporters. I see that as preaching to the choir though. I bet they already know all about entrapment, and I bet that they know what happened to Hal Turner, even if the weasel deserves a cellmate named Tiny.

I just go by what is written, because it's all I can go by. It's when I try and assign alternative meanings to what is written that I can be led astray.

.

PSUSA  posted on  2010-12-11   5:57:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 55.

#56. To: PSUSA, GreyLmist, Original_Intent (#55)

I just go by what is written, because it's all I can go by. It's when I try and assign alternative meanings to what is written that I can be led astray.

November 10, 2001 - President Bush Speaks to United Nations G.W. Bush:
"We must speak the truth about terror. Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th; malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists, themselves, away from the guilty. To inflame ethnic hatred is to advance the cause of terror."

wudidiz  posted on  2010-12-11 06:08:33 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 55.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]