[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help] 

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Texas Man Arrested for Threatening NYC's Mamdani

Man puts down ABC's The View on air

Strong 7.8 quake hits Russia's Kamchatka

My Answer To a Liberal Professor. We both See Collapse But..

Cash Jordan: “Set Them Free”... Mob STORMS ICE HQ, Gets CRUSHED By ‘Deportation Battalion’’

Call The Exterminator: Signs Demanding Violence Against Republicans Posted In DC

Crazy Conspiracy Theorist Asks Questions About Vaccines

New owner of CBS coordinated with former Israeli military chief to counter the country's critics,

BEST VIDEO - Questions Concerning Charlie Kirk,

Douglas Macgregor - IT'S BEGUN - The People Are Rising Up!

Marine Sniper: They're Lying About Charlie Kirk's Death and They Know It!

Mike Johnson Holds 'Private Meeting' With Jewish Leaders, Pledges to Screen Out Anti-Israel GOP Candidates

Jimmy Kimmel’s career over after ‘disgusting’ lies about Charlie Kirk shooter [Plus America's Homosexual-In-Chief checks-In, Clot-Shots, Iryna Zarutska and More!]

1200 Electric School Busses pulled from service due to fires.

Is the Deep State Covering Up Charlie Kirk’s Murder? The FBI’s Bizarre Inconsistencies Exposed

Local Governments Can Be Ignorant Pissers!!

Cash Jordan: Gangs PLUNDER LA Mall... as California’s “NO JAILS” Strategy IMPLODES

Margin Debt Tops Historic $1 Trillion, Your House Will Be Taken Blindly Warns Dohmen

Tucker Carlson LIVE: America After Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk allegedly recently refused $150 million from Israel to take more pro Israel stances

"NATO just declared War on Russia!"Co; Douglas Macgregor

If You're Trying To Lose Weight But Gaining Belly Fat, Watch Insulin

Arabica Coffee Prices Soar As Analyst Warns of "Weather Disasters" Risk Denting Global Production

Candace Owens: : I Know What Happened at the Hamptons (Ackman confronted Charlie Kirk)

Illegal Alien Drunk Driver Mows Down, Kills 16-Year-Old Girl Who Rejected His Lewd Advances

STOP Drinking These 5 Coffees – They’re Quietly DESTROYING Your Gut & Hormones

This Works Better Than Ozempic for Belly Fat

Cinnamon reduces fat

How long do health influencers live? Episode 1 of 3.

'Armed Queers' Marxist Revolutionaries Under Investigation For Possible Foreknowledge Of Kirk's Assassination Plot


Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: Texas Sued Over Sale of Baby Blood Samples
Source: Parent Dish
URL Source: http://www.parentdish.com/2010/12/0 ... er-sale-of-baby-blood-samples/
Published: Dec 12, 2010
Author: AP
Post Date: 2010-12-12 12:21:22 by abraxas
Keywords: None
Views: 117
Comments: 8

Texas Sued Over Sale of Baby Blood Samples

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) - A civil rights group sued Texas health officials Wednesday over the sale and distribution of about 8,800 samples of baby blood to pharmaceutical companies and the military.

The federal lawsuit filed by the Texas Civil Rights Project alleges officials at the Texas Department of State Health Services lied when they said the state had not sent the samples to private companies or federal agencies.

The group originally sued the state in 2009 over what it said was the improper collection of millions of baby blood samples without parental consent that were stored indefinitely for scientific research. State officials announced a settlement later that year that included destroying about 5 million of the blood samples.

The lawsuit filed Wednesday in San Antonio seeks to recover and destroy the samples the group says were sold by the state to pharmaceutical companies and sent to the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology for DNA research. The plaintiffs also want state Health Commissioner Dr. David L. Lakey to pay $1,000 for every blood sample distributed.

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of two parents who don't know if their children's blood sample was sold. Civil Rights Project director Jim Harrington said the 8,800 figure was only an estimate and that there could be more.

Harrington said he believes the state profited more than $300,000 from the sale of the samples, which he said pharmaceutical companies and the military use for drug and medical research.

Jeff Higgins of San Antonio said he supports medical research but wouldn't want his 3-year-old daughter's blood sample to be given to the military.

"If they had asked us to participate and it was for non-profit human benefit, we would say yes and what else can we do?" Higgins said. "There is no circumstance I want my daughter's genetic material or DNA to be stored by any of the military."

Health Department spokeswoman Carrie Williams said in a statement that the agency had not yet seen the lawsuit and would not comment on specific allegations.

Williams said the agency considered the blood sample dispute closed when the settlement was reached in 2009.

"The state spent countless hours responding to their concerns in good faith, and we had come to a resolution that we all agree on, with the state destroying the bloodspots in question," Williams said.

Texas has been collecting blood samples for decades to screen for at least 27 different birth defects and other disorders. By law, the blood could be taken without consent by hospitals, birthing centers and midwives, and discarded after a certain period of time.

The state established a policy in 2002 in which it began setting aside the blood samples after the screenings were done and using some of it for research.

State lawmakers in 2009 tightened up procedures, extended privacy guarantees and gave parents the option to not participate. The settlement announced in December 2009 dealt with samples taken before the new law took effect.

Harrington said state officials were asked several times during negotiations whether the state sold or bartered any of the samples to drug companies or state or federal agencies.

According to the lawsuit, state officials, including Lakey, denied the samples had been sent to those outlets.

"They drew blood for a good reason, newborn screening, but then secretly and unlawfully sold, traded, bartered and distributed it, and were deceptive about it," Harrington said.

Williams said agency officials told the truth in the settlement but declined further comment.

"As part of the legal process, we provided information and truthfully answered everything they asked of us," Williams said.

Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. All active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL. This article was written by JIM VERTUNO,Associated Press.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 5.

#1. To: abraxas (#0)

"They drew blood for a good reason, newborn screening, but then secretly and unlawfully sold, traded, bartered and distributed it, and were deceptive about it," Harrington said.

If my computer weren't so overloaded, I'd look these two up on manta:

Texas Department of State Health Services

Armed Forces Institute of Pathology for DNA research

www.manta.com

they'd probably come up as "companies" or "corporations"

AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt  posted on  2010-12-12   13:00:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt (#1)

they'd probably come up as "companies" or "corporations"

Texas Department of State Health Services is a state agency of Texas. The department was created by House Bill 2292 of the 78th Texas Legislature in 2003 through the merging of four state agencies: the Texas Department of Health, Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation, Texas Health Care Information Council, and Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse. (WIKI)

According to a WAPO article, the 150 year old Armed Forces Institute of Pathology has, in fact, fallen into private hands:

A private company revealed plans this month to fill the "critical void" left by the institute's closing. A news release Aug. 7 announced the formation of "AFIP Laboratories," made up of staff from "the soon-to-be-closed Armed Forces Institute of Pathology."

Company officials say they are hiring more than two dozen civilian pathologists from the institute. The company has leased space in Silver Spring, three miles from Walter Reed, and is set to begin operations on Sept. 8.

But the military institute insists that reports of its demise are exaggerated.

Last Monday, the private company, a division of Bostwick Laboratories, received a letter from the Defense Department requesting that it cease using the AFIP name. On Thursday, the company agreed, changing its name to "AIP Laboratories."

According to the institute's Web site, the center "will function as the reference center in pathology for the Federal Government and will, at a minimum, provide pathology services to the military healthcare system, Department of Veterans Affairs, and other federal agencies."

Military health-care officials are "committed to ensuring that DoD continues to have a one-stop shop for pathology consultation," the Web announcement said.

Evan Farmer, director of AIP Laboratories, said that although the Joint Pathology Center will retain the repository and have pathologists, "it's not AFIP by any stretch of the imagination."

Farmer, a dermopathologist who served as an institute fellow and is a part-time faculty member at Johns Hopkins and Virginia Commonwealth universities, said the private company will carry on much of the work of the military institute.

www.washingtonpost.com/wp- dyn/content/article/2009/08/16/AR2009081601836.html

abraxas  posted on  2010-12-12   14:09:25 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: abraxas, AllTheKings'HorsesWontDoIt, FormerLurker, TwentyTwelve, all (#3)

A private company revealed plans this month to fill the "critical void" left by the institute's closing. A news release Aug. 7 announced the formation of "AFIP Laboratories," made up of staff from "the soon-to-be-closed Armed Forces Institute of Pathology."

This seems to be a growing trend in areas of sensitive black operations.

Private companies do not have to respond to Freedom of Information Act requests or court orders.

NASA did that with the photos of the last few Mars Missions by farming it out to "Malin Space Sciences". Thus NASA can evade information requests for photographs by saying "that is a private contractor and we have no control over the images". It has also allowed for the photoshopping of images to obscure details that might be embarrassing to the the Party Line while evading FOIA requests for the original data. Of course they also use the "data dump" by making huge unannounced data dumps onto their website. Thus they can claim "transparency" while either withholding or photoshopping images that show something contrary to the Party Lyin'.

Original_Intent  posted on  2010-12-12   14:29:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 5.

        There are no replies to Comment # 5.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 5.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest


[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Sign-in]  [Mail]  [Setup]  [Help]